Re: Maemo & Meego & Mer & Nemo & Jolla: Web Browser released N900 N9

Aapo, thanks that worked, yes I have extra-devels installed and so I just simply find it in the catalogue under "dooble", so it is a one.click install, worked very well, thanks for you work, the next release will be soon there and maybe you can update the package for a while. thanks a lot for your

Re: Maemo & Meego & Mer & Nemo & Jolla: Web Browser released N900 N9

2012/9/30 Randolph D. : >>Hi I tried to install this thing, but it says the lib libgcrypt is missing, Do you have extras-devel enabled and are your installing Dooble from there? (this is preferred way to install Dooble). http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-devel_free_

Re: Maemo & Meego & Mer & Nemo & Jolla: Web Browser released N900 N9

>Hi I tried to install this thing, but it says the lib libgcrypt is missing, why are dependent libs are not loaded automatically? is that different that in ubuntu? has this to be linked in the app, or is the reposititory catalog link missing? 2012/9/27 > >

Maemo & Meego & Mer & Nemo & Jolla: Web Browser released N900 N9

http://maemo.org/packages/view/dooble/ http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=87030 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJlrOWENVD8 ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.mae

Fwd: Replacement for MeeGo Community OBS

-- Forwarded message -- From: martin brook Date: Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM Subject: [mer-general] Fwd: Replacement for MeeGo Community OBS To: mer-gene...@lists.merproject.org Hi Guys, Thanks for your time at the meeting and you can find Minutes and the full log below. [17

Re: Fwd: VMPK & FluidSynth 0.1.0 for Meego Harmattan (Maemo is next?)

below), but I am not a programmer. Would be cool if someone could dive into this a bit! Thanks in advance, ~D (not subsribed to this mailinglist, plz reply to all) Original Message Subject:Re: [LAA] [ANN] VMPK & FluidSynth 0.1.0 for Meego Harmattan Date: Thu

MeeGo Policies Bug Jar 2011.40

A Quick Look at MeeGo Policies in Bugzilla (http://bugs.meego.com/). 2011-09-26 through 2011-10-02 As of 2011-10-03 MeeGo Policies contains: * total items: 41 * total open items: 21 * open bugs: 19 * critical: 0 * security: 0

MeeGo Projects Bug Jar 2011.40

A Quick Look at MeeGo Projects in Bugzilla (http://bugs.meego.com/). 2011-09-26 through 2011-10-02 As of 2011-10-03 MeeGo Projects contains: * total items: 1701 (+13 this week) * total open items: 417 * open bugs: 280 * critical: 5 * security: 0

Detailed comparison results for Maemo 5 Fremantle and MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan

Hi, This message is intended for those who are interested in porting applications from Maemo 5.0 Fremantle to MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan. The Maemo release team has already published the differences between the corresponding versions of SDK [1]. I would like to extend them by our comparison results

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan?

I found a "MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan" product at the Nokia Developer Bugs page [1]. I think it's the most appropriate place for reporting bugs. Thanks! [1] http://www.developer.nokia.com/bugs On 06/22/2011 11:07 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:29, Andrey Pono

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan?

n me where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan >> [1]? >> >> To maemo.org Bugzilla [2] or to MeeGo Bugzilla [3]? > > Neither. See Quim's post: > >    http://forum.meego.com/showpost.php?p=22953&postcount=77 > > HTH, > > Andrew &g

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:29, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > > Could anybody explain me where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan > [1]? > > To maemo.org Bugzilla [2] or to MeeGo Bugzilla [3]? Neither. See Quim's post: http://forum.meego.com/showpost.php?p=229

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan?

e vendor's path of upgrades > > If you can replicate an error in MeeGo.com images/components directly, > you're of course welcome to submit to those bugtrackers. Example could > be a Qt or Qt Mobility issue that happens on MeeGo.com images too. > > /Carsten > > 2011/6/22

Where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan?

Hi, Could anybody explain me where to post bug reports for MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan [1]? To maemo.org Bugzilla [2] or to MeeGo Bugzilla [3]? Thanks! [1] MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan <http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/Introduction.html> [2] maemo.org Bugzilla <https://bugs.maemo.org/> [3] Me

Kick-off of the MeeGo-Python project

Hi, I'd like to announce the kick-off of the MeeGo-Python project by inviting interested parties to join the MeeGo-Python mailing list at [1] and/or to the #meego-python IRC channel at FreeNode. The scope of the project is to create a vigorous Python developer community and provide

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:41 PM, wrote: > I don't know status of > MeeGo Hildon port but there will be some difficulties . In Maemo 5 most of > animations > and transitios were made with window manager, in MeeGo they are made with UI > toolkit > except application swit

RE: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

ct: Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo > >Hi, > >Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> AFAIK GTK is still around in MeeGo and will still be supported. I know >> Nokia wants everyone to use Qt, but not everyone wants to use Qt. > >GTK is still around & part of the stack - so guarante

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

Hi, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > AFAIK GTK is still around in MeeGo and will still be supported. I know > Nokia wants everyone to use Qt, but not everyone wants to use Qt. GTK is still around & part of the stack - so guaranteed to be present. Going from there to "supported"

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

Hi Detlef, first of all Gtk+/Hildon is currently not properly working on MeeGo-Handset and it's also not currently supported. Even if someone gets it running it will be only community supported, which means that we have support it ourself. Still all is not lost :) There have been some

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

will be true for MeeGo I think. How to proceed. Detlef Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2010, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > ds wrote: > > is there a guide, howto or something simelar on porting Maemo Apps (e.g. > > gtk based) to MeeGo. I could not find on MeeGo and Maemo sit

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

ds wrote: is there a guide, howto or something simelar on porting Maemo Apps (e.g. gtk based) to MeeGo. I could not find on MeeGo and Maemo site:-( AFAIK GTK is still around in MeeGo and will still be supported. I know Nokia wants everyone to use Qt, but not everyone wants to use Qt

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

As a general rule, I would say that you should get yourself acquainted with Qt , which is the UI (and much more) framework MeeGo uses, so a good bet is to start with the ui, checking which subsystems have changed and re-bindings the UI to the new ones in meego if so. Now with Qt, some of this

Re: Porting Maemo to MeeGo

Hi, ds wrote: > is there a guide, howto or something simelar on porting Maemo Apps (e.g. > gtk based) to MeeGo. I could not find on MeeGo and Maemo site:-( Not really. It would be more relevant to MeeGo lists than Maemo lists. Linked from the Qt page in the wiki: http://wiki.maemo.org/Qt

Porting Maemo to MeeGo

Hay, is there a guide, howto or something simelar on porting Maemo Apps (e.g. gtk based) to MeeGo. I could not find on MeeGo and Maemo site:-( Thanks a lot Detlef ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org

[Fwd: GTK+/MeeGo Handset integration work, call for bids]

Hi all, This announcement looks relevant both to MeeGo and Maemo developers, so I hope people won't mind me forwarding it along (for information). Thanks, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dne...@maemo.org Jabber: bo...@jabber.org --- Begin Message --- The GNOME Foundation is lookin

Re: Qt Dev Days San Francisco/Meego Conference - Are you going to?

On 10/07/2010 04:25 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: I am going to attend both events and would like to meet other maemo developers, anybody else? I'm going. I'll have my first Maemo app to show off. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.

Qt Dev Days San Francisco/Meego Conference - Are you going to?

I am going to attend both events and would like to meet other maemo developers, anybody else? Felipe ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

d, how >>> the Maemo Community will be related to the MeeGo one? >> >> The question is: what would you migrate or bridge from Maemo to MeeGo? >> >> Some steps being done: running MeeGo in the N900, having a MeeGo Extras >> process in place, [...] > > Wit

Re: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

Andrew Flegg wrote: http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005525.html This is very sad. I see nothing has changed since I left the MeeGo lists. Having static packages is so 2000! A MeeGo foundation should be to have all packages in upstream MeeGo repositories instead of

Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

[Follow-ups to maemo-developers, please] On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 19:22, Quim Gil wrote: > > On 09/07/2010 10:10 AM, ext Andrea Grandi wrote: >> let me understand better then. If neither a migration is planned, how >> the Maemo Community will be related to the MeeGo one? > &g

A 'red thread' through MeeGo Conference proposals

Hello all, For Maemo Summit 2009, stskeeps brought up the subject of continuity and commonality between talks and workshops (qole and timsamoff also contributed heavily to the brainstorming). I'd also like to kick off a similar dialog for the MeeGo Conference 2010.� It may help the judges d

Re: Maemo / MeeGo application gallery?

Le 29 août 2010 18:26, Ville M. Vainio a écrit : > 2010/8/29 Benoît HERVIER : > >> http://maemo.org/downloads/Maemo5/ isn't restricted to extras. You can >> put any install file to any repository. This is just not recommended >> to send user to extras devel. When a package reach extras some infos

Re: Maemo / MeeGo application gallery?

2010/8/29 Benoît HERVIER : > http://maemo.org/downloads/Maemo5/ isn't restricted to extras. You can > put any install file to any repository. This is just not recommended > to send user to extras devel. When a package reach extras some infos > are updated on Maemo5 download page. But this isn't th

Re: Maemo / MeeGo application gallery?

2010/8/26 Attila Csipa : > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: >> >> The concept is so obvious, it has probably been discussed to death >> many times over - >> >> Should we have some central place to "showcase" maemo / m

Re: Maemo / MeeGo application gallery?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > The concept is so obvious, it has probably been discussed to death > many times over - > > Should we have some central place to "showcase" maemo / meego > applications, wherever they are? > Well, the origi

Maemo / MeeGo application gallery?

The concept is so obvious, it has probably been discussed to death many times over - Should we have some central place to "showcase" maemo / meego applications, wherever they are? I mean all of extras / extras-devel / Ovi store. Sort of like http://maemo.org/downloads/Maemo5/ , bu

MeeGo Conference 2010: registration form open an 7 days left for call for paper

Hi all, first of all, please excuse me for cross-posting, but since this is an important news I hope I won't disturb anyone :) Few days ago, on MeeGo website, was published the registration form where people can register to attend the first MeeGo Conference that will be in Dublin on Nov

MeeGo Conference 2010: LinkedIn event entry

I added a LinkedIn event entry for the upcoming MeeGo Conference 2010: http://events.linkedin.com/MeeGo-Conference-2010/pub/393262 Note that this is not the official signup page, although the link to the conference site is provided there (and I will repeat here also:�http://conference2010

Re: Open letter of support for Python on the Maemo/MeeGo platform

as a > platform for Ovi Store  applications - represents a serious threat to > the success of Maemo, MeeGo and  Ovi Store. > It will come as a surprise for many community members and users that > Python is  still not an officially supported language/runtime on the > Maemo nor MeeGo 

Open letter of support for Python on the Maemo/MeeGo platform

the availability of Python as a platform for Ovi Store applications - represents a serious threat to the success of Maemo, MeeGo and Ovi Store. It will come as a surprise for many community members and users that Python is still not an officially supported language/runtime on the Maemo nor MeeGo

Re: [MeeGo-community] Open Letter/Proposal to allow Maemo on the MeeGo Community OBS

This issue has recently received some attention from this post onwards: http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615#c26 so I felt it worth re-posting this to remind people of the original request. Summary : We would like to support the Maemo community in migrating to MeeGo by allowing them to

Re: Wetab Android stack on Maemo/MeeGo

be a kind of Android runtime environment based on > Android 2.1. > I really wonder if it would be possible to get this stack running on > Maemo/MeeGo or if Nokia might be willing to include such a stack in upcoming > OS releases. Many apps are currently released for Apple iOS or Android, but &

Wetab Android stack on Maemo/MeeGo

wonder if it would be possible to get this stack running on Maemo/MeeGo or if Nokia might be willing to include such a stack in upcoming OS releases. Many apps are currently released for Apple iOS or Android, but there are barely Apps released for Maemo/MeeGo. Therefore an Android runtime environment

Maemo/MeeGo meetup at Akademy 2010

Hi There's an ongoing plan the arrange a maemo.org meet up on the first day of Akademy 2010. Current proposal is to have to meet up on Friday 2nd July 7PM at Plevna - http://www.plevna.fi/index_e.php Other proposals are welcome. Original t.m.o thread http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=56616

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

On mer., 2010-06-16 at 13:15 +0300, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > > I think you are barking at the wrong tree - pulseaudio should get way > > better latency than 5000ms, otherwise it would be useless for pretty > > much everything. > > My thought exactly. If that really is the case, a proper phone > co

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

Benno Senoner wrote: Thanks to all for your responses, yes I agree with what you said. I will try to track the evolution of the audio subsystem on meego and provide my feedback and findings. I'll discuss the issue with the JACK authors too what they think about it, about adding power manag

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

Thanks to all for your responses, yes I agree with what you said. I will try to track the evolution of the audio subsystem on meego and provide my feedback and findings. I'll discuss the issue with the JACK authors too what they think about it, about adding power management to jack etc. (the

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

done with Maemo and MeeGo is yet unprecedented from a commercial market point of view. Let me assure you that if you communicate your issues you will get a serious response and if you're right with your complaints action will be taken. Sivan ___ ma

RE: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

OS (Maemo) that is at a EOL status. As for Meego, you need to obviously present a case on the Meego mailing list -- but since they already shipped a version; gutting the sound system may not be something worth while that they would consider until a later major version.Although who knows, maybe

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

x27;re really not in the right place for this kind of discussion, both technical and political (=> forum). Not to stop whining. Perhaps if you listened to that, you'd get feedback of the type you're after. > But as said I will continue to point out possible flaws in Meego > regard

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

to access that features, or your market share will continue to drop and drop. It seems like Maemo will be end of lined soon so I'm not expecting Maemo getting much improvements, but it's successor, Meego HAS to deliver a smooth user experience. I will continue those discussions on the Meego li

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Benno Senoner wrote: > I just represent a multimedia developer wanting to use the platform > and point out the flaws in order to contribute to improve it. ... and that is appreciated. OTOH it's waste of typing to engage in long diatribes about business models and

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

s in order to contribute to improve it. The fact is that the Iphone makes it transparent and easy for developers to achieve low latency audio while Nokia has still not achieved this goal, The day I can pipe audio in and out of QAudioInput/QAudioOutput with negligible delay and having it work well

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

ing perfectly >> when using QAudioInput/QAudioOutput classes then I'll shut up and take >> my words back, but at the moment the situation does not seem so, and I >> fear that >> those "features" will be inherited by Meego. > > I think you are barking at

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

up and take > my words back, but at the moment the situation does not seem so, and I > fear that > those "features" will be inherited by Meego. I think you are barking at the wrong tree - pulseaudio should get way better latency than 5000ms, otherwise it would be useless for pret

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:56 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote: > Hi, > Can you back up your claims that pulseaudio uses less CPU than JACK ? > pulseaudio cannot do wonders, if mixing is required the code must sum > up the inputs, jack does this > already in the most efficient manner and one can easily add

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

ient stuff which later will plague the platform for the entire lifecycle and often it's to complex or expensive to fix the system later, so users do have to live with the flaws of the system. Millions of future users and developers don't want the same fate for Meego, so Nokia please listen

Re: Open Letter/Proposal to allow Maemo on the MeeGo Community OBS

[David Greaves Mi 16. Juni 2010]: > > *Please discuss on meego-community mailing list* > > DocScrutinizer on irc pointed out that a url might be useful but was too shy > to post himself ;) > >http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community For your convenience, h

Re: Open Letter/Proposal to allow Maemo on the MeeGo Community OBS

On 15/06/10 18:16, David Greaves wrote: This is an open letter to the whole MeeGo community and on behalf of the Maemo development community. The purpose of this letter is to ask the MeeGo community for their permission to bring Maemo build targets (currently Fremantle eventually Harmattan

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 01:27 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote: > So my advice to Nokia, while still in time, cosider switching to JACK > as an audio server for future versions of Meego, The N900 already sucks batteries like mad. JACK is a no-compromise low-latency pro audio server, and does it

Re: Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

al groupings 2) sent them to the appropriate place For instance, questions and suggestions for MeeGo architecture are probably better sent to the meego-dev mailing list (http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev). I'm not sure who you could talk to about QAudioInput's performance, but I

Low Latency Audio Capture on the N900, QAudioInput BUG: has 5000msec latency, Meego audio future

roduct would have been unsellable. So it is puzzling why Nokia decides to continue with pulseaudio even in Meego. Meego is the successor of Maemo so it is natural to inherit features and code from Maemo, but nowhere is it written in stone that they need to continue with pulseaudio. Nokia

Open Letter/Proposal to allow Maemo on the MeeGo Community OBS

This is an open letter to the whole MeeGo community and on behalf of the Maemo development community. The purpose of this letter is to ask the MeeGo community for their permission to bring Maemo build targets (currently Fremantle eventually Harmattan, Diablo, Chinook?) to the MeeGo Community

Re: MeeGo Platform Bug Jar 2010.22

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Stephen Gadsby wrote: > > (part 2 will follow) > No it won't. This is the wrong list. Sorry, everyone. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-develope

MeeGo Platform Bug Jar 2010.22

A Quick Look at MeeGo Platform in Bugzilla (http://bugs.meego.com/). 2010-05-24 through 2010-05-30 As of 2010-05-31 MeeGo Platform contains 2158 items (+1027 this week), including 828 open issues (+366 this week): * 767 open bugs (+347 this week) * 27 critical (+7 this week) * 763

Making Symbian / MeeGo cross device

Hi All, As MeeGo is about cross vendor OS, I would like to propose to have builds of MeeGo for N8, or Symbian 3/S60 on N900. I guess I am dreaming of choosing the device and OS , given the hardware allows it. Is there a way for us to achieve that? That would be something cool to have, as

Re: Fw: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Akademy talk acceptance (Enhancing User Engagement on Mobile Devices)

> - Original message - > From: "MoRpHeUz‎" > To: "Randall Arnold‎" > Subject: Re: Fw: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Akademy talk acceptance (Enhancing User Engagement on Mobile Devices) > Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 14:52:27 -0300 > > >On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11

Re: Fw: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Akademy talk acceptance (Enhancing User Engagement on Mobile Devices)

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Randall Arnold wrote: > - Project Silk.  This is the KDE project responsible for bringing web APIs > to Linux devices.  No response yet from the project; I am concerned it may > be defunct It's not a defunct. Look for "sebas" or "richmoore" on Freenode (usually #p

Fw: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Akademy talk acceptance (Enhancing User Engagement on Mobile Devices)

FYI for those not on the MeeGo lists. Randy - Original message - From: "Randall Arnold‎" To: "MeeGo Dev List‎" , "MeeGo community‎" Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Akademy talk acceptance (Enhancing User Engagement on Mobile Devices) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 09:29

Re: GSoC project discussion - MeeGo cloud storage support

An initial version of my application can be found here: http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/sttwister/t127066037516 Cheers, Felix Kerekes (sttwister) ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://l

GSoC project discussion - MeeGo cloud storage support

Hi, First of all, I'm sorry I'm posting this so close to the deadline, I know how important it is to discuss any idea with developers and possible mentors beforehand. I'm interested in working on the cloud storage support project for the Maemo and MeeGo community. Before boring y

Meego and mafw

Hello, Is there any information available about the multimedia framework that will be used by Meego? Any future for mafw? I'd like to work on the project "Porting Canola to N900" as a Gsoc student and I've been discussing with canola developers the possibility to use mafw.

[Updated] Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework

Thanks to everyone who has provided valuable guidance for this effort to improve the MeeGo user experience in feedback, testing and related activities. I have added a wiki page[1] that's also linked to the main page with other proposals. Feel free to add yourself as a contributor if yo

Re: [Meego-community] Qt | Podcasting + conferencing + Twitter

> - Original message - > From: "Alexey Zakhlestin‎" > To: "Randall Arnold‎" > Subject: Re: [Meego-community] Qt | Podcasting + conferencing + Twitter > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:15:28 +0300 > > > > On 15.03.2010, at 2:26, Randall Ar

MeeGo Metrics and Reporting

Just in case there weren't enough projects erupting around MeeGo, here's another.� :D I think most of us understand that at the root of successful projects lies good data.� To that notion, Dawn Foster and I have started an effort to establish metrics definitions and reporting solutio

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

> - Original message - > From: "Jeff Moe‎" > To: > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework > working group > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:05:38 -0700 > > >On Thursday 04 March 2010 07:19:05 Randall Arn

Re: [Meego-community] Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

Good point. I was thinking of writing something from scratch, but not quite. so I happen to also be a member of the Plone community (I happen to be *the* QA team) and a good friend[4] of mine has done a lot of work on a repoze.bfg[3] application called Karl[0], for the OSI in Budapest. Essentiall

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

On Thursday 04 March 2010 07:19:05 Randall Arnold wrote: > - Original message - > > > Randall, > > > > I am thinking along the line of something like a sort of "expert" > > > > system, a web ui, that offers bug/problem domains to the user to > > choose from. Then according to the problem

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

Okay dude, I think we need to start working on this! At least start designing the data model for starters :) Sivan On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Randall Arnold wrote: > > - Original message - >> Randall, >> >>  I am thinking along the line of something like a sort of "expert" >> system

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

- Original message - > Randall, > >  I am thinking along the line of something like a sort of "expert" > system, a web ui, that offers bug/problem domains to the user to > choose from. Then according to the problem domains a set of question > are presented for the user to answer with minim

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

Randall, I am thinking along the line of something like a sort of "expert" system, a web ui, that offers bug/problem domains to the user to choose from. Then according to the problem domains a set of question are presented for the user to answer with minimum free text. And so on and forth. We cou

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

- Original message - > Hi, > > ext Randall Arnold wrote: > > Thanks Attila!  I just uploaded a more recent update to the PDF > > (http://maemo-daemons.org/MeeGo_User_Experience_Framework.pdf) > > based on helpful feedback so far. > > Some comments on the bug reporting thing. > > We already

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Eero Tamminen wrote: > Crash reporting isn't currently targeted for normal users > for few reasons: > > * Crash dumps are large and can contain private information >  (like passwords).  Hopefully in Harmattan we can can use >  minidumps that contain only enough info

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

Hi, ext Randall Arnold wrote: Thanks Attila! I just uploaded a more recent update to the PDF (http://maemo-daemons.org/MeeGo_User_Experience_Framework.pdf) based on helpful feedback so far. Some comments on the bug reporting thing. We already have Crash reporter which collects crashes. Cre

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

> - Original message - > From: "Sivan Greenberg‎" > To: "Randall Arnold‎" > Subject: Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:44:33 +0200 > > >Another pressing question as I see it, you tal

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

Another pressing question as I see it, you talk about automatic bug search and and offer the user to comment or vote on an existing one if a match is found. I've seen alot of bug tools in my time trying to do to the same, I have to say that the matching algorithm usually works when the user scores

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

> - Original message - > From: "Sivan Greenberg‎" > To: "Randall Arnold‎" > Subject: Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:55:30 +0200 > > >Randall, would you be interested i

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

f the platform and not specifically doing QA. Sivan On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Randall Arnold wrote: > >> - Original message - >> From: "Attila Csipa‎" >> To: >> Subject: Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group >>

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

> - Original message - > From: "Attila Csipa‎" > To: > Subject: Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:32:50 +0100 > > >On Wednesday 03 March 2010 16:13:28 Randall Arnold wrote: > > I have link

Re: Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

more suggestions and technical guidance from the community.� In > addition, I want to propose a MeeGo working group for this project as > I lack the skills and time to make all of this happen.� I am > especially hoping Andrew, Henri Bergius, Attila Csipa and more will > jump

Fw: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group

http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com/ - Original message - From: "Randall Arnold‎" To: "MeeGo Dev List‎" , "MeeGo community‎" , "Maemo Community‎" , Subject: Proposal: MeeGo User Experience Framework working group Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:41:21 -

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [OFF-Topic] Developers corner in Helsinki-Finland

hello, > The main idea is to gather developers interested in MeeGo / Maemo and > share information about projects > and other kind of activities related to these technologies. > count on me. > > Any idea is welcome. > > how about encouraging students to learn thes

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Hi, On 22 February 2010 19:05, Renato Araujo wrote: > Hi guys, nice to know about this thread. Some weeks ago I started a > Twitter client based on Pyside, for promote the project. The INdT > designs team help me with the Interface designer, some friends help > with suggestions and bug report (a

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Hi guys, nice to know about this thread. Some weeks ago I started a Twitter client based on Pyside, for promote the project. The INdT designs team help me with the Interface designer, some friends help with suggestions and bug report (a lot off :D). And after read this e-mail, I would like to shar

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

In my experience, you can switch back and forth easily. So you can use either. Auto routing of signals was the biggest annoyance to me so far (PyQt yes, PySide no). Well that and cross platform availability. Frank On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > Right, so at the moment

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Right, so at the moment PyQT supports more of the Qt bindings. But I think we should use PySide and help the PySide team enable more of the bindings we require, or at least ask them for those critical for the app development. Sivan On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Frank Banul wrote: > PyQt. > >

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

PyQt. Frank On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andrea Grandi wrote: > Hi, > > On 22 February 2010 18:01, Gibran Rodriguez wrote: >> Do you think PySide could be used at some point? > > I'm going to use PySide :) > Do you know any other working binding for Qt available for Maemo? > > -- > Andrea

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Hi, On 22 February 2010 18:01, Gibran Rodriguez wrote: > Do you think PySide could be used at some point? I'm going to use PySide :) Do you know any other working binding for Qt available for Maemo? -- Andrea Grandi email: a.grandi [AT] gmail [DOT] com website: http://www.andreagrandi.it PGP K

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Hello there, I am very interested in this project, I am not an expert programmer either but I've been programming for some time and I've got an N900 > 1) Maemo (MeeGo) is moving to Qt and for this reason I'm going to use > Qt, while Mauku uses Gtk. > Do you think PySi

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Twitter client for Maemo in Qt + Python: call for developers and UI designers

Dnia poniedziałek, 22 lutego 2010 o 17:06:33 Andrea Grandi napisał(a): > In these days I had the idea to start writing a Twitter client for > Maemo with a precise direction in my mind. I'll try to explain all my > reasons here. Name it YATCFMBTTIQ (Yet Another Twitter Client For M

  1   2   3   >