First off, I apologize for not having much time to interact with folks
on this list. Hopefully I can improve that situation soon.
Rather that respond to every message in this thread, I'll try to
summarize my thoughts on this issue. First, IMO there's little we can
do to stop spammers from using
> "Stig" == Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stig> Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and
Stig> mail, would prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service,
Stig> and addressed to their own address, so that they know the
Stig> mail was sent to
At 6:13 PM +0900 2004/05/11, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
FWIW, I agree with you and James. For an announcement list it makes
sense to me that the editor's mailbox would be placed in the From
header, and the alias for mass-mailing not be exposed at all. I think
that would look more "profession
> "somuchfun" == somuchfun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
somuchfun> I am literally shocked to see that you think everyone
somuchfun> who does not agree with you is a Spamer!
That's not what he said. He said he can't think of a good reason why
a non-spammer would want to do this, while
At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
can hit reply to get h
At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
can hit reply to get h
At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
can hit reply to get h
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:26:05AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> This is a mailing list. Mailman is a mailing list manager. It
> is not a "hidden address so you can spam" manager. We're not trying
> to hide anything here, and I doubt that anyone is going to be
> interested to see code in
At 11:31 AM -0700 2004/05/10, Somuchfun wrote:
You might want to ignore it but there are announcement lists and newsletters
people actually want to get and this is not spam by definition. If I get a
newsletter from United Airlines for example because I am a frequent traveler
and I asked for it
owles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 1:51 AM
> To: James Ralston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: suggestion for Full Customization [Mailman-Developers]
>
> At 2:54 AM -0400 2004/05/10, James Ralston wrote:
>
> > ...why would you even *wan
At 2:54 AM -0400 2004/05/10, James Ralston wrote:
...why would you even *want* to have the listname for an announcement
list exposed in the To and/or CC header of messages sent through the
list? If a recipient replies to the list, it's just going to go to
the moderators, right? In most cases
Brad,
On 2004-05-06 at 10:26:05+02 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 7:03 PM -0400 2004/05/05, James Ralston wrote:
>
> > If I have set the "personalize" option to "Full Personalization",
> > a very likely reason why I have done so is because I don't *WANT*
> > the recipient to reply
At 7:03 PM -0400 2004/05/05, James Ralston wrote:
If I have set the "personalize" option to "Full Personalization", a
very likely reason why I have done so is because I don't *WANT* the
recipient to reply back to the list--or, for that matter, even realize
that the message was sent through a m
13 matches
Mail list logo
