On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
VERP has nothing to do with
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
Return-Path.
I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the Return-Path too:
Return-Path:
On 5/30/08 8:40 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
Return-Path.
I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the
David Newman wrote:
Given the above, is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the subscriber that's complaining?
Or is it just a coincidence that that AOL user got listed first?
Since you're now sending just one message for each recipient, you will get
unique queue ids assigned by your MTA for each and every
David Newman writes:
Initially I thought the changes I made to mailman would result in a
unique Message-ID per recipient, but this does not appear to be the case.
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate
On May 30, 2008, at 11:00 AM, David Newman wrote:
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders like Mailman must not touch it.
IIRC,
On 5/30/08 3:28 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders
On 5/28/08 8:43 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/28/08 9:26 PM, David Newman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another is to enable VERP for your outgoing messages, this allows
you to track the message ID to the individual user.
That sounds very promising, thanks. Trying it now...
I have all my lists
David Newman wrote:
OK, I've enabled VERP but I'm no closer to isolating who's complaining
in AOL-land.
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = Yes
VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes
On 5/29/08 11:40 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
David Newman wrote:
OK, I've enabled VERP but I'm no closer to isolating who's complaining
in AOL-land.
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = Yes
David Newman wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:40 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
David Newman wrote:
OK, I've enabled VERP but I'm no closer to isolating who's
complaining in AOL-land.
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
At 01:53 PM 5/29/2008, David Newman wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:40 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
David Newman wrote:
OK, I've enabled VERP but I'm no closer to isolating who's
complaining in AOL-land.
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
On 5/29/08 12:09 PM, David Andrews wrote:
Did you go back to the list configuration and turn on personalization?
Er, no, I haven't. Where do I set that in the Web UI?
thanks
dn
DA: It is under Nondigest Options.
Sorry for being dense, but where?
These are the only choices I see under
It is between the first and second choices you listed. Since it
isn't there, I would guess you need to stop and restart Mailman so
the configuration file is reprocessed.
Dave
At 03:02 PM 5/29/2008, David Newman wrote:
On 5/29/08 12:09 PM, David Andrews wrote:
Did you go back to the list
On Thu, 29 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = Yes
VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes
VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL = Yes
VERP_CONFIRMATIONS = Yes
VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL = 1
On 5/29/08 1:46 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
Possibly this is some VERP config error on my part. I added the
following to mm_cfg.py and rebooted:
VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = Yes
VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes
VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL = Yes
VERP_CONFIRMATIONS
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
VERP has nothing to do with Message-ID, and everything to do with
Return-Path and Sender: ;-)
-Jim P.
One or more AOL subscribers is reporting posts to one of our mailing
lists as spam. Every time there's a post to this list, both we and our
upstream provider get a feedback report from AOL. This report provides
the message-ID for the offending email, but not the recipient's address.
AOL
Quoting David Newman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
One or more AOL subscribers is reporting posts to one of our mailing
lists as spam. Every time there's a post to this list, both we and our
upstream provider get a feedback report from AOL. This report provides
the message-ID for the offending
On 5/28/08 7:09 PM, Dave Dewey wrote:
Quoting David Newman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
One or more AOL subscribers is reporting posts to one of our mailing
lists as spam. Every time there's a post to this list, both we and our
upstream provider get a feedback report from AOL. This report provides
On 5/28/08 9:26 PM, David Newman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another is to enable VERP for your outgoing messages, this allows
you to track the message ID to the individual user.
That sounds very promising, thanks. Trying it now...
I have all my lists VERPed for just that reason. Once I
23 matches
Mail list logo
