On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Shane Clay wrote:
>I can't figure this one out so looking for some help from people in the
>know. One of our clients has a postfix mail relay server used for
>relaying emails from photocopiers/internal software systems out to the
>world.
>Any ideas?
I don't know, but
Bill - the email wasn't aimed at asking Microsoft for support on a public
mailing list. It wasn't a technical support request at all. It was from a
network person, separate the end user, looking into an issue which he is
unforunately lumped with, who decided to ask a community of people who
On 23 Nov 2017, at 22:31 (-0500), Shane Clay via mailop wrote:
Any ideas?
Maybe an organization that is clearly paying Microsoft for email
services should consider the possible utility of going directly to
Microsoft for support???
I'm 100% serious about that. It's been a few months since
I'd considered that.
This server has been around a long time (and the rdns hasn't changed) and the
problem has only just come up. If it is the rdns, it's a new problem.
Do the HELO and RDNS have to match to pass spam detection? I would have thought
that a valid, matching SPF record and the
Hi All
I can't figure this one out so looking for some help from people in the know.
One of our clients has a postfix mail relay server used for relaying emails
from photocopiers/internal software systems out to the world.
Below I've pasted the headers of one. Office 365 / Outlook chucks them
On 11/22/2017 06:47 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
I never liked the design choice which said permission failure had to
look like nonexistence,
Is this a reference to the mentality of needing to say "username or
password" instead of "password" in an attempt to not confirm that a
Hi Michael,
I recently wrote:
> My question would be: If Microsoft does not want all complaining
recipients removed / listwashed, which I can understand, why not provide
anonymous feedback on bad senders? Provide similar info like Google is
providing (with the Feedback-ID or sender domain). Why
Indeed, they do read the postmaster@ messages, although not necessarily answer
to any request.
Cheers,
Davide
Davide Migliavacca
cto, ContactLab
Tel +39 02 2831181
www.contactlab.com
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Luis E. Muñoz via
Hi Andrew,
But in your case you may have some differing "ip reputation" to account
for. For me the only difference was the html layout. Nothing else was
changed.
I have to say this was years ago. I generally do not spend so much time on
a single message.
Yours,
David
On 22 November 2017 at
