Hi,
I've just updated my FBL parsing in preparation of using
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9477 and while doing that checked if
Microsofts JMRP could send reports in ARF format instead of attachments
so I could remove any special-case parsing just for Microsoft... But to
my surprise in
Am 11.12.2023 um 12:04:44 Uhr schrieb Kirill Miazine via mailop:
> The IP belongs to Hetzner which have a full lack of abuse handling.
> A broad range of IP addresses within the block the IP address you are
> requesting about s constantly being abused to spam and scam campaigns,
> and Hetzner
> The residential address of the operator is a risk, because spamming is
> a criminal activity in most countries and spammers are sometimes
> organized like the mafia. They hate those lists and try to bring them
> down by all kinds of attacks. Not providing them more attack surface
> than
Am 10.12.2023 um 14:27:35 Uhr schrieb Kirill Miazine:
> • Marco Moock via mailop [2023-12-10 11:24]:
> > Am 10.12.2023 um 10:55:21 Uhr schrieb Kirill Miazine via mailop:
> >
> >> The block is quite new, I guess spam.fail operators just took
> >> Hetzner's IP ranges and put in their lists
> Well, yeah, not really _impossible_, but I was referring to doing
> monitoring based on DNS lookups, as is normal for DNS BL.
Of course.
> Also, Domeneshop confirmed they operate spam.fail as internal list
OK. I tried tagging them on LinkedIn; it's an automatically generated
corporate page
> Inability to do external DNS lookups makes it impossible to monitor
> for presence on their list.
https://spam.fail/search?ip=127.0.0.2
--
Atro Tossavainen, Chairman of the Board
Infinite Mho Oy, Helsinki, Finland
tel. +358-44-5000 600, http://www.infinitemho.fi/
Am 11.12.2023 um 09:26:36 Uhr schrieb Kirill Miazine:
> • Marco Moock [2023-12-11 09:13]:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Anyone has any experience with this list or who the operator is?
> > >
> >
> > The latter is something they hide because spammers would threat them
> > otherwise.
>
> Then does
Hello Mailops Community,
I wanted to pass along an update regarding coming changes in 2024 to public
query access for Validity reputation data in DNS. We're finalizing
implementation of necessary response codes (including in Spam Assassin) to
enable this. It's similar to the Spamhaus DQS
• Atro Tossavainen via mailop [2023-12-11 09:54]:
> > Inability to do external DNS lookups makes it impossible to monitor
> > for presence on their list.
>
> https://spam.fail/search?ip=127.0.0.2
Well, yeah, not really _impossible_, but I was referring to doing
monitoring based on DNS lookups,
Very helpful feedback Slavko, thank you, I'm sharing with the team here to
discuss.
Tom
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:36 AM Slavko via mailop
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dňa 11. decembra 2023 16:52:43 UTC používateľ Tom Bartel via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> napísal:
>
> >Starting March 1, 2024 we will
Hi,
Dňa 11. decembra 2023 16:52:43 UTC používateľ Tom Bartel via mailop
napísal:
>Starting March 1, 2024 we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user over a
>30-day time period. After 10,000 requests, users must create a MyValidity
>account to continue using this free service.
You asked for
Hi, Tom
• Tom Bartel via mailop [2023-12-11 17:52]:
Hello Mailops Community,
I wanted to pass along an update regarding coming changes in 2024 to
public query access for Validity reputation data in DNS. We're
finalizing implementation of necessary response codes (including in Spam
It appears that Gellner, Oliver via mailop said:
>And to add a rant to that: I don’t have much sympathy for operators that are
>trying to use their control over a MTA or DNSBL as some
>kind of extortion tool or to put forward their own vendettas.
I also block most mail from Hetzner's network.
> On 11.12.2023 at 12:11 Kirill Miazine via mailop wrote:
>
> Also, Domeneshop confirmed they operate spam.fail as internal list and
> that they indeed have blacklisted Hetzner ranges because "lack of abuse
> handling":
>
>
> The IP belongs to Hetzner which have a full lack of abuse handling.
>
• Gellner, Oliver via mailop [2023-12-11 21:29]:
Even if there are a lot of addresses in that netblock that are sending
spam, Domeneshop now officially knows that at least one IP address does
not (Kirills). It would be trivial to exclude it from their blocking,
Domeneshop shall be given due
• John Levine via mailop [2023-12-11 22:00]:
It appears that Gellner, Oliver via mailop said:
And to add a rant to that: I don’t have much sympathy for operators that are
trying to use their control over a MTA or DNSBL as some
kind of extortion tool or to put forward their own vendettas.
16 matches
Mail list logo
