Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 08:23, Brandon Long wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Robert Mueller wrote: > >> We don't recommend doing that: >> >> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/175365 >> >> If you are forwarding mail, you'll inevitably

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 12:45, Robert Mueller wrote: > >> >> Ok, just to confirm, does this mean you don't recommend or recognise SRS >> rewritten MAIL FROM addresses as special in any way? >> >> Does anyone understand SRS? I thought it was pretty much a dead end. > >

[mailop] msn/outlook blacklist advice

Hello everyone, We've just moved someof our MXs to a new IP and it turns out we didn't plan this very well. Microsoft has the whole new range blacklisted (Getting SC-001 errors for 136.243.92.253; 136.243.92.252; 136.243.92.216). The troubleshooting form provides no real feedback and I

Re: [mailop] msn/outlook blacklist advice

On 14/09/2015 06:44 μμ, Steve Atkins wrote: Microsoft has the whole new range blacklisted (Getting SC-001 errors for 136.243.92.253; 136.243.92.252; 136.243.92.216). I'm assuming those three IP addresses are for smarthosts > that send outbound mail for you and your customers. Only one is

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

If it has anything to do with Hotmail, this is the wrong advice. If it’s specific to Hotmail or Outlook.com email addresses and such like…

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from > the servers called.. > > mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com > > And over the last week, those numbers substantially

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote: We are compelled to deliver it; talk to the senders who wander around wondering what the heck happened to a message that they handed off to a given mailhost and it was never delivered. We've all been seeing that for over a decade with hotmail, we

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

On 15/09/2015 06:54, Franck Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors > wrote: > >> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the >> servers called.. >> >> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

Or people who are in a desperate hurry... Both of which intersect on the Ven Diagram of a great many Mail Admins. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From:

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

Why don't we take this to the next level then and hide it behind a 1x1 pixel and triple the level of tier-1 scripted support, after making it available only via IVR with average 15 minutes wait? let's weed out the weak-willed, because what this industry definitely needs is more distrust and lack

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

> From: Michael Wise > The account has probably already been killed. I doubt that. I quoted entire header and the one-line body, but: == Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:03:03 +0300 From: l...@lena.kiev.ua To:

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

As I said ... we are compelled. And we're working on that for Hotmail as well, but it's not gonna happen, "Tomorrow". Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From:

[mailop] pobox.com contact?

Hey, Old story, shadow IT setup, email for a domain being handled by pobox, person who set it up has left, no authentication information stored in company password manager system. I'm trying to get back access so we can pay pobox money and get things running again. (Which is, understandably,

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

Heh. Would love to stop using the pipelined metaphor, but alas; I'm not in charge of the design, coding, or anything else... I just try to make sure that the spammy stuff is tagged as spam so y'all can look at it and decide for yourselves, easily. :) There are many, many other types of

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

If you see this ... X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to deliver it. The traffic came in via a TLS

[mailop] Gmail and PDF attachments.. Changes in policy?

Just had a few reports that Gmail is blocking messages with PDF attachments.. 74.125.28.26 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content presents a potential 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit 552-5.7.0

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

On 15-09-14 12:16 PM, Michael Wise wrote: If you see this ... X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to