Just to be clear - all of my issues are resolved at this time. I'm just
replying back here because I think it's important to learn from mistakes and
how improvements can be made. I don't imagine my opinion counts for much, but
in case it does...
> If you respond to the second email detailing
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, at 09:26, Jesse Thompson via mailop wrote:
> When someone reply-alls to a munged message it only composes a message to the
> Reply-to and the Cc, but ignores the From (the list address is munged into
> the From header).
That sounds exactly what I would expect for "Reply
Hi all,
We're making a push to get mailing lists to implement header munging because of
gov domains adopting DMARC p=reject.
Does anyone know what's up with Outlook (Office 365 Pro Plus) when "Reply All"
is used? When someone reply-alls to a munged message it only composes a
message to the
Just...
One...
Caveat.
If you respond to the second email detailing the mitigation, or the lack
thereof, and don't receive an email from a live human (they'll use boilerplate;
they're required to), or you don't receive that second email with the details
of the machine mitigation...
Send me the full headers of a sample Junk’d email, and you won’t have to guess.
Sorry, was a bit under the weather over the weekend.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
Got the Junk Mail Reporting
On Mon 11/Mar/2019 13:39:14 +0100 John Levine wrote:
> In article you write:
>>DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk;
>>s=s2048; t=1552218309; bh=g57fG3sVY8VJp5C0XX298lF8prrXAX2lkZMD2FVQd8o=;
>>h=Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:References:From:Subject;
Nope this is 100% manual email sent to people who have specifically
asked to be contacted (either via website form, phone or email).
No templates, cold emails or other nonsense like that at all.
The three main people affected was a sales person, someone who does a
little bit of sales but not
In article you write:
>DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk;
>s=s2048; t=1552218309; bh=g57fG3sVY8VJp5C0XX298lF8prrXAX2lkZMD2FVQd8o=;
>h=Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:References:From:Subject;
What type of mail are they sending?
These wouldn’t happen to be part of your sales team who are sending cold emails
to addresses they’ve … acquired through different pathways, would it?
Given they’re inserting tracking links from Hubspot, it seems there is some
level of outbound cold email
