Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

On Tue 24/Mar/2020 17:22:14 +0100 Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:58:14AM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote: >> I'm not understanding how this intersects with spamtraps. What does >> this alert actually notify a network owner of? >> Failed SMTP auth attempt from my

Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

> Uh, well, aren't you curious about how bots harvest that data? I am indeed not. Using leaked credentials from Adobe, Dropbox, LinkedIn, or any other widely available leak that has email addresses and passwords is quite the sufficient explanation for me. There may be others, but this is large en

Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

> On 25 Mar 2020, at 10:00, Alessandro Vesely via mailop > wrote: > > For a comparison, how'd you rate the signal to noise ratio of (accumulated) > DMARC aggregate reports? I don’t think there’s a valid comparison as DMARC reports are opt-in and the folks who are opting into them understand w

Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

On Wed 25/Mar/2020 11:36:52 +0100 Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: >> On 25 Mar 2020, at 10:00, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: >> >> For a comparison, how'd you rate the signal to noise ratio of (accumulated) >> DMARC aggregate reports? > > I don’t think there’s a valid comparison as DMARC repo

Re: [mailop] Abusix Potentially Compromised Account Report

> Once-only invitations to opt-in sound cool. Not to me - we tell marketers they can't ask permission by spamming, so I don't think anybody else should get a free pass either. IT. DOES. NOT. SCALE. Nobody gives a flying flamingo about who the sender is or what the purpose of the messaging is. IT.

[mailop] Oath/Yahoo/AOL

Anyone with Yahoo/AOL I can chat with off-list? We're seeing lots of delays/timeouts for one segment. I know why but trying to figure out a solution and was hoping to chat with someone. -- Brett Schenker Man of Many Things, Including 5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com Graphic Policy - ht

[mailop] Reputation issues with Microsoft for new sending IPs

Hello, My name is Mathew Hodges and I’m a Deliverability Engineer with Mailchimp. We send transactional messages for Zoom via Mandrill. Given the current global situation, their volume has drastically increased. We are currently seeing some rejection issues with smtp responses such as : 451 4.7.

Re: [mailop] Reputation issues with Microsoft for new sending IPs

Once again, always best to include an ACTUAL IP address in your first email, so it can be addressed in the most timely manner. For the record, one thing is that we hear about mailchimp customers saying that they have a 'dedicated' IP address, however they still have the generic PTR records.. Y

Re: [mailop] Reputation issues with Microsoft for new sending IPs

Dnia 25.03.2020 o godz. 11:41:46 Mathew Hodges via mailop pisze: > > My name is Mathew Hodges and I’m a Deliverability Engineer with Mailchimp. > We send transactional messages for Zoom via Mandrill. Given the current > global situation, their volume has drastically increased. We are currently > s

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Reputation issues with Microsoft for new sending IPs

MailOp is not the Microsoft Outlook Sender Support form … That would be … HERE. Chatting here isn’t going to move the issue forward. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Open a ticket for Hotmail