This explanation is interesting,but a bit cryptic. Could you expand?
Robin Kornman
In the Eudemian Ethics (1219b) Aristotle distinguishes between encomium,
praise and felicitation:
dio heteron eudaimonismos kai epainos kai enko:mion. to men gar
enko:mion logos tou kath' hekaston ergou, ho d'
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:31:24 +0200
From: Jorge Fernandez Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:39 PM 7/14/98 +, Yvan Nadeau wrote:
The problem about email is that it induces action rather than
reflection. I think I shall give it up.
I'm not sure it's any worse than conversation in that regard,
Subject: Re: VIRGIL: RE: Panegyric, was: a question on book iv
Sent:7/15/98 4:07 PM
Received:7/15/98 5:31 PM
From:David Wilson-Okamura, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:31:24 +0200
From: Jorge
: Panegyric, was: a question on book iv
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 11:32:47 -0700
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Yvan Nadeau [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if your friend meant that the Aeneid was primarily written as a
panegyric of Augustus, he was right. Which
At 10:39 PM 7/14/98 +, Yvan Nadeau wrote:
The problem about email is that it induces action rather than
reflection. I think I shall give it up.
I'm not sure it's any worse than conversation in that regard, but I think
Yvan's right about the epic/panegyric distinction: it probably didn't
