# Have stable1/stable2 links:
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable1 - hadoop-1.x
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable2 - hadoop-2.x
+1, would also make:
current - stable2(since v2 is the latest)
stable - stable1 (for compatibility)
+1, Eli's proposal looks good to me.
-
+1 (non-binding)
- Upgraded HDFS including snapshots from 2.2.
- Ran a few sample jobs.
- WebUI looks good.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/02/12 7:09), Karthik Kambatla wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Built source. Brought up a pseudo-cluster with manual RM HA. Ran a few MR
examples.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014
Hi all,
We collected and analyzed JIRA tickets to investigate
the activities of Apache Hadoop Community in 2013.
http://ajisakaa.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-activities-of-apache-hadoop.html
We counted the number of the organizations, the lines
of code, and the number of the issues. As a result, we
Moving to u...@hadoop.apache.org.
If you have a question about this, please reply to
user mailing list instead of mapreduce-dev@.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/02/17 10:06), Akira AJISAKA wrote:
I know map method put these text file into map,like follows,right?
001, 35.99
001, 35.99
002, 12.49
004
Hi developers,
I found several MapReduce documents such as MapReduce tutorial,
Hadoop Streaming, Hadoop Archives, and DistCp are not ported to
trunk. I created some patches for porting them.
* MAPREDUCE-5636
* MAPREDUCE-5637
* MAPREDUCE-5638
* MAPREDUCE-5639
Now newcomers have to refer branch-1
I compiled the documents with the porting patches and uploaded them to
http://aajisaka.github.io/hadoop-project/ .
I'll appreciate the patches will be reviewed and finally merged in.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/02/17 15:35), Akira AJISAKA wrote:
Hi developers,
I found several MapReduce documents
+1 (non-binding) for 2.4.1 release.
We can debate whether or June is too early for hadoop-2.5 and it's
contents, but I recollect there was consensus that releases every 6
weeks (or so) makes sense.
Also, +1 (non-binding) for the 6 weeks (or so) timeline releases.
However, I'm thinking it's
Moved to u...@hadoop.apache.org.
You can configure the interval by setting
mapreduce.client.progressmonitor.pollinterval parameter.
The default value is 1000 ms.
For more details, please see
Hi JIRA admins,
Hadoop 2.4.0 was released, but 2.4.0 is now unreleased and instead
2.2.1 is released in the JIRA.
Would you please fix it?
Thanks,
Akira
.
I want to get more finer values, instead of directly jumping from 280 to
516.
Did that make sense? mapreduce.client.progressmonitor.pollinterval does not
seem to effect it. Any workaround ?
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jpwrote:
Moved
source code. I am willing to take the issue and contribute if
required.
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jpwrote:
Moved mapreduce-dev@ to Bcc.
Hi Dharmesh,
The parameter is to set the interval of polling the progress
of the MRAppMaster
Hi Arun,
I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1.
It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy wrote:
Folks,
Here is a handy short-cut to track 2.4.1:
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.4.1-blockers
I'm hoping we can get the
I think we should include this issue in 2.4.1, so I uploaded a patch to
fix it. I'll appreciate your review.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/06/18 12:13), Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
There is one item [MAPREDUCE-5830 HostUtil.getTaskLogUrl is not backwards
binary compatible with 2.3] marked for 2.4.
Extended attributes (HDFS-2006) is already merged to branch-2,
so I'll update the Roadmap wiki to change it from 2.6 to 2.5.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/06/23 16:28), Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote:
IMHO, I'd like to +1 to include YARN-1492 and work-preserving restart
in 2.6. I
+1 (non-binding)
(2014/06/24 10:33), Zhijie Shen wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
Folks,
+1 (non-binding) for 2.5 to be the last release to ensure JDK6.
My higher-level goal though is to avoid going through this same pain
again when JDK7 goes EOL. I'd like to do a JDK8-based release
before then for this reason. This is why I suggested skipping an
intermediate 2.x+JDK7 release
Hi Hadoop developers,
Now Jenkins is failing with the below message.
I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkins server.
After the upgrade, the version of svn client was also upgraded,
so the following errors occurred.
It will be fixed by executing 'svn upgrade' before executing
other
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10804
Please correct me if I am wrong..
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/07/09 11:24), Akira AJISAKA wrote:
Hi Hadoop developers,
Now Jenkins is failing with the below message.
I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkins server.
After
-1 (non-binding)
+ downloaded tarball and deployed HDFS-HA cluster
+ confirmed HDFS Rolling Upgrade from 2.4.0
+ ran some sample jobs
- documents are missing in tarball
In 2.4.1 release, the documents were deployed at share/doc/hadoop/ .
Would you please re-create a tarball with adding -Pdoc
+1 (non-binding), I don't use subversion at all in creating patches.
After the migration, we need to change test-patch.sh to use git.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/08/11 7:18), Mit Desai wrote:
+1 non binding.
-M!T
On Aug 10, 2014 4:12 PM, Chen He airb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun,
Thanks Karthik for the update, but the some documents are not included.
It looks to me that *.apt.vm files are not compiled.
Would you please generate documents with
'mvn site site:stage /path/to/deploy'?
I'm +1 (non-binding) if the documents are included.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/08/12 13:49),
Thanks Karthik for the quick update. +1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/08/12 21:20), Karthik Kambatla wrote:
Thanks for trying the new binary out, Akira. I just updated the binary to
include the site files as well.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa
is very much 2.5.0 done right.
I just updated the how-to-release wiki to capture this step in the release
process, so we don't miss it in the future.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp
wrote:
-0 (non-binding)
In the document, Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 is a minor
Thanks Arun for creating another rc!
+1 (non-binding)
- patched Tez 0.5.2 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1
- patched Hive 0.14 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1
- run several Hive queries on Tez
Thanks,
Akira
(11/14/14, 10:16), Wangda Tan wrote:
Thanks Arun!
Have tried compile, deploy and
Thanks Andrew for bringing this up.
+1 mostly looks fine but I'm thinking it's not now to cut branch-3.
classpath isolation
IMHO, classpath isolation is a good thing to do.
We should pay down the technical dept ASAP. I'm willing to help.
I'm thinking we can cut branch-3 and release 3.0 alpha
Hadoop community was continued to expand also in 2014.
We hope it will be the same in 2015.
Thanks,
Akira
On 2/13/14 11:20, Akira AJISAKA wrote:
Hi all,
We collected and analyzed JIRA tickets to investigate
the activities of Apache Hadoop Community in 2013.
http://ajisakaa.blogspot.com/2014/02
Thanks all for collecting jiras for 2.6.1 release. In addition, I'd like
to include the following:
* HADOOP-11343. Overflow is not properly handled in calculating final iv
for AES CTR
* YARN-2874. Dead lock in DelegationTokenRenewer which blocks RM to
execute any further apps
* YARN-2992.
Done. Thank you, Tsuyoshi.
On 4/15/15 14:55, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo
+0 (non-binding)
- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
- Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
- Looked Web UIs
I found several issues to be fixed.
- HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI Hadoop, 2014 is old
I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop
Hi Folks,
In MAPREDUCE-6307, I'd like to remove unused
mapreduce.tasktracker.taskmemorymanager.monitoringinterval property,
however, the compatibility document says Hadoop-defined properties are
to be deprecated at least for one major release before being removed.
to the 2.6.1-candidate list. I included everything
even though some of them are major tickets. The list is getting large, we
will have to cut these down once we get down to the next phase of figuring
out what to include and what not to.
Thanks
+Vinod
On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa
Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
ajisakaa/common-merge branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
jiras.
Thanks,
Akira
On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
I hope someone tests this against JDK6,
12, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp
wrote:
Thanks all for collecting jiras for 2.6.1 release. In addition, I'd like
to include the following:
* HADOOP-11343. Overflow is not properly handled in calculating final iv
for AES CTR
* YARN-2874. Dead lock
Thanks Vinod for starting 2.7.2 release plan.
The focus obviously is to have blocker issues [2], bug-fixes and *no*
features / improvements.
Can we adopt the plan as Karthik mentioned in Additional maintenance
releases for Hadoop 2.y versions thread? That way we can include not
only blocker
Thanks Vinod for updating the candidate list.
I'd like to include the followings 12 JIRAs:
* YARN-3641
* YARN-3585
* YARN-2910
* HDFS-8431
* HDFS-7830
* HDFS-7763
* HDFS-7742
* HDFS-7235
* HDFS-7225
* MAPREDUCE-6324
* HADOOP-11934
* HADOOP-11491
Thanks,
Akira
On 7/18/15 11:13, Vinod Kumar
Thanks Sangjin for creating RC for 2.6.2. +1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Deployed a single node cluster
- Built Tez 0.7.0 with Hadoop 2.6.2 pom
- Built Hive 1.2.1 with Hadoop 2.6.2 pom
- Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully
Regards,
Akira
On 10/23/15 06:14, Sangjin
+1, thanks Allen and Andrew.
Regards,
Akira
On 7/3/15 22:31, Devaraj K wrote:
+1
Thanks Allen and Andrew for your efforts on this.
Thanks
Devaraj
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Varun Vasudev vvasu...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Many thanks to Allen and Andrew for driving this.
-Varun
On
by other columns works fine.
Is anyone else able to reproduce the issue? I checked 2.6.0, and it works
fine on 2.6.0.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi all,
After a nearly month long [1] toil, with loads of help from Sangjin Lee
and
; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org;
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org; Sangjin Lee <sjl...@gmail.com>; Akira AJISAKA
<ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:10 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1
Hi all,
Af
Thanks Vinod and Sangjin for releasing 2.6.1 and starting discussion for
2.6.2!
+1. If there's anything I can help you with, please tell me.
Thanks,
Akira
On 9/25/15 13:23, Vinayakumar B wrote:
Thanks Vinod and Sangjin for making 2.6.1 release possible.
Apologies for not getting time to
Thanks Junping for starting release process.
I noticed there are duplicated tags:
* release-2.6.3-RC0
* release-2.6.3-RC0.1
* release-2.6.3-RC1
Could you remove RC0.1 and RC1?
Regards,
Akira
On 12/16/15 10:17, yliu wrote:
Thanks Junping, +1.
Download the tarball and deploy a small HDFS/YARN
+1 for releasing 2.6.4 after release 2.7.2.
I'll work on the list [2].
Thanks,
Akira
On 1/7/16 08:59, Junping Du wrote:
Hello folks,
Hope everyone had a wonderful holiday and good rest in passed weeks. We
just had a 2.6.3 release on Dec.17 and now it is a good time to look forward to
Thanks Vinod for starting the discussion.
I'm +1 for cherry-picking these issues to 2.7.2.
As Andrew said, when users upgrade Hadoop from 2.6.3 to 2.7.2,
they can hit the issues.
I'm thinking we should reduce the regressions as possible.
Regards,
Akira
On 12/25/15 01:56, Andrew Wang wrote:
My
+1 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2
- Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries
My late +1 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2
- Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0 using Hadoop 2.6.3 pom successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries
Thanks Allen for reporting.
Agreed that HDFS-10256 broke the tests. Filed HDFS-10561.
Regards,
Akira
On 6/19/16 03:54, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 17, 2016, at 7:04 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
For more details, see
The general rule sounds good to me.
> "any fix in 2.x.y to be there in all 2.b.c releases (while b>=x) that
get out after 2.x.y release date"
+1
> I would prefer this rule only applies on critical/blocker fixes, but
not applies on minor/trivial issues.
+1
Thanks,
Akira
On 12/29/15
Hi Xiao,
> From a quick comparison between the releasenotes.html and the
CHANGES.txt
> files in source tarball, the number of total JIRAs is quite different.
In CHANGES.txt, JIRAs fixed in 2.6.1/2.6.2 are not in 2.7.2.
That is why the number of JIRAs are different.
Regards,
Akira
On
Thanks Vinod for the information.
+1 for removing origin/bracnh-2.8 and origin/sjlee/hdfs-merge.
In addition, I'm thinking we need to delete origin/master,
which was pushed wrongly. I've already deleted
origin/ajisakaa/common-merge before force-push protection starts.
> — There is a general
+1 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.2 using Hadoop 2.6.4 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully
Thanks,
Akira
On 2/4/16
+1 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully
Thanks,
Akira
On
+1 for the 3.0 release plan and continuing 2.x releases.
I'm thinking we should consider stopping new 2.x minor releases after
3.x reaches GA.
Thanks,
Akira
On 2/19/16 10:33, Gangumalla, Uma wrote:
Yes. I think starting 3.0 release with alpha is good idea. So it would get
some time to reach
Thank you Vinod!
FYI: 2.7.3 will be a bit special release.
HDFS-8791 bumped up the datanode layout version,
so rolling downgrade from 2.7.3 to 2.7.[0-2]
is impossible. We can rollback instead.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791
> Also, the docs target (mvn package -Pdocs -DskipTests) is completely
busted on branch-2, I figured I have to backport a whole bunch of
patches that are only on trunk, and may be more fixes on top of that *sigh*
To fix this failure, HADOOP-12022 should be backported to branch-2 and
+1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the
version in trunk.
Thanks,
Akira
On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hi developers,
We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's
essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.
+1.
- Checked out HADOOP-12930
- Built by "mvn package -Pdist -DskipTests -Dtar" successfully
- Added custom subcommands to ~/.hadooprc and confirmed they worked
- Built documentation and it looks good
Thanks,
Akira
On 5/15/16 02:33, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
This vote closes in 2 days and the
Hi developers,
Before cutting 3.0.0-alpha RC, I'd like to drop JDK7 support in trunk.
Given this is a critical change, I'm thinking we should get the
consensus first.
One concern I think is, when the minimum version is set to JDK8, we need
to configure Jenkins to disable multi JDK test only
+1 for the source tarball.
- Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Compiled Hive 2.1.0/1.2.1 and Tez 0.8.4/0.7.1 using Hadoop 2.7.3 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully
Thanks,
Thanks Vinod and Andrew for the summary.
> Here's an attempt at encoding this policy as a set of rules for
setting fix
> versions (credit to Allen):
>
> 1) Set the fix version for all a.b.c versions, where c > 0.
> 2) For each major release line, set the lowest a.b.0 version.
Assuming
As I commented in the jira, I'm +1 for upgrading.
-Akira
On 6/29/16 10:16, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
No objections here?
- Tsuyoshi
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hi developers,
I will plan to upgrade Google Guice dependency on trunk. The change
also
Hi Marton,
This is intentional. source htmls were removed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13688
Regards,
Akira
On 2017/01/22 0:50, Marton Elek wrote:
hadoop-3.0.0-alpha2.tar.gz is much more smaller than
hadoop-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz. (246M vs 316M)
The big difference is the
Thanks Sangjin for finding this.
> It looks like hadoop-cloud-storage-project was missed in the version set?
Yes. Probably this is because
hadoop-cloud-storage-project
is missing in pom.xml so `mvn versions:set` did not work for the
project. Filed HADOOP-14004 for fixing this.
Regards,
Thanks Vinod for cutting another RC.
+1
- Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Compiled Hive 2.1.0/1.2.1 and Tez 0.8.4/0.7.1 using Hadoop 2.7.3 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully
-1 (binding)
HADOOP-13434 and HADOOP-11814, committed between RC0 and RC1, are not
reflected in the release note.
-Akira
On 8/17/16 13:29, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
-1
HDFS-9395 is an incompatible change:
a) Why is not marked as such in the changes file?
b) Why is an incompatible change
Thanks Andrew for the great work.
+1 (binding)
- Downloaded source and verified checksum and signature
- Compiled with -Pnative @ CentOS 7.2 and OpenJDK 8u101
- Ran some MapReduce jobs successfully
- Checked Web UIs and logs
- hdfs/yarn/mapred "--daemon" option works as expected
Regards,
Akira
Yes. I can help with releasing them.
-Akira
On 9/9/16 15:31, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Chiwan Park reported Hadoop incompatibility by the change of HADOOP-11252.
Now, HADOOP-13579 is committed to branch-2.6 and branch-2.7.
complement: HADOOP-13579 fixes the problem of incompatibility by
Hi Sangjin,
When using binary tarball, I'm seeing
"2016-09-27T18:26Z by sjlee from branch-2.6.5" in Web UI.
Can we rename it?
AFAIK, hadoop releases were built by hortonmu in 2014 and was renamed to
jenkins.
*
ould you change the name to 'jenkins' by using
the Jenkins infra?"
Regards,
Akira
On 10/7/16 03:04, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Oct 5, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
Can we rename it?
AFAIK, hadoop releases were built by hortonmu in 2014 and was
-0 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Compiled successfully with both JDK6 and JDK7
- Compiled and built a single node cluster
- Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.1/0.8.4 using Hadoop 2.6.5 pom
successfully
- Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2
It's almost a year since branch-2.8 has cut.
I'm thinking we need to release 2.8.0 ASAP.
According to the following list, there are 5 blocker and 6 critical issues.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985
Regards,
Akira
On 10/18/16 10:47, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
Hi Vinod,
I proceed.
Thanks,
-Eric
--
*From:* Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
*To:* Ming Ma <min...@twitter.com>
*Cc:* Sangjin Lee <sjl...@gmail.com>; Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com>;
Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>; Brahma Reddy B
This discussion was split into two separate topics.
1) Remove line length checkstyle rule for package line
2) Remove line length checkstyle rule for the entire source code
1) I'm +1 for removing the rule for package line. I can provide a
trivial patch shortly in HADOOP-13603.
2) As Andrew
-2?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:
It's almost a year since branch-2.8 has cut.
I'm thinking we need to release 2.8.0 ASAP.
According to the following list, there are 5 blocker and 6 critical issues.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/
I'm sorry I was wrong. Thanks Allen for the detailed information.
-Akira
On 10/7/16 15:04, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:39 PM, Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually built by and on
the J
Thanks Junping and Andrew!
HADOOP-2.8-JACC is not working well, so I manually kicked a job to
compare 2.8 with 2.7.3.
https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-trunk-JACC/24/artifact/target/compat-check/report.html
Regards,
Akira
On 2016/12/02 2:08, Junping Du wrote:
Thanks
please refer:
https://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/).
btw, I assume we only plan to change maven version on trunk given
new YARN UI only merge to trunk branch. Isn't it?
Thanks,
Junping
____
From: Akira Ajisaka <aaji
Hi YARN and MapReduce developers,
I'm working for Java 9 support and created a patch to replace '_' with
'__' in the hamlet framework (org.apache.hadoop.yarn.webapp.hamlet) used
by YARN and MapReduce webapp. In Java 9 '_' as a one-character
identifier is banned.
Based on the positive feedback from Junping, filed HADOOP-14285 for the
update.
Discussion can continue in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Akira
On 2017/04/05 12:56, Akira Ajisaka wrote:
Agreed to upgrade to 3.3+ and change the version only in trunk.
-Akira
On 2017/04/05 11:21, Sunil G wrote:
Thanks
HADOOP-14336 is the umbrella jira to fix the newly found warnings.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14336
Regards,
Akira
On 2017/04/20 3:12, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Apr 19, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
That sounds scary. Would you mind to
Probably 2.8.0 will be released soon.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?focusedCommentId=15898379=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15898379
I'm thinking 2.7.4 release process starts after 2.8.0 release,
so 2.7.4 will be released in April
Thanks Konstantin for the work!
I have a question: Where are the maven artifacts deployed?
-Akira
On 2017/07/30 8:29, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
Hi everybody,
Here is the next release of Apache Hadoop 2.7 line. The previous stable
release 2.7.3 was available since 25 August, 2016.
Release
/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1061/
They are not released yet, which happens once the release is approved.
See in Publishing section #5
https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePreDSBCR#Publishing
Thanks,
--Konst
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org
<mailto
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksum and the signature of the source tarball
- Built from source with CentOS 7.2 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_141
- Built Hive 2.1.0/2.3.0 and Tez 0.8.5/0.9.0 with Hadoop 2.7.4 artifacts
- Built single node cluster and ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully
Regards,
Thanks Andrew!
+1 (binding)
* Verified signatures and checksums
* Built from source on CentOS 7.2 with OpenJDK 1.8.0_131 with -Pnative
* Deployed pseudo-distributed cluster and ran some example job
* The change log and the release notes look good.
Regards,
Akira
On 2017/06/30 11:40, Andrew
-6024.
May be we can raise one Jira to track this..?
--Brahma Reddy Battula
-Original Message-
From: Akira Ajisaka [mailto:aajis...@apache.org]
Sent: 25 April 2017 15:36
To: Haohui Mai
Cc: Brahma Reddy Battula; Andrew Wang; Sangjin Lee; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli;
Marton Elek; Hadoop Common
issues resolved in the release. Disable mail
notifications for this bulk change.
Therefore, let's close them.
On 2017/04/27 3:01, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:35 AM, Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org> wrote:
Maybe we should create a jira to track this?
I think no
,
old
release script, anything else) I would be happy to do any task for
new maintenance releases (or more frequent releases).
Regards,
Marton
________
From: Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 7:34 AM
To: Brahma Reddy
Hi Konstantin,
Thank you for volunteering as release manager!
> Actually the original link works fine: https://s.apache.org/Dzg4
I couldn't see the link. Maybe is it private filter?
Here is a link I generated: https://s.apache.org/ehKy
This filter includes resolved issue and excludes
Hi folks,
Now we are migrating from logging APIs (log4j, commons-logging) to slf4j for
upgrading from log4j1 to log4j2.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956
I really appreciate if you are using slf4j APIs in the code instead of other
logging APIs.
Thanks and regards,
Akira
2.8 and trunk in
following link.??
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP
From: Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 3:58 AM
To: Akira Ajisaka
Cc: Hadoop Common; Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5988
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6304
I will raise a JIRAs to back port it.
@Akira , could you help to add these JIRAs into wiki?
Thanks & Regards
Rohith Sharma K S
On 29 May 2017 at 12:19, Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org> wrote:
Thanks Andrew for the reminder!
I've checked the commit log and set 2.9.0 to the issue if the patch is
committed in branch-2.
-Akira
On 2017/05/08 6:21, Andrew Wang wrote:
Hi folks,
I've noticed with the backporting efforts for 2.8.1, we're losing some
x.y.0 fix versions (e.g. 2.9.0). Our
Hi folks,
I found MapReduce precommit job is still using Yetus 0.3.0.
Would someone upgrade Yetus in this precommit job or would someone give me a
privilege to fix it?
Thanks,
Akira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi folks,
https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ is no longer editable.
If you want to edit a wiki page in wiki.apache.org,
you need to migrate the page to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Home.
If you want to edit the wiki, please tell me your account
for cwiki.apache.org.
Yes, qbt runs nightly and it sends e-mail to dev lists.
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/
Regards,
Akira
On 2017/10/19 7:54, Wangda Tan wrote:
Hi,
Do we still have nightly (or even weekly) unit test run for Hadoop
projects? I couldn't find it on Jenkins dashboard
+1
* Downloaded source tarball and verified checksum and signature
* Compiled the source with OpenJDK 1.8.0_151 and CentOS 7.4
* Deployed a pseudo cluster and ran some simple MR jobs
I noticed ISA-L build options are documented in BUILDING.txt
but the options do not exist in 2.x releases.
Filed
Hi Andrew,
Signatures are missing. Would you upload them?
Thanks,
Akira
On 2017/11/15 6:34, Andrew Wang wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanks as always to the many, many contributors who helped with this
release. I've created RC0 for Apache Hadoop 3.0.0. The artifacts are
available here:
> - When did we stop putting CHANGES files into the source artifacts?
CHANGES files were removed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11792
> - Even after "mvn install"ing once, shading is repeated again and again for
every new 'mvn install' even though there are no source
+ common-dev and mapreduce-dev
On 2018/04/27 6:23, Owen O'Malley wrote:
As we discussed in hdfs-dev@hadoop, I did a force push to Hadoop's trunk to
replace the Ozone merge with a rebase.
That means that you'll need to rebase your branches.
.. Owen
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures and checksums
- built from source and setup 4 node cluster
- ran some examples jobs
- verified some HDFS operations
Thanks,
Akira
On 2018/03/22 10:08, Robert Kanter wrote:
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures and checksums
- setup pseudo cluster using Fair
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo