In a message dated 1/6/2009 2:21:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jann...@gmail.com writes:
An industrial capital formation as a historically distinct sector of
capital
no longer exist. I am not aware of one single economist of note that speaks
of an industrial sector of capital. Not one.
Comrade Case puts forth several points as immediate and partial solution to
the 2008 crisis. These points begin with:
1). Economic infrastructures, including much of the financial system must
be further socialized. This is necessary to begin the large institutional
restructuring process
Re: [PEN-L] Systemic Threat?
Eubulides
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:34:29 -0800
On 11/10/05, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Carrol,
For financial economists, systemic threat means a situation where the
regular functioning of the financial markets (i.e. the equity, forex and
the futures markets)
Exactly. Though I would recommend the whole of Part IV of _Capital_
Vol. I to get the whole swoop on the Industrial Revolution.
Part IV: Production of Relative Surplus Value
Ch. 12: The Concept of Relative Surplus-Value
Ch. 13: Co-operation
Ch. 14: Division of Labour and Manufacture
Ch. 15:
Speculation as speculative capital, denotes something different than
speculation - risk taking, on the part of finance capital during the era of
Lenin.
Speculative capital as a concept means investment and risk taking on the basis
of financial institutions more than less detached from
WL: I am not aware of one single economist of note that speaks
of an industrial sector of capital.
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 5,210,000 for Industrial sector of capital.
(0.23 seconds)
Search ResultsIndustrial Sector Outlook - Capital Spending Trends (2 of
2 ...Full Study Keywords:
And see:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/elkonin/works/1971/stages.htm
Also important to note that Piaget, in attempting to work out a
description of the 'sciences of man', integrates Marxism into his
system.
On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Charles Brown wrote:
CeJ jannuzi
Poor CB,he can't even tell when I agree with him. Dude, if you would
stop soaking your ass in places like A-hole list, Marxmal and Liberal
Bored Observer, maybe we could communicate occasionally.
CJ
^
CB: As a linguist
CB: Sure. The goal is a class_less_ society. The working class is an
exploited/oppressed class. The aim in no exploiting or exploited classes.
But in the transitional stage, the working class is the ruling class. That's
before the total abolition of classes.
^^
and that the
Charles,
I don't know whether the KKK lynched anybody in 1916, but not only
wasn't that the question, but an accurate answer to it doesn't enter
into what we were discussing...which was Harry Truman's 1922
membership in the KKK.
In that context, the point of your eagerness to begin using the
The ideas that nothing has changed since Lenin is just intellectual laziness
and a refusal to admit that things change at best and dogmatism at worse.
GMAC not GM is the master of GM. GMAC is GM.
.
Dude, its all finance capital.
I'm not sure I'm following your arguments. One, who here has said
What a dazzling use of language from our linguist! Missed it first
time around, because CeJ goes straight to /dev/null.
Hey since irony is out this year (leftists have a world to save), I'll
take that as a compliment, even from someone like Duff Henwood. Thanks
Duff, and Happy New Year to you.
CB: As a linguist , you know it takes two to communicate (smile)
Extended quotes aren't communication if no one reads them, and they
seem to bring in a third party, don't they?
CJ
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To
CB: What are some of the specifics of that integration ?
That's a good question. I'll get back to you on that. I have a work on
the philosophy of 'human' sciences by Piaget (he was commissioned to
write it a few years before Lyotard was commissioned to tell us about
the post-modern episteme) but
CB: What are some of the specifics of that integration ?
First, a correction. I must have imagined any Piaget-Vygotsky
correspondence. Piaget only found out about Vygotsky's work after his
death, through contact with people who studied under Vygotsky.
Second, we have discussed this before (or at
Seems to me you do in fact get the distinction between productive capital
and speculative capital. A good Ponzi scheme is not back until it collapses.
Profits to be made from that side of the business constituting productive
capital has never been bad business.
On the other hand this
16 matches
Mail list logo
