Jeff writes:
I don't know about you, but I supported the fight against fascism as part
of the class war, not because I like one of the nations better than the
other! If Russians came to view it as a war between nations, I would
call
that an ideological failure. And indeed one encouraged by
Dennis Brasky writes:
Of course, the proof is in the eating. If it's Obama vs a real greater
evil - Palin or Huckerbee in 2012, we'll see if the Lindorffs and
Greenwalds continue to hold their noses and vote lesser evil to stop
impending fascism.
=
Maybe some leftists
Dennis Brasky writes:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Marv Gandall
marvgand...@videotron.cawrote:
At present, as between the two parties, a split within the Republicans
seems
more likely, with the rich patrician wing which formerly controlled the
party now sensing it has more in common
Artesian writes:
As for your spark a run on the dollar would lead to a grave international
economic and political crisis whose outcome would more likely than not be
catastrophic rather than positive for both the Chinese and American
working
classes, that is simply absurd...
It's the
Lehman's collapse almost brought down the money-market industry
By Sam Mamudi, MarketWatch
September 9 2009
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- As the threat of a Lehman Brothers bankruptcy grew
last September, many money-market fund managers were wary but not worried.
Their industry had quietly grown
Finance Overhaul Falters as '08 Shock Fades
By DAVID ENRICH and DAMIAN PALETTA
Wall Street Journal
September 9 2009
Nearly one year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers sent shock waves
across the globe, the world is a different place.
The investment bank's messy death intensified the deepest
overproduction of commodities and overproduction of capital
(overaccumulation).
-Ernest Mandel, Marx's Theory of Crisis
http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article289
- Original Message -
From: S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net
To: Marv Gandall marvgand...@videotron.ca
Sent: Monday
Luko writes one might say, that China is saving world wide capitalism from
deeper
crises, but I prefer China growing than starving so that the working masses
in
the imperialist countries fall into misery. I have never been a follower of
the
the worse the better strategy.
Artesian writes:
...so I wouldn't
rush out and buy shares in Baosteel based on the WSA article, know what I
mean?
==
Jeez, Artesian, anyone following your investment advice would have been
short China and long the US market since 2000, and we know where they'd
Dennis Brasky writes:
If the Israeli Jews are offered self determination after the coming
socialist revolution, what form will that take? Won't it be a Jewish state
in Palestine - where the Palestinians would want their state? But the Jews
already have such a state, so why do they need a
Artesian writes:
Dennis is quite write to point out that there is no such thing as
self-determination for the Afrikaners in South Africa, for the Israelis in
the Middle East, just as the French in Algeria were not entitled to, nor
struggling for self-determination.
Proyect l...@panix.com
To: Marv Gandall marvgand...@videotron.ca
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] self determination for oppressors
Marv Gandall wrote:
It's not possible to conceive of a socialist revolution in
Palestine/Israel
which would not involve the participation
Artesian writes:
[...]
If, however, you're referring to the the type of deal struck by de Klerk,
Botha with Mandela, then preserving cultural identity of the minority is
a
non-issue at best, a joke at worst, as the economic and social power of
the
minority has been preserved.
Artesian writes:
[...]
No, I don't consider the end of apartheid a joke-- never said any such
thing-- but the sort of Mandela-de Klerk deal does not bring democracy, or
secularism, or socialism.
Thanks for clarifying.
Does anyone think the Afrikaners made this deal out of the goodness of
Artesian writes:
I no more deny that apartheid was broken than I would deny that segregation
by race has been dismantled in the South.
My last word on the subject but as you know I say that often, usually
after I have already given assurances of my last word on the subject.
Bhaskar writes:
That .pdf that I linked to is still recommended...
=
Yes, well worth reading. ...the concept of instrumentalism that is so
closely associated with Ralph Miliband’s theory of the state is not merely
an oversimplication and caricature of
Artesian writes:
From the Financial Times of 19 October:
Russian plans to raise $18bn with international bond
Russia is to launch its first international bond in a decade to bolster
its
public finances and take advantage of the surge in demand for emerging
market debt.
From a speech to the Senate by Delaware Senator Ted Kaufman, published in
yesterday's Huffington Post:
(High frequency or flash trading refers to the growing practice of
investment houses like Goldman Sachs to locate and program servers next to
exchanges, giving them split second advance access
Thomas Bias writes:
The Fourth International was launched to combat Stalinism and social
democracy in the working class, with the belief that without doing so
socialist revolution was not possible.
It's a little more complicated than that. The Trotskyists
Matt Russo posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/business/economy/09econ.html?ref=business
A widening gap between data and reality is distorting the government’s
picture of the country’s economic health, overstating growth and
productivity in ways that could affect the political debate on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Ralph Johansen writes:
S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net wrote
From the FRB
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis wrote:
...an open letter signed by some high-profile Obama
supporters
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis wrote:
The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you are going to
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
U.S. Keeps Foreign Ph.D.s
Despite Fears of a Post-9/11 Drop, Most Science,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-02-06, at 12:48 PM, Greg McDonald wrote:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The effect:
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for Blankfein, Dimon
By Julianna
:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Marv Gandall wrote:
The effect:
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for Blankfein, Dimon By Julianna
Goldman
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
sent in error...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marv Gandall marvgand
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-04, at 5:50 PM, Gary MacLennan wrote:
I thought the reference to
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-09, at 6:16 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
On 2010-03-09, at 4:21 PM, Louis
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
My wife and I saw the Hurt Locker on cable last night. I must have missed Louis
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At the Tea Party
By Jonathan Raban
New York Review of Books
March 25, 2010
People
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-16, at 9:12 AM, Mark Lause wrote:
Lajany Otum is reading far too much
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-07-25, at 7:19 PM, MICHAEL YATES wrote:
Full at
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-07-26, at 10:26 AM, Carrol Cox wrote:
So?
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Below, standard boilerplate from the Tory economic columnist Ambrose
.
==
On 8/2/10 3:56 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
Thank Hans, Les. I'll revert to my previous email acct in order to get
copies...
according to google:
When you send a message to any mailing list you subscribe to, Gmail
automatically skips your inbox and archives
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-04, at 12:01 AM, michael perelman wrote:
The New York Times
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Fed appears poised to resume quantitative easing both because legitimate
fears
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angry flight attendant swears at passenger, quits, and leaves plane by
emergency
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-21, at 11:50 AM, Michael Perelman wrote:
The accusations have been
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yet another magic bullet we have always been hoping for, this time from the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
World Bank data shows investment by state-run companies accounted for a bigger
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-30, at 4:02 PM, Andrew Pollack wrote:
Pathetic.
After a very
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, co-authors of numerous studies on the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-09-07, at 9:00 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
Louis,
[…]
The central
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-09-07, at 4:50 PM, Eli Stephens wrote:
Actually much more interesting
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Lucid five part series, with links...
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-10-21, at 10:57 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
Of course, the most powerful
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-02, at 9:50 PM, sobuadha...@hushmail.com wrote:
The anguished
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Here's one Marine Corps Major General I'd be prepared to posthumously absolve:
I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-16, at 12:45 PM, Intense Red wrote:
One can find many aspects of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(The PA is using the threat of a unilateral declaration of independence next
year
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-05, at 11:31 AM, S. Artesian wrote:
As for China. China was
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-05, at 3:12 PM, DW wrote:
The term Client State is a bit in-exact. I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-06, at 1:14 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
This is essentially the EU
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
But so far it's only
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-07, at 8:58 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:
Obama: On the way to a failed
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-07, at 7:00 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Beginning of the End of Dollar Hegemony
By RANDALL W. FORSYTH
Barron's
December
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Polling showed large majorities in favor of the Roosevelt administration,
federal
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(Long article with many links)
Underneath the Happy Talk, Is This As Bad as the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
China Squeezes Foreigners for Share of Global Riches
By SHAI OSTER, NORIHIKO
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Wall Street Warms to China Story
By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
Wall Street Journal
January 2
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-04, at 4:24 AM, r...@riseup.net wrote:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-06, at 12:52 PM, James Holstun wrote:
As the Fiscal Policy Institute
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
1. A biting satire on the ubiquitous charge of anti-semitism:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Without describing it in these blunt terms, Financial Times economic columnist
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-10, at 5:50 PM, Mark Lause wrote:
I think it's hard to take the issue
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-10, at 6:47 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
In fact, how can a young white
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
While there is no clear indication that Loughner was directly influenced by
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-12, at 6:51 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
...I describe him as
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-12, at 9:55 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
...if someone stabbed a
stranger
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-13, at 1:58 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
Loughner was *not* a terrorist.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(The link to this New Yorker article was posted to the lists moderated by Julio
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-23, at 6:45 AM, Lenin's Tomb wrote:
The reality is that unionisation
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-23, at 11:55 AM, Einde O'Callaghan wrote:
79 matches
Mail list logo