On Dec 5, 2007 6:14 PM, James Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just submitted a patch to the Annotation class that allows
> specification of a 'data offset' frame for the text coordinate. This allows
> you to specify a data point to annotate and an offset that will stay the
> same regard
All,
I have just submitted a patch to the Annotation class that allows specification
of a 'data offset' frame for the text coordinate.
This allows you to specify a data point to annotate and an offset that will
stay the same regardless of scale. Please let me know
if this should be given a d
I feel a 0.91.2 in the next few weeks, and I'll be sure to do this and
send you a test build.
- Charlie
On Dec 5, 2007 1:30 PM, Russell E Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:03 AM -0800 2007-12-05, Christopher Barker wrote:
> >Russell E Owen wrote:
> >>At 10:08 AM -0500 2007-12-05, Stephen Uh
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> ...probably because I forgot to attach it. (When will my e-mail
>> client read my mind?) I've also attached a version with a new version
>> of the layout algorithm -- in addition to making all axes that were
>> initially aligned remain aligned
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> ...probably because I forgot to attach it. (When will my e-mail
> client read my mind?) I've also attached a version with a new version
> of the layout algorithm -- in addition to making all axes that were
> initially aligned remain aligned, it sets an axes that ori
Russell E Owen wrote:
> At 10:08 AM -0500 2007-12-05, Stephen Uhlhorn wrote:
>> Just for my edification, why can't the egg version be linked
>> against/include a different Tcl/Tk?
>
> If you mean why can't it be built that way in the first place, I
> don't know. The guy who builds it apparently d
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I'm embarrassed to admit I wasn't familiar with mplsizer before I
> looked into this. The user "API" of mplsizer actually looks like it
> would be much easier to support the text-overlapping problem, since
> the placement of the axes in a grid is more exp
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 11:32:29 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
> > Darren Dale wrote:
> >>> One other problem to be aware of in this area: usetex does not support
> >>> rotated text, so autofmt_xdate and related tricks will still not work
> >>> until usetex supports
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
>>> One other problem to be aware of in this area: usetex does not support
>>> rotated text, so autofmt_xdate and related tricks will still not work
>>> until usetex supports arbitrary rotations. One thing that has been on
>>> my wish list is to expos
Darren Dale wrote:
>> One other problem to be aware of in this area: usetex does not support
>> rotated text, so autofmt_xdate and related tricks will still not work
>> until usetex supports arbitrary rotations. One thing that has been on
>> my wish list is to expose the agg image functionality a
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 09:39:33 am John Hunter wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 4:02 PM, Ted Drain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks very nice! We'd love to have smarter layout systems as we
> > create a lot of plots for people (i.e. standard scripts that people
> > run instead of edit) and it's
Thanks Mike. I checked the contents of all the .cvsignore files and compared
them with propget svn:ignore. I removed every instance of .cvsignore, with
the exception of toolkits/basemap/.cvsignore and
toolkits/basemap-0.9.6.1/.cvsignore.
Darren
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 09:16:11 am Michae
On Dec 4, 2007 4:02 PM, Ted Drain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks very nice! We'd love to have smarter layout systems as we
> create a lot of plots for people (i.e. standard scripts that people
> run instead of edit) and it's difficult to apply nice layouts that
> work for every case that comes
It looks like these are already set in the "SVN way" (maybe cvs2svn did it):
> svn propget svn:ignore .
build
dist
docs
*.pyc
.project
matplotlibrc
win32_static
...so it's probably safe to remove them, unless we plan to migrate back
to CVS someday ;)
Cheers,
Mike
Darren Dale wrote:
> Is it
Is it safe to remove the instances of .cvsignore from the svn repository?
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.
Andrew,
I'm embarrassed to admit I wasn't familiar with mplsizer before I looked
into this. The user "API" of mplsizer actually looks like it would be
much easier to support the text-overlapping problem, since the placement
of the axes in a grid is more explicit. I may want to reconsider how
16 matches
Mail list logo
