Re: [matplotlib-devel] Matplotlib's new default colormap

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Phil Elson wrote: > Please use this thread to discuss the best choice for a new *default* > matplotlib colormap. > > This follows on from a discussion on the matplotlib-devel mailing list > entitled "How to move beyond JET as the default matplotlib colormap". >

[matplotlib-devel] attaching images to github issues

Hurray! https://github.com/blog/1347-issue-attachments -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and

Re: [matplotlib-devel] BUG: Qt4Agg backend save figure io-slave error

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Philippe MALLET wrote: > Dear all, > > When I use the Qt4Agg backend and I want to save the figure by clicking the > save button, I get this Error message: > > kfilemodule(5951): couldn't create slave: "Unable to create io-slave: > klauncher said: Protocole « » in

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Time to delete backend_qt (QT3)?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Eric Firing wrote: >> >> Is there any good reason *not* to delete support for Qt3 from master? >> Is anyone who is using it likely to be able to upgrade to the next mpl >> release, and yet *not* be able t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Embedding a plot in gtk3

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Narf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm porting a python application that makes use of matplotlib from > gtk2 to gtk3. I don't think matplotlib includes support for PyGObject yet, so gtk3 is not supported. --

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] ipython intermittently segfaults when figure is closed.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > >>> >>> Darren, >>> >>> I thought the Sourceforge tracker was supposed to be closed to new >>> entries >>> after your transition to github--is that not the case? >> >> Unfortunately, disabling the sourceforge tracker makes the links I >> create

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/20/2011 11:29 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > >> Ok, I've migrated the issues over to github. >> >> Darren > > Darren, > > Thank you.  Now I see another possible problem with the issue tracker: > it

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/15/2011 10:35 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > >> >> I figured out how to migrate soureforges tracker to github issues with >> the new github api. There are 232 open issues on the sourceforge >> tracker, 79 of which

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/15/2011 10:35 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > >> >> I figured out how to migrate soureforges tracker to github issues with >> the new github api. There are 232 open issues on the sourceforge >> tracker, 79 of which

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 06/15/2011 01:00 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Michael Droettboom >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >>>> >>>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:06 AM, John Hunter  wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Darren Dale  wrote: >>> >>>> I su

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:06 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > >> I suggest we make a 1.1.x branch from the current state of master, and >> consider it as a placeholder for now. Then we bump the version number >> in the py3

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 06/13/2011 01:38 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Michael Droettboom >>  wrote: >>> >>> This was recently discussed in the thread "v1.0.x branch seems confuse

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote: > On 06/13/2011 07:38 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Michael Droettboom >>  wrote: >>> >>> This was recently discussed in the thread "v1.0.x branch seems confused.&q

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] Plan to merge the matplotlib-py3 branch?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > This was recently discussed in the thread "v1.0.x branch seems confused." > > I (believe) the consensus was to get out another v1.0.x maintenance > release out in the near future (which would not support py3k, but would > still support

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x RIP, long live v1.0.x-maint

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> We had some minor confusion with a merge a few weeks back, which >> pulled much of the master branch into the v1.0.x maintenance branch

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:39 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >>> >>> Before we made the git transition, I read about various workflows. >>> What we

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:39 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> Before we made the git transition, I read about various workflows. >> What we are doing now is somewhat similar to what used to be done with >> svnmerge. I

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

Matthew, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > ... >>> Even without the foulup, I think you would see that the merges from &g

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/02/2011 12:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Eric Firing  wrote: >>> Going forward, is there any good reason to retain all the old branches >>> (transforms, 0.91.x etc.)? >

[matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x RIP, long live v1.0.x-maint

Folks, We had some minor confusion with a merge a few weeks back, which pulled much of the master branch into the v1.0.x maintenance branch. I created a new v1.0.x-maint branch that rolled back all of the changes from that point on, and cherry-picked all of the changes that were actually intended

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 06/02/2011 11:48 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> [...] >>> >>> I had another look at the history after rereading Pauli's email. I'm >>> goin

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/02/2011 11:48 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > [...] >> >> I had another look at the history after rereading Pauli's email. I'm >> going to try the following on a temporary v1.0.x-cleanup branch: >> >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Eric F

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> > On 06/01/2011 12:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Eric Firin

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

Mike, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Yes, it seems that the v1.0.x got hosed somehow back in early May.  Eric > Firing did some spelunking and traced it to a push I made, but I'm not sure > what I did wrong, and I'm even less sure how to fix it.  If someone with > mor

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch seems confused

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >>> The current practice worked very nicely with SVN (IMHO), and I think it >> >> (I recall that Mike had to rescue us more than once from svnmerge >> confusions, at least during the

[matplotlib-devel] need advice on a crash report

Hi All, I'm trying to track down a sporadic Fatal python error in a complicated data analysis program I'm writing. Quick explanation: I have a qt gui that launches a python task-manager thread. That thread creates a multiprocessing.Pool, and iterates through a list of data in an hdf5 file, passing

Re: [matplotlib-devel] github pull requests: odd listings of hundreds of commits

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 05/18/2011 08:47 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Gerald Storer > > wrote: >> >>     On 18/05/2011 5:14 AM, Eric Firing wrote: >>      > 3) We don't have to always push sets of ch

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What is rcParams['units'] for?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Eric Firing wrote: > While investigating the imshow problem reported today by Emanuale > Passera (a problem that seems to have been fixed, though I don't know > when or how), I stumbled across the verbose-helpful report of the > "units" rcParams entry.  Sure enough

Re: [matplotlib-devel] New issue tracker on GitHub

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 04/11/2011 07:24 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom  wrote: >>> I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the >>> Github issue tracker, but

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Ok.  I hope I fixed it.  Here's what I did (from my clone of the > matplotlib/matplotlib repository) > >  > git branch v1.0.x e5970f4 >  > git push origin v1.0.x > > Looking at the commit history and contents at the tip of this branch, >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.0.x branch?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > Hi all, > > I thought we have a "v1.0.x" branch on the github repo, but no more. > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/branches > > Hmm... > Is it (accidentally?) removed or do we now use another branch for > maintenance (although I don

Re: [matplotlib-devel] New issue tracker on GitHub

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > (Hmm... git doesn't use its own issue tracker for tracking its own > issues... what does that say? ) Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments. ---

Re: [matplotlib-devel] New issue tracker on GitHub

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote: > Darren Dale, on 2011-04-11 13:24,  wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> > I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the >> > Github issue tracker, but

Re: [matplotlib-devel] New issue tracker on GitHub

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the > Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based on the new > Github issue tracker announced on Saturday: > > https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-ne

Re: [matplotlib-devel] windows immediately close after show()

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 04/04/2011 10:24 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> When I run some of the examples in pylab_examples, like >> simple_plot.py, the call to show() yields a window that immediately >> closes. This is with either the v1.0.x or ma

[matplotlib-devel] windows immediately close after show()

When I run some of the examples in pylab_examples, like simple_plot.py, the call to show() yields a window that immediately closes. This is with either the v1.0.x or master branches on OS X with python 2.7 and the qt4 backend, with interactive=True in matplotlibrc. When I change interactive to Fals

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git repository access

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:06 PM, James Evans wrote: > Hello All, > > > > I am finally getting around to checking out a local copy of the git > repository following the directions here: > > http://matplotlib.github.com/devel/gitwash/set_up_fork.html > > > > and I keep getting the following error: >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Python 3.x port status/roadmap

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I would love a Mac user to build and run regression tests on both Python > 2.x and Python 3.x, and run some interactive examples, particularly the > mac os backend, as I haven't been able to test that personally. I'm not able to get th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Python 3.x port status/roadmap

Hi Mike, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Things are looking pretty good over on the Python 3 branch, thanks to > the great work done at CTPUG, Sage Days 29 and elsewhere, and it > probably bears some discussion about where we'd like to go from here. > > I'm thinking

Re: [matplotlib-devel] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'HTTPSHandler'

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Nils Wagner wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:01:34 +0200 >  "Nils Wagner" wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am using the latest matplotlib. >> How can I resolve the following problem ? >> > import matplotlib >> Traceback (most recent call last): >>   File "", line 1, i

Re: [matplotlib-devel] I screwed up matplotlib/master on github

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: > Paul Ivanov writes: > >> I can't figure out a way to pull it from there, but I think Eric >> was the last to commit to trunk before I (destructively) pushed >> my stale copy. Eric's last commit hash was: >> 8506c33c811e970c6aa73a446d3ed2

Re: [matplotlib-devel] ImportError: Warning: formlayout requires PyQt4 >v4.3

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:23 PM, OriolV wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I get the same error ( 'ImportError: Warning: formlayout requires PyQt4 >>v4.3' ). I have spent a lot of hours but I am not able to solve it. I would > be very grateful if someone could let me know if there is a solution. > > Thank

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Merging instructions

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 03/07/2011 09:36 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: >> I just wrote this as a response to a question on >> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/32 >> about how to merge to v1.0.x and master. >> >> Please feel free to comment or ask for det

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Merging instructions

Hi Jouni, Thanks for doing this... On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: > I just wrote this as a response to a question on > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/32 > about how to merge to v1.0.x and master. > > Please feel free to comment or ask for details. > > ---

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Martin Teichma

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Martin Teichmann > wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, Hi list, >> >> > Exactly.  That's all I found too.  Nothing indicates that we need to >> > change anything.  We are throwing away the second part of the tuple >> > w

Re: [matplotlib-devel] make.osx: should it set --prefix=$PREFIX ?

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: > Fernando Garcia Bermudez writes: > >> Do you know if these changes will trickle to the py3 repo after >> merging into master? > > I don't know if we have a process in place for that. It depends on how > you view the py3 repo: if it's just

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Just for completeness, I wanted to include a link to some sort of reference > indicating a need to change the function.  I can not find any documentation > that says that we need to change from getSaveFileName() to > getSaveFileNameAndFilter(

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > As for the sourceforge/github confusion, we are currently in a transition > phase.  Our repository is now hosted on github, but the official website and > trackers are still sourceforge.  Sorry for any confusion there.  The > (un)official new

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Martin Teichmann > wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I'm using matplotlib as a library, in a program using the >> new APIs of PyQt4, which will be the normal APIs for >> Py

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Problems with new PyQt4 API

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Martin Teichmann wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm using matplotlib as a library, in a program using the > new APIs of PyQt4, which will be the normal APIs for > Python 3. Unfortunately, the matplotlib Qt4 backend is > not compatible with this new API. This really doesn't

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> If we are not convinced that github issues provides >> everything we need, I think we should provide feedback to the github >> devs and stick with sourceforge for the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Enhancement to matplotlib's PyQt4 backend

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Are you still maintaining the qt4 plot editor dialog? It doesn't > appear to be working properly: setting the marker and linestyle > options does not effect the plot (tested on Ubuntu Natty alpha, with &g

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Enhancement to matplotlib's PyQt4 backend

Hi Pierre, Are you still maintaining the qt4 plot editor dialog? It doesn't appear to be working properly: setting the marker and linestyle options does not effect the plot (tested on Ubuntu Natty alpha, with the v1.0.x branch on python-2.7 and PyQt4-4.8.3). I have a really hard time following the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > If we are not convinced that github issues provides > everything we need, I think we should provide feedback to the github > devs and stick with sourceforge for the time being. Having said that, depending on how the github devs re

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > If we are not convinced that github issues provides > everything we need, I think we should provide feedback to the github > devs and stick with sourceforge for the time being. Here is a copy of a message I just sent to supp...@githu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: > Darren Dale writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >>> On 02/26/2011 10:54 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>> >>> The submitter info is lost? >>> And when it was ori

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Github has been a wonderful tool for *developers*, but for > users of projects, I haven't seen the amount of sophistication and polish > that sourceforge has. > > I am personally fine with continuing to use sourceforge for the tracker (I > kn

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 02/26/2011 10:54 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Darren Dale  wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing  wrote: >>>> On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > Dropping 2.6 any time soon would be too drastic for my liking, though. > It would require that any development work done on recent ubuntu > systems, for example, would require first installing a non-default > version of python.  So, I hope the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing  wrote: >>>> On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 02/26/2011 09:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing  wrote: >>> On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perez     >>&

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 02/16/2011 08:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perez   >> wrote: >>> are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to github? >> >> Probably at some point. &g

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:29:55 -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote: > [clip] >> Yes.  The minimum version for this Python 3.x compatibility work is >> Python 2.6.  Anything earlier is just insane ;) > > Out of curiosity: did you consider using a s

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > How up to date is matplotlib-py3 with respect to the master branch? It is currently 5 commits behind matplotlib/master. -- Free Software Download: Index, Search

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:01 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> Are PIL and PyGTK holding back matplotlib for Python 3 > > Not at all. Both are optional dependencies. Mpl's hard external dependencies > are python, zlib, libpng, freetype and numpy.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patch for Bug ID: 3176823 plot_date does not respect timezone

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Maximilian Trescher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there, > > I just created my first patch for matplotlib, it's addressing bug 3176823. > > I send the patch with an example (as suggested in the faq). A pull request has been filed

[matplotlib-devel] make.osx pull request

Here is a pull request proposing some changes to make.osx: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/17 . I have never used make.osx myself. Could someone familiar with its use please have a look and decide whether the changes should be accepted? Thanks, Darren ---

Re: [matplotlib-devel] github devel question

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 02/25/2011 10:01 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ryan May  wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Darren Dale  wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Benjamin Root  wrote:

Re: [matplotlib-devel] github devel question

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Ryan May wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> Ok, I am still learning quite a bit about git, please bear with me. >>> >>> I am having difficu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] github devel question

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Ok, I am still learning quite a bit about git, please bear with me. > > I am having difficulty completing a pull request that I opened. In general, I don't think we should close our own pull requests. It short-circuits the review process. >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn is frozen; github migration underway

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >>>> * Jarrod offered to contribu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Possibility for internationalized sphinx docs?

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Hello all, > > Given some recent -- ahem -- difficulties with matplotlib users where > English is not their native language, it has dawned on me that maybe we > ought to consider making available translated versions of our > documentation.  I

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn is frozen; github migration underway

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >>> * Jarrod offered to contribute to the docs to describe the recommended >>> workflow. >> >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn is frozen; github migration underway

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> * Jarrod offered to contribute to the docs to describe the recommended >> workflow. > > I did a first pass at changing the documentation from describing svn >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn is frozen; github migration underway

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, John Hunter wrote: > I have removed everyone's commit access to the mpl svn server in > advance of the github migration, which is underway.  Darren will reply > when github is live. > > svn is dead, long live github! I just pushed the repositories up to github.com

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn is frozen; github migration underway

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> I have removed everyone's commit access to the mpl svn server in >> advance of the github migration, which is underway.  Darren will reply >> when github is live. > > Excellent!  I am gl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 02/16/2011 03:53 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Michael Droettboom  wrote: >>> Not sure Sourceforge allows custom hooks in SVN. >> We have a couple in place already >> >> >> https://sourceforge.net/project/

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: > are you guys planning on transfering the old bugs to github? Probably at some point. > As I > mentioned, I have code lying around for the upload (and to download > from launchpad, but that's irrelevant here).  I'm going to be mosly > offl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening >> at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:34:32 -0500, Darren Dale wrote: > [clip] >> Unfortunately, I am getting exactly the same results: the matplotlib/ >> directory is missing in the earliest history. I've tried adding >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Andrew Straw wrote: >> On 29-Jan-11 01:08, John Hunter wrote: >>> >>>> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/matplotlib co >>>> -P matplotlib

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Straw wrote: > >> On 07-Feb-11 17:13, Darren Dale wrote: >>> The git migration is still on hold, pending the return of CVS service >>> at sourceforge. According to someone

[matplotlib-devel] git migration

The git migration is still on hold, pending the return of CVS service at sourceforge. According to someone on the sourceforge IRC channel, CVS is estimated to return this week, but it might slip to next week. Darren -- Th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Fernando Garcia Bermudez wrote: > Before continuing the debug process, though, I wanted to check with > someone knowledgeable of this branch regarding its current status. Is > it possible to compile matplotlib on python3? Mike D. did some initial work for py3 supp

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Freetype bindings available

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I've made a basic first crack at this. > > Thanks to your examples, it was really easy to get basic text rendering with > matplotlib's Agg backend (the other backends will need to be updated > accordingly, and they may be more involved si

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening > at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home on > Saturday morning. > > If you have concerns, please sp

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Andrew Straw wrote: > On 29-Jan-11 01:08, John Hunter wrote: >> >>> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/matplotlib co >>> -P matplotlib >> >> cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to >> cvs.sourceforge.net(216.34.181.96):2401 failed: Connection refu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:56 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > >> Stitched in from where? The jdhunter branch appears to only contain >> one commit, so it only contains the contents of matplotlib/ for rev4. > > It's

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > >>> The first good svn version is apparently 541; the prior commit 540 had >>> the log message "reorganizes py code". >>> This was when we mov

Re: [matplotlib-devel] svn ancient history broken

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, John Hunter wrote: > I was trying to spot check the git repo by checking out the first > commit that we have a history for in the log > >> git checkout 48111d043ec52f9afb511ac447438877b236e7f3 > > and notice that the main code directory 'matplotlib' was missing.  I

[matplotlib-devel] git migration this weekend

Hi Folks, I'm planning on freezing the sourceforge svn repository Friday evening at 8:00 (NY time), and moving the git repository to its new home on Saturday morning. If you have concerns, please speak up. Darren -- Spe

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > to, 2011-01-27 kello 13:44 -0500, Darren Dale kirjoitti: > [clip] >> Still, Even after removing the the largest blob in the repo with >> >> run git filter-branch --index-filter \ >>    'git rm --

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:39:48 -0500, Darren Dale wrote: > [clip] >> Me too. I just posted the latest version of the repository to >> github.com/darrendale/matplotlib.git . Its ~42MB, but it has a bunch of >> unreachabl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:00 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote: >>> And some of the biggest blobs are associated with svg and pdf files. >>> It seems possible to re

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > And some of the biggest blobs are associated with svg and pdf files. > It seems possible to remove these files (if needed) from the > repository using "git-filter-branch" to further reduce the size, but > I'm not sure if we need that. Some o

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: >> The complete magic stanza is: >> >> git reflog expire --expire=0 --all >> git prune >> git repack -f -a -d >> git gc --prune=0 > > Wonderful! > With this, I get about 40 MB! How did y

Re: [matplotlib-devel] git-svn matplotlib mirror

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Darren Dale wrote: > Last night I noticed that, in the git repo, the commit messages > produced by svnmerge.py still contain a lot of svn-specific > information. Pauli's conversion script includes a step that filters > out two lines at the e

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >