On 1/25/11 1:06 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:19:37 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
>>> There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
>>> git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and basemap-testi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> to, 2011-01-27 kello 13:44 -0500, Darren Dale kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> Still, Even after removing the the largest blob in the repo with
>>
>> run git filter-branch --index-filter \
>> 'git rm --cached --ignore-unmatch release/osx/matplotlib
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:39:48 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
> [clip]
>> Me too. I just posted the latest version of the repository to
>> github.com/darrendale/matplotlib.git . Its ~42MB, but it has a bunch of
>> unreachable objects. As soon as we f
to, 2011-01-27 kello 13:44 -0500, Darren Dale kirjoitti:
[clip]
> Still, Even after removing the the largest blob in the repo with
>
> run git filter-branch --index-filter \
>'git rm --cached --ignore-unmatch release/osx/matplotlib-0.98.5.tar.gz' \
>-- 750059aa09340^..
>
> the blob still e
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:39:48 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
[clip]
> Me too. I just posted the latest version of the repository to
> github.com/darrendale/matplotlib.git . Its ~42MB, but it has a bunch of
> unreachable objects. As soon as we figure out how to git rid of them, I
> think we will be ready to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:00 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>>> And some of the biggest blobs are associated with svg and pdf files.
>>> It seems possible to remove these files (if needed) fr
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>> And some of the biggest blobs are associated with svg and pdf files.
>> It seems possible to remove these files (if needed) from the
>> repository using "git-filter-branch" to further r
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> And some of the biggest blobs are associated with svg and pdf files.
> It seems possible to remove these files (if needed) from the
> repository using "git-filter-branch" to further reduce the size, but
> I'm not sure if we need that.
Some o
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> The complete magic stanza is:
>>
>> git reflog expire --expire=0 --all
>> git prune
>> git repack -f -a -d
>> git gc --prune=0
>
> Wonderful!
> With this, I get about 40 MB!
How did y
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> Last night I noticed that, in the git repo, the commit messages
>> produced by svnmerge.py still contain a lot of svn-specific
>> information. Pauli's conversion script includes a step that
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Last night I noticed that, in the git repo, the commit messages
> produced by svnmerge.py still contain a lot of svn-specific
> information. Pauli's conversion script includes a step that filters
> out two lines at the end of each commit contai
On 01/25/2011 06:53 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
[...]
>
> Darren,
>
> It looks like at least some of the problem is the origin/unit_support:
>
> efiring@manini:~/test/matplotlib.git.ddale$ git checkout origin/unit_support
> Checking out files: 100% (4514/4514), done.
> Note: checking out 'origin/unit_su
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:35:03 +0900, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen
>> wrote:
>>> The complete magic stanza is:
>>>
>>> git reflog expire --expire=0 --all
>>> git prune
>>> git repack -f -a -d
>>> git gc
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:12:35 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
[clip]
> Pauli: could I trouble you to have a look at my rules file, maybe you
> will notice something I overlooked?
> (https://github.com/darrendale/mpl2git/blob/master/matplotlib.rules) Any
> other ideas?
As an additional check, I'd suggest che
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:35:03 +0900, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen
> wrote:
>> The complete magic stanza is:
>>
>> git reflog expire --expire=0 --all
>> git prune
>> git repack -f -a -d
>> git gc --prune=0
>
> Wonderful!
> With this, I get about 40 MB!
Some ad
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> The complete magic stanza is:
>
> git reflog expire --expire=0 --all
> git prune
> git repack -f -a -d
> git gc --prune=0
Wonderful!
With this, I get about 40 MB!
Regards,
-JJ
-
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:37:59 +0900, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
[clip]
> I spend an hour to figure out how we can delete these unreachable
> objects. But it turned out that the answer seems to be simple.
>
> $ git repack -ad
The complete magic stanza is:
git reflog expire --expire=0 --all
git prune
git rep
On 01/25/2011 01:38 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> There is still an outstanding issue that must be taken care of before
>> we migrate. The conversion routines create a basemap repository out of
>> trunk/toolkits/basemap, and matplotlib repository o
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> There is still an outstanding issue that must be taken care of before
>> we migrate. The conversion routines create a basemap repository out of
>> trunk/toolkits/basemap, and matplotlib re
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> There is still an outstanding issue that must be taken care of before
> we migrate. The conversion routines create a basemap repository out of
> trunk/toolkits/basemap, and matplotlib repository out of
> trunk/matplotlib. Still, the matplotlib
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:19:37 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
>>> There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
>>> git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:19:37 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
>> There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
>> git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and basemap-testing
>> directories. In commit 4419, basemap w
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:19:37 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
> There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
> git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and basemap-testing
> directories. In commit 4419, basemap was renamed basemap-0.9.6.1, so
> there was only basemap-0.9.6
There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and
basemap-testing directories. In commit 4419, basemap was renamed
basemap-0.9.6.1, so there was only basemap-0.9.6.1 and
basemap-testing. In commit 4420, basemap-testing is r
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> That said, I have the conversion routines set up right now to create a
>> separate "toolkits" repository, which currently includes all the
>> contents of trunk/toolkits. I can tailor thi
On 1/24/11 7:11 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:48 AM, John Hunter wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding basemap, what do people recommend? Should I create a separate
>>> github project for basemap and it's data?
>> I think that would
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> That said, I have the conversion routines set up right now to create a
>> separate "toolkits" repository, which currently includes all the
>> contents of trunk/toolkits. I can tailor thi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:18 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> I think natgrid could be moved into the same directory because it is
> small too, but because of licensing issues I don't think it should be
> built and installed by default. Could you handle this move Jeff, on
> fairly short notice?
I'm goi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> That said, I have the conversion routines set up right now to create a
> separate "toolkits" repository, which currently includes all the
> contents of trunk/toolkits. I can tailor this further to split the
> toolkits up and create a repositor
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:48 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>
>> Regarding basemap, what do people recommend? Should I create a separate
>> github project for basemap and it's data?
>
> I think that would be ideal. Unlink svn, in git you can't hav
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
> Regarding basemap, what do people recommend? Should I create a separate
> github project for basemap and it's data?
I think that would be ideal. Unlink svn, in git you can't have full
featured subdirectory checkouts, and since some of the
On 1/24/11 6:10 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
>>> On 23-Jan-11 04:05, John Hunter wrote:
Darren
if you are ready to "flip the switch" and make an official github repo
under this o
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
>> On 23-Jan-11 04:05, John Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> Darren
>>> if you are ready to "flip the switch" and make an official github repo
>>> under this organization, go for it. Once we get the t
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> I feel very much honoured by this, it is a great belated Christmas
> gift, so I like it very much that you speak up for me, but currently I
> don't feel like a "core dev". Maybe, when matplotlib-filters
> (formerly matplotlib-grayscale
2011/1/23 Benjamin Root :
> Btw, if Friedrich hasn't been made a developer
> yet, he has my vote (if he wants it).
I feel very much honoured by this, it is a great belated Christmas
gift, so I like it very much that you speak up for me, but currently I
don't feel like a "core dev". Maybe, when ma
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> That said, I would be more comfortable saying "lets do this" if I heard from
> more of the debate that the drop looks ok.
In case anyone was wondering, that was the result of the android spell
checker, not alzheimers.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
> On 23-Jan-11 04:05, John Hunter wrote:
>>
>> Darren
>> if you are ready to "flip the switch" and make an official github repo
>> under this organization, go for it. Once we get the trunk active,
>> we'll worry about the rest, like migrating t
On 23-Jan-11 04:05, John Hunter wrote:
>
> Darren
> if you are ready to "flip the switch" and make an official github repo
> under this organization, go for it. Once we get the trunk active,
> we'll worry about the rest, like migrating the release branch. Of
> course, if Andrew as the original fo
On Saturday, January 22, 2011, John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> I would like to be included in the group with git write access, unless
>> there is a clear decision to restrict this group to a very small core of
>> gatekeepers.
>
> I can add you -- any de
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> I would like to be included in the group with git write access, unless
> there is a clear decision to restrict this group to a very small core of
> gatekeepers.
I can add you -- any developer who currently has mpl commit privs,
send me your gi
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Thanks Eric, that's encouraging. I am reasonably confident, but in the
> spirit of code review/cya, I would feel better if another dev chimed in that
> they were also reasonably confident without having to take my word for it.
I agree with Er
On Jan 22, 2011 9:06 PM, "Darren Dale" wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2011 5:28 PM, "Matthew Brett" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > >> >> What have been the proposed solutions to dealing with basemap's
data?
> > >> >
> > >> > Separate repo?
> >
> > I just fished up some previous discussions:
> >
> > http://c
On Jan 22, 2011 5:28 PM, "Matthew Brett" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> >> What have been the proposed solutions to dealing with basemap's
data?
> >> >
> >> > Separate repo?
>
> I just fished up some previous discussions:
>
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.matplotlib.devel/8275
> http://commen
Hi,
>> >> What have been the proposed solutions to dealing with basemap's data?
>> >
>> > Separate repo?
I just fished up some previous discussions:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.matplotlib.devel/8275
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.matplotlib.devel/8461
Do I remember
On Jan 22, 2011 2:28 PM, "Eric Firing" wrote:
>
> On 01/22/2011 07:06 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> >>> wrote:
>
On Jan 22, 2011 3:38 PM, "Friedrich Romstedt"
wrote:
>
> 2011/1/22 Eric Firing :
> > This doesn't all have to be perfect; it just has to be good enough. I
> > suspect your conversion is good enough. If you are reasonably
> > confident, then I think that if you go ahead and set up a github repo a
2011/1/22 Eric Firing :
> This doesn't all have to be perfect; it just has to be good enough. I
> suspect your conversion is good enough. If you are reasonably
> confident, then I think that if you go ahead and set up a github repo as
> the new official source tree, along with posting whatever no
On 1/22/11 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some minor
>> problems and 2) want to know what others think about this.
>
> Late last year, I did some work to convert t
On 01/22/2011 07:06 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some minor
>> > problems and 2) want to
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some minor
> > problems and 2) want to know what others think about this.
>
> Late last year, I did some
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some minor
> problems and 2) want to know what others think about this.
Late last year, I did some work to convert the svn repository to git.
The code to d the conversi
Hi,
I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some minor
problems and 2) want to know what others think about this.
I'm a native git user and I don't know how to use svn properly. So I
try everything to avoid svn. Furthermore, I like git so much that I
don't want to give it up
53 matches
Mail list logo
