[matplotlib-devel] matplotlib-0.99.1.win-amd64-py2.6.exe and numpy 1.4.0

The matplotlib 0.99.1 installer for Python 2.6 for Windows 64-bit that is currently on SourceForge (matplotlib-0.99.1.win-amd64-py2.6.exe) will not work with the upcoming numpy 1.4.0 release. The installer was built against an ABI incompatible version of numpy 1.4.svn. Is there going to be a ma

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Building MPL Releases for Windows

reproduce the GTK problems with the latest official matplotlib 0.99.1, pyGTK 2.12.1-3, and GTK 2.16.6 binaries. Are you using the GTK or GTKAgg backend? -- Christoph Gohlke Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics University of California, Irvine http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/ On 1/20/2010 2:21 PM, P

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Support for Python 2.7?

On 5/17/2010 12:13 PM, Ryan Wagner wrote: > > Does anyone know if/when MPL will be supported on Python 2.7? Thanks! I built matplotlib 1.0.svn for Python 2.7b2 (32 and 64-bit) against numpy 2.0.dev using the attached patch. Unofficial Windows installers are at

Re: [matplotlib-devel] refactoring of show

Wing IDE recently added support for matplotlib, specifically non blocking show(). It might be worth also to test the 4.0 beta release. http://www.wingware.com/wingide/beta Christoph On 7/16/2010 2:26 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > All, > > John noticed that my changes to show() prior to 1.0 had brok

Re: [matplotlib-devel] compiling on Solaris (and going against the python API)

On 9/16/2010 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 9/16/10 10:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 09/16/2010 04:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >>> On 9/16/10 9:03 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 9/16/10 8:00 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >>> I tested your patch with Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed. The problem is

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc has an outdated pytz

On 1/3/2011 12:00 PM, Russell Owen wrote: > matplotlib 1.0.1rc has pytz 2010h but the current version is 2010o. > (dateutil is current at 1.5). > > Should I report this as a bug or is this email sufficient? > > -- Russell > > These packages should be kept up-to-date if possible. There is an old

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

Not sure if this should hold the release but 1.0.1rc fails to run two examples (contourf_log.py and pcolor_log.py) as described in bug #3143748 "Math domain error in ticker.py is_decade()" Christoph On 1/5/201

Re: [matplotlib-devel] What's the status of the py3k branch?

On 2/25/2011 4:03 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Paul Ivanov > wrote: > > Fernando Garcia Bermudez, on 2011-02-03 09:14, wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 06:05, Michael Droettboom > wrote: >

[matplotlib-devel] Patches for CTPUG / matplotlib-py3

Hello, please consider the attached patch for the matplotlib-py3 CTPUG fork on github. The patch fixes several build and runtime issues/crashes. Tested on win-amd64-py3.2. Christoph diff --git a/lib/matplotlib/backend_bases.py b/lib/matplotlib/backend_bases.py index b3d4403..64848c2 100644 --

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patches for CTPUG / matplotlib-py3

On 3/9/2011 12:01 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Christoph Gohlke mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu>> wrote: Hello, please consider the attached patch for the matplotlib-py3 CTPUG fork on github. The patch fixes several build and runtime issues/c

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patches for CTPUG / matplotlib-py3

ged all print statements to `print("a string")`, which prints a string, not a tuple, on python 2 and python 3. Christoph > > On 03/10/2011 02:18 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >> >> On 3/9/2011 12:01 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> >>> >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patches for CTPUG / matplotlib-py3

her thought, we should probably put "from __future__ import > print_function" in all .py files whether they have print functions or > not, just to avoid this confusion. I can submit that as a separate > patch, though. > > Mike > > On 03/11/2011 12:33 PM, Christoph Gohl

[matplotlib-devel] Patch for matplotlib-py3

Hello, please consider the attached patch for the matplotlib-py3 fork on github. It corrects some build and test failures and removes unnecessary 'extern "C"' statements from PyMODINIT_FUNC functions. From : Note that PyMODINIT_FU

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patch for matplotlib-py3

pment_workflow.html > > Cheers, > Mike > > ____ > From: Christoph Gohlke [cgoh...@uci.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:01 PM > To: matplotlib development list > Subject: [matplotlib-devel] Patch for matplotlib-py3 > > Hello, >

[matplotlib-devel] matplotlib-py3: dateutil 2.0 and patch for mathtext_wx example

Hello, Dateutil 2.0 is now available for Python 3.x at . The example user_interfaces/mathtext_wx.py is broken since as_rgba_str() was removed from the ft2font extension. A patch is attached. Christoph diff --git a/examples/user_interfaces/mathtext_wx.py

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Calling all Mac OSX users!

On 8/16/2011 11:12 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 08/16/2011 10:10 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> The mpl developers are getting very close to the long-awaited v1.1.0 release >>> of matplotlib. Before we do so, we are doing some final checking

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Calling all Mac OSX users!

On 8/17/2011 12:03 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> The only thing worth providing might be the prebuilt static link libraries >> and header files for zlib, libpng, and freetype for the 4 different MSC >> com

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Calling all Mac OSX users!

On 8/17/2011 1:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 8/17/2011 12:03 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >>> The only thing worth providing might be the prebuilt static link libraries >>> and head

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Building on Windows (Was Re: Calling all Mac OSX users!)

On 8/17/2011 4:05 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke <mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu>> wrote: >> >> >> On 8/17/2011 12:03 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Christoph Gohlke <mailto:cgoh

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Implementation of cubehelix color scheme

On 9/12/2011 10:35 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Pim Schellart > wrote: > > Dear Developers, > > In the field of Astronomy (and in science in general) we often make > images that represent the intensity of some source. >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release: stalled again?

On 9/17/2011 2:08 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I think it will take a declaration of a firm deadline. How about this? > > Cut RC release Friday, Sept 23rd > Release v1.1.0 Friday, Sept. 30th. > (Barring any major significant changes) > > In particular, for the RC, I want to make sure that installa

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release: stalled again?

On 9/17/2011 7:16 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 09/17/2011 12:17 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >> >> On 9/17/2011 2:08 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> I think it will take a declaration of a firm deadline. How about this? >>> >>> Cut RC release F

[matplotlib-devel] Quantization of normalized float to uint8

Hello, matplotlib uses int(x*255) or np.array(x*255, np.uint8) to quantize normalized floating point numbers x in the range [0.0 to 1.0] to integers in the range [0 to 255]. This way only 1.0 is mapped to 255, not for example 0.999. Is this really intended or would not the largest floating poi

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Quantization of normalized float to uint8

On 9/18/2011 2:30 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 09/18/2011 09:30 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> matplotlib uses int(x*255) or np.array(x*255, np.uint8) to quantize >> normalized floating point numbers x in the range [0.0 to 1.0] to >> integers in th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Quantization of normalized float to uint8

On 9/19/2011 2:23 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 9/18/2011 2:30 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 09/18/2011 09:30 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> matplotlib uses int(x*255) or np.array(x*255, np.uint8) to quantize >>> normalize

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Another colormap

On 9/13/2011 12:24 AM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 07/18/2011 07:07 AM, Sameer Grover wrote: >> I came across this website where different colormaps have been compared >> and the author has come up with an optimal colormap for data >> visualization called the "cool-warm colormap". >> >> http://www.cs

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

On 9/23/2011 6:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests. If you know you are

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.0 branch created

On 9/24/2011 11:41 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > The source tarball for the rc can be found here: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0/ > > binary builders can use this and upload the binaries there. Please let > me know when the windows and mac binaries

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

On 9/27/2011 9:32 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:23, John Hunter wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this parti

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

On 10/6/2011 7:57 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> On 10/06/2011 10:46 AM, John Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Hunterwrote: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > P

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

On 10/6/2011 10:42 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 6, 2011, John Hunter <mailto:jdh2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke <mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu>> wrote: >> >> > Is it really intended t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

On 10/6/2011 10:58 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 10/6/2011 10:42 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday, October 6, 2011, John Hunter> <mailto:jdh2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke&g

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Py3 merge

On 11/9/2011 2:00 PM, Arik Raffael Funke wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I managed to get matplotlib to compile and run on Python 3.2.2 on > Windows though at present there are two problems: > > 1. The linker is missing the "/MANIFEST" argument. This means that the > manifest files are not being created an

[matplotlib-devel] imread issues

Hello, while working on the scikits-image io plugin system, I noticed some issues with matplotlib's imread function. I have a patch for all these issues and will submit a PR but wanted to check on the list first. 1) imread does not properly detect the file type if an open file handle is used.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] imread issues

Pull request at <https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/616> Christoph On 12/9/2011 12:11 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > Hello, > > while working on the scikits-image io plugin system, I noticed some > issues with matplotlib's imread function. I have a patch for

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On 3/22/2012 7:18 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Hunter > wrote: > > I think we are pretty close to cleaning up issues and PRs related to > v1.1.x, so I'd like to cut the release candidate this Thursday. > Let's continu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Plans for matplotlib py3k/final release (and impact on Debian)

On 5/12/2012 6:16 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: On 05/12/2012 07:21 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: My original offer (made several months ago) to help test this on Windows still stands :) Thanks. Does git master build and pass the unit tests on Windows? Mike git master builds and tests OK on

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Plans for matplotlib py3k/final release (and impact on Debian)

On 5/14/2012 7:43 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 05/12/2012 01:33 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >> >> On 5/12/2012 6:16 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >>> On 05/12/2012 07:21 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: >>>> >>>> My original offer (made

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Plans for matplotlib py3k/final release (and impact on Debian)

On 6/7/2012 12:04 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > >> I did not see any replies to Sandro's reasonable question. >> >> Wasn't there at least a plan for a 1.1.x release soon? >> >> There are quite a few open pull requests for master--not many for >> 1.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Plans for matplotlib py3k/final release (and impact on Debian)

On 6/7/2012 1:01 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> Is there time for another release candidate? >> >> With the latest github branch on win-amd64-py2.7 I get both, a segfault

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Plans for matplotlib py3k/final release (and impact on Debian)

On 6/7/2012 1:34 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 6/7/2012 1:01 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >>> Is there time for another release candidate? >>> >>> With the latest github branch on

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

Hi John, the matplotlib-1.1.1rc2.win installers are at . I am again unable to upload them to SF. They are built against numpy 1.6.2 and include the test files. All tests pass on Python 2.7, 32 and 64 bit. Christoph On 6/9/2012 2:14 PM,

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

On 6/30/2012 12:55 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Fernando Perez > wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Hunter > wrote: > > Well, looks like we better get moving then ;-) > > Go MPL!

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

On 6/30/2012 1:24 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 6/30/2012 12:55 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Fernando Perez > <mailto:fperez@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Hu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Release Candidate

at I've missed? >> > > The process is usually that the release is tagged in github, a tarball > is created, and then various platform specialists create the binary > releases. For the last release Christoph Gohlke did the Windows builds, > and I assume he is able to do th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.2.0rc1 is cut

On 9/12/2012 7:44 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I have tagged and created a tarball for 1.2.0rc1. The githash is > bda6dd9feab8. The tarball is on the github download page here: > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/downloads > > I have created a new branch, v1.2.x, for continuing 1.2.x

Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.2.0rc1 is cut

On 9/12/2012 10:31 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 9/12/2012 7:44 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> I have tagged and created a tarball for 1.2.0rc1. The githash is >> bda6dd9feab8. The tarball is on the github download page here: >> >> https://github.com/matplotlib/m

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Python 3.3 released

On 9/29/2012 9:48 AM, Damon McDougall wrote: > I've just read that Python 3.3 has been > released and thought I > would initiate a discussion oriented around adoption and possible > benefits/problems. It appears that, at least for the Mac, there are > iss

Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP11: Attempting to deal with the Python library dependency issue

On 10/3/2012 9:20 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with > respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies. > > In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders -- those > producing binary installers and packages f

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Delaying rc3 (again)

On 10/30/2012 8:54 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Agreed! Thanks to everyone for their hard work. I think this has > shaped up to be a great release. > > I'm fortunate to have power and connectivity today, so I was able to get > a release tested, tagged and uploaded. > > To our binary builders:

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Matplotlib Binary Dependencies compiled against VS2010

On 11/20/2012 5:55 AM, Fred Pollard wrote: > I'm in the process of completing an application with an embedded > Python 2.7.3 interpreter - but it all has to be compiled against > VS2010. > > Have managed Python and it's dependencies, as well as numpy 1.6.2, but > struggling with matplotlib because

Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.2.1rc1 Tagged

On 3/7/2013 11:30 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > We've finally squashed all of the bugs slated for 1.2.1, so I have > tagged a 1.2.1rc1 for testing. This is a bugfix release, and improves > on the overall quality of 1.2.0. Thanks to everyone who worked hard to > fix a multitude of papercuts. I'

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] DLL Load failure for matploltlib._png

o forward with the static lib approach. The static approach is recommended. If you link to the DLLs instead you will need to ship those with the binaries, which is not done in setup.py. Christoph > > Thanks, > Regards, > Tej. > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christoph Goh

Re: [matplotlib-devel] ANN: matplotlib-1.3.0rc1

Hi, minor issue: the tarball contains a lib\matplotlib.egg-info directory. The SOURCES.txt contains absolute paths (/usr/src/CXX/...) and therefore fails to build on my system. Deleting the lib\matplotlib.egg-info folder works. Does the release announcement mention that Windows binaries won't

Re: [matplotlib-devel] ANN: matplotlib-1.3.0rc1

ael Droettboom wrote: > It seems that in the setuptools way [TM] it is rather difficult to not > include this folder. Does it work if you only remove those hardcoded > paths? It should be easy for me to fix that by not having it search for > system libraries when building a tarball.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] ANN: matplotlib-1.3.0rc1

c2.tar.gz > > > Mike > > > > On 05/29/2013 03:41 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> On 05/29/2013 03:30 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >>> Removing the hardcoded paths works. >>> >>> I noticed two more build issues. >>> >>> 1)

Re: [matplotlib-devel] ANN: matplotlib-1.3.0rc1

f a failed > transfer apparently. > > Mike > > On 05/29/2013 04:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> Sorry, but that tarball does not include setup.py and other files. It is >> only ~25 MB. >> >> Christoph >> >> >> On 5/29/2013 12:48

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.3.0rc4

The official release candidate binaries include all the test data. The final binaries and the ones on my site do not because of the ~30 MB overhead. http://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.3.0rc4/ Christoph On 7/2/2013 11:04 AM, Paul Hobson wrote: > On Fri, Ju

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Error in import matplotlib.pyplot using Python/C API

On 9/10/2013 1:54 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 2013/09/10 5:43 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> Do any of those use ctypes? Try creating a minimal ctypes example and >> see if that works. > > Mike, > > I was a bit horrified to see that ctypes import and usage in mpl; > fortunately it is a workaroun

Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.3.1rc1 tagged

Hello, `matplotlib-1.3.1rc1.tar.gz\matplotlib-1.3.1rc1\lib\matplotlib.egg-info\SOURCES.txt` contains absolute paths to `/usr/src/CXX/*.cxx` files and therefore distutils fails to build installers on Windows. Deleting the .egg-info directory works for me. Christoph On 9/27/2013 10:20 AM, Mic

Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.3.1rc1 tagged

On 9/27/2013 10:20 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > - Now works with 64-bit versions of Ghostscript on MS-Windows. Not really. gswin64c.exe is detected in __init__.py but apparently not used in the PS backend: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/blob/v1.3.x/lib/matplotlib/__init__.py#L341 ht

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Please consider Html Help

On 7/28/2014 11:32 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 28 July 2014 11:27, Benjamin Root > wrote: > > Going to the sourceforge page you have, I see that you mean "HTML > Help" as in ".chm" files. That is something different that I am not > familiar with. All of our d

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Please Build the doc as HtmlHelp

On 7/30/2014 11:20 AM, Gary Setter wrote: > Thank you for all the responds concerning Html Help. If someone would > build using /class /sphinx.builders.htmlhelp.HTMLHelpBuilder and upload > the outputs were I can get them, I have a HTML Help workshop installed > on my desktop. I would gladly setup

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Thanks for the HtmlHelp file

On 8/1/2014 10:53 AM, Gary Setter wrote: > Thank you for the HtmlHelp version of MatPlotLib help. Todays build from > http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib > does not have > a problem with blocked content. It does have missin

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Suggestions for the MatPlotLib documentation

On 8/6/2014 10:04 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > In your wiki, you stated that you replaced the Introduction section with > a "Orgins of Matplotlib" section instead. However, I am completely > unaware of a section named that way. Can you be more specific? > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Gary Sett

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.4.0

On 8/25/2014 8:25 PM, Thomas Caswell wrote: > I have tagged 1.4.0, posted the source tarball to sf, updated pypi, > updated the docs, and kicked off building the mac wheels. > > Holding off on announcing to the rest of the lists until the windows > binaries get built. > > Created a v1.4.0-doc branc