What I see on in Firefox 71 is correct, meaning "Carnifex" and here is
a screenshot:
https://imgur.com/9zZG9Hp.png
and on Chromium "Version 78.0.3904.108 (Official Build) Arch Linux
(64-bit)" I see "I:Carnifex" and here is a screenshot:
https://imgur.com/vpI09M0.png
Hershel
--
Interesting. On my Linux box, I see it on Chromium but not Firefox, and
both are the latest versions.
On 12/10/19 1:47 PM, David Gerard wrote:
I saw the problem as reported in Firefox and Chromium, both on Linux.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 10:46, Brian Wolff wrote:
Well this weird. I was able
I would actually consider using another host -- one that would have
the decency to make an exception and let your DB go past 1 GB for just
one day so that you could reduce its size.
Beyond that, however, you could consider exporting some data in SQL
format, like the user table, for example, and
You may find it easier to install by visiting the URL of the install
and using the web installer.
Hershel
___
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
> It therefore looks to me like a Linux server config issue of some sort,
I would agree with that, but unfortunately that's not the sort of
issue we can easily advise upon as it depends on a myriad of factors,
such as what OS you use, what webserver software, what database server
software etc.
This is an issue with your server (or host) and you would need to
contact them, and review the server logs and other settings.
Hershel
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM herve wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've a mediawiki 1.31.1 site at https://drivrsdu.fr/dicof/w/index.php .
> Until now it was good. But now
> I've heard that Wikimedia splits their enwiki database up among more than
> one server; is that how they're able to handle several page saves per
> second on the master?
That is correct. See here
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers for more details.
--
http://civihosting.com/
> What's the best way to boost performance ...
Depends on a myriad of factors, such as the OS, web server and
database and hardware etc.
The simplest answer is to increase your hardware resources, meaning if
the site has one CPU, give it two. For anything more specific, we
would need more
Is there a way to use a wildcard domain on a Parsoid service
configuration? What I want to is to do is use:
*.mysite.com
for the domain, instead of having to list every subdomain, for an
install with a lot of subdomains.
Thank you,
Hershel
--
http://civihosting.com/
Simply the best in shared
> Say you are the owner of example.com with a wiki at www.example.com/wiki Say
> you decide to move the wiki to it's own subdomain: wiki.example.com/wiki.
> Would there necessarily be any "hit" on SEO assuming you implement
> permanent redirects at the www site?
Yes, there would be. That article
10 matches
Mail list logo
