[MeeGo-dev] Do someone know how to disable ScreenSave in handset image?

Hi all, Because we need to run application on handset image with screen non-black for long time. After I remove libXScrnSaver, xorg-x11-proto-scrnsaverproto, but the screen will turn black all the same. Here, anyone know how to disable screensaver? Thanks best wishes Junmin Zhu --

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Accelerometer sensor driver with sysfs interface

On 2010-12-29 at 05:23:37, ext Zhao, Forrest wrote: > > The default adaptor of accelerometer used input event. > If we use sysfs to replace input event, are there any effect of this? > Does any information will be lose because of replacing input event to > sysfs? That depends a little bit on the

[MeeGo-dev] Accelerometer sensor driver with sysfs interface

Hi Timo, The default adaptor of accelerometer used input event. If we use sysfs to replace input event, are there any effect of this? Does any information will be lose because of replacing input event to sysfs? I assume no side effect by replacing input event with sysfs, but like to double-confi

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On 12/28/2010 9:21 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: 2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Lists: Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio: QWidgets were not good enough for anybody You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego conference were about? Are you really wonde

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

> >From: ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:27 PM >To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki) >Cc: meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without >libmeegotouch ov

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:25:42 + wrote: > > > > >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on > >behalf of ext Bernd Stramm [bernd.str...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, > >December 28, 2010 10:41 PM To: Ville M. Vainio > >Cc: meego-dev@m

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

> >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of >ext Bernd Stramm [bernd.str...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:41 PM >To: Ville M. Vainio >Cc: meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advant

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:49:17 + Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen wrote: > On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 20:41:51 Bernd Stramm wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100 > > "Ville M. Vainio" wrote: > > > > > > > > > If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it > > > more expl

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 20:41:51 Bernd Stramm wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100 > "Ville M. Vainio" wrote: > > > > > If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more > > explicit in the future. > > What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appe

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100 "Ville M. Vainio" wrote: > > If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more > explicit in the future. > What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be a new, strict separation between the UX layers for mobi

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Lists : > Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio: >> QWidgets were not good enough for anybody > You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego > conference were about? > > Are you really wondering why developers are confused and l

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

Hi Kate, thanks for this reply. Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieben Sie: > MeeGo conference presentations at general were not Nokia's (or I think Intel) > official opinions excluding some keynotes but were just > selected by content selection board that was just few (4?) persons and so > mo

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 19:50:35 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: > I promise that we in Forum Nokia do everything to get developers informed as > well as possible. We release Qt Quick Components pre-alpha as soon as we > get it done, we released Qt for Maemo5 with first SDK. Reason that you

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

> >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of >ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:35 PM >To: meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing Q

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 14:37:26 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: > >What is the timescale and roadmap for Qt Quick Components? > > Thiago or Henrik Harz can comment this issue ? As soon as humanly possible. So sometime in Q1 or Q2 in 2011. Hopefully in time for us to talk about in the Me

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

Hi, Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio: > QWidgets were not good enough for anybody You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego conference were about? Are you really wondering why developers are confused and loosing confidence in all this? Do you r

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

(Sorry about posting at meego-dev - it appears almost nobody is on-topic on this mailing list, so one more won't hurt). 2010/12/28 Benoît HERVIER : > Currently it s look like a new technology, require to reconstruct many > things, isn't ready, and many push for using it. It s look like we are > d

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-SDK] Is there "make" available for meego?

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:06 +0800, He, Yunlong wrote: > Thanks a lot, the issue is caused by run it with “sudo zypper install > make”, after running it with root, works perfect. Sorry for such > stupid questions, J If you don't want to use sudo, just do a pkcon install make

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Why is qt embedded not being used as UI development tool kit instead qt X11???

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:09:00AM +, ext mikko.j.te...@nokia.com wrote: > All ideas on x-less solution are welcome. As Thiago points out the solution > to be targetted is wayland managing the Egl surfaces and then a product > specific window manager. Input drivers need consideration too. hey

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

> >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of >ext Benoît HERVIER [kher...@khertan.net] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:52 PM >To: meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT ap

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is there "make" available for meego?

On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:37:26 +0800 "He, Yunlong" wrote: > Hi, Experts, > > Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop > on meego, we also need tools like “make”, where can we download these > tools? Zypper "patterns" are your friend in this case... To see a list of al

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

Hi, >Very big disadvantage to do QWidget application is that you can't get full >MeeGo handset user experience, you don't have >sliding stacked windows, portrait orientation / orientation switching support, >animations etc and you can't do them at >all with QWidgets ( without doing everything wi

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

>From: ext Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:40 PM >To: Andrew Flegg >Cc: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki); meetthero...@gmail.com; >meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote: >> With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick >> Components you have all UX components ready made. > > Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good > cross-platform support (e.g. Symbian, Ma

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

> >From: Andrew Flegg [afl...@gmail.com] on behalf of ext Andrew Flegg >[and...@bleb.org] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:20 PM >To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki); meetthero...@gmail.com; >meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the a

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs > soon, what sort of already ready made "regular" application components > are available from Qt Quick Components right now? You can follow the progress (for meego versio

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs soon, what sort of already ready made "regular" application components are available from Qt Quick Components right now? Button, Windows, Dialogs? Can I use everything I would have used using Qt Designer default mainwindow app ske

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, 13:50:35 GMT, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: > > With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick > Components you have all UX components ready made. Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good cross-platform support (e.g. Symbia

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

>From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of >ext Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:23 PM >To: Rohit Baravkar; meego-dev >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps

Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

Disadvantage with both QWidgets (which is what I assume you mean by Qt w/o meegotouch) and mtf is that neither is an officially supported solution, i.e. you are on your own if you use them. If something works today (e.g. gestures), somebody may decide to break it tomorrow without prior warning.

[MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?

What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF (Meego touch framework) enabled application.? If we need to implement gestures for any given use case, will a application based on libmeegotouch be more smoother than QT app without libmeegotouch? Any touch testing resul

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is MeeGo a Google product?

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM, wrote: > Thanks for the user agent tip. It wasn't documented in the man page (probably > generated from --help). > For starbucks: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15945 Works fine here (8.0.552.224). -- Felipe Contreras _

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is MeeGo a Google product?

Thanks for the user agent tip. It wasn't documented in the man page (probably generated from --help). For starbucks: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15945 On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:54 AM, wrote: >> > I have never noticed obvious issues with Firefox on >> > Linux. I have had

[MeeGo-dev] Forum Nokia UX Library

Hi All, The FN's UX design library is public and available at[0]. Recommended reading for people designing UXs looking for guidelines and direction. Cheers, -Sivan [0]: http://library.forum.nokia.com/index.jsp?topic=/Design_and_User_Experience_Library/GUID-A8DF3EB8-E97C-4DA0-95F6-F464ECC995BC

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is MeeGo a Google product?

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:54 AM, wrote: >> > I have never noticed obvious issues with Firefox on >> > Linux. I have had issues uploading photographs  on Ebay with Chrome >> > and some web-sites don't work properly with Chrome. Perhaps this >> > is because website developers tend to test with IE

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Why is qt embedded not being used as UI development tool kit instead qt X11???

All ideas on x-less solution are welcome. As Thiago points out the solution to be targetted is wayland managing the Egl surfaces and then a product specific window manager. Input drivers need consideration too. Mikk0 Terh0 On Dec 27, 2010, at 4:14 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: > On Monday,

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-SDK] Is there "make" available for meego?

zypper install gcc gcc-c++ make build-utils then your qt creator can work nativlly -zheng From: meego-sdk-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-sdk-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of dhaval bc Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:46 PM To: He, Yunlong Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; meego-...@meego.com Subject:

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-SDK] Is there "make" available for meego?

Thanks a lot, the issue is caused by run it with “sudo zypper install make”, after running it with root, works perfect. Sorry for such stupid questions, :) B.R. He Yunlong From: Zhang, Zheng Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:04 PM To: dhaval bc; He, Yunlong Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; meego-...@m

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-SDK] Is there "make" available for meego?

you can use zypper to install these tools. zypper install make use zypper search `tool name` to check if the tool exists in meego repo. regards, Dhaval 2010/12/28 He, Yunlong > Hi, Experts, > > Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on > meego, we also need too

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is there "make" available for meego?

Hi, > Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on meego, we > also need tools like “make”, where can we download these tools? You can add MeeGo SDK repository (http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/sdk/host/repos/meego/) to get the MeeGo SDK. "make" command is in make package (you d

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is there "make" available for meego?

From http://wiki.meego.com/SDK/Docs/1.1/Building_a_MeeGo_chroot_on_Linux#Install_developer_packages is a quite good list, probably throw in git as well: $ zypper install man qt-creator qt-devel make libmeegotouch-devel gcc gcc-c++ gdb wget (assuming your zypper repos are appropriate) From: meego-

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is MeeGo a Google product?

> > I have never noticed obvious issues with Firefox on > > Linux. I have had issues uploading photographs  on Ebay with Chrome > > and some web-sites don't work properly with Chrome. Perhaps this > > is because website developers tend to test with IE and Firefox but > not > > with Chrome. > > If

[MeeGo-dev] Is there "make" available for meego?

Hi, Experts, Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on meego, we also need tools like “make”, where can we download these tools? Best Regards He Yunlong (何云龙) Cube: GTC-18M08 iNet: 8751-1645 Tel: +86-010-57511645 Email: yunlong...@intel.com