Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt 4.8 and QtQuick 1.1

2011-05-03 Thread Sakari Poussa
Kate, On May 3, 2011, at 12:16 AM, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: - Original message - On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Thiago Marcos P. Santos thiago.san...@intel.com wrote: Latest preview image of MeeGo Tablet relies on Qt 4.7.2. Is there any plans on the roadmap to push

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 23:40, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net wrote: See: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/01/31/well-be-right-back/ From what I can gather of this, these MeeGo components are really for Harmattan, so I don't know what real-world use they're going to be in a MeeGo context,

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread kate.alhola
On May 3, 2011, at 1:40 AM, ext Robin Burchell wrote: Hi Mikael, On 02/05/11 23:37, Mikael Hermansson wrote: Den måndagen den 2:e maj 2011 skrevkate.alh...@nokia.commailto:kate.alh...@nokia.com: . cut... Then you may ask that why there is different components for handset and tablet. One

[MeeGo-dev] API change due to upower 0.9.5 - 0.9.9: devkit-power-gobject is deprecated, use libupower-glib instead

2011-05-03 Thread Yin, Yan
Corrected email address and send again... Regards, Yin, Yan From: Yin, Yan Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:13 PM To: Zhang, Qiang Z; rob...@linux.intel.com; r...@linux.intel.com Cc: meego-...@linux.intel.com; Zhu, Peter J Subject: API change due to upower 0.9.5 - 0.9.9: devkit-power-gobject is

Re: [MeeGo-dev] FYI -- prevent tracker or other services from starting up in MeeGo 1.2 netbook

2011-05-03 Thread Martyn Russell
On 01/05/11 05:07, Niels Mayer wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com wrote: Which applications would be affected? How do I invoke tracker search on the MeeGo 1.2 netbook (other than command-line)? There may be some I am not aware of, but the best way to check

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Robin Burchell
Hi, On 03/05/11 08:53, Andrew Flegg wrote: Well, Intel wrote their own set behind closed doors and threw it over the wall. These then got adopted as the MeeGo UX without any public discussion; whereas Nokia were developing their own set in the open, and then closed the doors so as not to leak

Re: [MeeGo-dev] API change due to upower 0.9.5 - 0.9.9: devkit-power-gobject is deprecated, use libupower-glib instead

2011-05-03 Thread Yin, Yan
Yes, this is for 1.3, the bug is here - http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16962 . Robert/Qiang, please add SR# in the comments once you submitted fixes, and only change it to RESOLVED FIXED once all 3 packages are updated. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Rob Bradford

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread kate.alhola
On May 3, 2011, at 2:13 PM, ext Robin Burchell wrote: Hi, On 03/05/11 08:53, Andrew Flegg wrote: Well, Intel wrote their own set behind closed doors and threw it over the wall. These then got adopted as the MeeGo UX without any public discussion; whereas Nokia were developing their own set

[MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Robin Burchell
On 03/05/11 09:21, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: Yes, they are in Harmattan. Does they have real-world use just depends that do you like offer optimum user experience for certain class of devices. Intel components offers best match with Intel's tablet UX, Harmattan components offer best user

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Tom Swindell
Though I agree with most of what you're saying, I think a lot of app developers, at least the professional kind, will probably end up using pure QML based UXs tailored to their apps. MeeGo/Qt/Harmatten Components I suppose give certain developers/applications the ability to camouflage themselves

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset -

2011-05-03 Thread Robin Burchell
Hi, On 03/05/11 13:41, Tom Swindell wrote: snip I think from my perspective, I'd probably be writing several QML UXs for my apps anyway, one for tablets (large screen) and another for handsets, the main reason being, though a perfect UX designed in QML could be scalable across all screen

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Tom Swindell
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 16:00 +0300, Adrian Yanes wrote: libmeegotouch has been deprecated by its creators (Nokia) for almost a year now However several features implemented in MTF still missing in Qt/QML. Even if the main decision is to move to Qt/QML, some technologies implemented

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On + Will be developed open soon and is thus completely irrelevant. sorry. too little too late. we're shipping in 2 weeks whatever we do afterwards better be compatible with what we shipped, or we will likely pass on inclusion. ___ MeeGo-dev

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Tuesday, 3 de May de 2011, às 13:41:20, Tom Swindell escreveu: I think from my perspective, I'd probably be writing several QML UXs for my apps anyway, one for tablets (large screen) and another for handsets, the main reason being, though a perfect UX designed in QML could be scalable

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] First commit of QML based MeeGo Dialer application.

2011-05-03 Thread Tom Swindell
The QML dialer has made it to my public OBS: http://repo.pub.meego.com/home:/tswindell:/branches:/MeeGo.com:/Trunk/Project_DE_Trunk_Testing_standard/ Thanks to Carsten for help getting packaging/obs to working for me. Please test and let me know what you think. To make the dialer start on boot

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Martin Grimme
Hi, from all this I gather that if Nokia would release a MeeGo tablet, we'd have two incompatible sets of tablet apps. Those that use MeeGo UX Components, and those that use Qt Components, with either tablet not able to run the other framework. I hope this won't be the case, though. Martin

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Speech Recognition

2011-05-03 Thread Kevron Rees
On 05/02/2011 02:53 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote: Hello Kevron, thanks for helping me. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kevron Rees kevron_m_r...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 05/02/2011 12:10 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote: Is the Ivi application the only Speech Recognition

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Speech Recognition

2011-05-03 Thread Jimmy Huang
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 10:43 -0700, Kevron Rees wrote: On 05/02/2011 02:53 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote: Hello Kevron, thanks for helping me. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kevron Rees kevron_m_r...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 05/02/2011 12:10 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Robin Burchell
On 03/05/11 20:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 5/3/2011 9:00 AM, Martin Grimme wrote: Hi, from all this I gather that if Nokia would release a MeeGo tablet, for that tablet to be called MeeGo it needs to be meego compliant. we'd have two incompatible sets of tablet apps. Those that use MeeGo

[MeeGo-dev] 1.1 and 1.2 Compliance

2011-05-03 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
I heard at the last TSG meeting that the 1.1 compliance spec is approved. Any idea when we'll see a 1.2 compliance draft? Also, this page also seems out-of-date: http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance Thanks in advance, Gabriel ___

[MeeGo-dev] Dialer Project meeting - minutes for Tuesday 5/3

2011-05-03 Thread Shane Bryan
#meego-meeting: MeeGo Dialer Project meeting Meeting started by sabotage at 15:00:54 UTC. Online minutes: http://irclogs.meego.com/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego-meeting.2011-05-03-15.00.html Full IRC

Re: [MeeGo-dev] 1.1 and 1.2 Compliance

2011-05-03 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: I heard at the last TSG meeting that the 1.1 compliance spec is approved. Any idea when we'll see a 1.2 compliance draft? Also, this page also seems out-of-date: http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance If the out of date is due to not showing a

Re: [MeeGo-dev] 1.1 and 1.2 Compliance

2011-05-03 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: If the out of date is due to not showing a released 1.1 spec, true. There is/was a problem with uploading of pdf files (only), which has prevented me from adding the final copy - note the last review copy points to my directory on the LF site, as

[MeeGo-dev] meego-ux-settings transition to MeeGo.Ux.Components

2011-05-03 Thread Kevron Rees
Over the next couple of weeks, the API for settings pages will change to require usage of the new MeeGo Components AppPage component. There are many developers that are currently creating settings applets and I want to, as best I can, communicate the intention before pulling the trigger. The

Re: [MeeGo-dev] 1.1 and 1.2 Compliance

2011-05-03 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: knowing that not much will change for 1.2 compliance -- I think that's interesting to know, since I hope to ship a 1.2 compliant device soon. :-) it's a fair point. the biggest changes I know of are the ABI issues related to GL (Atom Qt libs linked against

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread Michael Hasselmann
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 21:01 +0100, Robin Burchell wrote: today, compliance does not yet cover the components, but you're making a very good case that it should That's what I was sort of hinting at earlier, I think it'd be a good idea. Nothing also prevents us (MeeGo the project) or

[MeeGo-dev] meego garage garage_data.xml is not there, redirect by 301 permanently?

2011-05-03 Thread Deng, Ying An
Bonjour, Garage failed to start, and the garage_data.xml downloaded from server says it was moved 301 permanently? Can anybody help? Best regards, Ian ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

[MeeGo-dev] How to create account on build.meego.com

2011-05-03 Thread Yuan, Feng
Hello, Is there anyone who know how to create a account on http://build.meego.comhttp://build.meego.com/? I have my account to login www.meego.comhttp://www.meego.com but that doesn't work on build.meego.com. There is no 'Register' button in the Meego Build Service Webpage. Anyone can help

Re: [MeeGo-dev] meego garage garage_data.xml is not there, redirect by 301 permanently?

2011-05-03 Thread Foster, Dawn M
On May 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Deng, Ying An wrote: Bonjour, Garage failed to start, and the garage_data.xml downloaded from server says it was moved 301 permanently? Can anybody help? I think Bob Spencer is looking into this issue. Dawn ___

Re: [MeeGo-dev] How to create account on build.meego.com

2011-05-03 Thread Rudolf Streif
Hi, Please check out http://wiki.meego.com/Build_Infrastructure and from there http://wiki.meego.com/Build_Infrastructure/Packagers_Developers#How_to_get_started for details on how to work with the MeeGo Build System. Dependent on what you are looking to do an account for the community build

Re: [MeeGo-dev] meego-ux-settings transition to MeeGo.Ux.Components

2011-05-03 Thread Drucker, Benjamin T
Also please consult the UX components migration information on wiki.meego.com. [Sent from my phone] - Original Message - From: Kevron Rees [mailto:kevron_m_r...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 01:30 PM To: meego-dev@meego.com meego-dev@meego.com Subject: [MeeGo-dev]

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?

2011-05-03 Thread ext-adrian.yanes
If the same set of components is then available on all MeeGo devices, then integration should be much easier for us. Well, we are also kind of depend on window management, but that's a different story. Can be a different history... but how is going to end?