On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 05:56, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:31 +0200, Cornelius Hald wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 07:20 -0700, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
Please post future application development questions to meego-sdk.
Ah sorry. I thought meego-sdk is for the
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Shane Bryan shane.br...@linux.intel.com wrote:
OK, I'll start, but please don't take this list, or my response to this
thread as a complaint to the change away from MTF, but rather observations
Have you checked out the mlite library that has some of the stuff
Hi,
is possible to use this SDK
http://wiki.meego.com/SDK/Docs/1.2/Installing_and_configuring_MeeGo_SDK_for_Linux
to develop with this http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900/DeveloperEdition?
N.
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
Hello,
I'd like to discuss a specific area of compliance for IVI systems.
Before I get to the subject matter, I'd like to know if I'm following
the correct process so I can address the right people. My first stop
was the MeeGo wiki where I searched for Compliance and arrived here:
Hi Jeremiah,
-Original Message-
From: meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com [mailto:meego-
architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Foster
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 1:04 PM
To: MeeGo-Devel; meego-...@meego.com; meego-architect...@meego.com
Subject:
Hi,
Hi,
is possible to use this SDK
http://wiki.meego.com/SDK/Docs/1.2/Installing_and_configuring_MeeGo_S
DK_for_Linux
to develop with this http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900/DeveloperEdition?
N.
It should be possible of course. Please let us know if you run into
meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to discuss a specific area of compliance for IVI systems.
Before I get to the subject matter, I'd like to know if I'm following
the correct process so I can address the right people. My first stop
was the MeeGo wiki where I
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Counihan, Tom tom.couni...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
Does that mean the IVI compliance specification is independent of the
overall MeeGo compliance specification?
Mark gives a great insight into the compliance structure here:
meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com wrote:
That document has a version number very similar to the MeeGo version
numbers. Does that mean they track each other? Or is that just a
coincidence? If they follow each other, are there relevant documents
for MeeGo 1.2? Does the spec change
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:25:43AM -0400, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Shane Bryan shane.br...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
OK, I'll start, but please don't take this list, or my response to this
thread as a complaint to the change away from MTF, but rather
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Shane Bryan
shane.br...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Have you checked out the mlite library that has some of the stuff you
mention?
If you'll look closer, I mention that at least two of the items
I listed are in mlite, in some state of completion. So yes ;)
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to discuss a specific area of compliance for IVI systems.
Before I get to the subject matter, I'd like to know if I'm following
the correct
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com wrote:
That document has a version number very similar to the MeeGo version
numbers. Does that mean they track each other? Or is that just a
coincidence? If they follow
On 5/7/2011 5:03 AM, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to discuss a specific area of compliance for IVI systems.
Before I get to the subject matter, I'd like to know if I'm following
the correct process so I can address the right people. My first stop
was the MeeGo wiki where I searched
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
I have to agree with Conny. Maybe a rename to meego-app would make more
sense...
This has been discussed - and agreed before - but the changes never
seemed to happen :-(
I think the agreed approach now is to educate
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
So compliance gets defined, then one might say it gets validated by
being made concrete in the package patterns? This seems to present a
logical process that one can follow.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
http://www.meego.com/Quality/Compliance_Implementation
hope that's of some use... and of course here too
comments are more than welcome.
That is giving me a 404 error
On 07/05/11 23:00, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
http://www.meego.com/Quality/Compliance_Implementation
hope that's of some use... and of course here too
comments are more than
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
On 07/05/11 23:00, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichm...@intel.com wrote:
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
http://www.meego.com/Quality/Compliance_Implementation
hope that's of some use... and of
Is anybody else seeing https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17233
(Netbook display often broken after suspend, especially after
starting legacy X programs)
It appears to be a longstanding (since 1.1) bug for some platforms, e.g.
[Toshiba NB 305 / Lenovo Ideapad S10-3t] fails to resume from
20 matches
Mail list logo
