On 09/29/2011 09:33 AM, Robin Burchell wrote:
So Intel has upped and gone Tizen. What I wonder is: does this have to
actually spell the end of MeeGo?
Definitely not.
MeeGo has been intended as an open source project since the very
beginning, and that means: let's keep the ball rolling.
In
Hi,
On 09/29/2011 08:00 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote:
So, Intel decided to left MeeGo, it's clear that their effort on the
platform has gone. We need to organize the community to keep MeeGo
development.
Why?
(Honestly, why *must* we organise the community?)
I think that many
Hi,
now that intel goes Tizen (and perhaps merges some stuff of MeeGo into
it), what should be the scope of the MeeGo project?
Some ideas that just came to my mind:
1. Why not make the main goal of the MeeGo project providing Qt
integration and Qt-based UXes for Tizen?
2.
On 09/30/2011 11:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
On 09/29/2011 08:00 PM, Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote:
So, Intel decided to left MeeGo, it's clear that their effort on the
platform has gone. We need to organize the community to keep MeeGo
development.
Why?
(Honestly, why *must* we
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:22 +0100, Dayo wrote:
If there are - as you say - no differences between MeeGo and Tizen
Dave did not state that.
andre
--
Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster | MeeGo QA)
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ | http://www.openismus.com
On 09/30/2011 12:28 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:22 +0100, Dayo wrote:
If there are - as you say - no differences between MeeGo and Tizen
Dave did not state that.
andre
He certainly implied it as an encouragement to others to leave MeeGo
and join Tizen. Not sure why you
Hi,
On 09/30/2011 01:35 PM, Dayo wrote:
On 09/30/2011 12:28 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:22 +0100, Dayo wrote:
If there are - as you say - no differences between MeeGo and Tizen
Dave did not state that.
He certainly implied it as an encouragement to others to leave
On Friday, 30 de September de 2011 14:25:56 Dave Neary wrote:
Another added advantage: MeeGo 1.3 was, I hear, below quality and
running late. By moving to an SLP based platform, MeeGo gets an existing
platform that's actually shipping in devices and has been proven to
work. Of course, this
There seems to be a confusion about who feels bad of the recent developments. I
guess there a two sorts of people emotionally attached to the meego project, on
the one side the system and component hackers, on the other side the
application developers (and not only 3rd party, also core
Consider again
http://limofoundation.org/en/Press-Releases/limo-foundation-and-linux-foundation-announce-new-open-source-software-platform.html
with its lack of even one mention of MeeGo. One conclusion
consistent with known facts is
***Intel is abandoning MeeGo for LiMo just as Nokia
Hi Alison,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Alison Chaiken alchai...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen any statement from anyone who *knows* what's going on
to indicate that Tizen will actually incorporate even one line of
MeeGo code.
From discussions on IRC over the past few days, we do know
On 09/30/11 18:24, Alison Chaiken wrote:
Consider again
http://limofoundation.org/en/Press-Releases/limo-foundation-and-linux-foundation-announce-new-open-source-software-platform.html
with its lack of even one mention of MeeGo. One conclusion
consistent with known facts is
***Intel is
On Friday, 30 de September de 2011 09:24:04 Alison Chaiken wrote:
LiFo owns MeeGo and won't let us the name, to be sure,
but we can call it OpenMobMo or OpenMaeLin if you like.(That
joke is bound to have turned someone's stomach.)
Has anyone asked the LF if we can continue the project,
Dave wrote:
and at best an improvement (HTML5 vs QML).
Fwiw QML doesn't stop any HTML5 improvement. In fact it plays perfectly well
with HTML Javascript next to its neighbor QtWebKit, and bridges web
development with native development (if you need it) down to core C/C++. If you
need
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 13:24, Alison Chaiken alchai...@gmail.com wrote:
With
Intel's possible complete departure, MeeGo development on Atom may
completely stop
Not if MeeGo devs partner with hardware makers currently shipping
MeeGo devices... namely, Asus (X101) and WeTab.
FC
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:40, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The strategic reasoning behind HTML5 is understandable: it is a general trend.
And I personally think that trend sucks. It means throwing away all
existing apps and reconverting them.
Why people would blindly follow such trends when it
Fernando wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:40, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The strategic reasoning behind HTML5 is understandable: it is a general
trend.
And I personally think that trend sucks. It means throwing away all existing
apps and reconverting them.
The trend of using web
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:59 PM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The trend of using web technologies to cover the apps space is clear and
pushed by many factors e.g. something simple to develop simple features and
compatibility across the jungle of platforms. I actually agree with it.
To an
Does any one whether Tizen will support Qt as like in MeeGo
Sent from my Nokia phone
-Original Message-
From: quim@nokia.com
Sent: 9/30/2011 5:59:15 PM
To: fcas...@gmail.com
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Who will keep pushing MeeGo?
Fernando wrote:
On Fri, Sep
Hello,
I didn't get Intel's position about Qt. It won't be supported or what?
I cannot see another good technology for interface building. More over
Qt is moving towards HTML5 and so on.
Kirill
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Tethys . tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:59 PM,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:59, quim@nokia.com wrote:
Apart from few and very bold exceptions, even the platforms that started
putting the bets on web ended up opening the door for native, and some of
them even to very native. Surely the Tizen architects know this and I'm
confident (but
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Tethys . tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:59 PM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The trend of using web technologies to cover the apps space is clear
and pushed by many factors e.g. something simple to develop simple features
and compatibility
Hi,
A few clarifications...
On 30 September 2011 17:24, Alison Chaiken alchai...@gmail.com wrote:
***Intel is abandoning MeeGo for LiMo just as Nokia abandoned MeeGo
for Window Phone 7.***
Ignore the PR. Look at Jim's statement (
Hi,
On 30 September 2011 18:59, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The trend of using web technologies to cover the apps space is clear and
pushed by many factors e.g. something simple to develop simple features and
compatibility across the jungle of platforms. I actually agree with it.
... but you
24 matches
Mail list logo
