Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

RB wrote: > What is wrong with women not wearing pants? Let's get off topic - I agree with RB - I like a lady in skirt/dress. No law about this, just preference. mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Man via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: Mountain Man <maontin@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief RB wrote: > What is wrong with women not wearing pants? Le

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curt wrote: > I notice we haven't heard much from Randy lately, apparently he took my > suggestion and told his wife she's no longer allowed to wear pants. Don't > worry, those bones will heal up soon buddy. ;) > Nobody that I read here has rules about skirts/dresses. so... no law has been

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> > "Let's hear it for uppity women!" ~ When women first wanted to be liberated so they could do traditional mens work, I thought it was a good idea. We men have gone out in a dangerous world and made a living for many centuries while our women stayed

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

"Let's hear it for uppity women!" I likes mine to gits uppit dawn to build up the fahr, etc. Sometimes I's even gives her a hand. -- Jim ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

es@okiebenz.com> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief On 07/01/2016 10:31 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes wrote: > 1950s USA where women couldn't wear pants and black people could be burned > with impunity. Great place. > Oh don't forget c

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

ebenz.com> Sent: 07 January 2016 17:07 To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Curt Raymond Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Go tell your wife she's no longer allowed to wear pants. After you pick yourself back up off the floor tell me how that worked out for you... -Curt __

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

On 07/01/2016 11:07 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes wrote: Go tell your wife she's no longer allowed to wear pants. After you pick yourself back up off the floor tell me how that worked out for you... -Curt Uh Oh - sounds like Curt's wife abuses him. RB who still prefers girls in skirts

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

rcedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 7:39 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Mental health for my brother in law, who is a hard core Fox News watcher. He told the wife last night that there are already 30+ ISIS terrorist training faciliti

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

suppose but he's hardly Syrian." Meaning he'd > been here 20 years. As we went on it turns out my dad knows LOTS of Syrians > he likes... > -Curt > > >      From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

iebenz.com] On Behalf Of >> Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes >> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:13 AM >> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> >> Cc: Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief >> &

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote: > When I was younger and especially as a child growing up in a very politically > active household, I never experienced the vitriol of the likes that we see > today. Only because you're such a baby:

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

ardly Syrian." Meaning he'd > been here 20 years. As we went on it turns out my dad knows LOTS of Syrians > he likes... > -Curt > > > From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Dan Peno

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:35 AM > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief > > As my now deceased fath

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> Dan wrote: ... those who cater to people who might be less educated and more susceptible to parroting ideas that are not of their own thought process. How much of the education system is truly encouraging independent thinking? The system sure has a strong record of suppressing anything

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

I note the pervasive use of passive aggressive responses is quite often the response to direct confrontation among the "politically correct". Personally, I am offended by this type of insulting behavior much more than a direct attack on my character, my ancestry, or number of married parents. It

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

G Mann wrote: > I note the pervasive use of passive aggressive responses is quite often the > response to direct confrontation among the "politically correct". > Personally, I am offended by this type of insulting behavior much more than a > direct attack on my character, my ancestry, or number

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Huh? On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:27 PM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote: > I note the pervasive use of passive aggressive responses is quite often the > response to direct confrontation among the "politically correct". > > Personally, I am offended by this type of insulting

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Aha! On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Strasfogel wrote: > Huh? > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:27 PM, G Mann via Mercedes > wrote: > >> I note the pervasive use of passive aggressive responses is quite often >> the >> response to direct

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curly, you're the poster child of far right wing group-think. Not that there's anything wrong with that. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > > Dan wrote: >> >>> >>> ... those who cater to people who might be less >>> educated and more

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

urt Raymond via Mercedes >> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 10:28 AM >> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> >> Cc: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com> >> Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief >> >> If the NRA had any brains at all (I have m

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

How about sticking with Mercedes for this list & saving you political diatribe for another list? Then you won't feel insulted here. You have,a lot to offer here from your Benz experiences. For the record I don't want left right or center political crap in this list. Rant off. Dwight Giles Jr.

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of >>> Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:13 AM >>> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> >>> Cc: Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> &

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> On January 6, 2016 at 2:25 PM archer75--- via Mercedes wrote: Think how long it's been since there was a duel between members of the legislature. I'd pay to see 434 of those take place in Congress. Mitch. Hey! don't leave out the 101 in the sen ate and the 9

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

How about sticking with Mercedes for this list & saving you political diatribe for another list? Then you won't feel insulted here. You have,a lot to offer here from your Benz experiences. For the record I don't want left right or center political crap in this list. Rant off. Dwight Giles Jr.

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Congress will forget to fund this stupid mandate. Then nobody will bother to enforce it because they can not profit from being cops. Around PNW trying to profit from seizure would be useless. The stuff gets melted down instead of sold on. The Seattle idiots would have to tax their own sales

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

We learned that my indy installed a faulty aftermarket LCA on the W220. It is out of spec and makes the airmatic go crazy trying to figure out how to deal with it. It gives up after a while and bleeds all the air. New sensors did not make it right, so the programing got hacked for it to

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> On January 6, 2016 at 2:25 PM archer75--- via Mercedes > wrote: > Think how long it's been since there was a duel between members of the > legislature. I'd pay to see 434 of those take place in Congress. Mitch. ___

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Max wrote: > Hard for me to see this political theater as anything other than a > distraction, a foil, used by both R and D to whip up their base. Prez gets > to claim progress, R's cry constitutional foul, gun sales and political > fundraising and NRA memberships all go up, no change to

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

From: Rich Thomas via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Cc: Rich Thomas <richthomas79td...@constructivity.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Which will do not much of anything to lower the shooting

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> On January 5, 2016 at 12:32 PM Curt Raymond via Mercedes > wrote: > > > Strangely criminals don't really keep records of who they sell guns too. This > law will accomplish exactly zero. What interests me is it won't hurt anybody > selling guns legally either, probably

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Mitch wrote: > I seem to remember an article decades ago, which cited research which showed > that there were minor occasional criminals, one time criminals, and > supercriminals who worked at with the diligence of a CEO. Very nice, interesting. Has anyone seen the Making A Murderer netflix

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Mitch wrote: > “We know that we can’t stop every act of violence. But what if we tried to > stop > even one (by restricting the rights of 300 million)?” People with rights are responsible in the commons - o, try to parse that as red / blue? Thugs are responsible to themselves, or nobody. Gun

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Actually, part of the initiative is to increase enforcement of existing laws and rules. This was an NRA talking point. Anyone have a problem with that? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > I seem to remember an article decades ago, which

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curt wrote: > A polite person just doesn't bring it up... +1 - TOTALLY!! Thanks. GOP has lost the election, along with the promises NRA promises. This sentiment... from a person that has never voted blue. GOP has a losing game plan, loosers for players, and blue has dynasty which always wins,

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curt wrote: > ...unwilling to manage the situation at all... Total red / GOP - total looser! Get wise, red. mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

rcedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mountain Man <maontin@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 12:14 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief So the NRA is too soft for you? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mountain Man

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> On January 5, 2016 at 12:14 PM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes > wrote: > > > So the NRA is too soft for you? You talking to Dan/Mao or to me? NRA has, at various times, stood for National Republican Association and Negotiating Rights Away, both were (now-failed)

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

t;curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 12:28 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief According to CNN here is what the President has proposed: "President Barack Obama bypassed Congress on Tuesday, unveiling a

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Quote of the year (so far): “We know that we can’t stop every act of violence. But what if we tried to stop even one (by restricting the rights of 300 million)?”

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

I seem to remember an article decades ago, which cited research which showed that there were minor occasional criminals, one time criminals, and supercriminals who worked at with the diligence of a CEO. I don't remember the numbers, but it seems like 85% of the serious crime was done by 15% or

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mountain Man < > maontin@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 12:14 PM > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chi

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

-Curt wrote: > If it came down to Hilary and Trump slugging it out I feel like a moderate > Libertarian candidate like a Ron Paul could probably sweep in and steal it > all away. People would be so disgusted with their choices they'd look for > ANYBODY else. > Third party candidate, and, lack

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

More to the point, in the last 5-10 years it seems like we as a society are placing far more significance to one's political affiliation as a measure of social norms. When I was younger and especially as a child growing up in a very politically active household, I never experienced the vitriol

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

n just doesn't bring it up... -Curt From: Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> To: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief There you go

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: M. Mitchell Marmel <marme...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 1:29 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Obummer has accomplished precisely nothing, save to shoot himself in the

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:20 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief More to the point, in the last 5-10 years it seems like we as a society are placing far more significance to one's political affiliation as a measure of social norms. When I was younger and especially as a child gr

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Which will do not much of anything to lower the shootings and deaths (there are plenty of laws about shooting and killing). I read the papers around here about the daily/weekly shootings, and a lot of the perps and vics have multiple prior arrests, many related to guns and robberies and

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

There you go - being politically correct. The anti-Obama crowd has dropped all pretense of civility or common decency, basking in their exalted state of political IN-correct-ness.. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > What strikes me as

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

One third of gun sales bypass the background check. On Jan 5, 2016 12:50 PM, "Mitch Haley via Mercedes" wrote: > > > > On January 5, 2016 at 12:32 PM Curt Raymond via Mercedes > > wrote: > > > > > > Strangely criminals don't really keep records of

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

d...@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief One third of gun sales bypass the background check.On Jan 5, 2016 12:50 PM, "Mitch Haley via Mercedes" <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > On January 5, 2016 at 12:32 PM Curt Ra

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

From: Mercedes <mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com> on behalf of Curt Raymond via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: 05 January 2016 17:22 To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Curt Raymond Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief They're being dumb, its like arguing

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> And why are you calling an executive order a "law"? > Mitch. > Because all the edicts of a dictator are "law." ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

If recent reporting from several college campuses is to be believed, "we" have produced a generation that believes society (the government) is responsible for protecting them from everything, even from hearing something they don't agree with. > -Original Message- > From: Of Curt >

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Maybe. But maybe too much media misinformation is bleeding through. Republicans control both houses of congress, most state legislatures, and most governorships. In fact, they have more political control than any time since the Civil War (maybe someone should tell them this). > > Curt

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

a Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> To: 'Mercedes Discussion List' <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Cc: Scott Ritchey <ritche...@nc.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Maybe.  But maybe too much media misinformation is bleeding through. Repub

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

What strikes me as interesting lately is the personal attacks on BO that the right seems to think are totally okay to make, saying that he hates America et al. I mean can't you disagree with somebody without calling them Mr. Poopy pants? 8 years ago if you said Bush was an idiot you were

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> Cc: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief > > If the NRA had any brains at all (I have my doubts lately) they'd embrace this > as "useful discussion and change" which would give them the shine of being > "Bipartisan&quo

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Registry, database, whatever you want to call it there has to be some well of information to pull from and it can't be free, somebody will have to pay for it. Makes some sense to me for the buy to pay a relatively small fee, say $10, on each purchase. They need to register the (relatively)

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief > > What strikes me as interesting lately is the personal attacks on BO that the > right seems to think are totally okay to make, saying that he hates

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Registry, database, whatever you want to call it there has to be some well of information to pull from and it can't be free, somebody will have to pay for it. Makes some sense to me for the buy to pay a relatively small fee, say $10, on each purchase. They need to register the (relatively)

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> Dan wrote: > > ... those who cater to people who might be less > educated and more susceptible to parroting ideas that are > not of their own thought process. How much of the education system is truly encouraging independent thinking? The system sure has a strong record of suppressing

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Too much to think about. Situation calls for some Todd Snider: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUK6zjtUj00 On Jan 5, 2016 3:32 PM, "OK Don via Mercedes" wrote: "47% of all statistics are made up on the spot." "There are lies, damned > lies, and statistics." That is

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Hard for me to see this political theater as anything other than a distraction, a foil, used by both R and D to whip up their base. Prez gets to claim progress, R's cry constitutional foul, gun sales and political fundraising and NRA memberships all go up, no change to violent crime or

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Too much to think about. Situation calls for some Todd Snider: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUK6zjtUj00 On Jan 5, 2016 3:32 PM, "OK Don via Mercedes" wrote: > "47% of all statistics are made up on the spot." "There are lies, damned > lies, and statistics." > > On Tue,

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Sure, exactly right. -Curt From: Jim Cathey <jim.cathey...@gmail.com> To: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 9:55 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief > Registry, databa

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

The public ignorance on this subject is appalling, and BHO did a "good job" exploiting emotion and ignorance this morning. The gun show loophole is a myth. All gun dealers do the instant background check every time, for that check is worth (obviously not much). Universal background checks are

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

rew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief > > Actually, part of the initiative is to increase enforcement of existing laws and > rules. This was an NRA talking point. Anyone have a problem with that? > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Mi

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

> On January 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM Scott Ritchey via Mercedes > wrote: > > > That's could be good one (maybe) and so might be mental health. But the > devil is (always) in the details. Mental defectives per NICS are three million and rising fast. Once they get it up to

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Newspaper article - Wash. Post. Today I think On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > One third of gun sales bypass the background check. >> On Jan 5, 2016 12:50 PM, "Mitch Haley via Mercedes" < >> mercedes@okiebenz.com> >> wrote: >> > >

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

es"- statistics that look good on paper but do little to deter violent crime. Greg -Original Message- From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 8:13 AM To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Andrew Strasfog

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curt sez: The pendulum swings both ways. I honestly thought the Republicans would let government shut down which would have been the kiss of death for them... Then how come nearly every time the gooberment was shut down, the R gained seats int he next election? Methinks you've been

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

are very costly and solve zero crimes. Greg -Original Message- From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Curt Raymond via Mercedes Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 7:28 AM To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Curt Raymond Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief If the NRA had

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

y 05, 2016 2:11 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Andrew Strasfogel Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Newspaper article - Wash. Post. Today I think On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > One third of gun sales bypass the backgrou

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

One third of gun sales bypass the background check. On Jan 5, 2016 12:50 PM, "Mitch Haley via Mercedes" wrote: Source of this data please? ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

IIRC, the invective and hate speech directed at the Shrubbery on list, let alone in public was quite caustic. Pretty sure Clowntoon also had uncivil discourse heaped on him as well. clay On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes wrote: > There you go - being politically

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

killed... > -Curt > > > From: Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:20 AM > Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief >

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

We used to be able to put the bad actors down, thereby reducing the criminal population. Now we warehouse them, costing tax payers billions of dollars. Washington decided to computerize the system, which has led to bunches of dangerous folks getting let out after spending less than a third of

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

<greg.fiorent...@comcast.net> To: 'Curt Raymond' <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; 'Mercedes Discussion List' <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 5:18 PM Subject: RE: [MBZ] the thug in chief I sort of agree with Curt on this...however, I think that the checks shoul

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

http://www.factcheck.org/2013/03/guns-acquired-without-background-checks/ "... hardly anyone using the figure ever cautions that it may not be accurate, or, at the very least, that it was based on a survey of just a few hundred people in 1994, in which participants may have guessed whether they

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Andrew wrote: > One third of gun sales bypass the background check. yeah - don't sell me your spare ak i am a known toro-wrist mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Curt wrote: > ...the best times we've ever had were generally during times when the > government was deadlocked and couldn't accomplish anything. Thats "the > process" actually at work. > Hear, Hear. mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

om> To: Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com>; Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:06 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief >Curt sez: >The pendulum swings both ways. I honestly thought the Republicans >would let gove

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Scott wrote: > If recent reporting from several college campuses is to be believed, "we" > have produced a generation that believes society (the government) is > responsible for protecting them from everything, even from hearing something > they don't agree with. > Yep. I am the one to blame.

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc: Mountain Man Subject: Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief Scott wrote: > If recent reporting from several college campuses is to be believed, "we" > have produced a generation that believes society (the government) is > responsible for protecting them fro

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

"47% of all statistics are made up on the spot." "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > http://www.factcheck.org/2013/03/guns-acquired-without-background-checks/ >> >> "... hardly anyone using the

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

I think you are not a dealer. Your sale at a loss is one of the loopholes. Small number of guns sold also exempts. Seattle idiots voted in a tax on guns and ammo this year. $25 per gun, 0.05 per round is what we got. Guess where the gun shops are going. OUT OF TOWN. With fewer vendors,

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Big brother has taken over for personal responsibility. A local University president shut down his campus for a day because a student made a hurtful comment online. Nobody got hurt, other than some feelings. Free speech was quashed to protect the esteem challenged clay On Jan 5, 2016, at

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

clay wrote: > Berium O'Bummer is taking down the nation Nope!! I am taking down the nation. mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

I am reading a book by Orson Scott Card on just this theme. Military decides that US of A has gone soft and destroyed too much of the Constitution, kills POTUS, gits martial law going and strips away the namby pamby liberal crapola. Berium O'Bummer is taking down the nation clay On Jan 4,

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Are Mercedes still allowed? Dwight Giles Jr. 1982 300CD 1990 300D Wickford RI On Jan 4, 2016 10:15 PM, "Curly McLain via Mercedes" wrote: > Just shredded more of the bill of rights. > > By official edict of his royal asinineness, b.o., criminal in chief. > > Will anyone

Re: [MBZ] the thug in chief

Obummer has accomplished precisely nothing, save to shoot himself in the foot: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/429235/obama-gun-control-executive-orders-mistake ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To