Only the 300SE & SEL have left and right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marshall Booth
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 8:09 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] motor mounts 116/123/126 whats the deal?
Bob DuPuy w
They are all the same, always have been.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob DuPuy
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 7:48 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: [MBZ] motor mounts 116/123/126 whats the deal?
Is the or is there not a
Hans Neureiter wrote:
The only difference I can see on my 126/617.95 is that the right side hase
a tapped hole (6mm ?) on top with nothing in it. The other side doesn't.
One side is stiffer than the other when the sides are NOT identical.
It's NOT something you can easily see (that's why they
On Monday, January 30, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Hans Neureiter wrote:
The only difference I can see on my 126/617.95 is that the right side
hase
a tapped hole (6mm ?) on top with nothing in it. The other side
doesn't.
Could it be for the engine shock absorber? Or a missing bolt? the
mounting
The only difference I can see on my 126/617.95 is that the right side hase
a tapped hole (6mm ?) on top with nothing in it. The other side doesn't.
--
Hans Neureiter, Houston, TX
'82 300SD, '95 E300D
Chuck Landenberger wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> When I first got my '80 300SD (W116) in '89, there were different
> motor mounts for each side. IIRC, the right side was a little
> "stiffer" to offset the torque. Don't remember when it changed in
> 90's, but they are now the same. And they are a 123 par
Bob,
When I first got my '80 300SD (W116) in '89, there were different
motor mounts for each side. IIRC, the right side was a little
"stiffer" to offset the torque. Don't remember when it changed in
90's, but they are now the same. And they are a 123 part number.
Take care,
Chuck
1980
Well Our Man Rusted Root can still get a reasonable facsimile of the
superseded right mount. Of course it costs double, but if it is important to
you, or your just gullable Tom can hook you up.
Bob DuPuy
On 1/29/06, John Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, January 29, 2006, at 0
On Sunday, January 29, 2006, at 05:23 PM, Bob DuPuy wrote:
Thats what I thought too. For a a 617.95 engine in the 116 chasis it
still
calls for two different numbers, that look the same when you open the
box.
In a 126 chasis they are the same number. Maybe one is a higher
durometer
rubber
B
Thats what I thought too. For a a 617.95 engine in the 116 chasis it still
calls for two different numbers, that look the same when you open the box.
In a 126 chasis they are the same number. Maybe one is a higher durometer
rubber
Bob DuPuy
On 1/29/06, Kaleb C. Striplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
they are the same.
Bob DuPuy wrote:
Is the or is there not a difference between the port side and starboard side
motor mounts. I've been told there used to be but now they are supperseded
to the same number, and now that there is a difference. what is the real
truth?
Bob DuPuy
Parrish, Fl
Bob DuPuy wrote:
Is the or is there not a difference between the port side and starboard side
motor mounts. I've been told there used to be but now they are supperseded
to the same number, and now that there is a difference. what is the real
truth?
Depends. Some engines/cars have different left
Is the or is there not a difference between the port side and starboard side
motor mounts. I've been told there used to be but now they are supperseded
to the same number, and now that there is a difference. what is the real
truth?
Bob DuPuy
Parrish, Fl
13 matches
Mail list logo
