Thanks to Sivakatirswami for posting the first example that I have seen of a
web-based MetaCard interface. Downloading the "portal" app took less than a
nanonsecond...and downloading content was very fast. Way cool!
Now we just need to get the MC player embedded in every web browser (still
top
Noticed this in the script of the messagebox, and can't find it in the hel index.
"set defaultStack to the traceStack"
Anyone know what this property is?
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug
I'm trying to display information as pseudo tables in text field
using MC2.3.1 on both Mac and Win.
I have created field with a set of tabStops and the horizontal and
vertical grid liens are displayed. The text in the field is in Arial
12pt, plain, say. What I'm trying to do is write a
I'm converting a program from the PC to run on Mac. Everything is going smoothly
(great job Scott and gang!) except for one thing. To make all the buttons look the
same between the two versions (PC and Mac), I set the Lookandfeel of the Mac version
to "Windows." This works great except now,
I'm converting a program from the PC to run on Mac. Everything is going smoothly
(great job Scott and gang!) except for one thing. To make all the buttons look the
same between the two versions (PC and Mac), I set the Lookandfeel of the Mac version
to "Windows." This works great except
Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that trail, and
either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex than I thought (as ever).
As I'll probably be asking a number of questions on this topic, I thought I'd first
see if anyone has a prototype with
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, David Bovill wrote:
Noticed this in the script of the messagebox, and can't find it in the hel index.
"set defaultStack to the traceStack"
Anyone know what this property is?
The traceStack is the stack currently being debugged with the Script
Debugger. This
David Bovill at wrote:
Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex than
I thought (as ever).
What would be the advantages of a MetaCard-based browser over MSIE or NN?
--
Richard Gaskin
Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, on 8/4/00 10:12 AM:
David Bovill at wrote:
Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
than
I thought (as ever).
What would be the advantages of a
Sounds like a useful stack. May I have a copy?
Thanks,
Leston
On 18 Jul 2000, at 17:11, Eva Isotalo wrote:
From: Eva Isotalo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: IBM to Mac question
Date sent: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:11:09 +0200
Send reply to:
Geoff Canyon wrote:
Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, on 8/4/00 10:12 AM:
David Bovill at wrote:
Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
than
I thought (as ever).
What
Sorry, this was meant to be off list. 8-0
On 4 Aug 2000, at 14:18, Leston Drake wrote:
From: "Leston Drake" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: IBM to Mac question
Date sent: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:18:42 -0600
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The question is in the header !
Pretty long subject:
Re: Is it a way to catch keyboard events in linux console-mode
using backgrounder .mt scripts ?
The answer is a qualified no. Kind of the whole point of background
scripts is that they
Scott Raney wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The question is in the header !
Pretty long subject:
Re: Is it a way to catch keyboard events in linux console-mode
using backgrounder .mt scripts ?
The answer is a qualified no. Kind of the whole point of
Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
than I thought (as ever).
My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one
Scott Rossi wrote:
My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
One word: tables.
Okay, two words: nested tables.
;)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Multimedia Design and
A French car?
Scott Rossi wrote:
My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
One word: tables.
Okay, two words: nested tables.
The thought makes me shiver -:)
OK, here is the first problem:
I was thinking of using CSSP for layouts for users with later browsers, and designing
style sheets that then work and look good for both the MetaCard environment and the
average web user. Template based web authoring, with added ease of dynamic CGI
scripting is what I think is worth aiming
A French car?
Scott Rossi wrote:
My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
One word: tables.
Okay, two words: nested tables.
The thought makes me shiver -:)
OK, here is the first problem:
Please, can anyone save me from the RFC???
There is no escape from RFCs :-0
Aha, but there is. For now I can use an xThing. I've looked at the "Really Friendly C"
stuff, and I have'nt got a word to say against them - just a bit long maybe. By the
way where are they again?
Archives:
20 matches
Mail list logo
