Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-06 Thread Klaus Major

Hi Richard,


Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest  
MC IDE.  After following the steps to set up the runtime engines  
(as outlined in Ken's doc), I can build the standalone  
successfully but it doesn't run.

What might I be missing?


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading  
a new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from,  
and even including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make  
sure it isn't that.

Still no go.
Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.

How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?


I have no problems creating standalones for PPC and IntelMacs with  
MC  and

engine 2.7.4 on my old G4.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation


Regards

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-06 Thread Shari
I did once create a test UB standalone using engine 2.7.3 and MC IDE 
2.6.  I built it on an Intel.  It did launch.


Shari
--
Gypsy King Software
Mac and Windows shareware games
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-06 Thread Tereza Snyder


On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Wil Dijkstra wrote:


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading a
new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from, and  
even
including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make sure it  
isn't

that.

Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.



Here's my experience:

Using Rev 2.7.4, I updated MetaCard per instructions and set up the  
runtime engines. I made a simple stack with only a quit button and  
built standalones for PPC and Universal. I modified the plists in  
both to name the correct executable.


The PPC version works. When I look inside the bundle, I see an  
extraneous MetaCard.app file NEXT TO, not inside, the contents  
folder. I delete it. The TestPPC.app still works.


The TestUB app appears briefly in the dock and disappears. There is  
an extraneous MetaCard.app in the bundle. I delete it. Still doesn't  
work. Permissions are correct.


(The extraneous MetaCard.app in the bundles appear when there is  
already a built standalone at the destination location. If I delete  
the destination .app first, the extra copy doesn't appear. However,  
my ultimate goal is to upgrade my own standalone builder which  
changes only the executable within the bundle because I store all  my  
app's files (e.g. LOTS of graphics) INSIDE the bundle. Whatever my  
motivation, I still cannot get the straight, normal MetaCard SB to  
make a viable UB standalone, much less my own refactored SB.)


I'm using a PowerPC G5, MacOS 10.4.8. I don't have an Intel Mac to  
work with.


Klaus, Jacque: Do you know what exact, specific difference there is  
between the PPC and UB build process? Or what incantation can make it  
work? I'm attempting to get my own Standalone Builder to work and  
it's... very [expletive deleted] frustrating .


t

--
Tereza Snyder

   Califex Software, Inc.
   www.califexsoftware.com

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-06 Thread J. Landman Gay

Tereza Snyder wrote:


The TestUB app appears briefly in the dock and disappears.


This is Richard's problem too. Sounds like a plist thing to me, but he 
did try my working plist and got the same results. So something else is 
going on, and since it doesn't happen to everyone it is hard to nail down.


There is an 
extraneous MetaCard.app in the bundle. I delete it. Still doesn't work. 
Permissions are correct.


One thing I always avoid is building on top of an existing build. At 
least until you get this figured out, I suggest always building to a 
folder that doesn't contain an existing copy of the standalone.




(The extraneous MetaCard.app in the bundles appear when there is already 
a built standalone at the destination location. If I delete the 
destination .app first, the extra copy doesn't appear. However, my 
ultimate goal is to upgrade my own standalone builder which changes only 
the executable within the bundle because I store all  my app's files 
(e.g. LOTS of graphics) INSIDE the bundle.


The best way to do this (assuming you get the SB working) would be to 
build in a temporary location, then delete the executable file from the 
older app bundle, and copy the new executable into the older bundle. 
Then delete what's left of the newly built bundle.


Whatever my motivation, I 
still cannot get the straight, normal MetaCard SB to make a viable UB 
standalone, much less my own refactored SB.)


One thing to try would be to build your standalone from within 
Revolution. Set the standalone settings to create a plist for you. After 
the standalone is built, copy the plist that was created into the MC 
standalone-building app you made. See if you can then create a working 
standalone from within MC.




I'm using a PowerPC G5, MacOS 10.4.8. I don't have an Intel Mac to work 
with.


Klaus, Jacque: Do you know what exact, specific difference there is 
between the PPC and UB build process?


The only difference is that 2 copies of the engine are inserted into the 
standalone, which means your UB standalone will be twice as large as a 
PPC one. Other than that, the build process is identical. However, if 
the thing launches and you see it in the dock briefly, I don't think it 
is a build problem, but rather a plist problem.


Unfortunately, Richard couldn't get it to work using the same plist that 
works fine for me. That's why I suggest letting Rev create a plist for 
you as a template.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-06 Thread Tariel Gogoberidze




Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest MC 
IDE.
 After following the steps to set up the runtime engines (as outlined 
in
Ken's doc), I can build the standalone successfully but it doesn't 
run.


What might I be missing?


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading a
new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from, and 
even

including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make sure it isn't
that.

Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.
How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?

--
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation




I tried  to build standalone back in October following Ken's 
instructions


 MC IDE 2.7.1 and Rev engine 2.7.4-gm-1
 OS 10.3.9 dual 1.8 PowerPC G5

PowerPC-32 build was fine

UB build was successful  but I was NOT able to launch it.
It appears in dock momentarily and immediately quits.

best regards
Tariel


___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-05 Thread Richard Gaskin

Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest MC IDE. 
 After following the steps to set up the runtime engines (as outlined in 
Ken's doc), I can build the standalone successfully but it doesn't run.


What might I be missing?


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading a 
new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from, and even 
including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make sure it isn't 
that.


Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.

How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-05 Thread Ray Horsley
I wrestled with it for a while and I believe I broke down and ended  
up making my standalone in Rev instead.


Ray Horsley
Developer, LinkIt! Software

On Dec 5, 2006, at 6:55 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:


Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest  
MC IDE.  After following the steps to set up the runtime engines  
(as outlined in Ken's doc), I can build the standalone  
successfully but it doesn't run.

What might I be missing?


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading  
a new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from,  
and even including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make  
sure it isn't that.


Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.

How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: UB standalones - update

2006-12-05 Thread J. Landman Gay

Richard Gaskin wrote:

Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest MC 
IDE.  After following the steps to set up the runtime engines (as 
outlined in Ken's doc), I can build the standalone successfully but it 
doesn't run.


What might I be missing?


Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading a 
new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from, and even 
including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make sure it isn't 
that.


Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.

How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?



Since I talked to you, I've been trying to think what's different 
between my successful build and your unsuccessful one. Since I sent you 
both a plist and a standalone-building-app, it is unlikely to be the 
software. The only thing I can think of is that I'm on an Intel Mac and 
you aren't yet. Do you have to be running an Intel machine to build a 
universal? I wouldn't think so, but...?


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


RE: UB standalones - update

2006-12-05 Thread Wil Dijkstra
Title: RE: UB standalones - update






No problem in creating in building a UB standalone with 2.7.4 with MC (I had to, because applevents did not work well with pre-2.7.4). I build it on a non-Intel Mac, and never tried to run it on an Intel Mac. I have my own plist, which I just copied from earlier (pre 2.7.4) builds.

Wil Dijkstra


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Richard Gaskin
Sent: Wed 12/6/2006 12:55 AM
To: Discussions on Metacard
Cc:
Subject: Re: UB standalones - update

Richard Gaskin wrote:
 I'm testing w/2.7.4, trying to make a standalone with the latest MC IDE.
 After following the steps to set up the runtime engines (as outlined in
 Ken's doc), I can build the standalone successfully but it doesn't run.

 What might I be missing?

Since then I've gone through the process a second time, downloading a
new copy of the IDE, making a new runtime engine to build from, and even
including Jacque's plist file which works for her to make sure it isn't
that.

Still no go.

Tereza has mentioned a similar experience.

How many of you are able to sucessfully make v2.7 builds in MC?

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard







___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard