Return of Son of sSteve now showing... sigh...
MrEman
Deja vue all over again...Yogi Berra
--- Eric Wichman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MeteoriteWatch.com Meteorite Giveaway
Hi all,
I'm giving away another meteorite. I'll be giving away a very nice
NWA 869 nicely fusion crusted
Just when you thought it was safe again to walk in the rain
http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/080122_red-rain.htm
Eman
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Just to jump on the me too bandwagon, I have a clean
pentagonal-shaped cavity in a small Gao I got from Al Lang 8 years ago.
The cavity is at least 10mm across and as deep. I was hoping I could
keep going through Al's stash to find the missing crystal but nada.
The shape is distinctly sided as
Doesn't SOUND like a bolide. It sounds like NOTHING as in NO SOUND
was reported ergo, it fails to meet the criteria for bolide.
The report of lights turning into flames is very weak evidence of a
meteor entry.
These UFO reports rarely talk about sounds such as sonic booms even
thought they
There is no evidence-- direct or inferred-- that the trace of the
eastern shoreline of North America is impact influenced. While much of
what you relate is sequentially correct it co-mingles 700+ million
years of geological history into a related event. The Connecticut
River Valley is a rift
Hello All,
I believe Occum's Razor would suggest that any C14 spikes associated
with impacts are more likely from enrichment while the asteroid is in
orbit.
As was mentioned previously, the C14 enriched region is concentrated at
the asteroid's exterior which in turn is the material shed into
Steve you say that several People talked you out of selling it???
Oh.I seeGosh I was so wrong on that one. I thought that you
canceled the auction just because the bid hadn't gotten over $181. I
am so delighted that you cleared that up for us.
Are any of those that you talked to about
To test for exclusion, that is to exclude this from being a meteorite,
my take is to determine the Specific Gravity ranges of Irons and the
range for Ataxites. Conduct a SpGr analysis on the specimen. I would
use distilled water given that it has been exposed already but if one
chooses not to,
Well... Well My take... This looks like a duel
So duelly speaking, Andi, it was you who fired the first volley with
your scathing attack with what you later renounced as your mistakes.
Were this a duel you fired into Ed's back before even throwing down the
glove.
Ed, you've already been
Ditto, Tom! The claim of any crust at all is misused! The crust
proper has long since ablated away by wind action and the smooth
surface is being called xx.x% fusion crust. What remains are the
questions: is this done through ignorance or is it willful exaggeration
to garner sales? If
if it was Steve, youself
or anybody else. I would feel the same- it is how I
was raised.
It is not in our business to ask- especially
copying a public forum in front of everyone where he
is open for ridicule.
Mike
--- Mr EMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then Steve is free to decline
How much did you pay for it Steve?
Elton
--- steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again list.Well I guess better late than
never.It is not very big,but at the price it's going
at, 1.18 grams,it is better than not having any.I
just got my piece from mike blood.A very nice but
How much did you pay for it Steve?
Elton
--- steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again list.Well I guess better late than
never.It is not very big,but at the price it's going
at, 1.18 grams,it is better than not having any.I
just got my piece from mike blood.A very nice but
That isn't what I asked, and for the record I did say it was an
attractive specimen.
I asked you, Steve how it was oriented?-- not who said it was
oriented. I'd like to be the judge on that based on your
description/defense of your claim. I am still waiting for you to
describe what features of
Steve Arnold (Chicago) wrote:
...one of the most beautiful and oriented meteorites that I have
ever seen.
OK... I'll bite-- Steve? how is this oriented?
You've been collecting how many years?
It may have flow features, the photos are fairly dark, but how do you
justify calling this
Hey Steve You've been PUNKED!!
You are correctamundo!! You've caught us red faced.
psst...Steve, it was all a setup and you've been
punk'd! You, Mike, and Matteo were the only ones on
the list that weren't in on it...te he he. It was Mike
that we were trying to punk-- We thought he had far
--- Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it has especially fine shock veins that
branch like a little lightning bolt in the stone.
Another distinction is that a filled fracture aka
shock vein will be the same on each side--showing
matching halves of any feature it transects. A
Hello Graham, Bernd, list
While there is no technical definition of a shock
vein so far as I know, it is in wide use and I hold
it to be a version of a healed fracture; healed by
the 1) injection or accumulation of adjacent wall melt
where the filling material has an origin in high
pressure, high
As to what Rob has raised--I did see several
chondrules in the photos. This looks much like the
friable L;s we have seen and contains slickensides
which would tend to make it a monomyct breccia.
However these large metal blebs are intriguing and
might make this an anomalous stone. I didn't see
Hello Listoids and Listoid Emeritus Bernd
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, no chance under such circumstances. The Kirin
(Jilin) meteorite main mass was found at a depth of
almost six meters and this was only possible because
the ground (loessal clay) was still almost frozen ...
quite unlike
Having received some request for more online map
information, here are some tips for locating free on
line maps.(Primarily USA). The good news is that
there is a federal program to publish digital products
online that will provide complete national coverage.
The bad news is that it is a federal
I am so sorry Mia Culpa!
I was covering writing several articles tonight and
had a computer glitch along with a brain freeze.
I lost something in the process. What I should have
said was:
Ringwoodite a mineral and is the spinel polymorph of
olivine.
Maskelynite is not a mineral but a glass
As to the mention of dense atmosphere, doesn't 90% of
the mass of the atmosphere lie below 2.5 miles above
sea level/asl?
I surmise that the shear(no pun) height of the ground
there with the combination of a large meteoroid mass
may have allowed for more retention of cosmic velocity
then
Is this the Pete Pete that came to this list
pretending to be two different people using two
different email addresses? You know the one defending
the name of him which shall not be said here( Hint
:Gao)? The one who tipped his hand when he replied to
a personal email to his pretend address
Hello Graham,List and-- Expeditionary Members,
wherever you are
It is an easy mistake in the broad scheme of things
but the striation features in these photos are not
shock veins but slickensides. Slickensides are the
slippage surfaces of micro/macro faults where each
side is ground down in
Hello Sterling,
I am separated from my files so the exact
figures/dates etc. are from memory. The gist is, I
was studying a glacial anomaly in Northeastern
Pennsylvania along State Rt.33 at the junction of
US209 near the village of Sciota. Perched atop a high
ridge/cliff is the remnant of a
Still unclear is why scores of residents
reported falling ill shortly
after the crater's discovery, but researchers say it
could have been psychosomatic.
In one report I read that this event excavated several
carcasses of live stock which had been buried on the
very spot. Havening been
--- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't say for sure but I bet my saw wouldn't
have
a problem with them. After all I can cut the hardest
irons with little effort and most condrites cut like
butter. However, my blade is .060 thick so cut loss
would be greater.
te he he-- I am skeptical,
Be it remembered that one of the rovers: Spirit or
Opportunity, captured the image of a meteor making
it the first recorded meteor flash observed on another
planet. Meteoroids do undergo compressional heating
even in the thin Martian atmopshere
Elton
__
--- PolandMET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You missed one point Jason.
Something that was like gentlemen agreement
The operative word is gentleman to which all parties
must have historically gentleman-like qualities such
as not lying, nor cheating, --Must have their word as
their bond and their
The good news is I escaped with my cell phone, shoes
glasses, underwear, and most of my blood and bodily
tissues. The bad news (which includes meteorite
related issues) everything else is in the wreckage.
Late Friday night minding my own business driving down
a 4 lane road my truck and trailer
Zag, the salt box.
Mike's mention of slickensides and the photos of the
light gray matrix, uniformly small chondrules --
describes Zag, IMHO, and may have literally shared
adjacent lots on the same parent body.
I'm curious what analysis will ultimately show.
Elton
One of the New England falls( Weston CT?) was reported
to have formed a frost rind.
Elton
--- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many other meteorites have been reported to be
very cold? I know that Hvittis and St Michel if I
recall were said to have frost on them almost
immediately
If memory serves--One on the Martian stones was
analyzed for its magnetic orientation and the reset of
its magnetic field post fall and was found to never
have reached 140°F deeper than 3-5 mm, indicating very
little heat transfer to the interior and only a
shallow intrusion.
During the ablation
How about both? Why didn't you take Steve to Columbia
with you to do the barrio ground search?
Sorry for butting in as this wasn't my week for
responding to Steve.
G
Elton
--- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone want to hear about a new meteorite fall,
or jawjack about Steve
As to Garmin units, I have settled on 3 units from the
RNIO series for a the following reasons especially
related to search party activities. The 110 is a
basic GPS/radio grayscale screen on par with the
eTrex. A bit jazzier are 120 and 130 also grayscale
while the 520-530 have color screens.
--- Mr EMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone wrote:
it is a ordinary chondrite not analyzed, probably
L6
My Bad! As no one changed the subject line I thought
we were still talking about the RSPOD for June 30th.
Yes L6 is a fair guess for the other stone that was
being discussed. My
Someone wrote:
it is a ordinary chondrite not analyzed, probably L6
Come on folks Has all the non technical meteorite
talk on the list has buried what we learned in Met
101..
This is certainly no more than a 4 and certainly looks
like a 3. The chondrules are far too many and far too
Yo...sSteevee Do you realize that you are posting
an AD/Giveaway/Trade EVERYDAY for the past 4 or 5 or
more I lose track myself but then I shouldn't be
the one having to keep count. Please please please
(I am on Steve's blocked list so would one of his
secret friends pass this along).
In just the last 2 weeks:by my count this is sSteves
12th self promotional posting/AD/non AD/
explanation/apology/poor me/all of the above email to
the list in 13 days.
I am bewildered, sSteve, you missed a day.
Elton
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Steve??? Is this the same sale you posted 2 days ago
with the additional email to apologize for not
putting AD in the subject line?---Just like you did
not do in this advertisement? Steve what is wrong
with this picture?
Yeah you have a happy blissfully oblivious memorial
day. Some of us that
Good question and here is the analysis! It makes
perfect sense if you know the history. There are many
new folks that haven't had the fortune to have lived
through a long history of the Chicago Swindler and his
dealings. This is yet another of a long line of
examples about how he doesn't EVER keep
--- Michael L Blood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to be argumentative, but to add some
perspective,
And
Harvey Nininger was a high school biology teacher when
he happened upon the meteorite bug. Buchwald - was
and is a metallurgist.
Elton
Maybe only the one name is gone...I saw three sellers
today all in Southern Cali, hiding bidders, all using
the same numbering convention using the same photos.
Funny the models hands all look the same, so do the
backgrounds!
With hidden biding and these 3 sellers obviously
being the same
Help me here someone, but dosesn't the nickel field
test kit also react in the presence of iron and
therefore is unreliable for evaluating the specimen
for meteoritical origins?
I noticed that this dealer is showing reactions to a
reagent--which I assume is the nickel test.
Elton
--- ken
When considering possible parent bodies, be it
remembered there is a theory that the population of
the inner planets of the early solar system consisted
of many smaller planets that swept each other up to
form fewer but larger planets. We may find meteorites
who's parent body has long since
--- steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why or how this pristine
meteorite got it's beautiful black fusion crust?
Hummm just a SWAG here but ...atmospheric transit at
36,000kps±, raising surface temps to an excess of
1400°C± followed by rapid quenching of the
Not up on the petrology of either numbers I'll make a
SWAG. This looks like a bleb of mesosiderite.
Elton
--- Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a hard time getting a good photo of this
feature, but here's a kind
of oddly-shaped bleb of metal in a micromount of NWA
787
Does this object bring to mind the infamous New Jersey
Object of recent debate?
http://cgi.ebay.com/Campo-del-Cielo-Iron-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ170044012315
Elton
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Taking time out during my expedition to the
Wetumpaka astrobleme...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The heating/ cooling caused the crust to crystallize
like nothing I have seen before...
Not picking on you Tom but I am using this as a segway
to speak to fusion crust again. One of the reasons I
The soot coating you are talking about is mostly
freshly created magnetite (micro /nano crystals) from
the oxidation of iron whilst passing through the
incandescent phase. It adheres by magnetism and can
be wiped off with rough handling. There is probably a
carbon component however graphite
Sigh...So we are back again to Irons having fusion
crust. Sorry I don't see the fusion crust. Crust
or no, this aborted art project does not have the
hallmarks of being a meteorite.
The statement that said this will be the 3rd Iron from
Illinois sure came across as a meteorite announcement
that
Thank you Steve for that cogent analysis. I'll try to
not assume facts which are not in evidence.
As to understanding the math I totally agree. I
remember a time when one ad a day for a week plus
addemdums( sometimes 2 per day) still equaled one ad
per week. Must be that new darn math.
Elton
Sorry Bob but this one is bogus...
Eman
I have some exciting news as I have met a gentleman
that may have found the 10th meteorite from Illinois
and the 3rd Illinois Iron. ... The piece has to be
tested before we submit it for classification.
Heres a link to photos of the piece:
--- drtanuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Ken, Michael and List,
I concur with Ken. The meteorite appears to have
been manufactured with a acetylene torch or forge and
a sledge hammer or press. The mass has an unusual
cross-section for a real iron meteorite and the
thumb printing looks like
Point of information, the IMCA doesn't vouch for nor
authenticate meteorites--the SELLER does and, when you
get down to stats that is the pretty much the way for
98% of ebay auctions.
Bill, Do I detect from your snide wording that no one
will nominate you for membership?
Elton
--- Bill [EMAIL
Hello Tom, List,
In the for what its worth category, the degree of
fluorescence in feldspar chondrules is the means for
defining the intermediate grades within the 3 grades,(
e.g 3.1, 3.2 , etc.) I don't know what wavelength is
the standard for that examination. If you've the
fluorscent
DUH, e hummm My Bad!
more Google less off the cuff, more Google less off
the cuff---I think I have it now.
Eman
--- Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the property that is used to determine the
petrologic types of chondrites is thermoluminescence
(TL), not fluorescence.
CD's found on and around the rim of Meteor Crater
were subjected to much greater pressures than the
fragments which fell off the swarm such as those found
in Canyon Diablo. The explanation I was given was
that the pressure was sufficient to convert some of
the graphite into diamonds. These can
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CV3 chondrite Grosnaja contains sodium
phlogopite, a phyllosilicate
Well if this is so, a long standing factoid in the
world of meteorites falls with this finding: Mica
does not occur in meteorites.
Seems some meteorites DO contain mica, and a mineral
Hello Gary,List
As to the question of why mesosiderites don't contain
chondrules...
Mesosiderites are almost identical chemically. So much
so, we believe they came from a single incident; that
being the collision of two asteroids, at least one of
them (if not both) was differentiated to the
No, looks like an H-- apparent chondrules visible in
photo.
Elton
--- Gary K. Foote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have an opinion? Mesosiderite or not?
http://www.meteorite-dealers.com/images/mesosiderite.jpg
Gary
__
Meteorite-list mailing
Many fireballs have a green hue and that is from
atmospheric oxygen as determined through spectral
analysis of meteors.
Copper abundance in meteorites is rare. I used to
think the green was probably from nickel.
Elton
--- Gary K. Foote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those are the only two
Pre 9/11 we were privy to fireball trajectory data
from the US Air Force. They have satellites staring
earthward for detecting launches and reentry. That
resource hasn't been mentioned in a long time and I've
misplaced the site URL.
I seem to recall that a list member was our liaison
for
WOW Dave! that seems to be a complete euhedral crystal
Is that a spinel, magnetite, chromite? Regardless
perfect crystal growth like this in a meteorite is
ultrarare.
Is this one of the pyroxene bearing pallasites?
Inquiring minds.
Really interesting piece, Congratulations.
Elton
--- Dave
Thank you Steve Have a good trip remember the Natural
History Museum in London and their meteorite exhibit.
We'll be looking forward to bidding on the Tatahounie
when you return.
Unfortunately, you'll still be here to endure the
thrashing the Bears will receive from Peyton. But
don't let that
Dear Jerry, Why do you say WOW!? just WOW? I enjoy
a good discussion like everyone else so imagine my
disappointment in opening posts that just say Wow or
Cool or Gosh... It is better to interact like this is
a message board and not a chat room, in my opinion. If
we all do so it will knock my
Greetings Bernd, Mike, List:
--- tett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can you tell the difference between kamacite and
taenite? Does the crystal structure give it away?
So far as I can remember...
Taenite (79.19 % Fe 20.81 % Ni) aka gamma-iron
and
kamacite (89.54 % Fe 10.46 % Ni)aka
Someone wrote:
...recovered recently after falling had been
beautifully fusion crusted, ...(snip)
Why anyone should doubt the existence of fusion crust
on a freshly fallen iron is beyond me - have a look at
Cabin Creek if you want proof that it still forms on
smallish irons falling at terminal
Hello Listoids, Svend
--- Dr. Svend Buhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:... I do not agree that the Glossary of
Geology of the American Geological Institute is a
sound reference for nomenclature and terminology of
meteorites.
GIST: For those that don't want to read the details, I
am asserting that even
I defined glass in a previous post specifically as
that which is formed from fuseing/melting silicates.
Which is closest to your thrid definition of glassy.
This isn't a discussion of commercial applications of
glass or philosophical ones. You missed the point of
this whole arguement that
Thanks for a cogent answer to my comments, Matthias.
We are in violent AGREEMENT. I fear now that I will
soon be the dead messenger beating the dead horse on
this simple issue.
I didn't select the term glassy for my argument. I
pointed out that it was quoted from the web site's
definition and
U What part of silicated irons may form a fusion
crust from my first post did you miss?
(GEEZEEE It feels like I am defending my thesis
all over again)
Regards,
Elton
--- Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
It occurs to me that many silicated irons exist.
So, if it walks like a
I am in search of a specimen of the Ries offset
Jurassic age, belemnites. (Or other examples of shock
affected fossils from elsewhere) OR, if you have a
publishable photo of said specimens.
If anyone has a specimen for sale or trade AND I am
still inside the Brotherhood-- please contact me off
Why do we keep speaking of fusion crust on iron
meteorites?
Eman
WNBC-TV here in N.Y. showed a clip of the rock
yesterday, no fusion crust that I could see.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Number 1: I believe this is an issue between YOU and
EBAY in accordance with the Ebay standard practice and
terms of service agreement.
Number 2: ... It is too overwhelming to put into words
so this will have to suffice. Where do you get off
complaining about a lack of honesty and integrity?
128 hours...
Ah ummm I believe there are several on ebay just
now.
--- steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list.Are there any small,30 to 50 gram
complete
individuals forsale?I have not seen any.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
The Sardis Stone in Georgia is also a paleo meteorite
well Paleo find I believe there is a smidgen of iron
within the 12-20ft(?) diameter shale ball.
Elton
--- stan . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about lake murray? wasnt that dug out from
solid limestone 100ft deep
or so?
Under this NomCom guideline NWA2828 isn't relict as
it is hardly altered and should be referred to as a
paleo meteorite. (Note:If this gets too drawn out all
meteoritic material is paleo as most is 4.5 billion
years old). However, paleo is a best choice of the
three proposed terms.
My take on
There isn't enough information to reach a conclusion.
The original masses and how they were assembled prior
to fragmentation are missing values and presently
beyond valid modeling.
However, interesting observation.
Eman
--- Thaddeus Besedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polujamki and
I believe that this is a seismometer package--pretty
sure by the grid in the background. The silver package
on the left was a plutonium based(?) thermocouple
powersupply(complete with an insulating blanket). I
believe I read that the experiment is still
transmitting.
The streak ...well any Star
--- Gary K. Foote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I do not know who Mr. DeRusse is I don't think
this applies to me.
If oone wants to play with the big boys and girls
meteoritically speaking one needs to know the
material. This is yet another Meteorite 101 (ok maybe
201) subject one should
Problem is David they failed to map the entire field
-- just the lake and they didn't recover all the
mapped fragments, or so I am lead to believe. I think
there were less than 6 plots on land( all adjacent to
the shore) out of what 300? plots on the lake surface.
Yes perhaps we can project the
-
From: Mr EMan
How so?
Elton
--- Gerald Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting hypothesis.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: mckinney trammell
the metal-based ones probably would not be
worth an air fill. but the carbon ones should be
water
--- abdelfattah gharrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there were a resemblance of some criteria of
certain meteorites with terrestrial rocks(basalt).
the meteorites had the same processes of fusion and
crystallization like the magmatic and volcanic
rocks?
Abdel.
While there are differences
How so?
Elton
--- Gerald Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting hypothesis.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: mckinney trammell
To: Rick Davis ;
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list]
--- Rick Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was under the impression they would rust away and
simply dismissed hunting underwater. (SNIP)Im just a
rookie Meteorite hunter and new to the list, but have
been working on the bottom for 37 years.
Sorry to hear of your extended submerssion just
I am in agreement with Martin. This is a myth that we
shouldn't allow to perpetuate on the list. An
Iron/siderite my have an original ablation surface, as
well as flow characteristics but won't have a fusion
crust. There are many reasons I won't go into about
why iron doesn't have the
Good Question, Mark:
Hap McSween author of Meteorites and their Parent
Bodies and Department head at the UNIV of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] did calculations for maximum and
minimum sizes at launch that allowed a Martian
meteorite to arrive on the ground. It had to be small
enough to not flash melt at
Hello Steve, Listoids,
These are the terms describing the composition of
meteorite breccias not just Eucrites. Poly means
plural-- or many, and mono means single. In a
monomict all the clasts are of the same type and class
(i.e. Lithologies). Meaning they came from a single
parent body. In a
OK... a sanity check here. If it screams meteorwrong
why list it in the collection of meteorites with the
caption Possible lunar??? Such speculation cloaked
in ??? is a disservice to novices who happen upon
the photo when Googling and use that caption to
justify their meteorwrongs.
Maybe it
...NO you are NOT sorry or you would STOP it. I am
tiring of hearing you say you are sorry then go ahead
and do it anyway.
Look...don't bother to say you are sorry or mention
the nay sayers, don't explain why you think you
should be exempt from self discipline, self restraint,
or limits on ads
Here is a suggestion for Helping an Illinois-based
Meteorite dealer-non-dealer-collector-non-collector
whatever. Steve are you listening?
Try this to reduce your SALES posts. Find an
alternative pass time like cooking...
A Good Starter recipe.
Print out for Reference:
Alphabet keyboard soup
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think i smell fish.
Yeppers! shil-fish
And why are these Nantans and Campos only found in
museum quality? Where are the common ones?
Elton
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
--- Charlie Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the 2 photos I posted last week, should
anyone care to comment based on photos alone:
Yeah I'll bite. The photos don't exclude this from
being a meteorite and the empty depressions might be
missing condrules. This doesn't look like an iron.
That is my assessment!
Some guys have all the luck.
Please let us know the results.
Elton
--- M come Meteorite Meteorites
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
a my friend have give to me this item for analyzed.
He
have buy in a mineral shop years ago. In the label
its
write arrive from
--- mark ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
talk about complete misconception after misconception!
Now show me where you can buy a 700GBq Po-210 source
(without any'questions asked') and I will be worried,
until then...
PssstMark c'mere
Opening rain coat to expose a shop's worth of trinkets
Ok the gates of hell apparently have frozen over, I
am stepping up to remind the membership that rules are
rules and while I have violated them myself there is a
prohibition against posting personal attacks, and we
are in round 4 of the present one. Please take it off
list else temper the
Jim, I think this is critical for the list as many of
us are preparing for our next expeditions. Thank you
for volunteering to do this for the group. Please
put aside your other chores and start searching. Can
you get this posted by next week since Christmas is
right around the corner???
There is a name for this Rusty Rock condition which
veterans of collecting know as Lawrencite disease.
Lawrencite is the mineral Iron/Nickel Chloride
(Fe,Ni)Cl2. In fact Lawrencite's type classification
location was a Georgia USA Meteorite. Drying out a
meteorite isn't an complete answer because
201 - 300 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
