So that's the idea for discussion. It may be naive. My motivation is to
reach to the average designer and developer folk in a way that's
accessible to them.
Thoughts?
A lot of the reasons you've raised might also apply to people who
simply want to *implement* uf rather than get into the
That's a good point -- and I think actually starting to look at what
you can *do* with microformats and providing technology
implementations, rather than just formats, would be an additional
purpose for this new list.
Something like microformats-implementors?
Chris
On 10/10/06, Ben Buchanan
On 10/10/06 4:54 PM, Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So that's the idea for discussion. It may be naive. My motivation is to
reach to the average designer and developer folk in a way that's
accessible to them.
Thoughts?
A lot of the reasons you've raised might also apply to people
The -dev list has been pretty dead since June... so it might be good
to push it forward... however the distinction between -dev and
-discuss is lost on me, since -discuss is used almost exclusively by
the community for all bidness.
According to the site [1], we have:
* microformats-discuss:
Tantek Çelik wrote:
A lot of the reasons you've raised might also apply to people who
simply want to *implement* uf rather than get into the discussions
about creating them in the first place. I wonder if one list could
server that need as well as the newcomers? Just a thought.
What
Chris Messina wrote:
So what if we changed the definition of -dev to:
* microformats-dev: This is a public list for discussion of
implementating microformats. Unmoderated, open subscription.
If there were to be a new list, perhaps we call it:
* microformats-suggest: This is a public
Please find it at: http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-proposal
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Guillaume
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Hi Guillaume,
Is currency unit intended to be one whole name or two names? I
believe specifying something with a class attribute value currency
unit means it's of class currency and unit, not currency unit
as a whole. Maybe currency-unit or currencyunit would be better?
Cheers,
King
