In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
properties!=values. types/schema are not just as much data.
You seem to be making unsubstantiated assertions and arbitrary
distinctions.
Please stop making the assumption of lack of foundation logical flaw.
I made no
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Lebleu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy Mabbett wrote:
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled
each telephone number as work?
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that included
the managers' home
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Lebleu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy Mabbett wrote:
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled
each telephone number as work?
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that included
the managers' home
On Tue, January 8, 2008 09:29, Michael Smethurst wrote:
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short
Hello!
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short code?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any
On Tue, January 8, 2008 09:29, Michael Smethurst wrote:
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short code?
Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've added the issue here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/vcard-suggestions#3.3.1_TEL_Type_Definition
and will raise it with the group being formed to look at revising vCard.
Hi,
it might be a good idea to look at the proposed registry for tel: URI
parameters
On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:08, Alex Mayrhofer wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've added the issue here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/vcard-suggestions#3.3.1_TEL_Type_Definiti
on
it might be a good idea to look at the proposed registry for tel: URI
parameters
On Jan 7, 2008 8:14 PM, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The distinction of properties, values, types, schema etc. are well
documented computer science terms.
Actually, in knowledge representation terms they're
usually not. To get around the what's meta problem
people generally just pick
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point. The nearest at the moment is type=cell, but since such
numbers usually cannot be dialled for voice calls, that's not really
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice calls?
On 8 Jan 2008, at 19:13, Philip Tellis wrote:
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point. The nearest at the moment is type=cell, but since such
numbers usually cannot be dialled for voice calls, that's not really
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled
On 08/01/2008, Jim O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice
calls?
I think the problem is that they can, but SMS short numbers can't.
so should there be a way to distinguish voice enabled numbers from SMS
only numbers and data
Philip Tellis wrote:
On 08/01/2008, Jim O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice
calls?
I think the problem is that they can, but SMS short numbers can't.
so should there be a way to distinguish voice enabled
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last see a phone number
not being a work number when both a person's formatted name and
organization name were present?
Today - and nearly every time I look at a contact page about someone
who does voluntary work.
Andy,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Lebleu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last see a phone
number not being a work number when both a person's formatted name
and organization name were present?
Today - and nearly every time I look at a contact
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Lebleu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last see a phone
number not being a work number when both a person's formatted name
and organization name were present?
Today - and nearly every time
On 1/8/08 6:47 AM, Christopher St John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 8:14 PM, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The distinction of properties, values, types, schema etc. are well
documented computer science terms.
Actually, in knowledge representation terms they're
On 1/8/08 12:08 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
properties!=values. types/schema are not just as much data.
You seem to be making unsubstantiated assertions and arbitrary
distinctions.
Please stop making
On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It
is just another service available @ the phone number, just like voice,
fax, etc.
so what we're looking at, is really two axes... one is the service
running at the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy
Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Perhaps the rule should be that the hCard is for a place if the
fn is
on *any* address (adr) child-component [1] (e.g. fn locality or
fn
street-address)?
This strikes me as being pretty workable. I'm mentally kicking the
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip
Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It
is just another service available @ the phone number, just like voice,
fax, etc.
so what we're
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more:
service:
voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone
connection:
landline, mobile
I'm not sure I'd bother distinguishing between landline and mobile,
for the
Hey guys,
Thought this would be of interest:
http://blog.spinn3r.com/2008/01/announcing-spin.html
We implemented initial hAtom support in this updated version of
Spinn3r. Updating it as the spec evolves shouldn't be a problem.
This is implemented as part of our content extraction technology
I'm not sure I'd bother distinguishing between landline and mobile,
for the same reasons that you mentioned. It's largely irrelevant. My
choice of work, home, mobile was more an indication of where I'm
likely to be if you reach me on one of these numbers, ie, if you know
I'm at home, you're
On 08/01/2008, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be of interest to people in some places - especially when there may
be differences between the costs of making a call to a landline or a mobile.
eg .. here in Sydney if I'm calling a local landline number from another
landline it is
Would you, for example, put down, preferred from 0900-1700IST, except
on weekends and between the 5th and 15th of May, unless you're signed
up with plan foo on provider bar as meta info for the number?
No,
but people might sometimes like to know if its a mobile or a landline (and
perhaps
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Thus, apologies, comment retracted.
Thank you.
Based on this feedback I will refrain from posting on microformats
mailing lists and making wiki edits (other than admin duties of
blocking/reverting spammers) for 24 hours.
On 09/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy
Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Perhaps the rule should be that the hCard is for a place if the
fn is
on *any* address (adr) child-component [1] (e.g. fn locality or
fn
street-address)?
This
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip
Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more:
service:
voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone
connection:
landline, mobile
I'm not
29 matches
Mail list logo
