Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
Hi,
the below patch fixes the definitions of SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION and
adds a definition of SYSTEM_PAGEFILE_INFORMATION and
SystemPagefileInformation. It also changes the formatting of
SYSTEM_INFORMATION_CLASS to make it a
Hi,
2012/11/12 Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu:
Hi there,
I would like to ask what the best/recommended practice for installing
shared libraries under Windows/mingw is. Qt4 for instance installs DLLs
to both $PREFIX/bin and $PREFIX/lib. I prefer to install to $PREFIX/lib
and add it to $PATH
This is a small question with much more impact as you might expect.
Old style is to put Runtime-DLL files into bin/ directory. This had
some advantages as long as you just have one target to support, but in
general isn't the best solution IMHO.
More modern gcc installs its runtime-DLL files
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
Hi,
the below patch fixes the definitions of SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION and
adds a definition of SYSTEM_PAGEFILE_INFORMATION and
SystemPagefileInformation. It also changes the formatting
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
Hi,
the below patch fixes the definitions of SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION and
adds a definition of
On 11/13/2012 18:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
Hi,
the below patch fixes the definitions of SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION and
adds a definition of SYSTEM_PAGEFILE_INFORMATION and
On Nov 13 18:30, JonY wrote:
On 11/13/2012 18:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
Hi,
the below patch fixes the definitions of SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION and
adds a definition of
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 13 12:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/12 Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 13 13:09, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 13 12:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Nov 13 09:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,78
2012/11/13 Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu:
This is a small question with much more impact as you might expect.
Old style is to put Runtime-DLL files into bin/ directory. This had
some advantages as long as you just have one target to support, but in
general isn't the best solution IMHO.
More
2012/11/13 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
On Nov 13 13:09, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Nov 13 12:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Nov
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2012/11/13 Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu:
This is a small question with much more impact as you might expect.
Old style is to put Runtime-DLL files into bin/ directory. This had
some advantages as long as you just have one target to support,
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2012/11/13 Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu:
This is a small question with much more impact as you might expect.
Old style is to put Runtime-DLL files into bin/ directory. This had
some
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
As I said before ... you need to add the target-lib/ folder to you
path.
That is unfriendly to the end-user. Note the discussion deals with
more than just GCC it is a deployment of the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
As I said before ... you need to add the target-lib/ folder to you
path.
That is unfriendly to the
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
As I said before ... you need to add the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
That doesn't address the side-by-side issue where we need a 32bit
executable matching the 64bit executable. What do you propose for
32bit executable path
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/13 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net
That doesn't address the side-by-side issue where we need a 32bit
executable matching the 64bit
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/11/13 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
On Nov 13 13:09, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Nov 13 12:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13,
On Nov 13 13:13, Kai Tietz wrote:
2012/11/13 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com:
On Nov 13 13:09, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
... is my point: I don't have an objection againt your correction, I have
an objection against its full form being present in the first place.
So you want to keep
This is a report for the 20121113 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW
packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which have been
applied since the previous mass rebuild.
During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used:
* mingw-w64 20121110 trunk snapshot
* binutils
I will try to do that, thanks for advice. It is a bit tedious, and many
templates are declared in headers, so I am not sure how far I will get
with that.
For the record, I compared -Os and -O2 options in gcc - they differ only
in -fintline-functions (enabled with -Os, disabled with -O2) and
On Nov 13 16:32, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com wrote:
About the correction made in SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION:
[...]
Index: winternl.h
===
--- winternl.h (revision
On 11/13/2012 21:44, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
This is a report for the 20121113 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW
packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which have been
applied since the previous mass rebuild.
During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used
On 11/13/12, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 13 16:32, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com
wrote:
About the correction made in SYSTEM_BASIC_INFORMATION:
[...]
Index: winternl.h
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: the opinions expressed in this email do not necessarily coincide with
the opinions of the MinGW-w64 developers, Microsoft, or any other person
participating in this discussion ;-)
Ha Ha. Ditto that.
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
