The OP was unsure about the quality of djbdns. By just I meant that
if the license allowed, it would be included, at least in ports.
That's my guess.
Stephan
On 5/24/05, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it not just a license problem that keeps djbdns out of the BSD's ?
On 25.05.2005, at 07:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Is it not just a license problem that keeps djbdns out of the BSD's ?
just
That word really does not belong there. That's a phrase used in
english
often used to express how small a problem is.
It is not a small problem. It is
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 15:03:34 -0700, Aaron Glenn proclaimed...
who will execute a maintenance contract on just the hardware?
certainly not Nokia...
Do it yourself; it's just a PC; and junk at that.
BTW - the quad cards do work too and show up as dc(4) devices.
Stephan Wehner wrote:
Mainly I'm worried about running a lot of user applications which
connect to the Internet. But I can't estimate the overhead.
choose wisely your applications and systrace(1) would most likely give
you some extra security.
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux, but
it doesn't work.
On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:09:35 -0700, wang fei wrote:
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux, but
it doesn't work.
I guess that man ifconfig doesn't work on Linux or you would have known
to use it.
Or maybe you just are not used to having on-line documents for nearly
Wim Vandeputte wrote:
Hey,
I'm on my way to Vienna now for the Linuxwochen, May 24 - 27, 2005
Reinhard and me will be in the MuseumsQuartier from Wednesday 25
to answer your questions or just meet people for a chat and drinks
Wim.
Hi Wim
A little off topic and for whatever it's worth;
Hi,
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux,
but it doesn't work.
`man ifconfig` and `man hostname.if` will tell you everything you need
to know.
Good luck... Nico
P.S. OpenBSD is not Linux.
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just FYI.
I am finishing up a port that hopefully will be put in for MySQL 4.1.12,
their latest recommended stable version.
Hi Daniel
That's brilliant!
So far all works well and pass all the tests suites stuff, with the
exception that I have to create three hard
wang fei wrote:
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux, but
it doesn't work.
As you're no doubt discovering, OpenBSD is not linux. man ifconfig and
read about IP aliases.
hint: ifconfig fxp0 alias x.x.x.x
cheers,
Sean
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
I'm about to launche a [3.7 AMD64 GENERIC.MP] mysql server (mysql
backend for a lot of servers / production environment) and would like to
test and use the new MySQL 4.1.12
I have the packages for i386 and amd64 ready for all clients, servers,
and test, or the
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just FYI.
I am finishing up a port that hopefully will be put in for MySQL 4.1.12,
their latest recommended stable version.
Hi Daniel
That's brilliant!
[installed pSQL from ports so: aggro offtopic]
That's nice for MySQL..
I'm still waiting until dataloss will be
Maybe it's a case for bugs@ but I wanna know if I did something wrong.
I've a DWL G520 (Rev 2, Atheros) and my ASUS K7V880 wont work with it.
Or at least OpenBSD dosn't work with the card at this board.
I assembled that card also at my ASUS K8V880 but because the Atheros
driver isn't ported to
2005/5/25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[installed pSQL from ports so: aggro offtopic]
That's nice for MySQL..
I'm still waiting until dataloss will be accapted as DoS-Case so that
the PostgreSQL would be updated up to 7.4.8 (but a update to 8.0.3 would
be better anyway)
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
I'm about to launche a [3.7 AMD64 GENERIC.MP] mysql server (mysql
backend for a lot of servers / production environment) and would like
to test and use the new MySQL 4.1.12
I have the packages for i386 and amd64 ready for all clients,
dear all,
after trying to get along on my own for a while, i finally go so disapointed
and unsatisfied and decided that i need help. i always ran into the same
problem, so there must be something wrong about my procedure how i build
kernel AND userland.
i got the final release of openbsd 3.7 on
Hello,
I'm a newwbie on OpenBSD and I've installed it on a IBM P100 Computer.
I have a Intel 82557 NIC inside. This NIC can be seen as fxp0.
My problem is:
When I don't use the comuputer during about 5 minutes, my NIC go to
sleep and don't want to receive or send any frames.
But if I press
I think the first thing you did wrong was to post that you'd done some
customizing on this list. Now i'm sure you have good reasons, but
honestly the usual reaction to that kind of thing is don't talk to us
until you've stopped customizing and tried it with GENERIC. Just a
warning that you're
Adam Gleave wrote:
I don't understand your point
--- START: Shell output ---
puffy:nard {109} alias foo 'echo bar'
puffy:nard {110} foo
bar
puffy:nard {111} su -
Password:
Terminal type? [screen]
puffy# foo
foo: Command not found.
--- END: Shell output ---
the thing i meant
I don't understand your point
--- START: Shell output ---
puffy:nard {109} alias foo 'echo bar'
puffy:nard {110} foo
bar
puffy:nard {111} su -
Password:
Terminal type? [screen]
puffy# foo
foo: Command not found.
--- END: Shell output ---
If a person gets access to manipulate shell startup
Niall O'Higgins wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:01:23PM +0100, Hyb wrote:
It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
every so often, but is often disregarded on the basis that gigE is now
cheap. I see the
Yes, i found these reports too, but without a solution. Adam, to be
not alone with this problem not doing me happier :)
The strange thing is that with Linux, FeeBSD, FreeSBIE, NetBSD Live
all works. I tried also to use xorg.conf files of these last, but i
recived the same problem... I think the
fehler404 wrote:
dear all,
after trying to get along on my own for a while, i finally go so disapointed
and unsatisfied and decided that i need help. i always ran into the same
problem, so there must be something wrong about my procedure how i build
kernel AND userland.
# cd /usr/src
#
Jason Opperisano wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 04:09:20PM +0300, Mike wrote:
would be easily to get password or something else.
if $bad_person has the ability to modify your user's or the system-wide
shell initialization files, why exactly would they need to steal your
password at that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Mike
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:14 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: risky alias..
Jason Opperisano wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 04:09:20PM +0300, Mike wrote:
would be easily to get
Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
when malloc gets a request with a size equal to the size of a pointer, we
can allocate a whole page, and return a pointer 4 bytes from the end.
the
four bytes allocated are useable, but don't touch the fifth or any later
ones. (8 bytes on 64bit archs).
Is the
Hello!
This is just a quick note to inform you about an 80-page report on the
Pharmaceutical Industry that we're able to provide you - at no cost.
Compiled by some of the best analysts in the industry, the report provides an
insight into the latest trends and strategies in the Pharmaceutical
- Original Message -
From: Jim Razmus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: NIC bonding/trunking/802.3ad
But this requires cooperation on the part of the switch. The original
poster mentioned connecting to two distinct switches to
fehler404 wrote:
dear all,
after trying to get along on my own for a while, i finally go so
disapointed and unsatisfied and decided that i need help. i always ran
into the same problem, so there must be something wrong about my
procedure how i build kernel AND userland.
# cd /usr/src
Hello!
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:17:59PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
[...]
This would make all 4/8-byte mallocs take up one page(4k) each if I
understand this correctly.
That's fine for debugging, but probably too expensive for normal usage.
I tend to agree. While most applications will
You can try man ifconfig and look for alias section.
OpenBSD is not Linux for such commands.
Le 26 mai 05 ` 00:09, wang fei a icrit :
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux,
but it doesn't work.
Wang,
Unlike many linux distros, OBSD has excellent manpages that will help
you with this.
On 5/25/05, wang fei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried ifconfig xxx:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxwhich worked at linux, but
it doesn't work.
or clean out $IFS and then call /usr/bin/su or other sensitive app...
search paths are a convenience, if you're worried about trojans in
~/bin and ., then the least you could do is use the full path to a
program.
On 5/25/05, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 04:09:20PM +0300,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:50:46PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
| I use djbdns on OpenBSD, and don't know anything that needs patching for
| my uses. However, I don't do ipv6. There is a patch to do that, but if
| I needed ipv6 support I'd probably stick with OpenBSD's version of BIND.
| (At least
If a person gains access to your account, it's already too late to
stop anything. They can change your shell to a trojaned one, install a
keylogger, remove something from path variable to manipulate it, etc.
This is what I would do:
Scenario #1: Console login
Vulnerability: A person could gain
Greets
maximum number of queues are in include files.For CBQ
limit is 256, HFSC 64 per interface.
Also you can use QoS only on outgoing interface.
I am about to test something that I read very recently, written by
D. Hartmeier?? (could be mistaken) When doing QOS on inbound, i.e.
and inound
On May 25, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Joel CARNAT wrote:
I would like to use ifstated (OpenBSD 3.7/i386) in the
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#incoming case (except I'll use
SMTP server, not HTTP) to modify the $web_servers macros when one of
the
server if detected to be down (no SMTP
On Wed, May 25 2005 - 12:58, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 25, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Joel CARNAT wrote:
I would like to use ifstated (OpenBSD 3.7/i386) in the
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#incoming case (except I'll use
SMTP server, not HTTP) to modify the $web_servers macros when one of
On May 25, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Joel CARNAT wrote:
On Wed, May 25 2005 - 12:58, Jason Dixon wrote:
If you want to monitor servers and remove them from availability, use
PF tables to store address lists. Then use your script (shell, perl,
etc) to monitor them and delete them from the table if
It seems that increasing openfiles-cur to infinity works the best in
this situation, so I guess this is solved.
Gerardo, I will try your updated port soon.
Regards,
Wijnand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:18:58AM -0700, Bruno Delbono wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ports aren't generally checked for much other than Does it build? and
Does it work?.
So, secure by default means that you should only run OpenBSD as it comes
and
An associated mentioned that they were having decent OS compatility (Linux)
with SuperMicro machines. Has anyone tried them? They seem to be pretty
cost effective for the h/w capability.
Lee
At 11:31 AM 5/25/2005 -0800, Damien Hull wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o, secure by default means that you should only run OpenBSD as it comes
and do not touch anything on it. Or else, it won't be secure by default;
your warranty is voided and Theo will spank you.
in the base install is
A link to a pdf file with complete Pacifica cpu virtualization
details (except for what sockets are supported) is
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/33047.pdf
Dave Feustel
Damien Hull wrote:
I'm still a long ways away from designing a system. I haven't even
decided which OS I want to use. If enough people on the list can
convince me that OpenBSD is the way to go I'll install it on a system,
ship it down to Seattle and collect my mail. This will be on a test
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Damien Hull
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc
Subject: Re: Email Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:18:58AM -0700, Bruno Delbono wrote:
On May 25, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Damien Hull wrote:
Thanks for the info. My concern is that OpenBSD is secure by
default when you do a base install but when you start adding
things like Postfix etc... are you still secure?
How is something that is not default, still default?
If we want to
I've bought several over the years and like them all.
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 01:51 pm, L. V. Lammert wrote:
An associated mentioned that they were having decent OS compatility (Linux)
with SuperMicro machines. Has anyone tried them? They seem to be pretty
cost effective for the h/w
--On 25 May 2005 16:11 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
Any operating system will end up using third party applications
Not necessarily, it is perfectly possible to run e.g. routers, VPN
gateways, NFS servers, wireless access-points, ftp and web servers,
mail servers, [...] with just the
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 21:38:03 +0200, Murat Mamitov proclaimed...
I'm planning to use my laptop like a desktop OS, i know, OpenBSD is
less desktop between BSDs,
Bullshit. you obviously know nothing. I've had it on my desktop since 2.8
Please go get a clue and stop spreading your bullshit.
use the package, I was able to successfully install it on my openbsd
workstation.
On 5/25/05, Price, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, when I try to build subversion on 3.7 i386 I get:
[]
main.o -c /usr/ports/devel/subversion/w-subversion-1.1.3p0/subversion-
L. V. Lammert wrote:
An associated mentioned that they were having decent OS compatility
(Linux) with SuperMicro machines. Has anyone tried them? They seem to be
pretty cost effective for the h/w capability.
I like SuperMicro boxes. We have about a hundred as webservers, mail
servers,
* Antonios Anastasiadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-21 11:27]:
Are all the xl-based cards crap without exceptions?
yes.
While I don't doubt Henning knows much much more than I do about such
things, this answer doesn't exactly satisfy me. Poor performance on
xl nics has been discussed many times
Thank You!
I had a version I tried to build from source before upgrading to 3.7
Got it installed now.
From: steven mestdagh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 5/25/2005 6:01 PM
To: Price, Joe
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: subversion port 3.7 problem
I ran 3.5 on a couple 5013G-Ms. Never had any problems.
On Wed, 25 May 2005, L. V. Lammert wrote:
An associated mentioned that they were having decent OS compatility (Linux)
with SuperMicro machines. Has anyone tried them? They seem to be pretty
cost effective for the h/w capability.
Hi Adam,
Apologies for the delay in response; I've been busy.
On 9 May 2005, at 11:52, Adam wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2005 07:40:10 +0100
Joseph Kiniry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I guess I should have been a little more specific to only
include
languages that have enough libraries to be
Setup a dhcp/bootp server along with tftpd on an exiting openbsd / linux
box, put bsd.rd on there and boot of that over the network using
boop()/bsd (as suggested in the INSTALL.sgi document). This worked fine
for me.
p.s. you'll need a serial console of sorts as that's the only way
sgi/obsd will
Sorry if it sounds to stupid.
What happens to an application that was forked with stdout/stdin or
even stderr opened for non-blocking I/O and it tries to read/write
from/to any of those FD and no process is attained to the other end?
PS: i known i could look into the source, but at the present
Would it be irrational to have it block ?
Thanks a lot.
On 5/25/05, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
What happens to an application that was forked with stdout/stdin or
even stderr opened for non-blocking I/O and it tries to read/write
I've just set up a Compaq Proliant 6500 with OpenBSD 3.7-release. It
works fine with the uniprocessor kernel, but when I boot from bsd.mp, it
sits at mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, then after a minute or two it
reports ami0: timeout ccb 1 and hangs.
I found
Dries Schellekens wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=111690466011478w=2
How does this compare to NetBSD agr(4)? Is this also IEEE 802.3AD?
It does some things that agr does not, but doesn't do 802.3ad yet.
Probably soon though.
-d
hmmm very odd. Let me try to reproduce.
On May 25, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Steve Shockley wrote:
I've just set up a Compaq Proliant 6500 with OpenBSD 3.7-release.
It works fine with the uniprocessor kernel, but when I boot from
bsd.mp, it sits at mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, then after a
fehler404 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OUTPUT
cc -fstack-protector -DPTHREAD_KERNEL -D_POSIX_THREADS -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wsign-compare -I/usr/src/lib/libpthread/uthread
-I/usr/src/lib/libpthread/include
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm a newwbie on OpenBSD and I've installed it on a IBM P100 Computer.
I have a Intel 82557 NIC inside. This NIC can be seen as fxp0.
My problem is:
When I don't use the comuputer during about 5 minutes, my NIC go to
sleep and don't want to receive or send
Damien Hull wrote:
...
Thanks for the info. My concern is that OpenBSD is secure by default
when you do a base install but when you start adding things like Postfix
etc... are you still secure?
How can that be answered?
The weakest link determins system security. It doesn't matter how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Me too.
Nice machines, low cost and high performance.
[]'s
Nadal
John R. Shannon escreveu:
I've bought several over the years and like them all.
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 01:51 pm, L. V. Lammert wrote:
An associated mentioned that they were
Matt Van Mater wrote:
* Antonios Anastasiadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-21 11:27]:
Are all the xl-based cards crap without exceptions?
yes.
While I don't doubt Henning knows much much more than I do about such
things, this answer doesn't exactly satisfy me. Poor performance on
xl nics
Thank you for your help Eric, you are a genius ;)
On 5/25/05, eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 21:38:03 +0200, Murat Mamitov proclaimed...
I'm planning to use my laptop like a desktop OS, i know, OpenBSD is
less desktop between BSDs,
Bullshit. you obviously know
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:52:34PM -0400, Adam wrote:
No, there you go living in a little fantasy world where you can say
things and they are magically true. Python and java are both
significantly slower than C#, especially python, its not even close.
I wonder what you mean by C# here; you
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 23:26 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
3c509: Worked. Easy software config.
3c509B: Worked Really Well, at least if you turn of PnP mode.
OpenBSD
has more trouble than Windows with the PnP mode, but it certainly
wasn't
trouble free on Windows.
I think they made a 3c509C
null and union mounts have been deleted. if you are using them and
tracking current, you will have pain when you reboot.
--
quit whining you haven't done anything wrong
because frankly you haven't done much of anything
* Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-26 05:46]:
3c920, 3c555, 3c{lots}: ok, people are tired of us slapping letters on
the end of a mid-grade card, let's make more confusing numbers. Oh,
3c940: after dozens of years of trying they gave up and shipped a
SysKonnect design
Sorry folks!
I think my question was explicited completely wrong.
Suppose a process tries to printf a log message and at the time the
process attained to the other end is not ready to read (the processes
are connect by mean of a pipe, ex:
$ a | b
Question: process a's attempt to write will
73 matches
Mail list logo
