Hey folks,
i am in need to figure out some info about setting a redudant. I can
manage to have two boxes setted in my end side. My problem is to have
the other end to support for redundance and provide a two internet
uplink connection. How have you faced such problem ?
On Monday 06 June 2005 06:43, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
i am in need to figure out some info about setting a redudant. I can
manage to have two boxes setted in my end side. My problem is to have
the other end to support for redundance and provide a two internet
uplink connection. How
I'm trying to compile vsftpd 2.03 with tcpwrappers and SSL support on
OpenBSD 3.7. I've edited the builddefs.h per the readme.ssl file
#ifndef VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILD_TCPWRAPPERS
#define VSF_BUILD_PAM
#define VSF_BUILD_SSL
#endif /* VSF_BUILDDEFS_H */
but when
Kvvesdan Gabor wrote:
The time sample was rejected because: The peer's stratum is less than the
host's stratum.
I had the same issue too. But i've solved it by pressing several times
on Update now button on winxp.
--
%cat ~/doc/personal.txt
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JID: [EMAIL
I have a PC with a couple of programs that have to write in a directory
in an NFS server. Both (client and server) are i386 OpenBSD systems.
Normally everything works perfectly, but I made a test to see what
happens if the NFS server is down: all client programs freeze for
exactly 10 minutes,
hi list,
i am very new in bsd and i have a problem with ldap. we have a suse linux
server with ldap on it. i have made a export from the ldap directory in a
ldif file. this file i can import on various linux machines without a
problem. but when i want to import the ldif file on bsd, it always
Hello,
I try to have a redundant DHCP server setup with CARP to no avail.
The IP multicast packets do not seem to appear on the carp
interface, which certainly is enough for the failure. OS is OpenBSD 3.7
GENERIC.
The carp interface looks like this:
#ifconfig carp192
carp192:
afaiR, ldif files can't have blank lines
nonsense.
slapadd: could not parse entry (line=421)
added:
ou=addr,uid=markert,ou=Users,ou=OxObjects,dc=suchtreffer,dc=de (0019)
but the line 421 is empty. strange.
What do the entries before and after line 421 look like?
What happens when
This is a Very Nicely Done Presentation!
Dave Feustel
Hi Dave,
Thanks a lot for this.
I'm glad that people like it because it was a lot
of work to put it together. More so than building
and configuring systems ;)
Actually, I did get a lot of help along the way and
Ryan McBride who was
Am Montag, 6. Juni 2005 16:41 schrieben Sie:
afaiR, ldif files can't have blank lines
nonsense.
slapadd: could not parse entry (line=421)
added:
ou=addr,uid=markert,ou=Users,ou=OxObjects,dc=suchtreffer,dc=de
(0019)
but the line 421 is empty. strange.
What do the entries
I'm trying to compile vsftpd 2.03 with tcpwrappers and SSL support on
OpenBSD 3.7. I've edited the builddefs.h per the readme.ssl file
#ifndef VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILD_TCPWRAPPERS
#define VSF_BUILD_PAM
#define VSF_BUILD_SSL
#endif /* VSF_BUILDDEFS_H */
Markus,
What do the entries before and after line 421 look like?
420 modifyTimestamp: 20050531112005Z
421
422 dn: ou=addr,uid=markert,ou=Users,ou=OxObjects,dc=suchtreffer,dc=de
I meant the whole records, not single lines. Records are separated by
blank lines. Try to find the
Booting USB is no problem for me... here is a snippet of code I use to
automate this process:
(note, you might have to run this on a -current box)
#!/bin/sh
# read disk from command line
DISK=$1
# default values for Kingston 64M DataTraveler
CYLS=120
HEADS=16
SECTS=63
if [ $DISK ]; then
Hi!
As I wrote the following problem a few days ago to the sparc list and until
now did not receive any answer, so I'll give the misc list a try. Sorry for
crosposting, but its urgent:
A few days ago I installed OpenBSD 3.7. Now I encounter problems with my IDE
drives.
I have an Ultra 60, two
Why not just:
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/`uname
-m`/wget-1.8.2.tgz
Federico Giannici wrote:
Clint M. Sand wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:09:23PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
I have a problem compiling wget from the ports.
Here is the final part of the
That has bad hardware written all over it. Try to reproduce on a
different drive.
On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:08 AM, Matthias Schreiber wrote:
Hi!
As I wrote the following problem a few days ago to the sparc list
and until
now did not receive any answer, so I'll give the misc list a try.
--On 06 June 2005 17:08 +0200, Markus Markert wrote:
ou=SharedFolder,ou=OxObjects,dc=suchtreffer,dc=de (0015) added:
ou=imapServer,ou=AvailableServers,ou=AdminObjects,ou=OxObjects,dc=su
chtreffer,dc=de (0016) added:
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Why not just:
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/`uname
-m`/wget-1.8.2.tgz
In fact, this is what I did!
But I'd like to know the reason of that error. I don't like the idea
that something is wrong in the system...
Bye.
Federico Giannici wrote:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Federico Giannici wrote:
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Why not just:
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/`uname -m`/
wget-1.8.2.tgz
In fact, this is what I did!
But I'd like to know the reason of that error. I don't like the
idea that something is
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Federico Giannici wrote:
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Why not just:
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/`uname -m`/
wget-1.8.2.tgz
In fact, this is what I did!
But I'd like to know the reason of that error. I don't like the
Hello,
I have 3.6 and I downloaded sendmail 8.13.0.
I ran sh Build, and got the following compile error:
cc -O -I. -I../../sendmail -I../../include -DNEWDB -DNIS -DMAP_REGEX
-DNETISO -DFAST_PID_RECYCLE -DNOT_SENDMAIL -c debug.c
In file included from debug.c:11:
On 6/6/05, Timothy Horie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have 3.6 and I downloaded sendmail 8.13.0.
I ran sh Build, and got the following compile error:
You are probably not going to get any help here on that subject. The
sendmail version that comes with OpenBSD is more than fine for your
Hello!
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:05:39PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| Hi list,
| anyone known a safe way to reduce my /usr partition and moving my
| /var ?
| Here my slice :
| Filesystem
I am having a LOT of problems with
formatting/previewing/printing in GnuMeric on 3.6.
Clicking on the gnumeric home page button produces
an error. Where do I report bugs?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
I need to recompile it without TLS. I've tried a lot of ways to get rid
of it without a recompile, but all paths led nowhere. I don't want TLS,
I don't want to Start TLS, I don't want any error messages in the logs
regarding TLS, I don't want to have to disable or enable TLS, I don't
want
Edit devtools/OS/OpenBSD and remove -DNETISO from confENVDEF
- todd
Like everyone (including me) has said, just use OpenBSD source. It
looks like TLS is enabled in OpenBSD's sendmail, so it's just a simple
matter of commenting out the few lines in the Makefile(s) to disable
it, then recompiling. The source code is all there, please just take a
look. You're still
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005, Timothy Horie wrote:
I need to recompile it without TLS. I've tried a lot of ways to get rid
of it without a recompile, but all paths led nowhere. I don't want TLS,
I don't want to Start TLS, I don't want any error messages in the logs
regarding TLS, I don't want to
I'm trying to compile vsftpd 2.03 with tcpwrappers and SSL support on OpenBSD
3.7. I've edited the builddefs.h per the readme.ssl file
#ifndef VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILDDEFS_H
#define VSF_BUILD_TCPWRAPPERS
#define VSF_BUILD_PAM
#define VSF_BUILD_SSL
#endif /* VSF_BUILDDEFS_H */
but
Hello everyone,
Is it possible to use an AMD64 machine (as 64 bit not i386) to cross
compile release for i386, without additional tools or extras? Google
reveals that cross compiling releases is an issue for some people, but
with i386 being fairly similar to AMD, would this still affect me?
--On 06 June 2005 11:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to compile vsftpd 2.03 with tcpwrappers and SSL support on
OpenBSD 3.7. I've edited the builddefs.h per the readme.ssl file
[..]
*** Error code 1
Stop in /tmp/vsftpd-2.0.3.
What's this /tmp/? Surely you'd do better to start
Never Mind. Sorry for the dumb question.
On Monday 06 June 2005 03:08 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
I am having a LOT of problems with
formatting/previewing/printing in GnuMeric on 3.6.
Clicking on the gnumeric home page button produces
an error. Where do I report bugs?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:27:39PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote:
On 6/6/05, Timothy Horie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to recompile it without TLS. I've tried a lot of ways to get rid
of it without a recompile, but all paths led nowhere. I don't want TLS,
I don't want to Start TLS, I don't
--On 23 May 2005 23:25 +0100, I wrote:
Can anyone suggest what's going wrong with this attempt at setting up
a ccd mirror on sparc64 (t1 105)? Making any changes to the disklabel
(with -e or -E) results in ccd0's disk information changing, e.g.:
I've just been looking at this again - for the
Ray Percival wrote:
To start with http://www.schneier.com/pptp.html and also because I for
one don't trust *any* security related code that I can't get the source
for. I think I'm not alone here by any means.
You're talking about PPTP, I'm talking about IPsec.
Fact of the matter is we can
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Lots of commentary from you, Steve... is that why you are the one giving
the talks?
I'm not sure I have anyone to give a talk to, and I haven't done
anything quite as interesting (or large-scale) as this with OpenBSD.
(Besides, isn't it less talk, more code? Of course
On Monday 06 June 2005 23.04, you wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is it possible to use an AMD64 machine (as 64 bit not i386) to cross
compile release for i386, without additional tools or extras? Google
reveals that cross compiling releases is an issue for some people, but
with i386 being fairly
As I suspected this was caused by the change to random addresses
returned by malloc. In this specific case, PL_oldbufptr is NULL
and, depending on the addresses of the other buf pointers, the
while() loop that trims spaces can go off into la la land.
The fix is to simply check that the buf ptr
(Besides, isn't it less talk, more code? Of course I'm probably
better at talking than coding.)
Actually, I don't know why, but people keep getting the sentence wrong,
for no good reason.
The real sentence is ``less talk, more cheese''.
Note that, I have a list if you somehow can't find
Mark Uemura wrote:
six month prior to
me taking over the SysAdmin position.
Ah, see when I read the slides, I got the impression that you came in as
a consultant to do all this, not that you did it all in-house.
I for one have problems putting a Windows Server on the Internet. Even
within
Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
and it didn't work out.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
option in ipconfig. I'm getting conflicting evidence from various
sources: on-line man page (+), man page of my brand new 3.7 install (-),
various forums (mix of + and -). It looks as if the ipconfig that comes
with
* Steffen Kluge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-07 02:13]:
I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
option in ipconfig. I'm getting conflicting evidence from various
sources: on-line man page (+), man page of my brand new 3.7 install (-),
various forums (mix of + and
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 10:11 +1000, Steffen Kluge wrote:
I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
option in ipconfig.
For crying out loud. Don't know where that came from, probably from
setting up a LAN party for my son last weekend...
Please
lladdr was added after 3.7. It will exist in 3.8 and later.
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:11:35AM +1000, Steffen Kluge wrote:
:Hi all,
:I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
:option in ipconfig. I'm getting conflicting evidence from various
:sources: on-line man
Mick wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 08:33 -0400, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Mick wrote:
I seem to be seeing somewhat odd behaviour with regards to the
userpace PPPoE program and my high speed ADSL link. By high
speed I mean 8Mbps down and 1Mbps up. Initially, I was on a
512/128 plan
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Stephen Marley wrote:
Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
and it didn't work out.
If the connection to the ipsec peer is not passive, you can use
I don't see lladdr in the OpenBSD 3.7 version of the online man page,
maybe you should check that. The default man pages for the website are
current, unless you specify a stable version. Make sure you do that
next time. Back on lladdr, you must use a snapshot in order to get it,
as it was put in
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:44:26AM +1000, Steffen Kluge wrote:
Can I simply pick the ifconfig binary out of snapshots/i386/base37.tgz,
or must I upgrade the whole thing, including packages and ports? If I
upgrade, will the installer detect installed packages and attempt to
No, you'll need to
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the issue
lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and setup a
Windows XP machine instead. The Windows native PPPoE client was able to
download at 5.5Mb/s and the OpenBSD machine was still stuck at 1.5Mb/s.
A
Ok, this is an odd one. I just finished upgrading a firewall from 3.6
to 3.7 -release using the tarballs. After completing everything as per
the upgrade guide, I noticed a syntax error reported by pfctl during
boot. However, I can login and enable PF manually without any errors.
pfctl -nf
Without researching this too much; have you guys tried -current which
contains the idle loop fix?
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:41 PM, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the
issue
lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and
Jason Dixon wrote:
Ok, this is an odd one. I just finished upgrading a firewall from 3.6
to 3.7 -release using the tarballs. After completing everything as per
the upgrade guide, I noticed a syntax error reported by pfctl during
boot. However, I can login and enable PF manually without
Jason Dixon wrote:
Hmm. might be possible to do a typo in such a way that with DNS, it
might resolve to an address, and without, it is an error. Probably
wouldn't work as desired, but that may have been unnoticed. Or maybe I
shouldn't speculate when over-tired.
Not a bad idea, but nothing
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the issue
lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and setup a
Windows XP machine instead. The Windows native PPPoE client was able to
download at 5.5Mb/s and the OpenBSD machine was
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
it is part of G. we will wait to see what effects it has.
and now it's option P. for some apps, it interfered with normal operation
too much.
--
And that's why he won't get my vote.
I have an old Dell server that used to crash with 3.5. Now, it stays up with
3.7. However, something strange is going on with the mac addresses of the
two onboard 100 F/D nics
fxp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
address: 00:02:b3:b1:a8:9a
description:
57 matches
Mail list logo