However, if I am on the the firewall machines themselves, I can ping
machines on the remote end, but service connection fails.
Steve is right. You have not setup flows in your isakmpd.conf to allow
for this.
Are there additional rules I need to put into pf for this type of
connectivity?
On 6/17/05, J. Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo gave an interview to Forbes Magazine, in which he stated: It's
terrible, De Raadt says. Everyone is using it, and they don't realize how
bad it is.
In many cases I talked to people those who chose Linux instead of
OpenBSD for
For the second time in about a week, a new server of us with OpenBSD
i386 3.7-stable (of a couple of weeks ago) crashed.
Here it is the dmesg with the stack trace.
Do you think there is any hint of it being an hardware or software problem?
Thanks.
Jun 18 03:09:36 arwen /bsd: fsync failed:
If I recall correctly, Sebastian has had numerous attempts to get a diff
submitted last year, that all went nowhere.
Some highlight that I might be wrong about:
- no communication at *all* from the maintainer
- no desire from anyone else to commit the diffs b/c they were not
blessed by the
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:50:27 +0200
From: Thorsten Johannvorderbrueggen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sparc Urani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Theo gave an interview to
I guess this is one of those things that keeps biting into you until
you get it resolved. After some experimentation, while I never thought
this would have such an effect--especially with net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
and net.inet.tcp.sack=1 by default--the following simple additions to
/etc/sysctl.conf
http://www.openbsd.org/security.html says that
OpenBSD 3.4 and earlier releases are not supported anymore. The following
paragraphs only list advisories issued while they were maintained;
these releases are likely to be affected by the advisories for more
recent releases.
Is the 3.4 in that
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:57:27PM +0200, Thorsten Johannvorderbrueggen wrote:
[...] OBSD only supports apm, no apci.
There's some initial acpi support in -current. So just wait and see
what else will be done.
Ciao,
Kili
sauce for the goose...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Clint M. Sand wrote:
Anyone care to share a procmail line to destroy any message with how do
I chroot and mysql and php?
see http://perlcode.org/tutorials/procmail/proctut/
HINT
By default, procmail scans only the headers of the email message.
The register has put up a very lazy opinion piece on the article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/17/de_raadt_channels_ballmer/
In it they dismiss Theo as a bitter, egotistical, Steve Ballmeresque
character. Ah well, the register = cheap uk tech tabloid rag so who
cares what they think.
I'm curious as to how programs actually get ported from one OS to
another, and if certain directions are easier than others. That is, how
does one figure out what needs to be changed in order to make OpenNTPD
work on Linux? Is it generally easier to move a program from $some_bsd
to
* Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050618 12:21]:
I'm curious as to how programs actually get ported from one OS to
another, and if certain directions are easier than others. That is, how
does one figure out what needs to be changed in order to make OpenNTPD
work on Linux? Is it generally
Is this possible using PF? We are using OBSD 3.6 (and newer if needed)
as a network provider to ISPs. Customers southbound have viruses that
send out 100 ARPs a second. This loads up the NAT table therefore
making the NAT box useless. I am trying to clear the NAT quicker, but
this makes other
CPAN now uses ftp or ncftp to download the files and all packages get
installed perfectly!
Noticed the same problem. Seem that lynx is un-gz'ing the files inline
and not removing the .gz, so CPAN tries to do a checksum and un-gz them
and errors out.
FYI, that didn't work here, so I
Jim Razmus wrote:
* Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050618 12:21]:
I'm curious as to how programs actually get ported from one OS to
another, and if certain directions are easier than others. That is, how
does one figure out what needs to be changed in order to make OpenNTPD
work on
I'm asking this here because I know you people know
alot about computers.
A friend of mine wants to share files with the world
with the help of his networked CD-tower server. He
would like a bit of saftey against hw crashes. The
weakest hw link is the harddrive so he therefore
proposed using his
Hi,
Is the 3.4 in that quote correct, and if so, an I correct in
inferring that 3.5 _is_ still supported (i.e. that following 3.5-
stable would still get me all critical to security/reliability
patches)?
Don't count on it. The current release (3.7) and its predecessor (3.6)
are supported.
Hiya.
I was told in [EMAIL PROTECTED] to email this address to ask for
helpb so yeah. :)
The problem is, I bought a USB 2.0 PCI controller card for my server, but it
only will work at 1.0 or 1.1 (not sure which) speeds. The 2.0 isnbt
working.. It says bnot configuredb in the dmesg.
On 18/06/05, Harry Tormey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The register has put up a very lazy opinion piece on the article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/17/de_raadt_channels_ballmer/
In it they dismiss Theo as a bitter, egotistical, Steve Ballmeresque
character. Ah well, the register =
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 07:54:29PM +0200, Tim wrote:
But apart from that what would be other drawbacks of using a
CD-tower server to provide files on the internet?
It will be awfully slow, especially for parallel access (lots of
seeks, and CD drives aren't designed for this). Additionally, I
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:05:11 -0500
ConCon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hiya.
:
:
: I was told in [EMAIL PROTECTED] to email this address to ask
: for help, so yeah. :)
:
: The problem is, I bought a USB 2.0 PCI controller card for my
: server, but it only will work at 1.0 or 1.1 (not sure
Hi all,
Is not possible to adjust clock under OpenBSD correctly??? I do not
understand why cmos clock needs to leave at UTC. why?
Do i need to recompile kernel with TIMEZONE option to correct this
bug?? Is not possible to use sysctl tool to correct this???
Thank you very much.
--
C.L.
I thought Theo never used Linux?
On 6/18/05, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/06/05, Harry Tormey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The register has put up a very lazy opinion piece on the article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/17/de_raadt_channels_ballmer/
In it
If you need to leave the timezone set differently because you dual-boot,
you can edit the kernel with config(8). A custom kernel is unnecessary.
-Josh Grosse-
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:04:37PM +0200, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hi all,
Is not possible to adjust clock under OpenBSD
C. L. Martinez wrote:
Is not possible to adjust clock under OpenBSD correctly??? I do not
understand why cmos clock needs to leave at UTC. why?
Do i need to recompile kernel with TIMEZONE option to correct this
bug?? Is not possible to use sysctl tool to correct this???
Aside from me
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:06:27 -0400
Haroon Khalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Theo never used Linux?
Again, the is a clear difference between using Linux, and reading the source of
it or observing it's development model!
Jasper
On 6/18/05, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2005/06/18 14:04:27, John Draper wrote:
We are getting attacked, but our root console is outputting log data
so fast we can't ussue any root commands.
Quickest way is probably 'pkill syslogd' (or 'kill `cat /var/run/syslogd.pid`'
if you don't have pkill).
...or just login as a user other
User A is on the east coast.
User B is on the west coast.
They both use the same computer.
What time is it?
UTC is the correct time.
User wants to view time in his own time zone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
C. L. Martinez
Sent:
On 6/18/05, John Draper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are getting attacked, but our root console is outputting log data
so fast we can't ussue any root commands.
What can I do to temporarily stop the console output so I can ussue
a few root commands to change our FW settings?
JD
Moritz Grimm wrote:
John Draper wrote:
We are getting attacked, but our root console is outputting log data
so fast we can't ussue any root commands.
What can I do to temporarily stop the console output so I can ussue
a few root commands to change our FW settings?
Log in as a regular
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:47:03PM -0700, John Draper wrote:
But the pkill syslogd seems a reasonable thing to do, but how do I
set it back again? One other problem I have is my ps don't work,
but that problem is going to be fixed in my next scheduled upgrade.
If ps doesn't work, there's a
Is proxy ARP running by default on a typical BSD install? I am talking
about ARPS. The only traffic I can see coming into the box is ARP when
I do a network trace. As soon as I disable the customer, NAT returns
to normal as far as the entries are concerned. I enable the customer
and then I start
Is there anyone here on the list from Tucson, AZ, and if so would you
have any interest in forming a local OBSD users group? If so please
contact me offlist.
Steve
Dear eBay Member,
You have not yet verified your eBay account. On May 20, 2005 we sent you an
email to notify you that you must provide account vericfication to continue to
be a part of eBay. This is needed to protect the integrity of your account
Section 9 of the EBay User agreement states
I just upgraded my firewall to 3.7, but I've found my VPN is now not
working. I keep seeing NAT detected messages, but both machines have
real IPs so it doesn't make sense. The client machine is a 3.6 install,
and the server machine was a 3.4 machine which I used the media CD to
upgrade. I've
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:34:06PM +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
I just upgraded my firewall to 3.7, but I've found my VPN is now not
working. I keep seeing NAT detected messages, but both machines have
real IPs so it doesn't make sense. The client machine is a 3.6 install,
and the server
Stephen Marley wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:34:06PM +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
I just upgraded my firewall to 3.7, but I've found my VPN is now not
working. I keep seeing NAT detected messages, but both machines have
real IPs so it doesn't make sense. The client machine is a 3.6
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 02:16:24PM +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
Stephen Marley wrote:
Have you tried the -T option to isakmpd?
Seems like the option I want ... but I can't see it in the man page on
either my 3.6 or 3.7 machines, and isakmpd won't accept -T as a flag
on either machine.
Is
Hi.
Actually I don't know about usefulness my information but...
I have another machine - on Intel 7501VW2 with 2 Xeon. And I have
Intel SRCZCR RAID controller there.
So, with uniprocessor kernel it's recognized and work fine -
there is 3 SCSI acting and seen as one (RAID5) disk. desg follow
39 matches
Mail list logo
