We finally got some money to build a router for the center of a 200-300
user network. Upon arrival I found it to be one giant segment with old
old switches (sort of - not real ones) and terrible sprawl.
I need to build a router that will handle 7 segments, 4 of which are
very heavily used, 3 of
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We finally got some money to build a router for the center of a 200-300
user network. Upon arrival I found it to be one giant segment with old
old switches (sort of - not real ones) and terrible sprawl.
I need to build a router that will
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
Bruno Rohee wrote:
Thus breaking a behaviour that people have been used too for about
the last 30 years.
Telnet was used for most of the last 30 years, too.
telnet is still a wonderful tool that I use all the time.
$ telnet hostname 25
$ telnet hostname 80
$
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:35:38 +0300
Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo everyone,
I've setup a web server with OpenBSD 3.7, default install Apache, PHP 5.0.3
and MySQL 4.0.23. When I connect from other hosts to mysql, everything works
fine, and then I try to connect to mysql local console,
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I spent the last three days reading through all the archives.
And I have no clue what I am doing wrong. I only started down
this road because of some of the other posters. I figured I
would give assembly a shot.
Why? Do you like pain?
I read Assembly Step
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing them to see if they will do the job I need. Can anyone recommend
other tools that will do the work?
As mentioned, use the -s option in tcpdump. There's also a tool
called
On 21/07/05, chaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:35:38 +0300
Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo everyone,
I've setup a web server with OpenBSD 3.7, default install Apache, PHP 5.0.3
and MySQL 4.0.23. When I connect from other hosts to mysql, everything works
I'm trying to build the gkrellm port in 3.7, and it fails at the link stage
looking for libCrender.so.3.1. Where should this be coming from?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Never mind that the way that code does syscalls is unsupported even on
i386. Never mind that the calling conventions on amd64 are different.
Never mind that you're using 32-bit pointers on a 64-bit architecture.
Never mind that
:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:34:05 -0400
stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build the gkrellm port in 3.7, and it fails at the link
stage looking for libCrender.so.3.1. Where should this be
During system boot, I see this:
Jul 21 10:52:05 tekkaman /bsd: cd0(atapiscsi0:0:0): Check Condition
(error 0x70) on opcode 0x0
Jul 21 10:52:06 tekkaman /bsd: SENSE KEY: Not Ready
Jul 21 10:52:06 tekkaman /bsd: ASC/ASCQ: Medium Not Present
Is it normal? Why the kernel should complain
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 09:21]:
Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
why would you want to deal with such crap? geez.
I was contemplating a
Quad gigabit card and a
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings, or
even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or connection
negotiation.
I've also been using telnet to do that kind of job.
--On 21 July 2005 14:11 +0200, BjC6rn SjC6berg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings,
or even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or
connection negotiation.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 09:21]:
Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
why would you want to deal with
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:11 +0200, Bjvrn Sjvberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings,
or
even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or
connection
Another option is to do something like:
STATE_LIMIT=(source-track rule, max-src-nodes 75, max-src-states 3)
...
$NET0_IN inet proto tcp from any to $RAS port ssh flags $tcpInit \
keep state $STATE_LIMIT
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 12:16 AM +0200 7/19/05, Romain GAILLEGUE wrote:
Today,
On 7/19/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot about the /dev/null idea. interesting result. I scp'd a 10 Mb
file from my gentoo box and it completed fast in a few seconds - speed
3.3 Mb/s. Not great but faster than the other experiences.
I then did the same with a 2.5Gb
Folk,
This one has me scratching my head:
I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user and have a stock X working.
I can type startx once I'm logged in and have kde up, but with no
mouse functionality.
The relevant section of /etc/rc.local reads thus:
#based on a solution posted by S.Marley
I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user and have a stock X working.
I can type startx once I'm logged in and have kde up, but with no
mouse functionality.
? Not sure about that one, if your mouse works in kdm.
The relevant section of /etc/rc.local reads thus:
#based on a solution
* Bill Chmura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 18:12]:
I too looked for the sk cards, but there is no Quad for them. I was
hoping to reduce interrupts by using Quad cards...
wrong assumption.
quad card does as many ints as 4 one port cards with the same type of
chip.
If I went with
several sk
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 17:44 schrieben Sie:
Hi,
Since you are using KDE, did you run genkdmconf to create the kdm
configuration files (eg. /usr/local/share/config/kdm/Xsession)?
HTH,
Stephan
Folk,
This one has me scratching my head:
I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user and
From: Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:57:04 -0700
Went to the SGI O2 command monitor and input
boot -f dksc(0,4,8)
What happens if you try
boot -f dksc(0,4,8)/boot
On my system that loads the bootloader from from cdrom and then
continues to load the
For the sk(4) cards, if you buy the Linksys ones (only single seaters i
believe) you should make sure to get the rev.2 ones, as the rev.3 is realtek
based, you can tell on the retail box, it shows the little crab on the chip.
Happy hunting
- J
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
#based on a solution posted by S.Marley
echo -n ' kdm'; (sleep 5; /usr/local/bin/kdm ${kdm_flags})
Don't do that. Use /etc/ttys if thats the effect you want.
Any good reason not to? I posted the a solution using
Hi,
...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:50:20AM -0400, Bill Chmura wrote:
Ethernet wise, currently the whole mess is at 100MB... It will be that
way at least for 12 months after this. As far as heavily used, I just
got on the scene myself and the usage is way down. School, summers
off.
Hello all,
I've been playing around with database driven web stuff lately in the
chrooted apache. I've got a pretty simple CGI written in C that selects
all of my blog entries from a database and displays them in a web page.
I got things working running httpd with the -u flag and now i'm
On 2005/07/21 15:32:37, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
nc(1) doesn't work for the telnet cli on speedtouch ADSL routers,
though.
That's probably because, quite unlike telnet(1),
nc(1) isn't a telnet client (but you can
Thanks. I just wasn't sure if my problem was an openBSD problem or an assembly
problem. It's definitely the later. And I just found the amd64 ABI, which is
making the problems clear for me. Pushing those args on the stack is
definitely wrong.
Anyway, I appreciate the feedback. And thanks Art
I'll be presenting a talk and demonstration at the upcoming OSCON
event in Portland, OR on August 4th. If anyone's going to be in the
area Aug 1-4, I'd love to hook up for an ad-hoc OpenBSD BoF over some
beers.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2005/view/e_sess/6475
--
Jason Dixon
On 21/07/05, Stephen Marley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
#based on a solution posted by S.Marley
echo -n ' kdm'; (sleep 5; /usr/local/bin/kdm ${kdm_flags})
Don't do that. Use /etc/ttys if thats the effect you want.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Polak wrote:
Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02
All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
will give it some thought, but
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 20:06]:
On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 09:21]:
Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Hello all,
I've been playing around with database driven web stuff lately in the
chrooted apache. I've got a pretty simple CGI written in C that selects
all of my blog entries from a database and displays them in a web page.
I got things working running httpd with the -u
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:13:48PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 20:06]:
On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 09:21]:
Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above
1000Mbps,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 21/07/05, Stephen Marley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they do? I use xdm and I didnt use a sleep. Maybe its a kdm issue?
Yes, it's a kdm specific issue. It seems all gettys need to be spawned
before kdm kicks in otherwise the
On 7/21/05, Steven Bowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/19/05, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
i'm not sure why you picked those two; neither would be near the top of
any list i'd make. 6944a in particular is de(4), not the greatest.
I
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Daniel Polak wrote:
SNIP
Bill,
As it happens I have been e-mailing with SysKonnect about the SK-9S22
and a possible quad port card today!
They are thinking about a doing a quad port card but need to be sure
that there is enough interest.
Anybody interested in a quad
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
You could post a URL that actually works..
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:23:04PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
SNIP
I do not have any SK-based cards using the newer Yukon-2 chips. If someone
could get me a card or two then it would provide incentive to support the
cards. SysKonnect stuff is much better
On 7/20/05, Tim Hammerquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
Bruno Rohee wrote:
Thus breaking a behaviour that people have been used too for about
the last 30 years.
Telnet was used for most of the last 30 years, too.
telnet is still a wonderful tool that I use all
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
Brad, think you can get them to start producing the 10Gb card I've
been talking to them for almost 2 years about?
diana
It would be nice if they even sent us the hardware that was offered via you
quite some time ago nevermind vaporware 10Gb cards.
Vivek Ayer wrote:
Hi guys,
This has really been frustrating experience. I have a dual boot client
behind an OpenBSD firewall that uses a DHCP server. When I boot into
XP, I get an IP of 192.168.0.2 and in Linux I get 192.168.0.3. Because
of this, I can do port forwarding without editing pf.conf
Brad wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
You could post a URL that actually works..
They took it down, but the KB article was How to ask a question. The
text of the article seems to be
Hi,
Just a little question that came up when designing a firewall system
here, can a transparent bridge with pf do load balance to internal
server even if the ifaces don't have any IP adresses?
I have two ways to develop this firewall, or a transparent bridge on the
switch to router link, or an
I'm trying to build a pair of 3.7 machines, to replace a pair of 3.5
machines. These machine will be a simple firewall, not NAT'ing just an
internal, and an external interface, plus a dedicated network for pfsync.
At hte moment I'm having trouble getting failover to ork, when I fail one
of the
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:35:27 -0500
Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be blunt, because when an enterprise just needs pure unfiltered
inter-VLAN routing, Cisco has CEF products which can route between
interfaces at bps and pps rates unapproachable using a general purpose
Unix OS and COTS
48 matches
Mail list logo
