Hi,
Can someone make a comment about this behaviour..
# date
Wed Aug 30 07:33:32 IST 2006
# chroot /emul/linux /bin/sh
..and music in my speakers stops (mplayer)..
# date
Thu Jan 1 01:00:01 IST 1970
# rdate -n vega.cbk.poznan.pl
Wed Aug 30 07:34:36 IST 2006
# date
Wed Aug 30 07:34:38
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:08:48PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It is personal use, because it is not corporate...
If you want to put it on the OpenBSD artwork webpage, you can download it here:
http://ronja.twibright.com/grx/tools/openbsd.png
I think it looks much better than the improperly
Do you know how to tell the /etc/printcap that it should print on both sides of
paper with a laserjet postscript printer? I looked into the printcap manpage
and there is nothing about sides or duplex.
CL
Good day
How can I configure pf in case with 2 external interfaces?
There is no binding to interface at all in ipfw. I just
divert 42345 ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any
fwd 194.185.178.126 ip from 194.185.178.125 to any
divert 42345 ip from any to 194.185.178.125
In pf I have to set external
On 2006/08/30 14:21, AstraSerg wrote:
How can I configure pf in case with 2 external interfaces?
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
load-balancing outgoing traffic.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:23:39PM +0200, Floroiu, John Williams wrote:
does sasyncd enable the IPsec failover gateways to also share the ISAKMP SA
(so that DPD exchanges can proceed despite failures)? the ISAKMP SA is not
explicitly mentioned in the help page (and is actually distinct from
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/08/30 14:21, AstraSerg wrote:
How can I configure pf in case with 2 external interfaces?
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
load-balancing outgoing traffic.
Thanks a lot.
--
Wed Aug 30 15:17:38 MSD 2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I'm trying to pxeboot a Dell 1650 with OpenBSD 3.9. Console redirection
of the BIOS is running without problems and pxeboot gets transmitted via
tftp too.
When I type in set tty com0, I get the following message:
com0 console not present
And
Hi,
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
Could some one give me steps I can follow to troubleshoot the problem?
I pinged differrent computers from a linux machine Below are the Statistics
Pinging
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
Could some one give me steps I can follow to troubleshoot the problem?
First on the openbsd machine check reserve name lookup of the client
machine you're coming from.
Also check how
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:54:31PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
Could some one give me steps I can follow to troubleshoot the problem?
There's a few suggestions here: http://www.openssh.com/faq.html#3.3
From your description, my guess
Hi all,
Yesterday I installed Openbsd3.9 and wanted to install Digest::SHA1 using
CPAN
I get an error complaining the MD5 checksum is incorrect and to delete it
from /root/.cpan../../etc etc (which I did). This happens with other
modules too. I can download the modules manually and run perl
On 8/30/06, Jonas Thambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check your resolv.conf/hosts file. Might be reverse-lookup that
fails.
Bull's eye! you hit it right on target Jonas.
The 3.9 had an outdated nameserver entry.
I updated it and it logs in through SSH real fast :-)
Thanks a million
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
As already mentioned, if reverse lookup doesn't work your login will
pause for a substantial amount of time before you are prompted.
Assuming this is a network under your control, if your LAN is small you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej David,
David Golden wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:00, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Don't have a Dell 1650 specifically, but most pre-boot console redirection
I've seen on PCs is basically screen-scraping the VGA text buffer. When you
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:46:25AM -0400, Monah Baki wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I installed Openbsd3.9 and wanted to install Digest::SHA1 using
CPAN
asking because you don't mention having a reason for trying CPAN rather
than ports, but you could just pkg_add(1) the p5-Digest-SHA package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej David,
second reply, after checking the BIOS settings.
David Golden wrote:
On our PC systems with redirection, there is a BIOS setting for when the
redirection cuts out, something like:
always
pre-boot
shared
disabled
The Dell only
On 2006/08/30 15:39, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Redirection After Boot
When I set the last paramter to disabled, I don't even see the pxeboot
(pxe bootloader) of OpenBSD. Logically, I can't type in set tty com0.
the console redirection is probably not sharing the serial port
with the OS - try
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:39, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Redirection After Boot
Any more ideas?
Well, I guess, set redirection after boot to no, but tell obsd pxeboot to
default to com0 with a /etc/boot.conf on the tftp server (see pxeboot man
page...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/08/30 15:39, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Redirection After Boot
When I set the last paramter to disabled, I don't even see the pxeboot
(pxe bootloader) of OpenBSD. Logically, I can't type in set tty com0.
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Replying to myself for the archives:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
The Dell only knows 3 Parameters for console redirection to serial port:
enabled / disabled (is set do on obviously)
Remote Terminal Type: ANSI or VT100 (is set to VT100)
Redirection
On 2006/08/30 16:10, Marian Hettwer wrote:
When I set the last paramter to disabled, I don't even see the pxeboot
(pxe bootloader) of OpenBSD. Logically, I can't type in set tty com0.
the console redirection is probably not sharing the serial port
with the OS - try setting this to disabled
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:09, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Linux can cope with this situation and OpenBSD can't.
Hmph. Could well just be because linux (or at least syslinux)
blindly assumes something that openbsd (probably correctly)
checks, though?
Friends,
I'm needing to mount a /tmp partition in a secure mode. Which is
the best way to fstab file configuration?
Thanks in advance,
Denis
This may or may not be related to the NIC adaptor, but I will try to
describe the problem as best I can.
Hardware: SunBlade 100- Sparc64
NIC: Gem0
Issue: About every 2-3 weeks the NIC stops working, issueing an
ifconfig down followed by an ifconfig up does something to wake the
interface up,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Golden wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:09, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Linux can cope with this situation and OpenBSD can't.
Hmph. Could well just be because linux (or at least syslinux)
blindly assumes something that openbsd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Stuart,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/08/30 16:10, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Did that. And also set image bsd.rd and boot bsd.rd, as I can't see
anything at this point of my installation if I disabled the console
redirection after boot.
I have replaced the network cable, and the hub that it is attached to...
Do we have case of bit rot here? Or maybe different NIC chip sets...
I'm getting a lot of CRC errors, but nothing shows up in netstat -ni...
gem01500 Link 00:03:ba:0b:72:de 9525295 0 1733115
0 167809
Hi all.
When it comes to auditing wireless networks, I notice that linux users
lives
happily with aireplay from aircrack suite. Unfortunately, it seems like
there is no any tool similar to aireplay in BSD world. In past days, we
had
wnet suite, with reinj and dinject, but those days are
On 8/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
OpenBSDs PF is able to block Packets by the passiv OS fingerprint.
For example you can block packets from nmap.
I4ve a little problem witht hat: How to block a host if it does/did a
nmap-Scan?!
I can block the nmap-scan
Is it possible? brconfig man pages says:
The bridge has support for 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), which can
be used to detect and remove loops in a network topology. Using the stp
or -stp commands to brconfig, STP can be enabled or disabled on each
port. STP will not work on
On 8/30/06, Denis Augusto Araujo de Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friends,
I'm needing to mount a /tmp partition in a secure mode. Which is
the best way to fstab file configuration?
chmod 0 /tmp ? that's a pretty secure mode. not too useful though.
A solution which works across several operation systems might be openvpn
(http://www.openvpn.net)
Openvpn creates tap/tun interfaces which have ethernet addresses and
support bridging. Its track record security wise has been pretty good
afaik. And its implementation crypto wise is ok (from
On 30 Aug 2006, at 19:51, Torsten Geile wrote:
mail -a file -s test recepient .
would do it, but actually in my case it doesn't.
I think you have to send it in base64 encoded form, with a few added
headers. What's simpler would be to put it in some publicly
accessible place (like a
On 30 Aug 2006, at 20:08, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
I think you have to send it in base64 encoded form, with a few added
headers. What's simpler would be to put it in some publicly
accessible place (like a website) and send the URL to the file rather
than the file itself.
Sorry, wrong list... :)
:( I wanted to also give OpenBSD a little free marketing (the monthly traffic
of the Ronja website http://ronja.twibright.com is IIRC around 10GB) by proudly
stating we use it on the project (well, me on my devel machine), but it looks
like every time I discuss OpenBSD on the Ronja mailing list I
Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
One very common cause of slow response to ssh login requests is some
sort of error in name resolution. Reverse lookups which do not
complete or does not return the expected result is one of
I didn't send to mutch valuable information. I'm testing Linux
compatibility layer under OpenBSD, and was to lazy to put full path of
commands under /emu/linux (/usr/local/emul/redhat). Found some issue
with rename() probably but that's is other story[1]. I was quite
surprise when I put this
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Ted Unangst wrote:
I'm needing to mount a /tmp partition in a secure mode. Which is
the best way to fstab file configuration?
chmod 0 /tmp ? that's a pretty secure mode. not too useful though.
You can always try 'chmod 1733 /tmp' though.
--
Antoine
Denis Augusto Araujo de Souza wrote on 30/08/2006 17:11:
I'm needing to mount a /tmp partition in a secure mode. Which is
the best way to fstab file configuration?
it depends on what secure is for you ?
no /tmp maybe ?
or restricting to root access ?
or using noexec,nodev,nosuid flags ?
chroot /emul/linux /bin/sh
# date
Thu Jan 1 01:00:02 IST 1970
I ran in this problem, before, too. But back then
I found out that others had similar problems, and in the
end I gave up on running Linux executables chroot'ed
OTOH, according to this message, you might be successful,
if
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
However a 2Mbps DSL line is not the fastest out there... a friend of
mine is griping about his 200MHz PPro (which will probably run circles
around the 4801) being unable to keep up with his 6Mbps DSL line with
PPPoE. I haven't
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
However a 2Mbps DSL line is not the fastest out there... a friend of
mine is griping about his 200MHz PPro (which will probably run circles
around the 4801) being unable to keep up with his 6Mbps DSL line with
PPPoE.
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
gotten to the point that being associated with the project is often
more of a liability than an asset. I will attempt to explain how this
happened, what the current state
On 31/08/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance.
If true, unfortunate. A sad day.
Jeff.
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
gotten to the point that being associated with the project is often
more of a liability than an asset. I will attempt to explain how this
happened, what the current state of affairs is, and what needs to be
done to attempt to
Hello Charles,
Some parts of your message seemed to be flames resulting from some
past personality conflict that I know nothing about, so I won't
comment further on those. Clearly you are more familiar with BSD
internals than I am. I imagine others will pickup various technical
points such as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
Charles M. Hannum wrote:
popularity in 1993 and 1994) have suffered similar problems. FreeBSD
and XFree86, for example, have both forked successor projects (Dragonfly
and X.org) for very similar reasons.
I don't agree that Dragonfly
On Thursday 31 August 2006 07:27, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
At this point most readers are probably wondering whether I'm just
writing a eulogy for the NetBSD project.
At this point i was wondering why I was reading this on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Lars Hansson
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:49 -0400
Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um. Wow. I think Theo wins.
What? Are you kidding? Theo _always_ wins. =)
As for Charles M. Hannum: fork!
Travers Buda
On 8/30/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 07:27, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
At this point most readers are probably wondering whether I'm just
writing a eulogy for the NetBSD project.
At this point i was wondering why I was reading this on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Holland wrote:
The thing could still be a frustrating first OpenBSD system for
someone. It's a great machine for what it is...but not as a Welcome
to OpenBSD system. My overall recommendation stands. Get used to
OpenBSD on familiar hardware, then get used to unusual hardware with
an
Am I overlooking something? I can't seem to find a firefox
port in the ports tree.
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
try mozilla-firefox instead then.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:47:21PM -0400, stan wrote:
Am I overlooking something? I can't seem to find a firefox
port in the ports tree.
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
On 8/30/06, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I overlooking something? I can't seem to find a firefox
port in the ports tree.
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
You might want to learn how to search the tree.
And btw.. it's listed
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, stan wrote:
Am I overlooking something? I can't seem to find a firefox
port in the ports tree.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports$ make search name=firefox
Port: mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.1
Path: www/mozilla-firefox
Please check the mailing list archives and the documentation
Charles M. Hannum wrote:
[I'm CCing this to FreeBSD and OpenBSD lists in order to share it with
the wider *BSD community, not to start a flame war. I hope that people
reading it have the tact to be respectful of their peers, and consider
how some of these issues may apply to them as well.]
Breen Ouellette wrote on Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:22:59PM -0600:
This really isn't relevant to OpenBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ head -n2 /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #2: Wed Aug 30 16:53:43 CEST 2006
[EMAIL
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
before so here goes...
I am a
Had anyone try to make mozilla?
Any success. I tried without any success.
Brgds,
Riwan
At 07:08 AM 8/31/2006 +0300, Antti Harri wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, stan wrote:
Am I overlooking something? I can't seem to find a firefox
port in the ports tree.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports$ make
60 matches
Mail list logo
