So far, every reply has been, It's yours if you pay
to ship it.
Count me in; I will help pay shipping as well.
Count me in too, I have slightly limited funds but will help as much as I can.
Please contact me off list if I can be of any use.
There isn't a shortage of multi-processor sparc64
On 11/10/06, Patrick Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a new openbsd 3.9 install on i386. It worked before on
that computer when I installed quickly to test for compatibility, but I
needed to finish up some hardware stuff on it and then I wanted to install
for real
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:37:35PM -0400, Adam wrote:
Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Threads a big PITA. Best avoided. Creates more problems than solves.
OpenBSD is about neatness, cleanliness and stability.
Threads don't have any of them. :-)
First of all, threads
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:06:12AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm familiar with 3261. However the SIP proxy that 3261 talks
about has a completely different function than what an ALG/SBC does.
Maybe I shouldn't have used the
Paul Stoeber wrote:
the cvs info manual says:
But in case you want to know, the rule is that the RCS file
is stored in the attic if and only if the head revision on
the trunk has state `dead'.
counterexamples:
/cvs/src/sbin/swapon/Attic/swapon.8,v
On 10/12/06, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Yes, cvs has bugs, no surprises here. These nonconforming RCS files do
not do any harm, and they are certainly not created whenever a file is
removed.
The only one that could be problematical would be the file located in
the Attic which
On 12/10/06, Albert Chin-A-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 02:36:29PM +0200, viq wrote:
Can't find the thread now, but few months ago there was a comment to
question about that hold on a while, this is being worked on. Seeing
that the support for UFQDN in
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just FYI. TS-WIFIBOX Tiny WiFi Box Application Kit for $249.
* Internal TS-7400 SoM engine
* Ultra-Fast Bootup Firmware
* 200 MHz ARM9 processor with MMU
* Internal 802.11g WiFi with external antenna
* Industrial quality design
o Rugged aluminum enclosure
o No moving
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:17:42PM -0700, Prabhu Gurumurthy wrote:
pgurumur-vm-openbsd (OpenBSD): [~/working/networking/docs]
10.200.0.46: [579]$ cat ipsec.conf
remote_gw = 192.168.0.1
remote_net = { 10.0.100.0/22, 10.0.2/24 }
local_net = { 172.16.18.0/26 }
ike esp from $local_net
On 12/10/06, Hans-Joerg Hoexer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:07:27AM +0200, viq wrote:
...
Now, there are two caveats to this I didn't yet figure out how to solve.
1) VPN-B must be able to resolve vpn-b.my.domain to the address of
it's egress interface, otherwise the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 10/11/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
is someone planning on making a OpenBSD port for
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:31:29PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you
want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Neither do I understand what really goes on during IP forwarding as
opposed to bridging
with forwarding(routing) tcp/ip packets have a destination IP address
which isn't bound to an
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
[..]
You should take a look at these links.
http://www.softpanorama.org/People/Ousterhout/Threads/index.shtml
Note that those slides are from 1995, that is over 10 years ago. You do
realize that
hi there,
my tiny server is not a champion when it comes to hardware..
normally it doesn't swap, but recently i have run a ram hungry
application and it started swapping.
top displays swapped processes nicely, easy to spot.
because of its limited dipslay, i had a look at ps's options
about
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:37:14AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
i know ps is only showing what was, or might have been, not what it is..
but how come in one moment 40-50 (out of the total 110-120 processes)
are swapped out and in the next instant none of them?
status swapped out does not mean
Friends,
I am a newbie to certain real world networking concepts since I have no
hands on experience in network deployments.
And OpenBSD man pages unfortunately are not clear enough for me.
Perhaps I am daft but I would gladly rewrite them for the benefit of ppl like
me...
On Thursday 12 October 2006 17:56, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
2) My second question relates to vlan(4). Is my understanding that you
can
extend ethernet segments logically across the Internet with vlans correct?
No.
I guess vlans can also be used to split an ethernet broadcast
hmm, on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:51:12AM +0200, mickey said that
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:37:14AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
i know ps is only showing what was, or might have been, not what it is..
but how come in one moment 40-50 (out of the total 110-120 processes)
are swapped out and
Claudio Jeker a icrit :
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:59:23PM +0200, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
I have an OSPF enabled backbone and want to insert two firewalls.
Each firewall will be connected to one different core router.
My idea is to setup OSPFd on the interfaces plugged to the core, and
CARP on
Girish Venkatachalam a icrit :
2) My second question relates to vlan(4). Is my understanding that you
can extend ethernet segments logically across the Internet with vlans correct?
I am sure there is much more to it. I am getting some idea from recent threads
but I am interested in
David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how this is going to affect the
I'd like to thank everybody for their comments. I'm listening and
learning. Keep those posts coming! :)
--ropers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Girish Venkatachalam
Sent: 12 October 2006 11:57 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Simple Networking Newbie questions
Friends,
I am a newbie to certain real world networking concepts since I
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
I use tun for ppp and gprs connections.
A lil bit elaboration with details will help I am sure. How exactly do you go
about it?
Thanks.
If I get enough info I promise to send a man page patch. That is why I
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:14:51PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:51:12AM +0200, mickey said that
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:37:14AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
i know ps is only showing what was, or might have been, not what it is..
but how come in one
-Original Message-
From: Girish Venkatachalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 October 2006 01:16 PM
To: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Simple Networking Newbie questions
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer -
Umzimkulu
On 2006/10/12 16:45, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
wrote:
I use tun for ppp and gprs connections.
A lil bit elaboration with details will help I am sure. How exactly do you go
about it?
Thanks.
If I get
On 2006/10/12 15:26, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
1) What exactly is the difference between tun(4), gif(4)
and gre(4) interfaces?
tun(4) is a path between kernel and userland so that network
interfaces can be handled by user code rather than in-kernel.
It's used by ppp(8), OpenSSH and OpenVPN
On 2006/10/12 14:39, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Neither do I understand what really goes on during IP forwarding as
opposed to bridging
with forwarding(routing) tcp/ip packets have a
On 12/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or, for that matter, why I needed to enable
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf for the bridge to work.
just checked and you definitely don't need net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
to bridge. net.inet.ip.forwarding is for IP packets,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 16:45, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
wrote:
I use tun for ppp and gprs connections.
A lil bit elaboration with details will help
2006/9/19, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
how can I get ppp(8) to insert a random delay while reconnecting?
Although I have
set redial random 0
in my ppp.conf, it's not random, but 3:
I can't?
Best
Martin
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 15:26, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
1) What exactly is the difference between tun(4), gif(4)
and gre(4) interfaces?
tun(4) is a path between kernel and userland so that network
interfaces can be handled by user
Hi,
I'm having a bit of trouble with the finer details of my OpenBGPD
config, and would appreciate some tips on getting it right and advice
on the right way of doing things.
I have two routers, two independent BGP connections, and a block of
provider independent address space. The routers are
On Thursday 12 October 2006 4:57 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 10/11/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:31:39AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant
amount of money! That's it.
Hmmm, before I answer that question I'd like to know what are
the intended uses? For example, for
On 10/12/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) My second question relates to vlan(4).
This link seem good:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/NetworkInterfaces
-Martin
--
Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names
the streets after them.
On 2006/10/12 13:57, ropers wrote:
On 12/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or, for that matter, why I needed to enable
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf for the bridge to
work.
just checked and you definitely don't need net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
to bridge.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 10:31 pm, David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:32:08 +0200
RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU
camp has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The
idea here is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course
Original message
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:45:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: open source PLCs?
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
is there any open source software that allows for use of OTS computers as
PLCs
It's no very expensive, the electric consumption (I don't know if this
expression is ok), the size, ...
On 10/12/06, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:31:39AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Thursday 12 October 2006 4:57 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 10/11/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from
Hi Julien,
It's no very expensive, the electric consumption (I don't know if this
expression is ok), the size, ...
This also holds true for Via Epia Mini-ITX boards, btw. Plus, most fit in
an 1U 19 enclosure or any standard (micro) ATX case.
That said, I know nothing of armish.
Buhbye...
On Oct 12, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Cabillot Julien wrote:
It's no very expensive, the electric consumption (I don't know if
this
expression is ok), the size, ...
On 10/12/06, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:31:39AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct
On 2006/10/12 15:42, Cabillot Julien wrote:
It's no very expensive, the electric consumption (I don't know if this
expression is ok), the size, ...
... socketed RAM, serial console :-)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Cabillot Julien wrote:
It's no very expensive, the electric consumption (I don't know if this
expression is ok), the size, ...
On 10/12/06, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
What advantages do you see from building a DNS server using
armish?
m
--
On 12/10/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just
On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the porting
software paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a
private mail from Mike Connor where he writes about patching of
app source violates their trademark. Oh
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just FYI. TS-WIFIBOX Tiny WiFi Box Application Kit for $249.
* Internal TS-7400 SoM engine
* Ultra-Fast Bootup Firmware
* 200 MHz ARM9 processor with MMU
* Internal 802.11g WiFi with external antenna
* Industrial quality design
o Rugged aluminum
Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Like many things in computing it just depends on what one is most
comfortable with and using the right tool for the right job. One time
that is events, the other time that is threads...
Greets,
Jeroen
Disagreed. Your points are
Shane J Pearson wrote:
You find a lot of things obvious for a guy who is so presumptuous.
For the record, I respect the intentions of RMS and I highly respect
the intentions and practical thinking of Theo, the OpenBSD project,
the developers and much of the user base. I've been enjoying
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:19:24PM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Like many things in computing it just depends on what one is most
comfortable with and using the right tool for the right job. One time
that is events, the other time that is
Hi,
Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish?
I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive
client (dsmc).
As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite
backup supported in my organisaton and if I want to maintain an
OpenBSD
I just spotted this in the news:
http://news.com.com/Transmeta+sues+Intel+for+patent+infringement/2100-1006_3-6124965.html?tag=nefd.top
If Intel makes a habit of stealing patented technology would open access
to their hardware documentation then make it easier for the patent
holder to sue?
Will these work with the OpenBSD/armish?
the boards supported by armish are reasonably close to the
intel development board (redboot/pci-x). this little board is
quite a different thing.
We, the authors of this work, are giving it away to you, dear
reader (and to everyone else), as an opportunity, not as a
service. Do with it whatever you want. We welcome your
contributions, and we owe you nothing.
This fails to grant the rights explicitly identified
At 08:51 AM 10/12/2006 -0500, you wrote:
i did see that there were a great many hits on google before posting and have
been sifting through what's already available for a few hours now. i wanted to
see if anyone could suggest something in particular as being better. the
qualifier of any was a
So... RMS vs. TdR in a hot jello grudge match... who comes out on top?
Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself. For the most part, this
whole thread seems just that silly.
Hi.
I happen to also run Tivoli/TSM.
As far as I know there is no native OpenBSD Tivoli client. and for
disaster recovery purposes (if that's all you are using it for) you
don't really need one - the tivoli client does object by object (read
that - file by file) backup
i am facing problems using hfsc with PF.
pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent root_fxp0
pfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parent's sc
/etc/pf.conf:21: errors in queue definition
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded
althoug my pf.conf looks
Hello list,
Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers...
Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines? I guess it should
work on 4.0, i see that mfi(4) supports the Dell SAS controllers that
this model use. Just wondering if anyone tried them and had any
* ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 10:26]:
Hi,
Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish?
I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive
client (dsmc).
As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite
backup supported in my
Hey Alejandro,
Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines?
Marco did. At least, he said so here two days ago:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=116048164710924w=2
The archive is your friend, not your foe. :-)
HTH... Nico
Just a few days ago someone asked the same question. Yes they are fully
supported and I have several deployed.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:20:23PM -0400, Alejandro Lozanoff wrote:
Hello list,
Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers...
Has anyone tried OpenBSD on
Oops! Sorry for the noise, for some reason i dont have that message on
my local newsgrouped misc where i searched.
Thanks anyway!
Alejandro.
Quoting Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just a few days ago someone asked the same question. Yes they are fully
supported and I have several
I'm not saying OpenBSD is a bad operating system. Far from it. However I
would only use it for routers, firewalls, bridges, etc... Anything that
has to do with networking because after all, OpenBSD's networking is
great. Outside these areas OpenBSD is just too slow and doesn't support
enough
On 10/8/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/10/07 19:29, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I am evaluating processor hardware for using with openbsd. Two options
of course: Intel and AMD.
There are more options than just those. macppc and sparc64 are amongst
the faster arch's too SNIP
On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am facing problems using hfsc with PF.
do you see anything wrong with this ? is there a bug in this ?
I don't mean to be rude but you *really* need to start learning how to look
into these things by yourself. It will help you out a
Don't know anything about TSM-clients but I'm swedish so here is a
translation of the important part.
-
I've fought with the TSM-client on OpenBSD 3.7 and it's starts but I
have done any backups yet.
There is a little problem with dependencies but I did the following:
Installed the
S t i n g r a y wrote:
pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent root_fxp0
pfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parent's sc
[... cut ...]
altq on $extif hfsc bandwidth 512Kb queue { www, msn, https, smtp, def }
queue www bandwidth 20%
queue msn bandwidth 20%
queue https bandwidth 20%
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster (at
least not if
Henrik Enberg wrote:
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:11:52 -0400
From: Kurt Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the porting
software paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a
private
Doh. There was no reply five minutes ago.. Oh well.. :)
/Anders
Alejandro Lozanoff wrote:
Hello list,
Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers...
Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines? I guess it should
work on 4.0, i see that mfi(4) supports the Dell SAS controllers that
this model use. Just wondering if anyone
Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish?
The only (hopefully) useful search result I could find was this page,
but it appears to be in Swedish:
Quick summary:
(The guy doing the test is Stefan. His contact info is on the archive page)
Marcus:
I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500
mhz for our Firewall.
Pentium III 500 mhz
512mb ram
(2) 20gb hard drives, in RAID 1
Realtek NIC
Patrick
Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know
My swedish ain't so guud but Stefan's solution appears to have been:
- Install RedHat library from OpenBSD package /usr/local/emul/redhat
and link it to /emul/linux.
- He used (under OBSD 3.7) the RPM version from Slackware 10.1
- He did a /usr/local/emul/redhat/bin/rpm
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:39:35 +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer -
Umzimkulu
wrote:
I use tun for ppp and gprs connections.
A lil bit elaboration with details will help I am sure. How exactly
My server is kind of old but runs OpenBSD like a charm.
# sysctl hw
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel Celeron (GenuineIntel 686-class, 128KB L2 cache)
hw.ncpu=1
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.physmem=268017664
hw.usermem=267587584
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=wd0,cd0,fd0
hw.diskcount=3
hw.cpuspeed=401
On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am facing problems using hfsc with PF.
That would be the first problem. Mention of HFSC was scrubbed from the
PF FAQ at http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html for good reason.
Everything I learned about HFSC was from other web sites
Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster
I am looking for something comparable to Ultra Monkey (Linux) that runs
on OpenBSD. Anyone?
Peter
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi,
Mine is not that old either. I'm using an IBM 350 as a firewall/Router
P133
93b RAM
1.2 gb HD
Works fine
Dylan
On 10/12/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500
mhz for our Firewall.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote:
| Hello List!
| We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
| know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
Oldest box I have is a 80486DX2 @66MHz w/ 16M RAM. It has two 10Mbit
NICs and a 250MB disk
Will H. Backman wrote:
The oldest one I have in production is a PIII 667 from 2001. Not that
old I guess.
I was going to stay silent, but... I have a Sparc 5 at home that runs
like a champ. Part of that is that the Sparc 5 took a lot of memory for
its time, and I've maxed it at 256MB.
--
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the internet.
cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) (GenuineIntel 586-class) 133
Intel Pentium 1 166 Mhz (with mmx!)
32 MB RAM
Network: 1 x fxp 1 x ne
Hard Disk: Western Digital 80 GB IDE
Connection internet: 15 mbit cable
http://redshift.mine.nu:8080/~glenn/phpsysinfo/
Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
# sysctl hw
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache)
hw.ncpu=1
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.physmem=200908800
hw.usermem=200519680
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=wd0,cd0
hw.diskcount=2
hw.cpuspeed=448
I run OpenBGPD on it with 4 full peers as a route server.
And
The machine!
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Cyrix 486DLC (486-class)
hw.ncpu=1
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.physmem=49917952
hw.usermem=49684480
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=wd0
hw.diskcount=1
# uname -a
OpenBSD anand..com.ar 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
Daniel
On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ sysctl hw
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache)
hw.ncpu=2
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.physmem=268001280
hw.usermem=267599872
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=sd0,sd1,sd2,cd0,fd0
hw.diskcount=5
hw.cpuspeed=449
On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Falk Husemann
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:55 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Oldest Server you run
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would
like to
At 03:21 PM 10/12/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet wrote:
I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500
mhz for our Firewall.
Pentium III 500 mhz - 512mb ram - (2) 20gb hard drives, in RAID 1 -
Realtek NIC
PII - 350Mhz - 64M - 4G disk - Intel NIC
On 12/10/06, Kurt Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/community-edition-policy.html
OpenBSD is complying with the published guidelines for
the community edition. That is the only point that matters.
If the Mozilla Foundation thinks differently, I'm
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a
On Thursday 12 October 2006 14:54, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the
Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just spotted this in the news:
http://news.com.com/Transmeta+sues+Intel+for+patent+infringement/2100-1006_3-6124965.html?tag=nefd.top
If Intel makes a habit of stealing patented technology would open access
to their hardware documentation then
On 10/12/2006 1:54 PM, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard disk
and a connection to the internet. So
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
