Hi,
is there sth. like a software watchdog for OpenBSD available? searching the
manuals or in the ports does not show up anything.
In the ddb manual I read I can drop into ddb when I press Ctrl+Alt+DEL, do I
can drop into ddb programatically without the need of a human entering this
key combin
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:09:33AM +1000, Leon yendor wrote:
> There does not seem to be much mention of the combination in man pages
> etc in 4.1.
>
> Is it really just like IPsec over IPv4 or ?
On a user-interface level, yes. (On a protocol level, not exactly - IPv6
has built-in support for IPs
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
> 1. Would it be possible to address the issue of new port tree in some more
> detail after system upgrade in the FAQ?
I suppose it would be, but you're the first to ask this. (Somewhat
surprisingly.)
> I have followed the steps provide
2007/8/26, Sean Darby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Basically, can I just download the 4.1/ports.tar.gz and "tar" it into
> /usr (after I finish my 4.1 upgrade and /etc upgrade)? (Overwrite or
> remove the old port tree?)
Yes
> Sean
--
La brigade SnW est une spC)cialitC)
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
> Thank you in advance for you input on this.
>
> I have some questions pertaining to getting the new ports after an
> upgrade,
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
read it all, particularly "Example usages for cvs(1)".
--
[EMAIL PROT
Ok...first off I apologize for wasting bandwidth this morning looking for
help...blame it on Sunday morning laziness. After googling and trying things I
got my qemu working w/XP finally. The undeadly article is great but isn't as
complete as it could be. Hopefully this will fill in the cracks fo
If anyone had any doubt that our insistance on freedom was important,
just read this.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/24/0027.html
What is even more astounding is the incestious love-in these other
groups have, with their Sam-worship, that prevents them from doing the
obvious
Thank you in advance for you input on this.
I have some questions pertaining to getting the new ports after an
upgrade, though first perhaps this would be fitting since those managing
OpenBSD's FAQ pages on the website might receive this:
1. Would it be possible to address the issue of new po
Kevin Cheng wrote:
> Hi Darrin,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
> take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
> upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
> application
Greetings Ladies and Gentlemen!
We are an european Computers company.
We offer you an additional income for part-time employment. You can earn some
cash for 2-3 hours per day work.It is absolutely free for you, you should NOT
sale anything! Very easy and fun way to make money.
Few main fa
There does not seem to be much mention of the combination in man pages etc in
4.1.
Is it really just like IPsec over IPv4 or ?
Thankyou,
Leon.
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
http://djs32.agava.net/~oz/postcard.gif.exe
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and ent
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:42:34AM +0800, Kevin Cheng wrote:
> Hi Darrin,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
> take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
> upgrade few months ago, plus months of tes
works fine for any of the `supported' (if
> wrong) modes like 1024x800.
>
> A new log file, with your virtual line and the shadow buffer disabled,
> is available at
> http://jschipper.dynalias.net/~joachim/posts/20070825/Xorg.0.log.
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
applications.
Should we just isolate one by o
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:33:34AM +0800, Kevin Cheng wrote:
> What would be the safe way to backport driver codes from 4.1 to 4.0, such as
> (/usr/src/sys/dev) ci, pcmcia, usb?
For most values of "safe" the answer is none.
With the upcoming 4.2 release, 4.0 will be unsupported. Your backports
wi
Hi,
What would be the safe way to backport driver codes from 4.1 to 4.0, such as
(/usr/src/sys/dev) ci, pcmcia, usb?
Thanks,
Kevin
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And as mentioned, you can always apply the 1.3 patches if you don't like
>> going that route. (I still actually don't understand why those patches
>> are not integrated yet in the default 1.3 tree, probably has something
>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:38:47PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
> Le samedi 25 aoC;t 2007 C 22:41 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
> > (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
>
Marc Espie wrote:
You obviously have a repository of packages that has various versions of
packages in there. That doesn't work well. pkg_add assumes you have a
snapshot-like structure of packages.
I don't really understand. I have a very much standard stable 4.0 and
4.1. The behaviour is the
That's the HOWTO in undeadly ;)
Denny White([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:51:41AM -0500:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:31:40PM -0700, Allie Daneman spake forth:
> > So I recently installed Qemu w/XP on my 4.1 box and am having a bear
>
Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as mentioned, you can always apply the 1.3 patches if you don't like
> going that route. (I still actually don't understand why those patches
> are not integrated yet in the default 1.3 tree, probably has something
> to do with 'no new features' or j
Le samedi 25 aoC;t 2007 C 22:41 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
> Hello,
>
> I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
> (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
> video card had me worried.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that there is
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> Stop exactly there.
>> Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
>
> Is there a conveniently chrooted version (port or package) of
> Apache2.x? Or is chrooting the new version entirely up to whoever
> installs it? It's
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Stop exactly there.
> Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
Is there a conveniently chrooted version (port or package) of
Apache2.x? Or is chrooting the new version entirely up to whoever
installs it? It's not difficult, it's just more
alwin wrote:
> hi misc mailinglist users,
>
> i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
> server in openbsd does not support ipv6
Stop exactly there.
Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
Don't even THINK further of going where you th
hi misc mailinglist users,
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
server in openbsd does not support ipv6 so i tought i will use pf to nat
the ipv6 address to the ipv4 address for port 80. but pf for some reason
does not support this.
i added the following rule to /e
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:36:38AM +0200, Adriaan wrote:
> On 8/25/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
> > (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
> > video card
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> | I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
> | (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
> | video card ha
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 01:10:16PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Wanting to find out which packages needed an update, I referred to FAQ 15:
> "Invoking pkg_add(1) with the -u flag and no package name will just
> examine all installed packages for updated versions."
> This results here in
>
> ># pkg_
* Falk Brockerhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 07:23]:
> Hi,
>
> I just trapped into a little bug within the combination of OpenBGPd,
> Carp and the "depend on" directive. I'm using the latest OpenBSD 4.2
> snapshot on i386.
>
> When I configure the eBGP session without any carp interface the
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
| I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
| (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
| video card had me worried.
| (If someone is aware of work being done on supportin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:31:40PM -0700, Allie Daneman spake forth:
> So I recently installed Qemu w/XP on my 4.1 box and am having a
> bear of a time getting pf and the networking going. I've tried the
> undeadly howto and another on the Qemu forum t
33 matches
Mail list logo
