On 29/10/2007, at 5:24 PM, Craig Findlay wrote:
As other have already said, it seems to only be a problem with
quite old PC's. At least mine is. (see dmesg below)
Cheers,
Craig
OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #1435: Sat Mar 10 19:07:45 MST 2007
[EMAIL
Hi,
On 29/10/2007, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread is a bit bothersome for a lot of reasons. However, there
is a lack of hard info so far.
When you say it isn't booting the CD, what does this mean? Does it try
but fail with some error? Does it not even stop at the CD on
Hi again,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 02:38:08 +0100 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
I just installed OpenBSD on a i386 from cd41.iso as
described in the FAQ, chapter 4.
When I restart the system from the CD all OpenBSD partitions
show up properly and I can chroot into /mnt after I mounted
them.
Hi,
I don't quite understand what you're doing? Are you looking for a
dual-boot with linux via grub?
If so, have a look at
www.aei.mpg.de/~pau/zen_process_obsd.html
Read it in detail.
If not, just forget this mail.
Cheers,
Pau
2007/10/29, Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi again,
Am
m fairly new to OpenBSD (been using FreeBSD for years) and have
stumbled across some issues on a desktop install (after several server
based installs over the past few months).
The system has two identical drives (WD 250G) which I wish to RAID
(1). As i understand it openbsd has no support for
Hello list,
I am trying to move my IPsec configuration from isakmpd.conf to ipsec.conf.
However i cannot find a syntax to specify multiple transform suites with
ipsec.conf
I tried something like:
ike passive esp from any to any quick enc {aes,3des}
but it is rejected.
I want something like
On 10/27/07, Calomel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju,
Has the device name changed? Perhaps to /dev/cd0a
No Calomel, I tried even cd0a it doesn't work out.
Meanwhile I gave that system for servicing because it shuts down
automatocally when the CPU load increases. Will see if there is any
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:48:20 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
This thread is a bit bothersome for a lot of reasons. However, there
is a lack of hard info so far.
Well, I read Theo's message and I know we can't ask for any changes to
the issue CDs.
Shit happens.
I just get my terrier genes showing a
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 11:01:44 +0100 schrieb Pau Amaro-Seoane:
I don't quite understand what you're doing? Are you looking for a
dual-boot with linux via grub?
Yes. I have a Linux box here with Grub. Admittedly the first
hard disk contains a Windows that gets used sometimes by
other
Hi,
Great work on the detailed inspection.
On 29/10/2007, RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 67,108,864 a possible barrier for old BIOSes ?
But weren't peoples old machines booting home made 4.2 cd's just fine?
My concern is more for some young guys with only one old dumpster
surprise and no
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:31:31PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
It's a pretty simple concept, really.
A few years ago, I was giving a talk at a local high school. One of
the students asked me why his computer crashed a lot, why can't they
build an operating system that doesn't crash?. I told
On 10/29/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if nobody makes really good hardware then there's nobody to reward
for it, so you end up buying bad hardware and rewarding the maker for
it.
If given a choice, I think I like Sun's sparc hardware most of all.
Though IBM's boxes do allow
is it a recent grub? if you're reading grub source I will assume you
know more about it than I do, but am writing this on a box which boots
debian/openbsd/xp without problems, from grub installed circa 6 months
ago. I certainly did not dd any sectors around. I can send you my grub
conf when I
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:18:07PM -0300, Marcus Andree wrote:
Got similar problems with imap once, a long time ago... Had to switch from
mailbox format to maildir
then, it wasn't Cyrus.
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
---
Institute of
I am writing this from a dual-boot system with linux only and I never
had your problem.
2007/10/29, michael hamerski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
is it a recent grub? if you're reading grub source I will assume you
know more about it than I do, but am writing this on a box which boots
debian/openbsd/xp
You need to use at least samba-2.2.7a and use the audit.so module. The
samba source code has what you need. Check out the information in
~samba/examples/VFS/audit.c and in the README file in that directory.
--
Calomel @ http://calomel.org
OpenSource Research and Reference
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007
indeed...
you seem not to have read the site I pointed to previously.
Don't say you have read it if you didn't. The information is there.
Do what Andrew says and tag it as A6; i.e. openbsd from the linux fdisk
This is *also* written in the web page
2007/10/29, Andrew Daugherity [EMAIL
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
2007/10/26, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Where are the choices for non-x86?
The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
(macppc) or expensive unsupported (IA64).
It's too bad that Apple discontinued their PPC. It was an acceptable
On 10/28/07, Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grub root (hd1,^I
Possible partitions are:
Partition num: 0, Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
Partition num: 1, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x82
Partition num: 4, Filesystem type is ext2fs,
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines. There are cases
where the same CD works with a newer machine, but fails to boot with an
older one. I presume this means the track alignment is marginal in some
cases.
--- Austin Hook [Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:49:09AM -0700]: ---
older one. I presume this means the track alignment is marginal in some
cases.
i swapped CD drives and that solved my problem. but it sounds as if i
should go retrieve that old drive from the garbage now, as i just
chalked it up to
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
I don't have a suitable machine to try it on, but amd64 boot loader is
now able to boot an i386 kernel, and I suspect (but am
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 11:54:23 -0500 schrieb Andrew Daugherity:
On 10/28/07, Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grub root (hd1,^I
...
Partition num: 5, No BSD sub-partition found, partition type 0xa6
...
Here is a `sfdisk' (Linux) output:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:42:19 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
I don't have a suitable machine to try it on, but amd64 boot
running 4.2/i386 as of two weeks ago, I've got a default route that
isn't being seen as valid and consequently not installed in the RIB.
when I first rolled this router out, however, it was valid and being
installed. while I'm interested in what could have happened between
then and now, I'm more
Thanks a lot for your patience when I became fretful.
I also become very usually fretful when something that SHOULD be
working is as stubborn as to refuse to do it. I know it. Oh, yes...
and how...
glad to read that it worked for you!
Pau
2007/10/29, Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:42:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
[...]
So, it may be worth someone with an affected
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:29:42 -0400, Barry Miller wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:42:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:49:09 -0700 (MST), Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines. There are cases
where the same CD works with a newer machine, but fails to boot with an
older one. I
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:53:38PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
2007/10/26, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Where are the choices for non-x86?
The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
(macppc) or expensive unsupported (IA64).
It's
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:11:01AM -0400, bofh wrote:
On 10/29/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if nobody makes really good hardware then there's nobody to reward
for it, so you end up buying bad hardware and rewarding the maker for
it.
If given a choice, I think I like
On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor
not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config
part and your setup should work again.
Henning hit me with that clue-by-four privately, and
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:42:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1
in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
[...]
So, it may be worth someone with an
* Aaron Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-29 23:33]:
On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor
not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config
part and your setup should work again.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Barry Miller wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:42:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/29 10:49, Austin Hook wrote:
I understand that some people have experienced boot problems with CD #1 in
the new 4.2 release set, mainly with older machines.
[...]
So, it may
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:40:07PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
running 4.2/i386 as of two weeks ago, I've got a default route that
isn't being seen as valid and consequently not installed in the RIB.
when I first rolled this router out, however, it was valid and being
installed. while I'm
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor
not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config
part and your setup should
* Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-26 16:53]:
On 10/26/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, then, is the correct way to separate the project files of more
than 16 projects, where some users will need access to all of the
groups?
There has to be _some_ solution
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Pieter Verberne wrote:
does OpenBSD have a program/script to remove control characters (escape
sequence) from text files?
Try col -b
--
Brett Lymn
Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 20:01:22 +0100 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 11:54:23 -0500 schrieb Andrew Daugherity:
I think this is your problem -- the OpenBSD partition needs to be a
primary partition (hda1-hda4 in Linux terminology, or (hd0,1) -
(hd0,3) in GRUB
I set up a test network with bgpd/ospfd, a standard service provider design
where ospf carries the network links and loopbacks and bgp carries
everything,
bgp routers doing nexthop self, core full mesh and access routers rr-clients
of the two nearest core routers.
I'm seeing some pretty odd
On 10/29/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for LPARs, I don't really need them. Unless, I suppose if they
really do provide rock-solid virtualization so I can run an OpenBSD
firewall in one LPAR and another instance of OpenBSD (or Debian,
whatever) in another LPAR for doing
I've been reading about and want to set up a set of (2) carp/pf/pfsync
redundant firewalls but I haven't seen anything in the docs or on the
list similar to what i'm hoping to accomplish so here goes:
I'm horrible at ascii art so i'll try to describe the scenario as best i
can:
2 firewalls,
I'm trying to convert a 22 node ~100 CPU cluster from Linux to
OpenBSD. The motivation is to increase reliability and security.
However, I have a peculiar problem with the bge driver. It seems that
bge doesn't detect properly the media type the hardware supports. The
nodes I'm trying to convert
44 matches
Mail list logo
