On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Marco, instead of complaining about GNU, GPL, FSF, Linux, etc. Why
don't you write some code instead? I know it's a strange concept.
Hehehe. A funny hippie.
//art
On 04/15/10 01:39, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Fascinating. I predicted Peereboom would post the same old rant.
My fix has nothing to do with childish attitude or being more nerdy than
you. It has everything do with GNU's twisted definition of freedom.
Yet, that's YOUR
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Marco, instead of complaining about GNU, GPL, FSF, Linux, etc. Why
don't you write some code instead? I know it's a
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
Search for Strange concept on marc.info.
Then apply some logical thinking yourself, and quit drinking Stallman's
kool-aid.
Funny.
How many restrictions are in the BSD and ISC licenses? For all intents
and purposes, one: keep the copyright message intact. Otherwise, *free*
to do with as you please. That's a fact.
This has been committed. Thanks.
-mark
lum@
===
Hello,
while playing with isakmpd, I found that it would be nice to have a
complement for the isakmpd: exiting log entry.
Index: isakmpd.c
http://marc.info/?w=2r=1s=%22Strange+concept%22q=t
and?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Eh? Was it irony? I suppose that not and you need to learn A LOT about
who is Marco ;-)
Search for Strange concept on marc.info.
On 14/04/2010 19:27, J Sisson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:38:56PM -0500, Ron McDowell wrote:
Yup, nowhere in that goals page does it say anything about don't be
rude to the casual users. Maybe that is why
P$PP PP P!P PP+P PP PPPP PPP/PPPP,P P P!PP
P P PPP PPPPPP
29-30 P0P?QP5P;Q | P PQP:P2P0
P!P5PP8P=P0Q P?QP5P4P=P0P7P=P0QP5P= P4P;Q: QPP1QQP2P5P=P=P8P:PP2,
P3P5P=P5QP0P;Q P=Q Q, QP8P=P0P=QPP2Q Q P8 P:5QQP5QP:P8Q
P4P8QP5P:QPQPP2, P4P8QP5P:QPQPP2 P?P
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
The fact that I'm not a developer does not means I should remain
in silence.
The general approach there has always been:
Shut up and hack!
-dav
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:35:36AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
I'm curious, what freedom do you think the GPL brings to
* Peter syllops...@syllopsium.com [2010-04-15 03:27]:
I know bigmem is still in a state of flux and can be enabled by
editing machdep.c and compiling a custom kernel.
What's the best way to test and report this?
none. bigmem is known broken, otherwise it would be enabled by
default. and tests
From: Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
* Peter syllops...@syllopsium.com [2010-04-15 03:27]:
I know bigmem is still in a state of flux and can be enabled by
editing machdep.c and compiling a custom kernel.
What's the best way to test and report this?
none. bigmem is known broken, otherwise
If you define freedom by the number of restrictions, then
the only
free license would be no license at all. Public domain. No
copyright.
Thus no restrictions. No ALL CAPs notices. Not even
crediting the
original developers.
So you think that giving people the freedom to know where the code
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
to this modified Rom code, and perhaps committed the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details. Which would have
longgest useless thread EVER!!! a bit funny, however :D
Jason George wrote:
Actually two of the top linux kernel developers answered my email
directly to them when I had some questions. There was no ridicule or
belittling.
If so, you got ripped off. You should hear us over beer.
Oh,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:39:29AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Fascinating. I predicted Peereboom would post the same old rant.
My fix has nothing to do with childish attitude or being more nerdy
than
you. It has everything do with GNU's twisted definition of freedom.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:35 -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Then apply some logical thinking yourself, and quit drinking Stallman's
kool-aid.
Funny.
He just spoke TRUTH, Your ilk is unfamiliar with that and its concept.
How many restrictions are in the BSD
Hello.
'make index' doesn't work inside /usr/ports after i update the ports.
It only works when i remove the entire ports folder and get it again from cvs.
# cd /usr/ports
# cvs -q -d$CVSROOT up -r OPENBSD_4_6 -Pd
M INDEX
P www/php5/Makefile.inc
P www/php5/distinfo
P www/php5/core/pkg/PLIST-main
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:38 +0100, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said
I can receive mail but I cannot get it to send email even after fixing
all the changes it made to my settings. It changed my outgoing server
from its IP address to the host name which will not work.
I changed it back to IP address but it still fails to work.I deleted a
password, but it won't even
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:49 AM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
So you think that giving people the freedom to know where the code has come
from to allow them to not get conned and not use old, possibly insecure
code
and giving them the ability to contribute to the original source of the
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:18:50AM -0700, ch...@bennettconstruction.biz
wrote:
I can receive mail but I cannot get it to send email even after fixing
all the changes it made to my settings. It changed my outgoing server
from its IP address to the host name which will not work.
I changed it
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:04:59PM +0300, Andreas Gerdd wrote:
Hello.
'make index' doesn't work inside /usr/ports after i update the ports.
It only works when i remove the entire ports folder and get it again from cvs.
# cd /usr/ports
# cvs -q -d$CVSROOT up -r OPENBSD_4_6 -Pd
M INDEX
P
The new athn driver support the AR5007 chip?
Thanks.
Hi,
I would like to use relayd to check if squid is up and working. If it is
up and works, it should be used as transparent proxy. If squid isn't
working properly for whatever reason (or the squid host isn't reachable)
I just want to have normal internet access.
When the Squid host is
[begin quote]
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details. Which
On 2010-04-15, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss lzsk...@gmail.com wrote:
The new athn driver support the AR5007 chip?
Thanks.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=athn
Donald Allen wrote:
After getting subjected to some of this nonsense personally, having
asked a question on openbsd-tech (and was in the midst of a useful
exchange with Bob Beck until it was interrupted out of the blue by
someone who apparently enjoys behaving like an unruly 10-year-old; it
had
Thanks for your answer.
We change obj to pobj on purposes. obj has some special propertis that WILL
throw make.
Does this mean doing a 'make index' is not necessary anymore?
Best wishes.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:03:43PM +0300, Andreas Gerdd wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
We change obj to pobj on purposes. obj has some special propertis that WILL
throw make.
Does this mean doing a 'make index' is not necessary anymore?
Best wishes.
No, it means that if you do a make
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:35:34AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
Look,
You gave no indication if you actually bothered to track down the author
or discuss relicensing with the author. Enough people don't think
Maybe I should ask the author.
You also gave a less than clear indication of I really liked
Donald Allen wrote:
After getting subjected to some of this nonsense personally, having
asked a question on openbsd-tech (and was in the midst of a useful
exchange with Bob Beck until it was interrupted out of the blue by
someone who apparently enjoys behaving like an unruly 10-year-old; it
A huge Thanks to Jacek Artymiak for the PDF's of Building Firewalls
with OpenBSD and PF, 3rd ed. and The OpenBSD Command-LineCompanion.
The wait was worth it !!!
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
As for the personal attacks, you can print off this email,
fold it until it's all corners, and shove it up your ass.
Now that was far longer than your first one-liner smackdown.
Good job.
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
If you were insulting a Windows user, probably.
I'm curious, what freedom do you think the GPL brings to those people
who use
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
You are the one interested in resurrecting this beast.
The onus is you to either track down someone with the right to change
the license, or else be the point of first blame in seeing if the author
will actually
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL are free. The only free
license would be no license at all. Public domain.
Since _my_ definition of
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Yes! Because they are all free (in _my_ opinion). I like GPL, ISC,
BSD, all of them.
See I told you logic wouldn't work for you.
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions therefore more
restriction is less free. Not sure how you can argue that.
ISC has one restriction, the GPL has numerous therefore less free.
Again not sure how this is debatable.
If you prefer
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently you did not study it.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Bill Dunshie gho...@suddenlink.net wrote:
A huge Thanks to Jacek Artymiak for the PDF's of Building Firewalls with
OpenBSD and PF, 3rd ed. and The OpenBSD Command-LineCompanion. The wait
was worth it !!!
Link or didn't happen.
* Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com [2010-04-15 17:53]:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
1. .. either track down someone with the right to change...
Been there.. did it...thanks...
2 ... or else be the point of first blame in seeing if...
Now
Hello Misc,
I am consistently having trouble sending data to one particular host.
After quite a lot of troubleshooting and reviewing config on my side, I
noticed that during the TCP handshake the host in question was not
sending any MSS in its SYN/ACK packet. My OpenBSD box then continues to
I work with a lot of systems integrator types - they deliver finished
platforms to run apps we develop on. A lot of familiarity with Solaris and
Centos. One day, a couple of load balancers died and one of them needed a
quick solution so I tossed them my 4.6 cd and sent them a link to man for
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently you did not study it.
It weems that you did not learn it.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:14:56AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
See I told you logic wouldn't work for you.
snip
Since _my_ definition of freedom for software is different, I
reach different conclusions.
Right. It didn't.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:02:23AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL are free.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
For them? Maybe the freedom to give copies to their friends whithout
being sued or doing anything illegal.
That can easily be applied to any of the free licenses without any
other legal obligations.
Yes!
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:02 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Lets try it.
0 X (Y + Z)
Y 0
Z 0
ISC = X
GPL = X + Y + Z
Logical enough for you?
If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
restrictions, then neither ISC nor GPL
On 04/15/10 23:14, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The dictionary definition of freedom is no restrictions
NO RESTRICTIONS
May I point out to you that ISC has restrictions. You are
contradicting yourself.
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
I don't suppose you've stopped to ask if the OpenBSD project is at all
interested in whatever code you feel like
On 2010-04-15 12:18, Matthew Sullenberger wrote:
I understand the host I am trying to communicate with has its own set of
issues, but my question to Misc is that I was under the belief that if
either side did not explicitly send a MSS during the handshake the
required behavior was to default to
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants rights (under conditions or restrictions) to the
receiver of a
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
I don't suppose you've stopped to
[IMAGE]
Bu e-posta size BultenYonetim.com'dan onaylı olarak gvnderilmiÅtir.
B|ltenYonetim'den e-posta almak istemiyorsanız des...@bultenyonetim.com
'a boÅ bir mail gvnderebilirsiniz.
Rahatsizlik verdigimiz igin vz|r dileriz.
Netport
Digital Solutions
YEN] M\^TER]LER KAZANMANIN TAM ZAMANI
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:11:56AM -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
As a long time Linux user I will soon try out OpenBSD, I have been
reading the list emails and contacted 1 OpenBSD top person who was
very rude. There is some of the RTFM or get lost attitude in
Linux, but if a questioner seems
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Then nobody knows who owns the code, and lack of license goes to the
default case of ALL Rights Reserved.
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
actually have to track down who Anonymous was?
Does the code
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:41:35 -0600
Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't think OpenBSD was even interested in such licensing
schemes in the Ports tree.
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:55:11AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Yes, it's a tricky question. As for OpenBSD, we do not include
anonymous work.
A work can be public domain if the copyright expires. In some
jurisdictions, a work can be put into the public domain by the author.
If a
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:41:35 -0600
Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't think OpenBSD was even interested in such licensing
schemes in the Ports tree.
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Not in a real sense. The ports tree is a build infrastructure
containing
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote:
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Good thing it's in ports, then. Keeps that shady license where we can
see it, and choose to suffer with it or not.
I am going to continue this on ports, my mistake earlier
I created a new profile, but I still can't get thunderbird 3 to accept
my self-signed certificate for sendmail TLS.
It asks for me to confirm that the certificate should be used as a
permanent exception (just as previous thunderbird did at
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
I work with a lot of systems integrator types - they deliver finished
platforms to run apps we develop on. A lot of familiarity with Solaris and
Centos. One day, a couple of load balancers died and one of them needed a
quick solution
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
[SNIP]
Unfortunately, for many of us the end goal is to get a pile of crap,
as dictated by management, working well enough that we get another paycheck.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
find all(!) copyright holders and have them agree to a new license. or
don't use that code.
There are at least three projects involved here.
1. The Diku project
2. The Merc project
3. The Forsaken Lands project
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
actually have to track down who Anonymous was?
Does the code become useless if its ownership
You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
A license grants rights (under conditions or restrictions) to the
receiver of a work. No license means no extra rights, which means the
default defined
On 2010-04-15 13:46, Matthew Sullenberger wrote:
So would
this be possibly a bug in the OpenBSD PMTU implementation (the expected
behavior occurs and the connection works normally if I disable PMTU) and if so
should I be submitting some kind of official report?
Maybe. Use sendbug(1).
Simon
--
I think the best example is Free as in Beer.
Which already misses the point.
I can brew beer all day.
I can keep it to myself.
I can also share it.
If I share a beer with you, it is free. (I am giving it to you)
If you sell it to me it's also free. You are missing the point.
If I
On 04/15/10 12:00, ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
I am going to continue this on ports, my mistake earlier
I created a new profile, but I still can't get thunderbird 3 to accept
my self-signed certificate for sendmail TLS.
It asks for me to confirm that the certificate should be used as a
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:13 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards to licensing?
Does anyone wanting to use that work in OpenBSD
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:05 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
I think the best example is Free as in Beer.
Which already misses the point.
That's why the example is so common?
It's in quotes because I didn't originate it.
I can brew beer all day.
I can
Marco Peereboom wrote:
First let me defend softraid. The rebuild code is designed to offer
maximum data protection. With this is mind certain assumptions were
made.
Sorry... I haven't stated that I think that data protection is king.
Any performance increase that could compromise the disk
(sorry about the long disclaimer in my original email-- I didn't think about
the fact that my company automatically appends that; I have signed up with a
new account).
Simon Perreault wrote:
Assuming you meant 536...
...you're right according to RFC 879:
Yes, I did indeed mean 536 not 576.
I don't know for certain, but I believe that in the United States
a work whithout copyright notices goes to the public domain after
25 years.
I don't know for certain, but I believe you are just making things up
as you go along, because you are nothing but a troll.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Matthew Sullenberger
su...@sadburger.com wrote:
establish a connection. I don't have another host that doesn't send an MSS to
test with, nor am I really sure how I would go about producing one. So would
this be possibly a bug in the OpenBSD PMTU implementation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:13 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Now this is interesting...
Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
What if I release my work as Anonymous with
no text in regards
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright
From http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm
1923 through 1977
Published without a copyright notice
None. In the public domain due to failure to comply
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59:57AM -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
Oh, absolutely - hence the proliferation of Linux and Solaris in our
solutions - the customer insists on oracle for the back-end db, they
get oracle. And as you say, that can be driven by the arbitrary
demands of the customer
hi there,
with the april 13 snapshot i get fluctuations
in the volume level and audible cracks and glitches
when have e.g. a browser (opera) and mplayer open.
i dont see a patern yet, but for example during
watching the movie the volume level keeps changing
accompanied by an audible pop.
it
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You are contradicting yourself. On your terms:
Axioms:
1 Freedom means no restrictions
2 ISC has
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:20 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You are
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
you love to hear yourself speak, eh?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 05:20:45AM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:20 -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Saying that ISC is more free than GPL makes no sense
Saying Do not remove our text does not restrict your freedom. That's
all the ISC asks of you. Leave the copyright notice and the permission
to use alone.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
hi there,
with the april 13 snapshot i get fluctuations
in the volume level and audible cracks and glitches
when have e.g. a browser (opera) and mplayer open.
i dont see a patern yet, but for example during
watching
hmm, on Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:20:02PM -0600, Ted Roby said that
You should paste a dmesg, and point out what audio drivers
i knew i forgot something :]
i even copied it to the mail server.
shame on me.
i never had audio problems before btw,
also forgot to add.
this static is just a hiss,
Would you freaking stop this?
Go hug Stallman or something.
It's not entertaining anymore.
The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
change the dictionary to match your little reality.
You
Saying that ISC is more free than GPL makes no sense
Saying Do not remove our text does not restrict your freedom. That's
all the ISC asks of you. Leave the copyright notice and the permission
to use alone.
Please do not take my mesages out of context. Removing sentences, and
twisting what
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:39:57PM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
That's because I don't yell GPL is not free while I'm using GPL.
what's wrong with that? if I use Windows and yell Windows is not free,
would you think the same?
If you were insulting a Windows user, probably.
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Please do not take my mesages out of context. Removing sentences, and
twisting what I said can be very convenient to put me in the wrong
whithout factual evidence.
I do not please.
Since no message can be completely within context, that implies
that your are
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
I'm reasoning. I'm not bombing your house.
Good morning in the Lord.
Religious fanatics don't automatically bomb a house, some create museum.
--
Antoine
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-04-15, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss lzsk...@gmail.com wrote:
The new athn driver support the AR5007 chip?
Thanks.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=athn
I've been having trouble with a 9285 in a low end Gateway
laptop/netbook. I've been tracking snapshots
97 matches
Mail list logo
