This is starting to get funny.
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the different
versions security support time.
How long does a version get's security support?
If I install a version of OpenBSD then when do I have to upgrade to a fresher
version??
E.g.:
If I
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, lancebaynes87 wrote:
This is starting to get funny.
Pretty funny indeed, now we see people installing an OS and they don't
even know how to read... http://www.openbsd.org/faq/index.html
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:25 AM, lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.comwrote:
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different versions security support time.
Surprisingly, people expect to use the worlds most secure OS without
reading anything about it. (hint:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:25:53AM -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote:
This is starting to get funny.
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different versions security support time.
No kidding? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
You are linked directly
lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com writes:
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different versions security support time.
well, a little bit into http://www.openbsd.org/security.html you will
find this snippet:
OpenBSD 4.7 and earlier releases are not
On 2011-07-11, lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com wrote:
This is starting to get funny.
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different versions security support time.
How long does a version get's security support?
If I install a version of OpenBSD
Hello all. This is the first time I'm posting to this mailing list so I'll
briefly introduce myself: I'm Miguel Almeida, I live in Portugal, I work as an
independent consultant, I've been using OpenBSD for less than a year (on two
of my own servers) and, well, to end this short intro, I'll say
On 2011-07-11, Miguel Almeida miguelalme...@miguelalmeida.pt wrote:
Hello all. This is the first time I'm posting to this mailing list so I'll
briefly introduce myself: I'm Miguel Almeida, I live in Portugal, I work as an
independent consultant, I've been using OpenBSD for less than a year (on
Solicita la informacion completa e Inscribase si tiene interes en
participar.
Necesitamos reunir un minimo de participantes para impartir este Curso.
CURSO TALLER
Procesos de seleccion exitosos con pruebas psicometricas
Duracion: (2 dias) 16 hrs.
Costo: $5,400 pesos mas IVA
Beneficios:
- El
Hi,
Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
forcibly power off.
This started happening post c2k11 changes.
amd64, GENERIC.MP compiled from source. Tried the amd64 July 10th
snapshot and its the same
On Monday, July 11, 2011, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
forcibly power off.
What was it building at the time?
This started happening post c2k11
Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
forcibly power off.
What was it building at the time?
dpb was building www/amaya/browser and its related dependencies. When
I try to get to that folder and do a
Environment:
- OpenBSD 4.9, stock (base) apache with self-signed certificate
- behind a SOHO NAT router (with relevant in-bound redirects)
Problem: non-local SSL connections never complete the handshake
(verified while monitoring the interface with tcpdump, see below)
During troubleshooting I
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
hours ago. I compiled kernel again post his commit and its still
hanging.
Are you certain your tree
On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib ji...@devio.us wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:02:08 -0400
Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition).
Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib ji...@devio.us wrote:
Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
where there is no command to disable shitty upstart daemons?
Which daemons are those again?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:46 PM, J Sisson sisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib ji...@devio.us wrote:
Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
where there is no command to
On 07/11/11 18:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
hours ago. I compiled kernel again post his commit and its
Hi,
One guess would be the SSL certificate is for your internal hostname,
not your external hostname. Those connecting to the external hostname,
reject the connection because the hostname doesn't match the
certificate. To use both internal and external names you have to create
certificate
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
Environment:
- OpenBSD 4.9, stock (base) apache with self-signed certificate
- behind a SOHO NAT router (with relevant in-bound redirects)
Problem: non-local SSL connections never complete the handshake
(verified while monitoring the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
than X listening on localhost by default in obsd? if you install a
daemon in debian/ubuntu and it listens on 0.0.0.0 by default, the
package isn't
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, J Sisson sisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
than X listening on localhost by default in obsd? if you install a
daemon in
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:25:53AM -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote:
This is starting to get funny.
Way ahead of you.
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
different versions security support time.
There is no 'security' support time. There is 'support time' and
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:46 PM, J Sisson sisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib ji...@devio.us wrote:
Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:40 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com
why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
than X listening on localhost by default in obsd?
Just because you install
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:40 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com
why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
than
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:42:10PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
You don't have to install anything. And if you upgrade only when
you 'have' to, I recommend you track -current, which has a clear
requirement that if you haven't upgraded today, you are no longer
running -current. Thus you
On 07/11/11 20:52, STeve Andre' wrote:
On 07/11/11 18:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
hours ago. I compiled
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com wrote:
you failed at making any point.
i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format:
debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a
associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a
29 matches
Mail list logo
