On 1/10/06, Jonas Lindskog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are using OpenBSD 3.8 as a firewall/router. We have two internal
nets; one with workstations (NAT) and one DMZ with a single server.
And thus we have three network interfaces installed in the router: one
for the NAT, one for the
On 12/12/05, Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is with -current dhcpd within the last month.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:15:37 -0800
Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have a dhcp'd network, with static entries for a ton of machines.
: The problem is that the range is for .10
On 12/12/05, Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:59:23 -0700
Abraham Al-Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On 12/12/05, Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :
: : Moving the static entries to outside the range is unfeasable right
: : now. And it doesn't
On 10/25/05, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Running 3.8, 2 nics, 1 statically assigned, and the other using dhcp.
Problem is that resolv.conf is always overwritten. Using
resolv.conf.tail doesn't help as the information is just tacked on at
the end of the dhcp supplied
On 10/7/05, Olivier Mehani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:29:08 +0200
Johan M:son Lindman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my clients has got an Internet connection with a no much
affidable provider. He reports continual disconnection and so on. I
would like to do a
You could use connection throttling, it won't eliminate them, but it will
make it take longer. If you don't need ssh on that host (although, you
probably do, I'd be lost without it) disable it. You could bind sshd to a
different port, and disable port 22 (most of these attacks are automated
bots).
just to add my $0.02. The best they could hope for would be disallowing your
default gateway from connecting to your ssh server... whoop-de-doo.
On 9/23/05, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My only question is what if I traceroute to you, find out the
The current one is great. Functional and easy to use, much like the OS
itself. No reason to fix it if it's not broken.
On 9/7/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
One of my friends sent me this new OpenBSD website design he created.
Please have a look at it :-D
On 9/5/05, Stephan A. Rickauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramiro Aceves schrieb:
I like and use both systems. But If you are concerned about easy
upgrading, I would recommend Debian GNU/Linux (no flamewars please ;-)
). It is a very stable system that it is upgraded slowly, about 2 years
The problem with the unichrome is that stock xorg identifies it (correctly)
as a via, but it does not support it's specific chipset. The
unichrome.sf.net http://unichrome.sf.net project has patches for XF86 and
Xorg that fix this, but you will have to recompile xorg for it to work. It
should work,
You've not indicated which kernel you used (it should be bsd.mp), nor
have you included a dmesg so that the more experienced users can help
you with your problem, if indeed there is one. Also, I understand that
English is probably not your native language, but I'm having a little
trouble
On 8/29/05, MySHOP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Abraham Al-Saleh ,
I am use OpenBSD 3.7 for test computer.
My computer with P4 - HT cpu like 2 CPUs . It find in some linux or windows
with 2 CPU.
and my home computer P4 Not HT = 1CPU only
How can make OpenBSD support 2 CPU
On 8/14/05, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a number of websites that I cannot load from machines
connected to the 'net through my OpenBSD firewall/NAT box.
One such site is directron.com. Using Mozilla Firefox, it will
just say Waiting for directron.com... but the page never
On 8/5/05, poncenby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly I never said mentioned the word security, so I don't know where
Tobias got that from.
I apologise once again for not searching the archives and reading the
man pages.
May I suggest some tolerance(doesn't have to be sincere) for people
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/5/05, Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100
users.
This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
Does
On 7/18/05, James Harless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my objective is to have fail-over on the outbound connections,
primarily. The load-balancing comes about because of that.
Load-balancing is definitely not a requirement for this site and I
probably should have worded my email a bit
I'm actually curious as to the apparent change of stance between interviews.
In the last two interviews I've read, you've made it clear that you've never
used it, and had no comment. Am I missing something? Just curious.
On 6/17/05, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005
Marvelous work. Thank you. :)
use the package, I was able to successfully install it on my openbsd
workstation.
On 5/25/05, Price, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, when I try to build subversion on 3.7 i386 I get:
[]
main.o -c /usr/ports/devel/subversion/w-subversion-1.1.3p0/subversion-
I had a similar problem a month or so back, I have a 4 Mb/s cable
connection, and I could only get about 200 Kb/s. I switched my nics out,
changed the tcp receive window size, etc, but nothing worked. I was running
3.6, so I installed a fresh 3.7 snapshot, and haven't had a problem since.
So, if
It's a good scripting language because of how well regular expressions are
integrated into the language. It's also easy to pick up and use, because
it's pretty lenient in specific syntax. I can't recommend a book though, as
most of what I know of perl has been from reading other peoples scripts
detailed docs or
examples how to use it. If you have time to provide me some directions to
this?
Thanks for your support
George
On Saturday 14 May 2005 23:46, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
Use binat.
From man (5) pf.conf:
binat
A binat rule specifies a bidirectional mapping between
Alright, before I go to far, I'm going to present what I know, what I
need, and what I've read so far. We had a recent scare at my company, we
lost conectivity with our isp for about ten minutes because of a glitch.
Due to the nature of our company, we have to have 100% uptime, and our
SLA
eric wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:35:09 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
Alright, before I go to far, I'm going to present what I know, what I
need, and what I've read so far. We had a recent scare at my company, we
lost conectivity with our isp for about ten minutes because of a glitch
eric wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:54:31 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
We have a backup generator that will run for five days and can be
refilled while in operation, as well as dual matrix 5000 UPS'. We're
working on an online medical prescribing and patient management
solution
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 06 May 2005 14:35 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
uptime, and our SLA only guarantees us 99.999%. So, I'm currently
You sometimes find that SLA means something like we'll charge you more
so that when things break, we can pay some of it back...
talking with several
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
Yes, there's only so much I can do to keep everything redundant at
present, something that will change later when we have sufficient money,
a big concern is that someone might dig out our local loop with a back
hoe, nothing I can do
. But it doesn't matter, because they're
both i386.
--
Cordially,
Abraham Al-Saleh
Systems Administrator
CaduRx
28 matches
Mail list logo
