Joe Holden [li...@rewt.org.uk] wrote:
That is the EJTAG port (debug.. single stepping the cpu etc) AFAIK (haven't
tested yet as I don't have the appropriate kit handy)
There is no need to flash the on-board chip unless you want to replace the
bootloader.
Supporting the USB isn't that hard,
Gilbert Sanford [gilbertz@gmail.com] wrote:
You're welcome. Since the OpenBSD documentation is clear and precise,
any cloud of confusion must be a product of my own defective thinking.
So I keep going back to the documentation (I stay off Google for
OpenBSD research) to push it in and
You can't debug relayd without attaching to all of the processes (you must use
multiple simultaneous gdb sessions)
Bogdan Andu [bo...@yahoo.com] wrote:
ok,
I checked out relayd -current, compiled with debug symbols, launched gdb
and attached to pfe pid :
pwd: /usr/src/usr.sbin/relayd
Hermes Ojeda Ruiz [hermes@gmail.com] wrote:
I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
expensive. (In M?xico taxes are a big problem).
In two months I'll test ALIX appliances:
http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm
They are cheaper, but I don't know about their
Erling Westenvik [erling.westen...@gmail.com] wrote:
physical disks:
sd0a: 64 + N-64
sd1a: 64 + N-64
RAID 1 volume:
sd2a: 64 + 64 + N-128
CRYPTO volume:
sd3a: 64 + 64 + 64 + N-196
The space wasted on large disks is negligible but I would really like to
know at which level the
h...@riseup.net [h...@riseup.net] wrote:
On the other hand XTerm is an old code and memory hog that relies on X
toolkit and supports features you'll find nowhere thus will never need
(like Tektronix).
Xenocara is the classic X tree, as much as possible. Any replacement for
xterm needs to
Pascal Stumpf [pascal.stu...@cubes.de] wrote:
Replacing GCC is no trivial task, but Bitrig already did it.
Did it aka now rely on packages to build base, some of them with a
non-free license.
Well they are working on a BSD-licensed toolchain, with mcpp, elftoolchain,
libc++ and
Evgeniy Sudyr [eject.in...@gmail.com] wrote:
BOX1 dmesg:
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 2400.45 MHz
cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 2400.09 MHz
cpu2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 2400.09 MHz
cpu3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 2400.09 MHz
cpu4:
openda...@hushmail.com [openda...@hushmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
Anybody have any thoughts on Snort vs Suricata?
Code quality is going to be a big question with the new one, as it always has
been with Snort (does running this utility open up a new attack vector on your
network)
Also, how
Lionel Hutchence [lionel.hutche...@gmail.com] wrote:
Dear Thomas,
Plagiarise much lately?
http://www.trollaxor.com/2013/07/why-i-abandoned-openbsd-and-why-you.html
Stop giving Grant so much attention. He's too busy wishing that OpenBSD,
FreeBSD, NetBSD and Dragonfly would merge into one
Thomas Jennings [thomas.jennings...@gmail.com] wrote:
Dear OpenBSD developers and users:
Happy 4th of July.
Thomas,
I don't understand why you make such a breach of OpenBSD list etiquette. We
all know these posts belong on tech@, not misc@
Please behave yourself better next time.
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
On 07/02/2013 11:44 AM, noah pugsley wrote:
More wrong? Maybe so. My point was that both are and either way it's
inconsistent.
not anymore. new text, as of last night:
Processors
All CPUs compatible with the Intel 80486 or better, with
Andy [a...@brandwatch.com] wrote:
I appreciate that you may be frustrated by the existence of bad advice
on the internet. And as someone who is continually learning and only
wants to do things right, could you instead of saying that he's an
idiot who knows nothing, please provide some
Riccardo Mottola [riccardo.mott...@libero.it] wrote:
Furthermore, you will learn that a lot of code has become buggy: it
is quite linux-x86 orientend and will break more or less the more
you deviate. If you take care and report bugs (or patch yourself)
you will get further.
Hey, after 10
Robert Blacquiere [rob...@blacquiere.nl] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:43:36PM +0800, Alan Cheng wrote:
I can't access www.openbsd.org right now.
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.openbsd.org shows it's down.
It is taken down by NSA secret agents? Or just bgp flapping
Laurence Rochfort [laurence.rochf...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for advice on what the best bet for well supported
non-intel hardware would be. Doesn't have to be lightning fast, but
being able to run a modern browser at reasonable rate is a must.
Some people with your tastes
Stuart Henderson keeps old kernels around at
ftp://sym.spacehopper.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/oldkern/
To help narrow down what change might have caused this, try and figure out
the newest kernel that still works properly.
Jeff Ross [jr...@openvistas.net] wrote:
Hi all,
Tonight I
I noticed some interesting messages upon resume for a thinkpad t410. It is
running X and has been through 20 suspend/resume cycles since the last reboot.
error: [drm:pid2:i915_hangcheck_hung] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU
hung
error: [drm:pid3:init_ring_common] *ERROR* failed to set
bwi is incomplete due to a lack of vendor documentation
there may be improvement in dragonflybsd that is worth porting over, or
you may get lucky, stick the PCI device ID for your card into the bwi
driver, and see that it otherwise works...
your best bet may be to buy a better supported
mxb [m...@alumni.chalmers.se] wrote:
I benefit from it as well :)
Using vether with ospfd on top of it is fare more stable than using gre or
plain gif.
How are you connecting vether to something else? IPsec? Care to share your
config?
Otto Moerbeek [o...@drijf.net] wrote:
There's a bug somewhere that computes the left-over memory for the
primary wrong.
Take the mem printed by OpenBoot (8064M), subtract the mem taken by
your guests and assign that to the primary.
primary {
memory ..
}
This seems to work:
I'm trying to use ldom on a few sun fire t1000s. The host system
tells me ERROR: Physical resources required by LDoms configuration: openbsd
not available. Falling back to default set after I ldomctl download and
then reset -c at ALOM.
I upgraded from factory 2005 firmware to this one
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
It may well be a problem if you're using medium/large altq buffers
or if you raise net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen too high..
While I don't disagree in concept (by definition, using sysctl maxlen=
big would create a large buffer), I think in
Andy [a...@brandwatch.com] wrote:
Hi,
We're really looking forward to improvements in ALTQ too.
And we are /really/ hoping that the queues can either be shared across
interfaces (so your WAN downstream bandwidth doesn't have to be sliced
up and divided up across all the internal
Carlos,
We are now on OpenBSD 5.3 and going forward. Please try that first.
carlos albino garcia grijalba [genesi...@hotmail.com] wrote:
i have read on archives but too many opinions on this subject since 4 and many
of them are saying to restart server, restart process, wait to be fixed a big
Drugs are not good for your brain.
Justin Lindberg [zx5...@yahoo.com] wrote:
You need to be shot to death.
- Original Message -
From: Richard Thornton rich...@thornton.net
To: Justin Lindberg zx5...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: From the
carlos albino garcia grijalba [genesi...@hotmail.com] wrote:
ok problem of mine again i run again on a fast solution since i have just
seen that there have been a lot of changes on uvm lets go 4.8 - 4.9 - 5.0
- 5.1 - 5.2 - 5.3 ant thanks this is actually an aswer will do that and
let folks
carlos albino garcia grijalba [genesi...@hotmail.com] wrote:
it is a server on production m a little concerned about fail after upgrade
from 4.8 to 5.3 has some services on it
Just upgrade to 5.3, pkg_add -r, and fix the fallout from ports changes. Read
the faq/current.html too
carlos albino garcia grijalba [genesi...@hotmail.com] wrote:
ok let u know what happen thank u very much actually u are the only folk that
answer all my other mails have been kicked by the way where do i have to send
mail to know why my laptop has to be rebooted so that the fan work on the
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
Important con here if you're talking about running it on OpenBSD is that
this is not a primary platform for them. I think it's safe to say that
far fewer people will be running BIRD on OpenBSD than will be running
OpenOSPFd on OpenBSD.
Is
Alfonso S. Siciliano [alfi...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to study the concurrency and the parallelism of OpenBSD.
Fortunately SMP is supported on my platform, amd64.
Where can I find documentation about what components are been
parallelized? (queue, stack, etc.)
No such documents
?? ?? [don.na...@gmail.com] wrote:
May I try to build and install a new kernel with that fix, or to wait for a
new snapshot?
Thank you.
That depends on your preference.
Sebastian Neuper [pha...@gmx.de] wrote:
Hello,
I can't figure out what causes this panic. Second time
I see this. I think I have to replace the NIC or the disk.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
uvm_fault(0xd6c73184, 0xb5cbd000, 0, 3) - e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Salim Shaw [salims...@vfemail.net] wrote:
OpenBSD is a server/router/network service OS, it's not designed for
desktops. OpenBSD is the pre-eminent platform for Firewalling,
IPsec, IPv6.
Trying to shove OpenBSD onto the desktop is the ultimate case of
square peg/round hole.
Salim, that's
For now you'll need to call your dns script from dhclient. A system() will do
the trick.
Scott [8f27e...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Migrated to v5.3. I had a mod to the former dhclient-script that would fire
a wget to my dns provider, which in turn, would act as a dynamic update
and
Ireneusz Szcze??niak [irek.szczesn...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
I'm running OpenBSD 5.2 on i386. I want to run there a personal mail
server (further referred to as my server) with some specific
requirements. I want my server to be secure and stable.
These are my critical requirements:
*
Peter Fraser [p...@thinkage.ca] wrote:
I believe I am trying to interface into a T38 gateway which is supported by
my SIP supplier.
I expect but don't know, that if I don't uses T38 my Sip supplier will send
the call on a SIP
call to any other client which will not recognize it as FAX.
Andres Genovez [andresgeno...@gmail.com] wrote:
I think this is a clean solution, putting an ATA Works fine even for POS
Machines (Credit Cards) that require a land line.
Only when you have a damn good connection :)
make -j breaks in the perl build at the moment
Ryan Kavanagh [r...@debian.org] wrote:
I downloaded a snapshot on the 27th or so, and am trying to update by
compiling
from source, but get the FTBFS below. This may or may not have to do with the
perl update (my snapshot came with perl 5.16.3,
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
The problem with ARM is there is no ARM reference platform.
Every machine is significantly different than every other machine,
technical details of how it is built are not published (why should they
be? They aren't being sold as general
Alan Corey [alan01...@gmail.com] wrote:
Not much to go on probably, but anyone else seeing this?
OpenBSD 5.3-current (post 5.3 release) now supports the latest
Intel XF86 driver with KMS. It's worth trying before you do
look at much else. See the snapshots/i386 or snapshots/amd64
directory.
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
Made my day.
So does this mean machdep can be turned off for some hardware and is
the best way to find out, simply to try?
If inteldrm attaches, the aperture now appears to work at 1 (instead
of 2) but not yet 0.
MJ [m...@sci.fi] wrote:
Hi,
On two occasions (had to test it to see if it was repeatable), ospfd has
crashed on my 5.2 release i386 machine while I was running a ruby script
that consumed too much memory (which also crashed). No other daemons on the
machine crashed except ospfd.
Alex Mathiasen [a...@mira.dk] wrote:
It appeared the BGPD kept receiving the routing tables, and then start all
over.
You don't mention which version of openbsd you are using.
There are some problems like this in older versions of bgpd which are
now fixed. You may want to try a new
Jes [jjje...@gmail.com] wrote:
In my experience it's perfectly possible to move from one
architecture to another one.
I do the following:
- backup /etc (only for security)
- remove all installed packages (I save a list of installed packages
to figure out what to install again after)
-
There's always companies like Portwell, Lanner, and even Supermicro has some
nice mini boxes with motherboard and soldered CPU for $100-$150 USD.
Voland Levit [vol...@iamcrab.ru] wrote:
I know about Soekris and Alix. Please tell me if there is anyone else worthy
of attention.
Thanks!
Richard Thornton [rich...@thornton.net] wrote:
Linksys routers are defaulted to port forwarding NOT enabled, so check facts
before ranting.
Your routers are impervious to penetration.
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
Every firewall/router product that I have purchased has been
compromised so far.
I don't believe this at all. Not one bit.
I could believe it but that doesn't mean that I do. 90% of the routers
on my street will be insecure and even
Robert Blacquiere [open...@blacquiere.nl] wrote:
Hi,
I've seen on the tech mailing list a patch for implementing a pppx
interface group (just one line code addition). Is this going to be in
5.3 release? It would make PF filtering much nicer with many dynamic
ipsec/l2tp connections.
Yes
Rodolfo Gouveia [rgouv...@cosmico.net] wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that the support for 5720 was backout because
it broke another chipset. [1]
The thing is that the newer Dell R320 has this chipset and
I'm currently evaluating the its support.
So I would like to know if the support would indeed
Francois Pussault [fpussa...@contactoffice.fr] wrote:
It may be a NIC speed issue... no ?
VAX have often AUI nic about 10Mbits/s Half so if you have hard 100Mbits/s
Full
it can cause a duplex conflict...
then a very low speed network...
not sure this is the problem but check
John is
Steven Kovalsky [kovalsky1...@gmail.com] wrote:
The need for additional nic (for nat) i created vether0
vether0 has 10.254.254.17/29 address
On the other host set ip addres 10.254.254.18/29
From this host i can't ping 10.254.254.17
and from 10.254.254.17-10.254.254.18
Zoran Kolic [zko...@sbb.rs] wrote:
Yeah, I like amd better. On desktop it is 8120 bulldozer. And I
like it.
I might bother gentle readers, but have no clue what to buy and
stay alive. I need exact processor name. So, if someone has amd
or intel, integrated, wirking on amd64 5.2, please
Mayuresh Kathe [mayur...@wolfman.devio.us] wrote:
hence my question, how good or bad is the ssd support under 5.2?.
most of my usage would be software development using either lisp, c
and c++ (at the console, no x).
There is some TRIM command support, not sure how extensive it is, but if I
Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
I already knew an answer (not the only one) could be write it.
What others did you have in mind? Thank you for bringing the most important
software project of modern time to our attention. We will now begin writing it
for you. ???
Do you have
Nico Kadel-Garcia [nka...@gmail.com] wrote:
SSH is the gold standard: OpenSSH is the popular and effective
freeware version, which did solve a number of issues. The early
history of SSH is interesting, and covered reasonably well at
Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
I said I can't code that.
If you already knew the answer was write it, then you asked the wrong
question.
I know that gnupg is in the ports tree, but it
just seems strange to me that it isn't on the base system, because for me
it sounds logical that if
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:13:47PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
So what would a BSD cloud be different in the context of cloud (not openbsd
features) ?
You can of course try to port KVM to OpenBSD, hehe.
OpenBSD supports Sun's LDom hypervisor hardware
Have you tried stacking a crypto volume on top of the softraid raid1 volume ?
zgeggy2k [zgegg...@yahoo.com] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 5.2 and trying to use 2 mirrored disks as RAID1, but also encrypt
them.
I can use softraid to either raid1 _OR_ encrypt, but not both.
I've RTFM'd and UTFSE to
Devin Ceartas [de...@nacredata.com] wrote:
If I wanted to hack on a solution to this AHCI (softraid related?) issue
with SSDs, where would I start?
vi /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/ahci.c
Do you have a /dev/vscsi0 ?
If not, cd /dev and ./MAKEDEV vscsi
Insan Praja SW [insan.pr...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi Misc@,
Has anyone tried using OBSD iscsid(8) initiator and FreeNAS target?
I was trying to do it on amd64 -current but so far unsuccessful.
Best Regards,
Insan
Francisco Valladolid H. [fic...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi Tito
I'm currently using a old Thinkpad T61p, good machine and OpenBSD 5.1 work
fine.
nvidia graphics.
Tom Bodr [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi all,
I???m quite sure that there are people which were able to replace Cisco and
similar with OpenBSD or related products (and/or other open source) in
their companies or helped to do that. However it???s quite hard to find real
examples
noah pugsley [noah.pugs...@gmail.com] wrote:
C'mon kids, it's huawei or the highway. Who would you rather have spy on
you, the Chinese government, or the US empire?
Everyone on this list already knows your root password. You need to start using
RSA keys.
So, every time I increase the size of the ramdisk, I tempt fate. In other point
of view, it's also the textbook definition as to why custom kernels aren't
supported here. Clearly, something's missing.
Peter Kay [syllops...@syllopsium.co.uk] wrote:
I have a Pentium III system running 5.1
: Checking rights for collection owned
by nobody
2012-09-05 15:27:24,244 - INFO: wesley refused
2012-09-05 15:27:24,244 - DEBUG: Answer status: 401 Unauthorized
Any idea ?
--
Wesley
Le 2012-09-03 19:04, Chris Cappuccio a ??crit??:
Z? Loff [zel...@zeloff.org] wrote:
Sorry
Wesley [open...@e-solutions.re] wrote:
Euh... httpd is not used here.
Oh, well see, then you're asking the wrong person. I don't even know what
radicale is.
Without authentication (i.e type = None ), using ical (from iMac),
it works great AND without httpd.
I just added htpasswd, and
the async flag is not necessary
Chaminda Indrajith [c.indraj...@gmail.com] wrote:
Thanks...
I did it and steps are shown below.
mount_mfs -s 2097152 /dev/sd0b /var/amavisd/tmp/
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
mfs:30586 1005M2.0K955M 0%
Z?? Loff [zel...@zeloff.org] wrote:
Now that I know httpd isn't involved, it sounds like htpasswd isn't
using an algorithm compatible with radicale. The htpasswd man page
says crypt(3) is the default but clearly SHA is the default.
Yes, but you can either use -s on htpasswd or specify
Z? Loff [zel...@zeloff.org] wrote:
Sorry for the noise, I'll crawl back into my hole now.
Hey, it's better than the 147th notice that my African bank account is now
suspended.
--
Keep them laughing half the time, scared of you the other half. And always keep
them guessing. -- Clair George
somehow, your computer thinks C3_CPUID_HAS_RNG is valid, which would mean you
are running the via_nano_setup routine, which means your cpu model is VIA Nano
processor, which is all just wrong. wtf?
LEVAI Daniel [l...@ecentrum.hu] wrote:
Hi!
I'm just curious if this is something that could
I don't think the in-tree bind supports dnssec. Bind 10 is the second or third
major re-write of Paul Vixie's oriignal, designed to support it dnssec in the
latest versions. nsd handles dnssec out of the box and it's in-tree. Once you
get used to the config file, which is simple, it's pretty
Ted Unangst [t...@tedunangst.com] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:53, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
/reference/, they're not meant to solve high-level problems. The FAQs are
really are no FAQs at all but a gigantic snowball with floppy install
instructions crucially leaving out 5 1/4 and 8
noah pugsley [noah.pugs...@gmail.com] wrote:
For fucks sake, just donate already! \
You know you use this shit every day \
I am an absolutely poor loser, I had $18 US (dollars, yech! Real men use
gold or rupees) \
after getting smokes and tall cans (corey, trevor, let's go!) and I just
I'm porting it for myself, although I stopped for a while because nobody else
showed much interest in it. I have the opposite view of Claudio, I'd love to
have this capability. It looks attractive for things like high-speed packet
capture and analysis. For re-implementing things that are
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
But having a generic mechanism to bring network data in/out userland for
analysis or manipulation, abstracted in a secure way from the kernel across
multiple network card
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
so i should move the whole filtering stack to userland... seems like a
needless work for simple packet capture
And I completely disagree.
You think what the kernel does now is simple ?
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
for clients (processes) that need to do trivial filtering, e.g.,
tcpdump 'ether multicast and not broadcast', it's an overhaul for
nothing
the placement of the filtering stack in the kernel is completely
irrelevant to how simple it will end up. if
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
i don't expect *every* application to manage the rx/tx rings directly,
reinject when they're done
Let's be more practical here. Luigi already gives you a stub pcap library that
does this for you. You can take an existing pcap application, link it to
Claudio Jeker [cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com] wrote:
Why go through layers and layers of kernel processing for applications
that simply don't need to? That's the goal here. Not replacing BPF.
You think it is better to go through layers and layers of userland code?
In the end you need to do
LEVAI Daniel [l...@ecentrum.hu] wrote:
2) jmb0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 JMicron JMB363 IDE/SATA rev 0x03
Worked nicely. According to systat it provided around 30MB/sec write
speed, whereas the SiI3512A only had around 20MB/sec.
This is good to know, I'm sure I'll prefer this kind of
OpenBSD/amd64 and OpenBSD/i386 both support Core i5 based machines.
Mayuresh Kathe [mayur...@kathe.in] wrote:
would it be there?
http://www.openbsd.org/plat.html shows nothing.
googling around too showed information not upto date (from my location).
need a reliable desktop system with a
Amit Kulkarni [amitk...@gmail.com] wrote:
they are cheap in india for a specific reason,
Most people in India can't afford to pay US/EU prices there
and they are expensive in US/EU for another specific reason.
Because more people in US/EU don't buy the India version
this is getting into
Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional graphic
designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
www.flexstudio.ch
Richard is a very good friend but still your typical starving artist with
Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
Richard's not a web designer; he's a graphic designer. He put his portfolio
on blogspot after I commented that downloading a single, enormous PDF kindof
sucked, and I didn't know of a CMS that didn't suck.
It should go without saying (after
Duh, this is OpenBSD. We use
banner `ftp -o - http://www.openbsd.org/`
Chris Bennett [ch...@bennettconstruction.us] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:59:28PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
If you really wanna improve that, I'd suggest reworking the same
webpage, but making it
??? [hohoho...@dreamsecurity.com] wrote:
I have question for openssh
SSH server with RSA key exchange?
I need to look for a free ssh server that accepts RSA key exchange instead of
diffie-hellman.
openssh supports both
read the sshd_config man page for details
Gasko, Peter [gaskopeter0...@postafiok.hu] wrote:
2)
https://www.bitrig.org/index.php?title=FAQ
A NEW OpenBSD fork! Will OpenBSD profit from this project?? :)
Yes, quite probably.
If you diff -ur openbsd bitrig you'll find the changes are almost all related
to either removing AFS,
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
It's obvious that you were not reading FAQ/man pages, because you
modified files which are not supposed to be modified because of
experience from some other OS or because you were reading some howto
install OpenBSD/Linux/BSD/Unix somewhere on the
This is all making me very worried about Brad's MailScanner and whether or not
it actually caught any viruses that might infect my mutt mail client.
I wasn't aware that a firewall needed configuration files or GUI. What is my
firewall doing? I don't know. How can claims of pure ignorance,
Steve Shockley [steve.shock...@shockley.net] wrote:
We Americans have to enjoy the bars, there's not much left to do
besides drink.
There's always bath salts and eating off homeless people's faces.
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
* you don't want to fsck a 3TB file system, 'specially if it is
rebuilding the mirror at the same time, though with 12G RAM, you
might be able to do it.
Isn't this situation seriously improved with fsck in 5.1 ?
Yeah they are actually tested/supported in 5.1 and maybe 5.0 too.
Pierre Berthier [pierre.berth...@ini.phys.ethz.ch] wrote:
Hi
it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
Rafael Zalamena [rzalam...@gmail.com] wrote:
ifconfig mpe0 192.168.1.130/32 -mplslabel 12345 up
ifconfig mpe0 192.168.10.132/32 -mplslabel 54321 up
What am I missing??
I think you want option mplslabel, not -mplslabel which should _remove_
existing labels from the interface rather than add
It's the wonderful new synaptics support in the pms driver.
It also causes a bunch of other odd behavior and is really fucking annoying if
you aren't used to it.
F Bax [fbax...@gmail.com] wrote:
I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 yesterday; everything looks good except that tap
of touchpad is
Jan Stary [h...@stare.cz] wrote:
The Passing Traffic example at
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
doesn't seem to be completely accurate.
# Pass traffic in on dc0 from the local network, 192.168.0.0/24,
# to the OpenBSD machine's IP address 192.168.0.1. Also, pass the
Mike Erdely [m...@erdelynet.com] wrote:
FYI: For a test, I added foo with useradd(8) and bar with adduser(8):
# grep -E (foo|bar) /etc/master.passwd
foo:*:1002:1002::0:0::/home/foo:/bin/ksh
bar:*:1003:1003::0:0:bar:/home/bar:/bin/ksh
Looks like useradd does the right thing and
The suggestion on this thread are interesting. But tcpdump -n is pretty
manageable over a modem link and shows you exactly what you want to know, not
just a summary of it.
Alan Corey [ab...@devio.us] wrote:
I'm on a modem, so there's only about 3 K/sec anyway, but is there
anything that'll
The newer chips are mostly supported in the athn driver but only in 802.11a/g
modes.
Alan Corey [ab...@devio.us] wrote:
I was shopping for Atheros cards to use with the athn driver but
down in caveats section of the man page it says The athn driver
does not support any of the 802.11n
Christian Weisgerber [na...@mips.inka.de] wrote:
Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
http://mosh.mit.edu/
Moreover, TELNET had some good things going it for a local-echo mode and
a well-defined network virtual terminal. Then SSH came along and added
minor
enhancements like
401 - 500 of 720 matches
Mail list logo
