Hi all,
I am setting up a pair of OpenBSD jump boxes, to be a pair of bastion hosts
of a large network.
I would like to have a primary and backup, with the same set of users on
each one.
I do not want to use YP or any other form of authentication server, because
part of the use case for these
On 19 August 2015 at 16:29, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
This is being stretched out to ensure the CD2 production
problems happen again.
ARGh, to ensure they DON'T happen again.
I just assumed you were being sarcastic ;-)
2012/3/28 Eric Furman ericfur...@fastmail.net:
To reinforce again to those that don't get it.
EVERYTHING at Calomelshit.fuck is bullshit
out of date fucking garbage.
That is C a l o m e l dot o r g
It is an insult to OBSD that this site still exists.
It displays open contempt to the OBSD
On 24/05/2010 11:44, Jozsi Vadkan wrote:
I want to use a secure web server on OpenBSD.
It would serve only static html filest, no cgi, no php, etc.
It just have to be secure, no need to be fast, just secure [only using
it with https].
What would be the best web server software?
On 20/01/2010 17:45, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hi All,
May I ask if someone ever used a PCI card integrating some input / output
(anaolg and/or digital signals) in OpenBSD ? I am looking forward to
incorporate external measurements to the webserver, making available
environement variables to
On 27/12/2009 23:47, xeagle linux wrote:
*Hi,*
**
*I would like to open the numeric keys automatically every time when OpenBSD
starts !*
*Who can help me?*
**
*Mysorrow*
Easiest way is, most BIOSes these days have an option to have numlock
default to on at boot. I'm sure you could do
Toni Mueller wrote:
now you only need to educate us about how such machines can be used
in an economic fashion.
Blaming people for not running PDA cpus for core routers or not
shelling out $40k for Niagara machines (supported by OpenBSD???) when
these are even outperformed by $4k PCs in
Lars Nooden wrote:
patrick keshishian wrote:
...So long as Theo continues his no
compromise/no bullshit attitude and keeps the project truly free and
secure, I will continue my support of the project (what little it may
be).
+1
Hey, I'm not for a moment suggesting its a /bad/ thing.
Robert McGillshaw wrote:
my 4.6 arrived in the uk today from openbsd europe...
thanks for the release to all developers. keep going!
btw. my favourite 'looking' release to date. the cds looks cool.
thank you
-robbo
Same here in Coventry, UK. Cheers OpenBSD Europe!
Is it me, or
Or if I just have a munged partition?
Background: Box is a Sun Fire T1000, running 4.5, used as a mirror for
my various internal boxes. It was running OpenBSD shortly after the T1
gained support, and what with running snapshots to test and whatnot, has
hung and had to fsck more times than I care
... isn't working, at least not for me.
Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425
And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I'm not happy with this approach of delaying all parallel building
until things are perfect. In practice, a lot could be gained by
simply marking all ports that are parallel-safe right now (or
conversely, marking all those that aren't), without attempting to
fix
frantisek holop wrote:
that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project.
Whilst transparency is a good thing, and the project is known for its
open stance, surely in this particular case it would be imprudent for us
to comment further until the parties directly involved have
Nick Holland wrote:
Dave Wilson wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
Marvell Semiconductor, eh?
They look rather nifty.
Even the hardware design is to be released under some sort of open license.
a company with a spotty history on open -- see malo(4)
(spotty
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
They look rather nifty.
Even the hardware design is to be released under some sort of open license.
We've already got the armish port.
If Dale Rahn or another OpenBSD dev wants to do a port to this thing,
I'll buy them the dev kit to do it with.
Snip possibly trolling stuff
Only one OS has been holding out against HappyNewWorld's rampaging
user-friendliness, GUIs co. armies: OpenBSD!
On the contrary, I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost
everything I want is already in base, most things are set up with
intelligent and safe
In my grandfather's attic (RIP) I unearthed one of these:
http://www.omnidatasys.net/product/spec_dataterminal_ti703.htm
which in a nutshell is a paper terminal which runs at 300 baud.
I figured it could be fun to set it up as a serial console on one of my
machines, and maybe useful if I left
Hi all,
I've got an IBM ThinkPad T41, dmesg below, and the appropriate docking
station, 74P6733. Said docking station has a serial port on it. I can't
find any referance to serial devices in the dmesg, and trying cu -l
/dev/cua00, and indeed cua01 and all the rest, gives device not configured.
Jonathan Gray wrote:
If it's anything like the T42 the serial port is disabled by default
in the bios, it is included in the laptop but you need something like
a port replicator/docking station to get a physical connector.
After changing the bios option it should just work, you can
even
Stuart Henderson wrote:
set ddb.console=1 (needs to be done with securelevel=0; add
to sysctl.conf and reboot), then you can send a BREAK over the
serial port and usually it will put you into DDB.
I set the sysctl a while ago.
It hung again today whilst I was trying to SSH an ISO to it, so
I have a Sun Fire T1000 (sparc64), which a while ago was occasionally
panicking, and I submitted a bug. kettenis@ commited a fix, and it
stopped panicking. All good.
Now I have a different problem. Every now and then, it just hangs. As
far as I can tell, its a complete hardlock. I can't get it to
Khalid Schofield wrote:
Dev's.
What are the chances of getting a port of ZFS to OpenBSD? I can't quite
bring myself to run solaris since it lacks so much of what I love about
OpenBSD and Linux is back to square one because of the reasons I moved
to OpenBSD.
Khalid
Given the Dev's
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
bofh wrote:
I think Marco's point was that if there are crashes, lockups, etc, it
is a pain in the ass not to have console access, or to be able to
unplug the power and reboot into a working config/kernel, etc etc.
...
Access to a second box, for control, which has both
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 06:17:53AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
2. In any case, how big does that slice need to be?
Mine is 2G, but the size depends on a lot of things. What arch are you
building for ? Do you only build kernels ? Full make build ? Making
Xorg ? I
Hi all,
I'm about to build a router using a Sun Fire X2200, which comes with 4
on-board gigabit ethernet interfaces:
nfe0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 NVIDIA MCP55 LAN rev 0xa3
eephy0 at nfe0 phy 2: Marvell 88E1149 Gigabit PHY, rev. 1
nfe1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA MCP55 LAN rev 0xa3
eephy1 at
: Dave Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As subject, was doing a cvs up of /usr/src from a cvs mirror on the
local machine (its my anoncvs/OS packages mirror), and it panic'd.
This is the third time its done this since I switched from -stable to
-current, each time with a later snap
Freddy DISSAUX wrote:
Thanks to all the developers for a job well done.
Just arrived by morning post here in Coventry, Great Britain.
2 T-shirts and a shiny shiny disk set.
Cheers Wim!
SD
Pete Vickers wrote:
well i think you could insert your dual NIC openbsd host into the switch
'ring' physically, then bridging between the 2 NICs and firing up STP,
but be aware that every time you up/down an interface or reboot your
openbsd box, you'll trigger an STP recalc - which is around
Pete Vickers wrote:
1. create a layer 2 (switched) ring, using spanning tree.
- completely independent of openbsd box
2. connect your (dual NIC) openbsd box to 2 separate switches for
redundancy, and add both NICs to a trunk group.
- redundancy of switch, cabling and NICs.
Pete,
thanks for
I am trying to work out a way to add some redundancy to my network, by
putting my switches in a ring.
I have a pair of CARP'd routers, each with 2 GigE interfaces, and the
ability to add more on PCI-E cards. I have a number of switches with
24x100Mb ports and 2 GigE uplink ports. Currently
Sunnz wrote:
Ahh I see, so how does memtest to compare to something like building
the userland?
memtest is targeted specifically at extensively testing your machine's
memory, where building the userland will place load on not only the
memory, but also the hard drive, testing both. The fact
and running a patched version?
I am a sysadmin rather than a coder, but I will happily do anything I
can to assist you.
Dave Wilson.
[0] Although granted, what I know about programming could fit on the
back of an envelope.
bofh wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at a project that I'm trying to run on openbsd. All that
box will have is postgresql. At this time, it's just 2 programmers
and 1 sysadmin type person that's involved, no DBAs, so apologies if
the questions are... too simplistic.
And I realize if I want to
Stuart VanZee wrote:
Hello OpenBSD Misc,
I have been doing some work with chrooting user accounts for
a project, and now I am looking to get syslogd working. I
found out that I need a log socket in the chroot environ
for this to work and the -a option does this fine and works
great! BUT... now
Sean Malloy wrote:
Hello,
Maybe NetFlow. Checkout the pfflowd and flowd packages.
I seem to recall it being said that the recent change if the pfsync
protocols (which pfflowd uses as its datasource) means that since 4.3
(possibly 4.2, I forget when the pfsync stuff went in) pfflowd doesn't
IPs per subnet (CARPd gateway IP, dhcp for
firewall A, dhcp for firewall B) rather than 1 if I can do it all on the
carp interface.
Ta all,
Dave Wilson
PS: I apologise if this post is overly verbose, but after seeing so many
posts saying there's not enough information, I'm trying to not leave
I may soon get the opportunity to obtain a Sun Fire T1000, which I
believe uses a T1 CPU. I think sparc64.html says that this is now
supported in 4.3-current, ie HEAD as of right now. I am highly tempted
to take up the offer of the machine, just because I've fancied playing
with something not
I must apologise, since my last reinstall I lost my text wrapping.
Reposted at 72cols as per the list guidelines. Sorry for noise.
I may soon get the opportunity to obtain a Sun Fire T1000, which I
believe uses a T1 CPU. I think sparc64.html says that this is now
supported in 4.3-current, ie
Gustavo Polillo wrote:
Why is sendmail a default smtp server and not is postfix or qmail?
Why is it that this message got attatched to an existing thread in my
mail client?
Ah. Because it has the exact same subject line, and covers the exact
same subject. Funny that.
To make this email
39 matches
Mail list logo
