Hello
Syracuse, NY -- no CD, but poster has arrived. looks great!
http://ce.gl/openbsd-5.8-poster.jpg
ian
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:51 AM, M Wheeler <6f84c...@refn.co.uk> wrote:
> CD's arrived today UK. Thanks again.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
There are dragons.
ingo, theo:
sorry to post toxic advice, and thanks for the knowledge. i did not realize
how shlib_version worked. i must have gotten lucky with my build but i
should go back and fix it properly now
ian
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a
fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc
edit 'shlib_version' to have the appropriate major/minor versions
If you are fluent in two or more languages you might be able to help
out with translations. Bug-hunting (with proper reporting habits!) is
always appreciated too.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeremy dyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I very much believe the OpenBSD is important and needs
5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Hopefully you agree that the file name snapshots/amd64/install56.iso
is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Lester martinblan...@gmail.com wrote:
Would the /bin/sh shell in OpenBSD, which is a reimplementation of bash be
affected by either of these exploits? So happy to learn no action is needed
on my part for my OpenBSD sever :)
/bin/sh is an implementation
refering to http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/ does not contain, as far as
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/gsoc2014.html
software that you speak of be portable to Linux or is it BSD only? I've
i am planning (post-GSOC) on writing an archlinux PKGBUILD and
eventually a debian package.
Umm, there are at least
24 links on that page to various projects that need done, to which are
if you don't have the time to look through a list of a couple dozen
items for the subject of what you have been criticizing, then i don't
have the time to reply to your petty, innocuous emails. i
https://uglyman.kremlin.cc/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=systemd-utl.git There
is either something wrong with the web page or firefox as it mentions
that the connection was reset while the page was loading. However,
I've used
you probably caught me in the middle of a reboot
yet. But I wanted to know,
that bsd is being crowded out, a thought that had not crossed my mind.
I wanted to know, before assuming that it is the case everywhere, do
people really not like systemd and is it really hurting bsd? If so,
I'd be interested in doing something about it. Thanks, David
yes, systemd has become
that doesn't make the slightest sense.
pure C can be and often is perfectly portable.
those were not the right words, i meant to convey that because systemd
uses its own DBus binding (and not an already-ported lib like
GIO/GDbus) it would be difficult to port, as that binding is seemingly
very
hi!
i'm a student working on four DBus daemons that emulate the behavior of
systemd ones as to allow porting code that depends on systemd less of a
hassle
i've set up gitweb to track my progress, you can find it here:
https://uglyman.kremlin.cc/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=systemd-utl.git;
the 'master'
12 matches
Mail list logo
