I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Is it enabled per-application or is there some magic in a top-level
Makefile somewhere? This IPv6 is like Whak-A-Mole. Or is it just so
pervasive now that it
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:33:22 -0200
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
--snip--
Stay away from
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:39:39 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
You are free of course to make mods, but please understand that you
are on your own for them. I suppose it could also be said that if
Ha, yeah, I feel so alone.
you need help in turning ipv6 off, you shouldn't--learn first how
So you
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
mostly a waste of time, except for the educational aspects of what not
to do.
Thanks for the nice story. I get a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way not to help people out. Instead offering up non-sequitars,
etc.
Come on
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:57:58 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
You could also do more digging around yourself.
I'd say that applies to you, not me. (^:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Other than adding rhubbell to the list of people who probably broke
it themselves, not really.
Nothing's broken here. Hope you didn't strain a muscle jumping to
conclusions. (^: Well nothing other than the pervasiveness of IPv6 into
every
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:52:35 +0200
Jussi Peltola wrote:
ipv6. The question is: do they care?
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
software with.
How much would that be? Ballpark. Doesn't seem like it would be very much.
Seems like you're just hand-waving without real numbers.
Wikipedia has a money-raised
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video card. Why
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:01:06 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
Feeding the troll, sorry.
Hi, fresh from high school?
I gave you the file where GENERIC for all kernels is configured.
Apparently you don't care enough to even read the thread. But it's ok,
I don't care if you care or not. But thanks at
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are a sphincter of epic proportions.
Sphincter's pretty important. So thanks!
Le me turn on my care meter, oh look at that -10 on the 0 to 1 scale.
Also looking back I see the question was ignored before.
I can figure it
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:10:27 -0800
Allie Daneman wrote:
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
It's not that simple. Applications still try IPv6 even when it's disabled
in the kernel
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Needs to be disabled
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
here would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
Well you're especially chipper, now instead of whining on mailing
lists.. how about you try helping
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you
Yeah you said that already.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:28 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:24:42PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:14 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 03:07:03 +0100
Michiel van Baak wrote:
Did you even bother to look at a tcpdump when you are running on a
kernel without ipv6 support? Is there any ipv6 traffic when running on a
kernel without ipv6 ?
Again re-read the thread if you need to. Can read the reply to P.
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:07:00 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
finally you say something that I can relate to.
But couldn't resist, eh? (^:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:45:32 + (UTC)
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Never mind no one verifying any of the keys or anything else that SSL
spits out. I am talking to you firefox!
That's pretty strange coming from the guy who complained the
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:37:36 +1100
Aaron Mason wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:02:51 +1100
Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not worrying
because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:47 +1100
Rod Whitworth wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:06:53 -0800, rhubbell wrote:
8 snipped for brevity.
You miss the point - the reason we toot that particular horn is that
you don't have to worry about those sorts of things (well, apart from
Definitely
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:22:45 -0500
Brad Tilley wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:06 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
It's naive to point elsewhere and say see, they're not secure.
Other similar systems are not as secure and that has been objectively
demonstrated. Here's one
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:22:08 +0100
soko.tica wrote:
On 11/20/09, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not worrying
because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone that's worked
on it and every package you've installed
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:08 +1100
SJP Lists wrote:
2009/11/20 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com:
Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not worrying
because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone that's worked
on it and every package you've installed and every
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:17:39 -0800
patrick keshishian wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Forgot the version info:
OpenBSD 4.6
Forgot to mention 4.6-stable
setpci version 3.1.2
Is there a tool like strace or truss here?
ktrace(1
Can't sort out what the problem is here.
setpci reads fine but is unable to write.
/dev/pci is a link to /dev/pci0
pci0 is rw for root
setpci -vG -s 2:04.0 3c.b
Trying method 8..using /dev/pci...OK
Decided to use obsd-device
Scanning bus 00 for devices...
Scanning bus 02 for devices...
Forgot the version info:
OpenBSD 4.6
setpci version 3.1.2
Is there a tool like strace or truss here?
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:55:25 -0800
rhubbell wrote:
Can't sort out what the problem is here.
setpci reads fine but is unable to write.
/dev/pci is a link to /dev/pci0
pci0 is rw for root
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:02:51 +1100
Aaron Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:40 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:05:04 -0800
Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
New around here, but I'm noticing a lot of tooting of our own
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:05:04 -0800
Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
New around here, but I'm noticing a lot of tooting of our own horn...so to
speak. With all the possible vectors for compromising a system that are
available it just sounds naive to keep touting how
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:39:56 -0500
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
I'm new to OpenBSD and so
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:26:44 -0800
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:11:47 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
I'm new
I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good.
One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com
card working.
cbb1 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 TI PCI1620 CardBus rev 0x01: apic 2 int 16
(irq 11), CardBus support disabled
cbb2 at pci1 dev 4 function 1 TI PCI1620 CardBus rev 0x01: apic 2
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good.
One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com
card working.
You're new, so you might want to read
35 matches
Mail list logo
