The're also proxmox ve that is really nice for virtualisation.
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Michel Blais mic...@targointernet.com wrote:
The're also proxmox ve that is really nice for virtualisation.
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page
As it's based on OpenVZ and KVM it doesn't seems to be answer on
question in subject.
* Hassan Monfared hmonfa...@gmail.com [2011-09-19 08:17]:
why don't you try xen ?
The XenB. hypervisor, the powerful open source industry standard for
virtualization, offers a powerful, efficient, and secure feature set for
virtualization of x86, x86_64, IA64, ARM, and other CPU architectures.
why don't you try xen ?
The XenB. hypervisor, the powerful open source industry standard for
virtualization, offers a powerful, efficient, and secure feature set for
virtualization of x86, x86_64, IA64, ARM, and other CPU architectures.
visit Xen at www.Xen.org
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM,
I haven't tried Xen on OpenBSD as host, but Xen is open source and there was
subject to correction of a lock-up bug in OpenBSD to support Xen Hosting.
NetBSD supports Xen Hostig
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Hassan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_platform_virtual_machines ( look
at Host OS column)
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Hassan Monfared hmonfa...@gmail.comwrote:
I haven't tried Xen on OpenBSD as host, but Xen is open source and there
was subject to correction of a lock-up bug in
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Hassan Monfared hmonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
IB haven'tB tried Xen on OpenBSD as host, but Xen is open source and there
was
subject toB B correction of a lock-up bug in OpenBSD to support Xen
Hosting.
NetBSD supports Xen Hostig
OpenBSD doesn't mean NetBSD for a
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Hassan Monfared hmonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_platform_virtual_machinesB (
look
at Host OS column)
For what? Xen doesn't have OpenBSD in that column and OpenBSD doesn't
have Xen in sources as you can check on OpenBSD
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:17 AM, lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com wrote:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from
I'm searching for Virtualization solutions:
OpenBSD: host
CentOS: guest
What are my
Hassan Monfared wrote:
subject to correction of a lock-up bug in OpenBSD to support Xen Hosting
On 19 September 2011 09:20, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
And eg. this one is not so hard
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscw=2r=1s=dom0q=b
Has anyone (qualified) ever taken an interest
If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against
virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast
in mainline and not controlled by oracle
sent from android handset. Please mind the brevity.
On Sep 20, 2011 12:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against
virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast
in mainline and not controlled by oracle
For production use, Xen and orchestrate seems to be
On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against
virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast
in mainline and not controlled by oracle
sent from android handset. Please mind the brevity.
On
On 20 September 2011 14:08, Corey clinge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against
virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as
fast
in mainline and not controlled
On 09/19/2011 09:15 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
On 20 September 2011 14:08, Corey clinge...@gmail.com
mailto:clinge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY
recommend against
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com wrote:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from
I'm searching for Virtualization solutions:
OpenBSD: host
CentOS: guest
What are my
What are my solutions? I'm searching for one that doesn't use packages from
ports. Are there any?
There are none. Consider using qemu from ports, or better,
don't use virtualization.
17 matches
Mail list logo