Haai,
"Tomasz Rola" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 12:25:56PM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote:
>>
>
> I use lynx a lot, very nice tool. It also helped me to restart my
> browsing of gopher sites. There was plenty of them 20+ years ago, now
> it is just a handful of servers. But still, better
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:55:59AM -0700, Luke A. Call wrote:
> On 03-07 19:19, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
[...]
> > As I know many sites without js doesn't work. Anyway I don't understand
> > how switching off js defend you from 0day browser bug.
> > Maybe you mean that because many 0day
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 12:25:56PM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote:
> Me's been following this discussion w/ some interest.
>
> Personally, meuses lynx(1) (w/o the ports patches, as they interfere w/
> text field editing among other things), in image_links mode w/ feh(1).
> Works like a charm :)
On 03-07 19:19, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:32:36AM -0700, Luke A. Call wrote:
> > I just leave javascript off for usual browsing, with a tab sitting open
> > in chromium or iridium to turn it on for the occasional temporary need,
> > or added to the browser's
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:32:36AM -0700, Luke A. Call wrote:
> On 03-05 04:18, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:06:40AM +0100, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > in the following message:
> > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> > > Theo discourages
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:28:35PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 2020-03-04 11:38, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > Probably not what you were looking for but, back in the days when I
> > was ultra paranoid about my web browsing, I used to use stripped down
> > live usb installations of Linux distros
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:38:40AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > in the following message:
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> > Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> > I asked if he suggests the same for the
On 03-05 04:18, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:06:40AM +0100, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> > in the following message:
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> > Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> > I asked if he suggests the same for
Me's been following this discussion w/ some interest.
Personally, meuses lynx(1) (w/o the ports patches, as they interfere w/
text field editing among other things), in image_links mode w/ feh(1).
Works like a charm :)
Mecan only agree with the sentiment that if something does not work in a
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:18:00AM +0100, Tomasz Rola wrote:
[...]
> As a side note, I sometimes get a bit obsessed upon seeing a program
> which "sits idle" but scratches my disk every n seconds (and/or loads
> my cpu with empty loops). A daemon can be hunted down and nailed. No
> big deal. But a
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:06:40AM +0100, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hi,
> in the following message:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
> is onlye
On 03-04 12:03, Luke A. Call wrote:
> Partly as a possible approach, and partly for feedback/suggestions on
> it:
[]
> multiple user logins and their corresponding X sessions running
> at the same time, among which I would switch with Ctrl-Alt-F* keys,
> hoping that if one account (where I
On 03-04 02:06, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> in the following message:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
> is onlye for *root*.
> Then what should I
On 2020-03-04 11:38, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Probably not what you were looking for but, back in the days when I
> was ultra paranoid about my web browsing, I used to use stripped down
> live usb installations of Linux distros (DSL was one of them that I
> remember). I ignore if OpenBSD comes with
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 01:06, wrote:
>
> Hi,
> in the following message:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
> is onlye for *root*.
> Then what should I
On 2020-03-04 01:06, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> in the following message:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
> is onlye for *root*.
I thought that
Hi,
in the following message:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
is onlye for *root*.
Then what should I do to hardening the most exposed piece of code that
17 matches
Mail list logo
