On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:02:37 +0200
Jean-Frangois SIMON wrote:
> OpenbBSD crashes at the first boot.
> Could one help with how to get the crash infos out of the console (ps
trace)
> ; is the only way to copy on paper then write in an email or is there a way
> to copy this one way or another ?
A ser
first boot.
2009/7/9 Anathae Townsend
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> > Of Anathae Townsend
> > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:02 PM
> > To: jfsimon1...@gmail.com; misc@openbsd.org
&
gt; > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> > Of jean-francois
> > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:56 AM
> > To: Theo de Raadt; misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Install difficulties
> >
> > I remember that I used to start ins
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> Of Anathae Townsend
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:02 PM
> To: jfsimon1...@gmail.com; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Install difficulties
>
> read the install docum
I finally saw that in the very first steps of the install procedure, the
type of partition ID of assigned install disk is set to A6 overwriting from
the original value (in my case for NTFS this is 0x86 I assume) preventing to
boot what was the original system on that disk.
Changing to the original
ean-francois
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: Theo de Raadt; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Install difficulties
>
> I remember that I used to start install procedure on each disk
> answering
> yes to 'all disk should be used for this install',
I remember that I used to start install procedure on each disk answering
yes to 'all disk should be used for this install', then I just checked
the size of the disk in the disklabel, in order to identify the one I
was look for and then quit & reboot without more modifications (p at
disklabel then q
> Therefore I don'nt understand why installing openbsd on sd0 has changed
> anything on the MBR of other disks ?
The installer does not touch the other disks.
2009/7/9, jean-francois :
> Something has been changed which prevent sd1 and sd2 to start however no
> data loss.
>
> I don't understand, I have launched install on sd0 ?
I suspect you had the bootloader on sd0 originally. I suggest you
install a new one and configure it appropriately.
Afaik the
Something has been changed which prevent sd1 and sd2 to start however no
data loss.
I don't understand, I have launched install on sd0 ?
Le jeudi 09 juillet 2009 C 11:29 +0200, Jean-FranC'ois SIMON a C)crit :
> Sorry, I mean, I installed on SD0 using "all disk space".
> I am not sure the MBR has
Sorry, I mean, I installed on SD0 using "all disk space".
I am not sure the MBR has been modified, I have to look further what was
modified, however the other disks do not boot anymore.
Windows (sd1) starts and crashes during the load.
Ubuntu (sd2) says "no os" ?
I hope that other disks were not e
On 9/07/2009, at 7:41 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
This is the best advice you will get.
Don't try duel booting until you know what you are doing.
And I'm not trying to be a smartass.
duel[sic] booting - someone will end up getting shot! 8-)
This is the best advice you will get.
Don't try duel booting until you know what you are doing.
And I'm not trying to be a smartass.
- Original message -
From: "jean-francois"
To: "Jan Stary" , misc@openbsd.org
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:40:55 +0200
Subjec
I installed the very standard procedure 'all disc' on 'sd1'
then when with the bios I start on the sd1, windows says 'no os' and on
sd2 the grub has disapeared too (I used to have sd0 free, sd1 win, sd2
linux).
Therefore I don'nt understand why installing openbsd on sd0 has changed
anything on th
> > On Jul 08 23:56:56, jean-francois wrote:
> > > Actually installing on sd0 the last 4.5 resulted in sd1 and sd2 boot
> > > sectors to be modified and not able to boot their own system anymore,
On Jul 09 08:40:55, jean-francois wrote:
> I installed the very standard procedure 'all disc' on 'sd1'
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:56:56PM +0200, jean-francois wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Actually installing on sd0 the last 4.5 resulted in sd1 and sd2 boot
> sectors to be modified and not able to boot their own system anymore,
> while I only wanted to install openbsd and its boot on sd0.
>
> Is this norma
Hi all,
Actually installing on sd0 the last 4.5 resulted in sd1 and sd2 boot
sectors to be modified and not able to boot their own system anymore,
while I only wanted to install openbsd and its boot on sd0.
Is this normal ? How is handled the boot manager install, where is it
installed by default
17 matches
Mail list logo
