Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:51:09 -0600 Adam Thompson
> On 16-01-26 10:32 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > On 2016 Jan 26 (Tue) at 08:13:22 -0600 (-0600), Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> > :> * adduser(8)/useradd(8):
> > :> Needs to be unified into one single
> >
> > One binary, with
Hi,
ropers wrote on Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:10:35AM +0100:
> On 26 January 2016 at 00:37, Rodrigo Mosconi wrote:
>> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>>> * ftp(8) is very old and suffering from bitrot; the last attempt to
>>>rewrite it trickled out with no obvious conclusion, i don't
>>>exactly
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> redirected to misc@, this is off-topic on tech@.
>
> Rodrigo Mosconi wrote on Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:54:32PM -0200:
>
>> I would like to receive some help/mentoring. I`m cursing a
On 2016-01-26 08.13.22 -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> > * adduser(8)/useradd(8):
> > Needs to be unified into one single
>
> This seems like a project that would end in arguments over which to
> consolidate to.
>
> "Adduser is better", no "useradd is better"
I assume that whoever actually
On 2016 Jan 26 (Tue) at 08:13:22 -0600 (-0600), Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
:> * adduser(8)/useradd(8):
:> Needs to be unified into one single
:
:This seems like a project that would end in arguments over which to
:consolidate to.
:
:"Adduser is better", no "useradd is better"
:
One binary, with
On 16-01-26 10:32 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2016 Jan 26 (Tue) at 08:13:22 -0600 (-0600), Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
:> * adduser(8)/useradd(8):
:> Needs to be unified into one single
One binary, with symlinks. Both methods should still work, however.
$0.02:
s/sym/hard /g
might satisfy
On 26 January 2016 at 00:37, Rodrigo Mosconi wrote:
> * ftp(8) is very old and suffering from bitrot; the last attempt to
> >rewrite it trickled out with no obvious conclusion, i don't
> >exactly know why.
> >
>
> ftp client or ftp server?
>
That must be a typo. There is no ftp(8), but
2016-01-25 20:42 GMT-02:00 Ingo Schwarze :
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> redirected to misc@, this is off-topic on tech@.
>
OK, my fault
>
> Rodrigo Mosconi wrote on Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:54:32PM -0200:
>
> > I would like to receive some help/mentoring. I`m cursing a master degree
> >
Hi Rodrigo,
redirected to misc@, this is off-topic on tech@.
Rodrigo Mosconi wrote on Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:54:32PM -0200:
> I would like to receive some help/mentoring. I`m cursing a master degree
> course at PUC-Rio, and I need to "create a useful program that performs a
> service of
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:42:37PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> * lpd(8)/lpc(8)/lpr(1) is very old and suffering from bitrot.
I do use lpd system. It works, but is clunky and sometimes frustrating
to get everything working for a new printer, local or network. It also
totally fails on some print
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:37 +0100 Ingo Schwarze
> Some GSOC projects may still be relevant, but one has to admit that
> it is rare that GSOC projects produce code that actually gets
> committed. Even among those that succeeded, only a minority produced
> code good enough to
11 matches
Mail list logo