On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Jason Tubnor wrote:
On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
people never move forward without the occasional
On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
people never move forward without the occasional push.
So the most appropriate way to use
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512
Could you please provide a little bit more information? What causes
encrypted vnd to be insecure
Ted went a bit far; it is unusual for him to be melodratic.
Basically -- less than state of the art crypto.
and what will happen to vnd(4) before 5.7 if it isn't removal of crypto?
You persist
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:37, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Could you please provide a little bit more information? What causes
encrypted vnd to be insecure
Ted went a bit far; it is unusual for him to be melodratic.
Basically -- less than state of the art crypto.
You would never use
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 19:45, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
What will be the right way to achieve such a nested-encryption setup
once encrypted vnd goes away? Is/will it be safe (i.e., free from
data corruption, deadlock, or other kernel badness) to nest softraid
crypto volumes?
Short answer:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=139524543706370
kind regards,
Robert
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:14:40 -0700
Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=140146687910205w=1,
Ted Unangst wrote:
If you are using encrypted vnd (vnconfig -k or -K) you will want to
begin planning your migration strategy.
[[...]]
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Once this
11 matches
Mail list logo
