On 19. juli 2013 at 9:13 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
They say Android apps are just an excuse for Java devs to keep programming in
Java. Now that
On 20. juli 2013 at 3:54 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
/usr/local/ports).
why are ports inside /usr/local. it should be /usr/ports. Some
ports may fail.
Maybe, yeah. I updated PORTSDIR in /etc/mk.conf though. Anyway
On 20. juli 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Why are you building the (huge) port,
instead of simply installing the package?
Whoa. When did that get there? Thanks man!
O.D.
write error? Did you run out of disk space?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:55 AM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Anybody managed to build /usr/ports/devel/jdk on OpenBSD 5.3?
Getting a rather nasty compile error here on amd64, was wondering if maybe
someone could help? Tried asking on the
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
write error? Did you run out of disk space?
Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
/usr/local/ports).
% df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:12:57PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
^^
Rightful cobol successor, then
See yesterday's dilbert...
Miod Vallat wrote:
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
Miod
métaphysico-théologo-cosmolo-nigologie :)
Language wars are s-o-o-o 20th century.
--
Jack Woehr # We commonly say we
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jack Woehr jwo...@softwoehr.com wrote:
Miod Vallat wrote:
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
Miod
métaphysico-théologo-cosmolo-nigologie :)
Hey, what
openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in /usr/local/ports).
/dev/wd0h 3.7G1.8G1.7G52%/usr/local
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
--
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 08:37:40PM +, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
write error? Did you run out of disk space?
Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
/usr/local/ports).
% df -h
Check
2013/7/19 openda...@hushmail.com:
% df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M885M 5%/
/dev/wd0k 9.2G434M8.3G 5%/home
/dev/wd0d 1.5G 12.0K1.5G 0%/tmp
/dev/wd0f 1.8G404M1.3G
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:06:16PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in /usr/local/ports).
/dev/wd0h 3.7G1.8G1.7G52%
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
Miod
On 07/19/13 18:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
2013/7/19 openda...@hushmail.com:
% df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M885M 5%/
/dev/wd0k 9.2G434M8.3G 5%/home
/dev/wd0d 1.5G 12.0K1.5G 0%/tmp
On 1/12/07, Kurt Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached are two patch files that you can drop
in /usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.5/patches that hopefully
will fix your amd64 build issue. Please let me know
if this fixes it for you and I'll work on getting
this in 4.0-stable.
Thank you very much, the
On 1/10/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only outstanding question is, has bofh gotten 1.5 to compile and
install correctly on his amd64 box with Kurt's previous suggestion?
? The first note from Kurt says he's working on a patch, and the
second mentioned a thread in ports@, and
On Monday 08 January 2007 17:38, bofh wrote:
I tried installing the jdk I had built under 3.9, jdk-1.5.0p14, that
installed without problems, however:
It has been said many, many times yet people still regularly make same
the mistake which you have made: Packages (and ports) from one version
On 1/9/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 17:38, bofh wrote:
I tried installing the jdk I had built under 3.9, jdk-1.5.0p14, that
installed without problems, however:
It has been said many, many times yet people still regularly make same
the mistake which you
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:20, bofh wrote:
On 1/9/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 17:38, bofh wrote:
I tried installing the jdk I had built under 3.9, jdk-1.5.0p14,
that installed without problems, however:
It has been said many, many times yet
Is it possible to build jdk;java directly from openbsd: I always
believed i had to install linux emulation first.
Thanks for the clarifications.
On 1/9/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:20, bofh wrote:
On 1/9/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 08:37, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Is it possible to build jdk;java directly from openbsd: I always
believed i had to install linux emulation first.
Thanks for the clarifications.
Hi Gustavo,
For building 1.4, you need the 1.3-linux port installed. The latter
requires the
On Monday 08 January 2007 8:38 pm, bofh wrote:
What am I doing wrong? This is openbsd 4.0 on a DL145, dual opteron.
Thanx for any pointers!
I've replied to your build problem on the ports@ list, but
just to clarify some things said in this thread:
Beginning with OpenBSD 4.0 devel/jdk/1.5 no
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 09:08, J.C. Roberts wrote:
When I built 1.5 on openbsd 3.9-current, it didn't require building
1.3 and 1.4. It didn't look like 4.0 needed it either. In fact,
on amd64, it won't build jdk1.4
Though people joke about the chicken-egg problem, you need a working
On 9-Jan-07, at 12:42 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
The painfully sad truth is if you're doing any serious development and
testing in Java, you have to debug everywhere and you normally need to
have ton of jre/jdk installations on each of your supported OS/
hardware
combinations. You really do need
On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 13:37:37 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Is it possible to build jdk;java directly from openbsd: I always
believed i had to install linux emulation first.
No, I don't think so.
I just installed jdk-1.5.0p19
from the port: very much make; make install
After that, I
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 12:26, Zoong PHAM wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 13:37:37 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Is it possible to build jdk;java directly from openbsd: I always
believed i had to install linux emulation first.
No, I don't think so.
I just installed jdk-1.5.0p19
Gustavo Rios [2007-01-09, 13:37:37]:
Is it possible to build jdk;java directly from openbsd: I always
believed i had to install linux emulation first.
if something is unclear about the section 'Building the Sun JDK' in
FAQ 8, please let us know what it is.
Disclaimer:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:31:21AM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:53:54 -0500
Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per FAQ 8.3, Java 1.5 or 1.4 must be built from source. An overnight
download have an
of the files should not be a huge problem, considering how much
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:27:36PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
[snip]
It does not run on arm/OpenBSD. It does not run on powerpc/OpenBSD.
It does not run on vax/OpenBSD. Heck, it even behaves differently
in on i386/Linux, i386/Windows, sparc/Solaris and pSeries/Linux,
and to this platform
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:24:37AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't want to download the source for java and compile... I am
on dialup so every byte counts.
I believe that java on bsd
Quoting Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:24:37AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't want to download the source for java and compile... I am
on dialup so
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:18:36 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: java on openbsd]
To: Keith Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Keith Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't know
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd.
I'll bet.
difference. I've googled for hours trying to find a solution, but can't
seem to fix it.
Lucky for you! My google works: http://www.google.com/search?q=openbsd+java
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd. Java is a
deal-breaker for me as I use it all day every day for work. What I've
done is taken a tar of the linux version, and untarred it in openbsd. I
have turned on linux emulation
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, first I'd like to mention that openbsd 4.0 is a first for me, and I
am really liking it so far (I am a linux refugee...).
I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd.
Thanks for your time,
Marc
Java's unsupported more
Quoting knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd. Java is a
deal-breaker for me as I use it all day every day for work. What I've
done is taken a tar of the linux version, and untarred it in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your response. Kaffe won't work for me as it is missing a few
feature s that I need (most notable swing support is not up to snuff yet).
For now, then, unfortunately you'll have to follow the normal
port-building instructions, which are lame to say the
Hi Marc,
On Nov 14, 2006, at 5:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I didn't try any linux 1.5/1.6 jdk, but perhaps you missed something
for your linux emulation? read man compat_linux, perhaps it helps.
the other options you have is having someone mail you the source on
cd, or use kaffe (don't
Quoting Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/14/06, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd.
I'll bet.
difference. I've googled for hours trying to find a solution, but can't
seem to fix it.
Lucky for you! My google works:
@others: stop picking on SUN and Java. It's actually a nice language
and going to be GPL software very soon, so I guess there will be an
option for binary packages and other nice stuff soon.
Java is a shitshow, it isn't a nice language. Stop defending Sun and their
ridiculous licenses.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:42:39 +0100, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Java's unsupported more or less. See the FAQ:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#Programming
Due to Sun's restrictive SCSL license, OpenBSD cannot ship binary
packages for the JDK. This means you will have to build it from
Bernd Schoeller wrote:
I this information still current, now that Java has released the JDK
under the terms of the GPL?
No, they haven't released the JDK under the GPL. They *will*.
Currently, they have released a virtual machine and javac under the GPL.
The remainder of the open-source JDK
On Nov 14, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Java is a shitshow, it isn't a nice language.
Hurling obscenities at Java, a mediocre language per se which happens
to offer
a wonderful team development environment with a breathtaking array of
tools,
doesn't generate any code to make
* Bernd Schoeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-14 19:25]:
I this information still current, now that Java has released the JDK under
the terms of the GPL?
they have _not_ released the JDK (-source) under the gpl.
they have released javac, hotpot and the help system under the gpl (at
lest,
Original message
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:41:35 -0600
From: Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: java on openbsd
To: Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
@others: stop picking on SUN and Java. It's actually a nice language
and going to be GPL
On Nov 14, 2006, at 9:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I asked for was some advice getting this working. If you're
going to bash me over the head for that, perhaps you'd consider not
replying at all... save both your time and mine.
Did you get it working? I have Java working on
Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your response. Kaffe won't work for me as it is missing a few
feature s that I need (most notable swing support is not up to snuff yet).
For now, then, unfortunately you'll have to follow the normal
port-building
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:07:50AM -0500, Marc Ravensbergen wrote:
...I am having a hard time getting java to work on openbsd. Java is a
deal-breaker for me as I use it all day every day for work. What I've
done is taken a tar of the linux version...
snip
...I really don't want to download
Heh, java lets me work on OpenBSD. Oh, wait... that's just plain
coffee, and not even Javanese coffee. Costa Rican.
God, I'm a troll today.
On 11/14/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you get it working? I have Java working on OpenBSD.
--
Try to do nothing for money that you
Hi list, hi Jacob,
On Tuesday, 14. November 2006 19:35, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Java is a shitshow, it isn't a nice language. Stop defending Sun and
their ridiculous licenses. The day Sun shows up as a real player in the
open source world this could be justified. For now they are just
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:12:31PM +0100, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
And regarding the language: Java runs on millions if not billions
of devices.
It does not run on arm/OpenBSD. It does not run on powerpc/OpenBSD.
It does not run on vax/OpenBSD. Heck, it even behaves differently
in on i386/Linux,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:07:50AM -0500, Marc Ravensbergen wrote:
Hi, first I'd like to mention that openbsd 4.0 is a first for me, and I
am really liking it so far (I am a linux refugee...). Eg., it's nice to
be able to rip out my usb cd burner, plug it in, and be able to actually
use the
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:32:57PM -0600, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Bernd Schoeller wrote:
I this information still current, now that Java has released the JDK
under the terms of the GPL?
No, they haven't released the JDK under the GPL. They *will*.
Currently, they have released a virtual
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:41:35AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
@others: stop picking on SUN and Java. It's actually a nice language
and going to be GPL software very soon, so I guess there will be an
option for binary packages and other nice stuff soon.
Java is a shitshow
No
On 14-Nov-06, at 5:27 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:12:31PM +0100, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
And regarding the language: Java runs on millions if not billions
of devices.
It does not run on arm/OpenBSD. It does not run on powerpc/OpenBSD.
It does not run on vax/OpenBSD.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:53:54 -0500
Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per FAQ 8.3, Java 1.5 or 1.4 must be built from source. An overnight
download have an
of the files should not be a huge problem, considering how much time,
computing, memory, and storage resource is needed to build
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:31:21 +0800
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
install X number of Linux JDK's
Apparently you dont need this anymore. Duh!
---
Lars Hansson
57 matches
Mail list logo
